Developing New Literacies among Multilingual Learners in the Elementary Grades

Technology-Mediated Learning Environments for Young English Learners: Connections In and Out of School

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 111-154

  Castek, Jill ^a   Leu, Donald J ^a   Coiro, Julie ^b   Gort, Mileidis ^c   Henry, Laurie A ^d   Lima, Clarisse O ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^e NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85162679783     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781003418009-6     Document Type: Chapter

References (106)

1. Allington, R. L. (1983). The reading instruction provided readers of differing abilities. Elementary School Journal, 83(5), 548-559.
2. Anderson, R.C., Hiebert, E.H., Scott, J.A., & Wilkinson, I.A.G. (1985). Becoming anation of readers: The report of the Commission on Reading. Washington, DC: The National Institute of Education.
3. Applebee, A.N. (1978). The child’s concept of story. Ages two to seventeen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Baker, C. (2001). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (3rd edition). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
5. Bartoli, J. S. (1995). Unequal opportunity: Learning to read in the U.S.A. New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Bialystok, E. (1988). Levels of bilingualism and levels of linguistic awareness. Develop-mental Psychology, 24, 560-567.
7. Bialystok, E. (1997). Effects of bilingualism and biliteracy on children’s emerging con-cepts of print. Developmental Psychology, 33, 429-440.
8. Bialystok, E., & Hakuta, K. (1994). In other words: The science and psychology of secondlanguage acquisition. New York: Basic Books.
9. Blanton, W. E., Greene, M. W., & Cole, M. (1999). Computer mediation for learningand play. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43(3), 272-278.
10. Blanton, W.E., Moorman, G.B., Hayes, B. A., & Warner, M.L. (1997). Effects of partici-pation in the Fifth Dimension on far transfer. Journal of Educational ComputingResearch, 16(4), 1-8.
11. Blanton, W. E., Simmons, E., & Warner, M. W. (2001). The Fifth Dimension. Applica-tion of cultural-historical activity theory, inquiry-based learning, computers, and telecommunications to change prospective teachers’ preconceptions. TheJournal of Educational Computing Research, 2, 214-225.
12. Bruce, B. C. (Ed.). (2003). Literacy in the information age: Inquiries into meaning-mak-ing with new technologies. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
13. Carver, P. R., & Iruka, I.U. (2006). After-school programs and activities: 2005. Retrieved July 17, 2006 from the National Center for Educational Statistics Website http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006076.pdf.
14. Cenoz, J., & Valencia, J. F. (1994). Additive trilingualism: Evidence from the BasqueCountry. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 195-201.
15. Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence. (2002). National Study of School Effectiveness for Language Minority Students’ Long-Term Academic Achievement Final Report. Retrieved June 22, 2004, from: http://www.crede.ucsc.edu/research/llaa/1.l_nnal.html.
16. Chandler-Olcott, K., & Mahar, D. (2003). “Tech-savviness” meets multiliteracies: Exploring adolescent girls’ technology-mediated literacy practices. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 356-385.
17. Coiro, J. (2003). Reading comprehension on the Internet: Expanding our understand-ing of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The Reading Teacher, 56, 458-464.
18. Coiro, J. & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 214-257.
19. Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D.J. (Eds.) (in press). Central issues in new lit-eracies and new literacies research. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. Leu(Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwaw, NJ.
20. Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.
21. Crawford, J. (2004). Educating English learners: Language diversity in the classroom(5th edition). Bilingual Educational Services, Inc.: Los Angeles.
22. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold & underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educa-tional success for language minority students. In California State Department of Education (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students. A theoretical framework (pp. 3-49). Los Angeles, CA: Evaluation, Dissemination and Assess-ment Center, CSULA.
24. Cummins, J. (1984). Wanted. A theoretical framework for relating language proficiency to academic achievement among bilingual students. In C. Rivera (Ed.), Language proficiency and academic achievement (pp. 2-19). Avon, England: Multilingual Matters.
25. Cummins, J. (1991). Interdependence of first-and second-language proficiency inbilingual children. In E. Bialystok (Ed.), Language processing in bilingual chil-dren (pp. 70-89). New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Cummins, J. (2000). Putting language proficiency in its place: Responding to critiquesof the conversational/academic language distinction. In J. Cenoz & U. Jessner(Eds.), English in Europe: The acquisition of a third language. Clevedon: Multi-lingual Matters.
27. Cummins, J., & Sayers, D. (1995). Brave new schools: Challenging cultural illiteracythrough global learning networks. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
28. Donaldson, M. (1978). Children’s minds. Glasgow: Fontana/Collins.
29. Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in firstgrade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 202-224.
30. Edelsky, C, (2006). With literacy and justice for all: Rethinking the social in languageeducation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Edelsky, C., Altwerger, B., & Flores, B. (1991). Whole language: What’s the difference?Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
32. Epstein, J. L., & Sheldon, S. B. (2002). Present and accounted for: Improving studentattendance through family and community involvement. Journal of Educational Research, 95, 308-318.
33. Fillmore, C. J. (1972). How to know whether you’re coming or going. In K. Huldgaard-Jensen (Ed.), Linquistik. 1971 (pp. 369-379). Amsterdam. Athemaiim.
34. Fitzgerald, J. (1995). English as a second language reading instruction in the United States. A research review. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 115-152.
35. Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: The Continuum Publish-ing Company.
36. Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat. A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
37. Galambos, S. J., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1990). The effects of learning two languages onlevels of metalinguistic awareness. Cognition, 1-56.
38. Gee, J. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
39. Gee, J. (2004). Situated language and learning. A critique of traditional schooling. New York, NY: Routledge.
40. Gonzalez, N., Moll, L.C., Floyd-Tenery, M., Rivera, A., Rendon, P., Gonza-les, R., et al. (1993). Teacher Research on Funds of Knowledge: Learning from Households. http://repositories.cdHb.org/crede/ncrcdslleducational/EPR06/.
41. Gort, M. (2003). Transdisciplinary approaches in the education of English languagelearners. In D. Kaufman, D. M. Moss, & T. A. Osborn (Eds.), Beyond the bound-aries. A transdisciplinary approach to learning and teaching (pp. 117-130). West-port, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
42. Gort, M. (2006). Strategic codeswitching, interliteracy, and other phenomena of bilin-gual writing: Lessons learned from classroom-based research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 6, 327-358.
43. Gross, E., Juvonen, J., & Gable, S. (2002). Internet use and well-being in adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 75-90.
44. Hakuta, K. (1986). Mirror of Language: The debate on bilingualism. New York: Basic Books.
45. Hakuta, K., Butler, Y. G., & Witt, D. (2000). How long does it take English learners toattain proficiency? http://faculty.ucmerced.edu/khakuta/research/publications.html.
46. Hakuta, K., & D’Andrea, D. (1992). Some properties of bilingual maintenance and lossin Mexican background high-school students. Applied Linguistics, 13, 72-99.
47. Harris Interactive, Inc. (2005). Web@work survey 2005. Retrieved March 13, 2005, from http://www.websense.com/company/news/research/webatwork2005.pdf.
48. Harris, J. B., & Jones, J. G. (1999). A descriptive study of telementoring among stu-dents, subject matter experts, and teachers: Message flow and function patterns. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 36-53.
49. Hull, G. (2003). At last, youth culture and digital medial: New literacies for new times. Research in the Teaching of English, 38, Retrieved August 30, 2004, from http://www.ncte.org/library/files/Publications/Journals/rte/0382-nov03/RT0382Last.pdf.
50. Hull, G., & Zacher, J. (2004). What is after-school worth? Developing literacy and identity out of school. Voices in Urban Education, 3. Retrieved August 26, 2004, from http://www.annenberginstitute.org/VUE/spring04/Hull.html.
51. Isaacs, E., Walendowski, A., Whittaker, S., Schiano, D., & Kamm, C. (2002). The char-acter, functions, and styles of instant messaging in the workplace. In Proceedingsof the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 11-20). New York. ACM Press.
52. Krashen, S.D., & Terrell, T.D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition inthe classroom. London: Prentice Hall.
53. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London, UK: Routledge.
54. Labbo, L.D., & Reinking, D. (1999). Multiple realities of technology in literacy researchand instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 478-492.
55. Lam, W. S. E. (2004). Second language socialization in a bilingual chatroom: Globaland local considerations. Language Learning and Technology, 8, 44-65.
56. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and class-room learning. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
57. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1986). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
58. Law, B., & Eckes, M. (1990). More than just surviving: ESLfor every classroom teacher.Winnigpeg, Manitoba: Peguis Press.
59. Learning Park (2001). Multilingual teaching and learning. http://archive.tpt.org/learningpark/topics/TGuide_12.pdf.
60. Lebo, H. (2003). The UCLA Internet report: Surveying the digital future, year three. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Communication Policy. http://www.ccp.ucla.edu/pdf/UCLA-Internet-Report-Year-Three.pdf.
61. Lee, C. D., & Smagorinsky, P. (Eds.). (2000). Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry. New York: Cam-bridge University Press.
62. Lemke, J. L. (1998). Metamedia literacy: Transforming meanings and media. In D. Reinking, M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, & R. D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 283-301). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. Lenhart, A., Simon, M., & Graziano, M. (2001). The Internet and education: Findings of the Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=39.
64. LePage, R., & Tabouret-Keller, A (1985). Acts of identity. Chicago: Chicago Univer-sity Press.
65. Leu, D. J., Jr. (1997). Caity’s question: Literacy as deixis on the Internet. The Reading Teacher, 51, 62-67.
66. Leu, D. J., Jr. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.S. Pearson, & R. Barr(Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3; pp. 743-770). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
67. Leu, D. J., Jr., & Ataya, R. (2002). Assessing assessment strategies among the 50states: Evaluating the literacies of our past or the literacies of our future? Paper pre-sented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.
68. Leu, D. J., Jr., & Karchmer, R., & Leu, D. D. (1999). The Miss Rumphius effect: Envi-sionments for literacy and learning that transform the Internet. The Reading Teacher, 52, 636-642.
69. Leu, D. J., Jr., & Kinzer, C. K. (2000). The convergence of literacy instruction and net-worked technologies for information and communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 108-127.
70. Leu, D. J., Jr., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., & Cammack, D. (2004). Toward a theory of newliteracies emerging from the Internet and other information and communicationtechnologies. In R. B. Ruddell &N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, fifth edition (1568-1611). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
71. Leu, D. J., Jr., Leu, D. D., & Coiro, J. (2004). Teaching with the Internet K-12: New litera-cies for new times (fourth edition). Norwood, MA: Christopher Gordon.
72. Manguel, A. (1996). A history of reading. Pittsburgh, PA: Penguin.
73. Markham, A. (1998). Life online. Walnut Creek, CA. AltaMira Press.
74. Mayer, R.E. (1997). Multimedia learning. Are we asking the right questions? Educa-tional Psychologist, 32, 1-19.
75. Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
76. Moll, L. C. (1992). Bilingual classroom studies and community analysis: Some recenttrends. Educational Researcher, 21, 20-24.
77. Moll, L. C. (1998). Turning to the World: Bilingual Schooling, Literacy, and the Cultural Mediation of Thinking. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 47, 59-75.
78. Murphy, S. M. (1986). Children’s comprehension of deictic categories in oral and writ-ten language. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 118-131.
79. National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). Internet access in public schools andclassrooms: 1994-2003. http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/frss/publications/2005015/.
80. New London Group, The. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 9-38). London: Routledge.
81. Nielsen/NetRatings (2004). Three out of four Americans have access to the Internet, according to Nielsen/NetRatings. Retrieved on March 18, 2004, from http://www.nielsen-netratings.com/pr/pr_040318.pdf.
82. Oakes, J., & Guiton, G. (1995). Matchmaking: The dynamics of high school trackingdecisions. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 3-33.
83. Peal, E., & Lambert, W. E. (1962). The relationship of bilingualism to intelligence. Psychological Monographs, 76, 1-23.
84. Peregoy, S., & Boyle, O. (1993). Reading, writing, and learning in ESL. A resource bookfor teachers. White Plains, NY: Longman.
85. Pew Internet and American Life Project (2005). Internet Evolution. Retrieved July 18, 2006 from http://www.pewinternet.org/.
86. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The Psychology of the Child. NY: Basic Books.
87. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1973). Memory and intelligence. NY: Basic Books.
88. Pike, K. L. (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of humanbehavior (2nd edition). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
89. Raphael, T. E., Florio-Ruane, S., & George, M. (2001). Book club plus. A conceptualframework to organize literacy instruction. Language Arts, 79, 159-168.
90. Roberts, C. (1994). Transferring literacy skills from LI to L2: From theory to practice, The Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 13, 209-221.
91. Rosenblatt, L. (1938-1976). Literature as exploration. New York: Modern Language Association.
92. Russell, M., & Plati, T. (2000). Mode of Administration Effects on MCAS Composition Performance for Grades Four, Eight and Ten. A report submitted to the Massa-chusetts Department of Education by the National Board on Educational Test-ing and Public Policy. http://www.nbetpp.bc.edu/statements/ws052200.pdf.
93. Skutnabb-Kangas, T., & Toukomaa, P. (1976). Teaching migrant children’s mothertongue and learning the language of the host country in the context of the socio-cultural situation of the migrant family. Helsinki: The Finnish National Com-mission for UNESCO.
94. Snow, C. (1992). Perspectives on second-language development: Implications forbilingual education. Educational Researcher, 21, 16-19.
95. Street, B. (2003). What’s new in new literacy studies. Current issues in comparative education, 5, 1-14.
96. Thomas, A. (2007). Youth Online: Identity and Literacy in the Digital Age. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
97. U.S. Census Bureau. (2001). Ability to Speak English for U.S. Residents Ages 5-17, 2000. http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en.
98. U.S. Department of Commerce: National Telecommunications and InformationAdministration. (2002). A nation online: How Americans are expanding theiruse of the Internet. Washington, DC. Author.
99. U.S. Department of Education. (2006). Teachers guide to international collabora-tion on the Internet. http://www.ed.gov/teachers/how/tech/international/index.html.
100. Vasquez, O. A. (1994). The magic of la Clase Mdgica: Enhancing the learning poten-tial of bilingual children. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 17, 120-128.
101. Vasquez, O. A. (2003). La Clase Mdgica: Imagining optimal possibilities in a bilingualcommunity of learners. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
102. Vasquez, O. A., & Duran, R. (2000) La Clase Mdgica and Club Proteo: Multiple litera-cies in new community institutions. In M. Gallego and S. Hollingsworth (Eds.), What counts as literacy: Challenging the school standard (pp. 173-189). New York: Teachers College Press.
103. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
104. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
105. Wong-Fillmore, L. (1991). When learning a second language means losing the first. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 6, 323-346.
106. Wong-Fillmore, L. (1998). Keeping pedagogy in and politics out of our ESLclassrooms. Paper presented at the meeting of Indiana Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Indianapolis, IN.