Beyond Constructivism: Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematics Problem Solving, Learning, and Teaching

Beyond Constructivism: Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematics Problem Solving, Learning, and Teaching

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-597

  Lesh, Richard ^a   Doerr, Helen M ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85140185608     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410607713     Document Type: Book

References (479)

1. Aliprantis, C. D. (1999). Games and decision making. Cambridge, England: Oxford University Press.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
3. Amit, M. (1988). Career choice, gender and attribution patterns of success and failure in mathematics. In A. Bourbas (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Vol. 1, (pp. 125-130). Veszprem, Hungary: Hungarian National Centre for Educational Technology.
4. Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. B., and Reiser, B. J. (1985). Intelligent tutoring systems. Science, 228, 456-462.
5. Anzai, K., and Simon, H. A. (1979). The theory of learning by doing. Psychological Review, 86, 124-140.
6. Archambault, R. D. (1964). (Ed.). John Dewey on education: Selected writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
8. Ausubel, D. (1978). In defense of advance organizers: A reply to the critics. Review of Educational Research, 48, 251-257.
9. Baker, E. L. (1990). Developing comprehensive assessments of higher-order thinking. In G. Kulm (Ed.), Assessing higher-order thinking in mathematics (pp. 7-20). Washington D C: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
10. Ball, D. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 373-397.
11. Baratta-Lorton, M. (1976). Mathematics their way. Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley.
12. Behr, M. Lesh, R., and Post, T. (1987). Theoretical analyses: Structure and hierarchy, missing value proportion problems. In J. Bergeron, N. Herscovics, and C. Kieren (Eds.), Psychology of mathematics education. Montreal, Canada: University of Montreal.
13. Behr, M., Wachsmuth, I., Post, T., and Lesh, R., (1984). Order and equivalence of rational number: A clinical teaching experiment. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15(5), 323-341.
14. Bell, A., Breke, G., and Swan, M. (1987). Diagnostic teaching: Four graphical interpretations. Mathematics Teaching, 119, 56-59
15. Bell, A., Swan, M., and Taylor, G. (1981). Choice of operation in verbal problems with decimal numbers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 399-420.
16. Bell, M., Fuson, K., and Lesh, R. (1976). Algebraic and arithmetic structures: A concrete approach for elementary school teachers. New York: The Free Press.
17. Bergeron, J. C., and Herscovics, N. (1982). Levels in the understanding of the function concept. In G. vanBarneveld and H. Kabbendam (Eds.) Proceedings of the conference on functions (pp. 39-46). Enschede, The Netherlands: National Institute for Curriculum.
18. Berman, E., Bound, J., and Machin, S. (1997). Implications of skill-biased technological change: International evidence. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
19. Beth, E., and Piaget, J. (1966). Mathematical epistemology and psychology. Dordrecht: Reidel.
20. Bezuk, N., and Cramer, K. (1989). Teaching about fractions: What, when and how? In P. Trafton (Ed.), National council of teachers of mathematics 1989 yearbook: New directions for elementary school mathematics (pp. 156-167). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
21. Bhaskar, R., and Simon, H. A. (1977). Problem solving in semantically-rich domains: An example from engineering thermodynamics. Cognitive Science, 1, 193-215.
22. Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
23. Black, P., and William, D. (1998, October). Inside the back box. Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 80(2) pp. 139-148.
24. Black, S., and Lynch, L. (2000). What’s driving the new economy: The benefits of workplace innovation. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
25. Boero, P., Dapueto, C., Ferrari, P.L., Ferrero, E. Garuti, R., Lemut, E., C. Parenti, L. and Scali, E. (1995). Aspects of mathematics-culture relationship in mathematics teaching-learning in compulsory school. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference of the PME, Recife (Vol. 1, pp. 151-166).
26. Borko, H., Mayfield, V., Marion, S., Flexer, R., and Cumbo, K. (1997). Teachers’ developing ideas and practices about mathematics performance assessment: Successes, stumbling blocks, and implications for professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 259-278.
27. Breshnahan, T., Brynjolfsson, E., and Hitt, L. (1999). Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled-labor: Firm-level evidence. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
28. Brouseau, G. (1977). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
29. Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert and R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Brown, A. L. (1990). Domain-specific principles affect learning and transfer in children. Cognitive Science, 14, 107-134.
31. Brown, S. I., and Walter, M. I. (1993). Problem posing: Reflections and applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Bruner, J. (1962). On knowing: Essays for the left hand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Bruner, J. (1963). The process of education. New York: Vantage Books.
35. Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Bruner, J. (1986) Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Buchler, J. (Ed.). (1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce. New York: Dover.
38. Burner, J. S. (1973). Going beyond the information given. In J. M. Anglin (Ed.), Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing. New York, NY: Norton. (pp. 218-238). (Original work published in 1957 Contemporary approaches to cognition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).
39. Burton, G., and Maletsky, E. M. (1998). Mathematics advantage: Teacher’s edition. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
40. Byrne, B. M. (1984). The general/academic self-concept nomological network: A review of construct validation research. Review of Educational Research, 54, 427-456.
41. Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L, and Connell, M. L. (1989). Metacognition: On the importance of understanding what you are doing. In R. I. Charles and E. A. Silver (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (Vol. 3, pp. 93-114). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
42. Carlson, M. (1998). A cross-sectional investigation of the development of the function concept. In E. Dubinsky, A. H. Schoenfeld, and J. J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education, 1. (Vol. 7, pp. 115-162). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
43. Carlson, M. (1998). Notation and language: Obstacles for undergraduate students’ concept development. Psychology of Mathematics Education: North America, Conference Proceedings, Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
44. Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., and Hsu, E. (2001). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Manuscript under review.
45. Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., and Larsen, S. (2001). An investigation of covariational reasoning and its role in learning the concepts of limit and accumulation. Proceedings of the Twenty Third Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education; Columbus, OH: Eric Clearinghouse.
46. Carpenter, T. P., Corbitt, M. K., Kepner, H. S., Lindquist, M. M., and Reys, R. E. (1981). Results from the second mathematics assessment of the national assessment of educational progress. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
47. Carpenter, T. P., and Fennema, E. (1991). Research and cognitively guided instruction. In E. Fennema, T. P. Carpenter, and S. J. Lamon (Eds.), Integrating research on teaching and learning mathematics (pp. 1-16). Albany: State University of New York Press.
48. Carpenter, T. P., and Fennema, E. (1992). Cognitively guided instruction: Building on the knowledge of students and teachers. In W. Secada (Ed.), Curriculum reform: The case of mathematics in the United States Special issue of International Journal of Educational Research (pp. 457-470). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
49. Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., and Lamon, S. J. (Eds). (1988). Integrating research on teaching and learning mathematics. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
50. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Chiang, C., and Loef, M. (1989). Using knowledge of children’s mathematical thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 499-532.
51. Carpenter T. P., and Lehrer, R. (1999). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. In E. Fennema and T. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 19-32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Carraher, T. N., Carraher, D. W., and Schliemann, A. D. (1985). Mathematics in the streets and in schools. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3(1), 21-29.
53. Charles, R. I., and Lester, F. K. (1982). Teaching problem solving: What, why, and how. Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour Publications.
54. Charles, R. I., and Silver, E. A. (1988). (Eds.). The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
55. Charles, R. I., Mason, R. P., Nofsinger, J. M., and White, C. A. (1985). Problem solving experiences in mathematics. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
56. Chase, W. G., and Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.
57. Chazan, D. (2000). Beyond formulas in mathematics and teaching: Dynamics of the high school algebra classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
58. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., and Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.
59. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
60. Cohen, E. G. (1996 April). A sociologist looks at talking and working together in the mathematics classroom. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, New York.
61. Clements, D. H. (1997). (Mis?) Constructing constructivism. Teaching children mathematics, 4(4), 198-200.
62. Clements, D. H. and Battista, M. T. (1990). Constructivist learning and teaching. Arithmetic Teacher, 38(1), 34-35.
63. Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13-20. [Reprinted in Fosnot, C. (Ed.) (1996). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (pp. 34-52). New York: Teachers College Press, and in P. Murphy (Ed.) (in press), Learners’ learning and assessment. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press].
64. Cobb, P. (1995). Cultural tools and mathematical learning: A case study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(4), 362-385.
65. Cobb, P. (1995). Mathematical learning and small-group interaction: Four case studies. In P. Cobb and H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 25-129). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
66. Cobb, P. (1999). Individual and collective mathematical learning: The case of statistical data analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1, 5-44.
67. Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K., Yackel, E., McClain, K., and Whitenack, J. (1997). Mathematizing and symbolizing: The emergence of chains of signification in one first-grade classroom. In D. Kirshner and J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 151-233), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
68. Cobb, P., McClain, K., and Gravemeijer, K. (April, 2000). Learning about statistical covariation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
69. Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., and Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. Journal for the Learning Sciences, 10(1and2), 113-164.
70. Cobb, P., Wood, T., and Yackel, E. and McNeal, B. (1993). Mathematics as procedural instructions and mathematics as meaningful activity: The reality of teaching for understanding. In R. B. Davis and C. A. Maher (Eds.), Schools, mathematics and the world of reality (pp. 119-134). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
71. Cobb, P., and Yackel, E. (1995, October). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Paper presented at the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Columbus, OH.
72. Cobb, P., and Yackel, E. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 27(4) pp.458-474.
73. Cobb, P., Yackel, E., and Wood, T. (1991). Curriculum and teacher development: Psychological and anthropological perspectives. In E. Fennema, T. P. Carpenter, and S. J. Lamon (Eds.), Integrating research on teaching and learning mathematics (pp. 83-120). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
74. Cobb, P., Yackel, E., and Wood, T. (1992). Interaction and learning in mathematics classroom situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 99-122.
75. Cohen, D. K. (1988). Teaching practice: Plus que ça change. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice (pp. 27-84). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
76. Cohen, D. K. and Ball, D. L. (1990). Policy and practice: An overview. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 247-353.
77. Cohen, D. K., and Barnes, C. A. (1993). Pedagogy and policy. In D. K. Cohen, M. W. McLaughlin, and J. E. Talbert (Eds.), Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice (pp. 207-239). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
78. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1-35.
79. Cohen, E. G. (1996 April). A sociologist looks at talking and working together in the mathematics classroom. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, New York.
80. Conant, J. B. (1951). Science and common sense. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
81. Confrey, J. (1995). A theory of intellectual development. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(1), 38-48.
82. Confrey, J., and Smith, E. (1995). Splitting, covariation, and their role in the development of exponential functions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 66-86.
83. Cooney, T. J. (1999). Conceptualizing teachers’ ways of knowing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(1-3), 163-87.
84. Cramer, K. (2001). Using concrete models to build middle-grade students understanding of functions. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 6, 310-319.
85. Cramer, K., Behr, M., Lesh, R., and Post, T. (1997a). Rational number project fraction lessons for the middle grades: Level 1. Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt.
86. Cramer, K., Behr, M., Lesh, R., and Post, T. (1997b). Rational number project fraction lessons for the middle grades: Level 2. Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt.
87. Cramer, K., and Bezuk, N. (1991). Multiplication of fractions: Teaching for understanding. Arithmetic Teacher, 39(3), 34-37.
88. Cramer, K., and Henry, A. (in press). Using manipulative models to build number sense for addition of fractions. In B. Litwiller (Ed.), Making sense of fractions, ratio and proportions: NCTM 2002 yearbook. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
89. Cramer, K., Post, T., and delMas, R. (in press). Initial fraction learning by fourth- and fifthgradestudents: A comparison of the effects of using commercial curricula or the Rational Number Project curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.
90. Cramer, K., Post, T., Lesh, R. and Behr, M. (1998). Rational Number Project. Level 1and Level 2. Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt.
91. Csiksentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row, Publishers.
92. Cunningham, D. (1992). Beyond educational psychology: Steps toward an educational semiotic. Educational Psychology Review, 4, 165-194.
93. Cuoco, A., Goldenberg, E. P., and Mark, J. (1996). Habits of mind: An organizing principle for mathematics curricula. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 375-402.
94. Danesi, M. (1994). Messages and meanings: An introduction to semiotics. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
95. Dapueto, C., and Parenti, L. (1999). Contributions and obstacles of contexts in the development of mathematical knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39, 1-21.
96. Davidson, N. (1985). Small-group learning and teaching in mathematics: A selective review of the literature. In R. Slavin, S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R. Lazarowitz, C. Webb, and R. Schmuck (Eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 211-230). New York: Plenum.
97. Davis, R. B. (1984). Learning mathematics: The cognitive science approach to mathematics education. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
98. Davis, R. B., Maher, C. A., and Noddings, N. (1990). Suggestions for the improvement of mathematics education. In R.B. Davis, C.A. Maher, and N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph No. 4) (pp. 187-191). Reston, VA: National Council for Teachers of Mathematics.
99. Davis, R., Maher, C. A. and Noddings, N. (1990). Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
100. Debellis, V. A., and Goldin, G. A. (1998, July). Aspects of affect: Mathematical intimacy, mathematical integrity. Paper presented at the 22nd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Stellenbosch, South Africa.
101. DeCorte, E., Verschaffel, L., Op’t Eynde P. (2000). Self-regulation: A characteristic and a goal of mathematics education. In P. Pintrich, M. Boekaerts, and M. Zeidner (Eds.), Self-regulation: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 687-726). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
102. Deely, J. (1986). The coalescence of semiotic consciousness. In J. Deely, B. Williams, and F. Kruse (Eds.), Frontiers of semiotics (pp. 5-34). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
103. Deely, J. (1990). Basics of semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
104. deLoache, J. S. (1989). The development of representation in young children. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior, Vol. 22, (pp. 1-39). New York: Academic Press.
105. Dennis, D., and Confrey, J. (1996). The creation of continuous exponents: A study of the methods and epistemology of John Wallis. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 6, 33-56.
106. Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review. 3, 357-370. Washington: American Psychological Association.
107. Dewey, J. (1916) Democracy and education. New York: Macmillian.
108. Dewey, J. (1963) Experience and education. London, England: Collier Books.
109. Dewey, J. (1982). In H.S. Thayer (Ed.) Pragmatism: The classic writings (pp. 253-334). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
110. Dewey, J. (1990). John Dewey’s pragmatic technology. In D. Ihde (Ed.), The Indiana Series in the Philosophy of Technology. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
111. Dewey, J. (1997). In L. Menand (Ed.) Pragmatism: A reader. New York: NY. Random House.
112. Dienes, Z. (1960). Building up mathematics. London: Hutchinson Educational Ltd.
113. DiSessa, A. A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman and P. B. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49-70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
114. DiSessa, A. A., Hammer, D., Sherin, B., and Kolpakowski, T. (1991). Inventing graphing: Meta-representational expertise in children. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10 (2), 117-160.
115. Doerr, H. M., and Bowers, J. S. (1999). Revealing preservice teachers’ thinking about functions through concept mapping. In F. Hitt and M. Santos (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-first annual meeting: Psychology of mathematics education. Columbus, OH: ERIC.
116. Doerr, H. M., Masingila, J. and Teich, V. (2000, April). Linking the emerging practices of pre-service teachers to an experienced teacher’s practice through the use of multimedia case studies. Paper presented at the Research Pre-session of the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teacher of Mathematics, April, 2000, Chicago, IL.
117. Doerr, H. M., and Tinto, P. (2000). Paradigms for teacher-centered classroom-based research. In A. Kelly, and R. Lesh (Eds.) Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
118. Driscoll, M. (1983). Research within reach: Secondary school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
119. Driscoll, M. (1981). Research within reach: Elementary school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
120. Duncker, K. (1935). The psychology of productive thinking. Berlin: Springer.
121. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
122. Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., and Reuman, D. (1987, April). Changes in self-perceptions and values at early adolescence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
123. Educational Testing Service. (1995). Packets project: Princeton, NJ: Author.
124. English, L. D. (1997). Children’s reasoning processes in classifying and solving computational word problems. In L. D. English (Ed.), Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images (pp. 191-220). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
125. English, L. D. (1998). Children’s problem posing within formal and informal contexts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 83-106.
126. English, L. D., Charles, K., and Cudmore, D. (2000). Students’ statistical reasoning during a data modeling program. In T. Nakahara and M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 265-272). Hiroshima, Japan: Hiroshima University.
127. Lesh, R. (2002) Research Design in Mathematics Education: Focusing on Design Experiments. In L. English (Ed.) International Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
128. English, L. D., and Cudmore, D. (2000). Using extranets in fostering international communities of mathematical inquiry. In M. J. Burke (Ed.), Learning mathematics for a new century (2000 NCTM Yearbook, pp. 82-95). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
129. Ewert, P. H., and Lambert, J. F. (1932). Part II. The effect of verbal instructions upon the formation of a concept. Journal of General Psychology, 6, 400-411.
130. Feltovich, P. J., Spiro, R. J., and Coulson, R. L. (1997). Issues of expert flexibility in contexts characterized by complexity and change. In P. J. Feltovich, K. M. Ford, and R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Expertise in context: Human and machine (pp. 125-146). Cambridge, MA: AAAI/MIT Press.
131. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., and Carey, D. A. (1993). Learning to use children’s mathematics thinking: A case study. In R. B. Davis and C. A. Maher (Eds.), Schools, mathematics and the world of reality. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
132. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L. Jacobs, V. R., and Empson, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children’s thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 403-434.
133. Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. Resnick (Ed.) The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
134. Frensch, P. A., and Funke, J. (Eds.) (1995). Complex problem solving: The European perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
135. Fuson, K.C. (1992). Research on whole number addition and subtraction. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, (pp 243-275). New York: Macmillan.
136. Gagne (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart Winston.
137. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind. New York: Basic Books.
138. Garofalo, J., and Lester, F. K. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16, 163-175.
139. Gee, J. P. (1997). Thinking, learning, and reading: The situated sociocultural mind. In D. Kirshner and J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 235-259). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
140. Gentner, D., and Toupin, C. (1986). Systematicity and similarity in the development of analogy. Cognitive Science, 10, 277-300.
141. Giere, R. N. (1992). Cognitive models of science. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
142. Ginsburg, H. P. (1998). Entering the child’s mind: The clinical interview in psychological research and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
143. Glenn, J. (2000). Before it’s too late: A report to the nation from the National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
144. Goldin, G. A. (1990). Epistemology, constructivism, and discovery learning in mathematics. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, and N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph No. 4) (pp. 31-47). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
145. Goldin, G. A. (in press). Representation in mathematical learning and problem solving. In L. English, (Ed.), International handbook of research design in mathematics education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
146. Goldin, G. A., and McClintock, C. E. (Eds.). (1984). Task variables in mathematical problem solving. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Original work published 1979 by the Franklin Institute Press).
147. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.
148. Good, T. L., and Biddle, B. (1988). Research and the improvement of mathematics instruction: The need for observational resources. In D. Grouws and T. Cooney (Eds.), Perspectives on research on effective mathematics teaching (pp. 114-142). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
149. Good, T. L., Mulryan, C., and McCaslin, M. (1992). Grouping for instruction in mathematics: A call for programmatic research on small-group processes. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: McMillan.
150. Good, T. L., Reys, B., Grouws, D., and Mulryan, C. (1989-1990). Using work groups in mathematics instruction. Educational Leadership, 47, 56-62.
151. Graduate Record Examination Board. (1997). The GRE fairness, access, multiculturalism, and equity (FAME)-Report Series (Vol. 1-3). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
152. Gravemeijer, K., and Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39, 111-129
153. Greeno, J. (1991). Number sense as situated knowing in a conceptual domain. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(3), 170-218.
154. Greeno, J. (1997). The middle-school mathematics through applications project group. Theories and practices of thinking and learning to think. American Journal of Education, 106, 85-126.
155. Greeno, J. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5-26.
156. Griffiths, J., and Hassan, E. (1978). Increasing the shipping capacity of the Suez Canal. Journal of Navigation, 31, 219-231.
157. Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., and Smith, C. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, (pp. 799-822).
158. Grouws, D. A. (Ed.). (1992). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.
159. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
160. Hadot, P. (2002). What is ancient philosophy? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
161. Harel, G. (2001). The development of mathematical induction as a proof scheme: A model for DNR-based instruction. In S. Campbell and Dr. Zargkis (Eds.). Learning and teaching of number theory. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
162. Harel, G. (in press). Students’ proof schemes revisited: Historical and epistemological considerations. In P. Boero (Ed.) Theorems in School. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
163. Harel, G. and Sowder, J. (1998). Students’ proof schemes. In E. Dubinsky, A. Schoenfeld, and J. Kaput (Eds.), Research on collegiate mathematics education. (Vol. III, pp. 234-283). Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society.
164. Harre, R., and Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
165. Harter, S. (1986). Processes underlying the construction, maintenance, and enhancement of the self-concept in children. In J. Suls and A. C. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives of the self (pp. 55-121). New York: Academic Press.
166. Hatfield, L. L., and Bradbard, D. (Eds.). (1978). Mathematical problem solving: Papers from a research workshop. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
167. Hembree, R., and Marsh, H. (1993). Problem solving in early childhood: Building foundations. In R. J. Jensen (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: Early childhood mathematics (pp. 151-170). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
168. Hestenes, D. (1992). Modeling Games in the Newtonian World. American Journal of Physics, 60, 732-748.
169. Hidi, S., and Anderson, V. (1992). Situational interest and its impact on reading and expository writing. In K.A. Renninger, S. Hidi, and A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
170. Hiebert, J., and Behr, M. (1988). Introduction: capturing the major themes. In J. Hiebert and M. Behr (Eds.), Research agenda for mathematics education: Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (Vol. 2, pp. 1-18). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
171. Hilton, P. J. (1981). Avoiding math avoidance. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Mathematics tomorrow, (pp. 73-82). New York: Springer-Verlag.
172. Hofstadter, D. R. (1999). Gödel, Escher, Bach: An eternal golden braid. New York: Basic Books.
173. Holmes, O. W., (1982). Pragmatism: The classic writings. In H.S. Thayer. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
174. Holmes, O. W., (1997). In L. Menand (Ed.) Pragmatism: A reader. New York: NY. Random House.
175. Horton, P. B., McConney, A., Gallo, M., Woods, A. L., Senn, G. J., and Hamelin, P. B. (1993). An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. Science Education, 77(1), 95-111.
176. Houser, N. (1987). Toward a Peircean semiotic theory of learning. The American Journal of Semiotics, 5, 251-274.
177. Hoyles, C. (1982). The pupil’s view of mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 13, 349-372.
178. Hoyles, C., Noss, R., and Pozzi, S. (2001). Proportional reasoning in nursing practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 4-27.
179. Hunt, E. (1991). Some comments on the study of complexity. In R. J. Sterneberg and P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms (pp. 317-340). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
180. Indiana State Department of Education. (2000). Indiana standards. Indianapolis: Indiana Department of Education Library.
181. Inhelder, B. and Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books.
182. James, W. (1878). Remarks on Spencer’s definition of mind as correspondence. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, XII (1878), 1-18. Reprinted in Essays in Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
183. James, W. (1918). The principles of psychology. (Reprint, August 1982). Harvard University.
184. James, W. (1982). In H. S. Thayer (Ed.) Pragmatism: The classic writings (pp. 123-250). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
185. James, W. (1987). The varieties of religious experience / Pragmatism /A Pluralistic Universe / The Meaning of Truth /Some Problems of Philosophy / Essays (Library of America) by William James. In B. Kuklick (Ed.) William James (Writings 1902-1910). New York, NY: Literary Classics of the United States.
186. James, W. (1997). Pragmatism: A reader. In L. Menand. New York: NY. Random House.
187. Jonassen, D. H., and Reeves, T. C. (1996). Learning with technology: using computers as cognitive tools. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, (pp. 693-719). New York: Macmillan.
188. Johnson, D., and Johnson, R. (1974). Instructional goal structure: Cooperative, competitive, or individualistic. Review of Educational Research, 44, 213-240.
189. Judson, T. W. (1999). E. A. Japan: A different model of mathematics education. In E. A. Gavosto, S. G. Krantz, and W. McCallum (Eds.), Contemporary issues in mathematics education (pp. 75-81). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
190. Kamii, C. (1982). Number in preschool and kindergarten. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
191. Kaput, J. (1987). Representation systems and mathematics. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 19-26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
192. Kaput, J. (1989). Linking representations in the symbol system of algebra. In C. Kieren and S. Wagner (Eds.), A research agenda for the teaching and learning of algebra. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
193. Kaput, J. (1991). Notations and representations as mediators of constructive processes. In E. v. Glasersfeld (Ed.), Constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 53-74). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
194. Kaput, J. (1992). Patterns in students’ formalization of quantitative patterns: The concept of function aspects of epistemology and pedagogy. MAA Notes, 25, 290-318.
195. Kaput J. (1994). Democratizing access to calculus: new routes to old roots. In A.H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking and problem solving. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
196. Kaput, J. (1994). The representational roles of technology in connecting mathematics with authentic experience. In R. Bieler, R. W. Scholz, R. Strasser and B. Winkelman (Eds.), Mathematics didactics as a scientific discipline. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
197. Kaput, J. (in press). Overcoming physicality and the eternal present: Cybernetic manipulatives. In R. Sutherland and J. Mason (Eds.), Visualization and technology in mathematics education. New York: Springer-Verlag.
198. Kaput, J., and Roschelle, J. (1993). SimCalc: Simulations for calculus learning [Computer software].
199. Kaput, J., and Thompson, P. (1994). The first 25 years of research on technology use in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25th Anniversary Edition, (December).
200. Karplus, R., and Peterson, (1970). In R. Lesh and M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes. New York: Academic Press.
201. Karplus, R., Pulos, S., and Stage, E. (1983). Proportional reasoning in early adolescents. In R. Lesh and M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 45-90). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
202. Katona, G. (1940). Organizing and memorizing. New York: Columbia University Press.
203. Kauffman, S. (1993). The origins of order: Self organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
204. Kauffman, S. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for laws of self-organization and complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.
205. Kehle, P. (1998). An empirical semiotic analysis of abstraction in mathematical modeling. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(06A), 1949. (University Microfilms No. AAG9932664).
206. Kelly, E., and Lesh, R. (Eds.) (2000). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
207. Kelly, E., and Lesh, R. (2000). Trends and shifts in research methods. In E. Kelly and R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
208. Kemme, S. (1990). Uitleggen van Wiskunde [Explaining mathematics]. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht: Onderzoek Wiskunde Onderwijs en Onderwijs Computer Centrum.
209. Kilpatrick, J. (1967). Analyzing the solution of word problems in mathematics: An exploratory study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
210. Kilpatrick, J. (1969). Problem solving and creative behavior in mathematics. In J. W. Wilson and L. R. Carey (Eds.), Reviews of recent research in mathematics education. Studies in Mathematics Series, (Vol. 19, pp. 153-187). Stanford, CA: School Mathematics Study Group.
211. Kilpatrick, J. (1978). Variables and methodologies in research on problem solving. In L. L. Hatfield and D. A. Bradbard (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving: Papers from a research workshop (pp. 7-20). Columbus, OH: ERIC/SMEAC.
212. Kilpatrick, J. (1985). Reflection and recursion. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16, 1-26.
213. Kilpatrick, J. (1985). A retrospective account of the past 25 years of research on teaching mathematical problem solving. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (1-15). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
214. Kilpatrick, J. (1987, July). What constructivism might mean in mathematics education. Paper presented at the Eleventh International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Montreal, Canada.
215. Kilpatrick, J., and Silver, E. (2000). Unfinished business: Challenges for mathematics educators in the next decades. In M. Burke and F. Curcio (Eds.), Learning mathematics for a new century (pp. 223-235). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
216. King, A. and Brownell, W. (1966). The curriculum and the disciplines of knowledge. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
217. Klein, R., and Tirosh, D. (2000). Does a research based teacher development program affect teachers’ lesson plans? In T. Nakahara and M. Koyama (Eds.) Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Hiroshima, Japan.
218. Kloosterman, P., and Gorman, J. (1990). Building motivation in the elementary mathematics classroom. School Science and Mathematics, (90)5, 375-382.
219. Koedinger, K. (1998). Intelligent cognitive tutors as modeling tool and instructional model. Paper prepared for the NCTM Standards 2000 Technology Conference. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
220. Kozak, M., and Robb, J. (1991). Education about technology. In Technological Literacy. Macmillan/McGraw-Hill.
221. Kroll, D. L., and Miller, T. (1993). Insights from research on mathematical problem solving in the middle grades. In D. Owens (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: Middle grades mathematics (pp. 58-77). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
222. Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28, 16-25.
223. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1962).
224. Kuhn, T. (1970). Logic of discovery or psychology of research? In I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (Eds.) Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
225. Kuhn, T. (1971). Concepts of cause in the development of physics. Etudes depistemologie genetique. Universitaires de Frances.
226. Kuhn, T. (1973). Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
227. Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes (Vol. 1). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
228. Lambdin, D. V. (1993). Monitoring moves and roles in cooperative mathematical problem solving. Focus on learning problems in mathematics, 15(2-3), 48-64.
229. Lamon, S. J. (1999). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
230. Lamon, S. J. (2001a). Presentations and re-presentations: From fractions to rational numbers. In A. Cuoco and F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The roles of representation in school mathematics. 2001Yearbook (pp. 146-165). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
231. Lamon, S. J. (2001b). A Over B: Meanings over applications. In R. Speiser, C. A. Maher, and C. N. Walter (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 235-243). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
232. Lamon, S. J. (in press). Part-whole comparisons with unitizing. In B. Litwiller (Ed.), Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions. 2002 Yearbook. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
233. Lamon, S. J., and Lesh, R. (1994). Interpreting responses to problems with several levels and types of correct answers. In R. Lesh and S. Lamon (Eds), Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
234. Lampert, M. and Ball, D. (1998). Teaching, multimedia, and mathematics: Investigations of real practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
235. Lange, J.de (1999). Framework for classroom assessment in mathematics. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute.
236. Latour, B. (1990). Drawing things together. In M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 19-68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
237. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
238. Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
239. Lehrer, R., Carpenter, S., Schauble, L., and Putz, A. (2000). Designing classrooms that support inquiry. In J. Minstrell and E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 80-99). American Association for the Advancement of Science.
240. Lehrer, R., Jacobson, C., Kemeny, V., and Strom, D. (1999). Building on children’s intuitions to develop mathematical understanding of space. In E. Fennema and T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 63-87). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
241. Lehrer, R., and Pritchard, C. (in press). Symbolizing space into being. In K. Gravemeijer, L. Verschaffel, B. Van Oers, and R. Lehrer (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling, and tool use in mathematics education. The Netherlands: Kluwer.
242. Lehrer, R., and Schauble, L. (2000). Inventing data structures for representational purposes: Elementary grade students’ classification models. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2, 51-74.
243. Lehrer, R., and Schauble, L. (2000). Model-based reasoning in mathematics and science. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 5). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
244. Lehrer, R., and Schauble, L. (in press-a). Symbolic communication in mathematics and science: Co-constituting inscription and thought. In J. Byrnes, J. and E. Amsel, (Eds.), Language, literacy, and cognitive development: The development and consequences of symbolic communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
245. Lehrer, R., and Schauble, L. (in press-b). Similarity of form and substance: Modeling material kind. In D. Klahr and S. Carver (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: 25 years of progress. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
246. Leher, R., Schauble, L,. Carpenter, S., and Penner, D. (2000). The inter-related development of inscriptions and conceptual understanding. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, and K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms (pp. 325-360). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
247. Leinhardt, G. (1990). Capturing craft knowledge in teaching. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 18-25.
248. Lemke, J. (1997). Cognition, context, and learning: A social semiotic perspective. In D. Kirshner and J. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 37-55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
249. Lesh, R. (1979). Mathematical learning disabilities: Considerations for identification, diagnosis and remediation. In R. Lesh, D. Meierkiewicz, and M. G. Kantowski (Eds.), Applied mathematical problem solving. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
250. Lesh, R. (1982). Metacognition in mathematical problem solving. Unpublished manuscript.
251. Lesh, R. (1983). Conceptual analyses of problem solving performance. In E. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving (pp. 309-329). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
252. Lesh, R. (1985). Conceptual analysis of problem-solving performance. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 309-329). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
253. Lesh, R. (1986b). Review of Mathematical Problem Solving, by Alan Schoenfeld. Teaching, thinking, and problem solving 8(1), 39-48.
254. Lesh, R. (1987). The evolution of problem representations in the presence of powerful conceptual amplifiers. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in teaching and learning mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
255. Lesh, R. (1996). Mathematizing: The “real” need for representational fluency. In L. Puig and A. Gutierrez (Eds.), Research Forum Plenary Address. Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. (pp. 3-13), Universitat do Valencia: Valencia, Spain.
256. Lesh, R. (1998). The development of representational abilities in middle school mathematics. In I. Sigel (Eds.), Representations and student learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
257. Lesh, R. (2000). Dealing with complexity: New paradigms for research in mathematics education. Plenary session in Fernandez, M. (Ed.) Proceedings of the Twenty Third Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
258. Lesh, R. (2001). What mathematical abilities are needed for success beyond school in a technology-based age of information? In M. Thomas (Ed.), Technology in mathematics education. Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland Press.
259. Lesh, R. (2001) Beyond constructivism: A new paradigm for identifying mathematical abilities that are most needed for success beyond school in a technology Based age of information. In M. Mitchelmore (Ed.) Technology in mathematics learning and teaching: Cognitive considerations: A special issue of the mathematics education research journal. Australia Mathematics Education Research Group. Melbourne Australia.
260. Lesh. R. (in press). Models and modeling in mathematics education. Monograph for International Journal for Mathematical Thinking and Learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
261. Lesh, R., and Akerstrom, M. (1982). Applied problem solving: Priorities for mathematics education research. In F. K. Lester and J. Garofalo (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving: Issues in research (pp. 117-129). Philadelphia, PA: Franklin Institute Press.
262. Lesh, R., Amit, M. and Schorr, R. Y. (1997). Using “real-life” problems to prompt students to construct conceptual models for statistical reasoning. In I. Gal and J. Garfield (Eds.), The assessment challenge in statistics education. [A publication for the International Statistical Institute, IOS Press]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
263. Lesh, R., Behr, M. and Post, T. (1987). Rational number relations and proportions. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in teaching and learning mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
264. Lesh, R., Behr, M., and Post, T. (1987). The role of representational translations in proportional reasoning and rational number concepts. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in mathematics learning and problem solving. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
265. Lesh, R., and Clarke, D. (2000). Formulating operational definitions of desired outcomes of instruction in mathematics and science education. In A. Kelly and R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
266. Lesh, R., Crider, J., and Gummer, E. (2001). Emerging possibilities for collaborating doctoral programs. In R. Reys (Ed.) The state of doctoral research in mathematics education. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
267. Lesh, R., and Doerr, H. M. (1998). Symbolizing, communicating, and mathematizing: Key components of models and modeling. In P. Cobb and E. Yackel (Eds.). Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
268. Lesh, R. and Harel, G. (in press). Problem solving, modeling and local conceptual development. Monograph for International Journal for Mathematical Thinking and Learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
269. Lesh, R., Hoover, M., and Kelly, A. (1993). Equity, assessment, and thinking mathematically: Principles for the design of model-eliciting activities. In I. Wirszup and R. Streit (Eds.), Developments in school mathematics education around the world, Vol. 3, (pp. 104-130). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
270. Lesh, R., Hoover, M., and Kelly, A. (1993). Equity, technology and teacher development. In I. Wirszup and R. Streit (Eds.), Developments in school mathematics education around the world: Vol. 3. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
271. Lesh, R., Hoover, M. Hole, B., Kelly, A., and Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In A. Kelly and R. Lesh (Eds.). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 591-646). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
272. Lesh, R., and Kaput, J. (1988). Interpreting modeling as local conceptual development. In J. DeLange and M. Doorman (Eds.), Senior secondary mathematics education. Utrecht, The Netherlands: OW and OC.
273. Lesh, R., and Kelly, A. (2000). Multitiered teaching experiments. In E. Kelly, and R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
274. Lesh, R., and Lamon, S. (Eds.). (1992). Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
275. Lesh, R., and Lamon, S. (Eds.) (1994). Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
276. Lesh, R., Landau, M., and Hamilton, E. (1983). Conceptual models in applied mathematical problem solving research. In R. Lesh and M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 263-343). New York: Academic Press.
277. Lesh, R., and Lehrer, R. (2000). Iterative refinement cycles for videotape analyses of conceptual change. In A. Kelly and R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
278. Lesh, R., Mierkiewicz, D., and Kantowski, M. (1979). Applied mathematical problem solving. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
279. Lesh, R., Post, T., and Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in teaching and learning mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
280. Lesh, R., Post, T., and Behr, M. (1987). Dienes revisited: Multiple embodiments in computer environments. In I. Wirszup and R. Streit (Eds.), Developments in school mathematics education around the world. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
281. Lesh, R., Post, T., and Behr, M. (1989). Proportional reasoning. In J. Hiebert and M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 93-118). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
282. Lesh, R., and Zawojewski, J. S. (1987). Problem solving. In T. Post (Ed.), Teaching mathematics in grades K-8: Research-based methods. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
283. Lesh, R., and Zawojewski, J. S. (1992). Problem solving. In T. Post (Ed.), Teaching mathematics in grades K-8: Research-based methods (2nd Edition, pp. 49-88). Newton, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
284. Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind.” Psychological Review, 94, 412-426.
285. Lester, F. K. (1978). Mathematical problem solving in the elementary school: Some educational and psychological considerations. In L. L. Hatfield (Ed.), Mathematical problem solving: Papers from a research workshop. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
286. Lester, F. K. (1980). Mathematical problem solving research. In R. J. Shumway (Ed.), Research in mathematics education (pp. 286-323). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
287. Lester, F. K. (1983). Trends and issues in mathematical problem-solving research. In R. Lesh and M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes. New York: Academic Press.
288. Lester, F. K. (1985). Methodological considerations in research on mathematical problem-solving instruction. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 41-69). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
289. Lester, F. K., and Garofalo, J. (Eds.). (1982). Mathematical problem solving: Issues in research. Philadelphia, PA: Franklin Institute Press.
290. Lester, F. K., Garofalo, J., and Kroll, D. L. (1989). Self-confidence, interest, beliefs, and metacognition: Key influences on problem-solving behavior. In D. B. McLeod and V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective (pp. 75-88). New York: Springer-Verlag.
291. Lester, F. K., Maki, D., LeBlanc, J. F., and Kroll, D. L. (Eds.). (1992). Content component. Vol. II, final report to the National Science Foundation: Preparing elementary teachers to teach mathematics: A problem-solving approach (Grant Number TEI 8751478). Bloomington: Mathematics Education Development Center, Indiana University.
292. Library of America. (1987). William James writings 1902-1910. In B. Kuklick (Ed.). Literary classics of the United States. New York: Penguin Books.
293. Lucas, J. (1972). An exploratory study of the diagnostic teaching of heuristic problemsolving strategies in calculus. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin.
294. Maher, C. A. (1987). The teacher as designer, implementer, and evaluator of children’s mathematical learning environments. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 6, 295-303.
295. Maki, D., and Thompson, M. (1973). Mathematical models and applications, with emphasis on the social, life, and management sciences (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
296. Manufacturing Skill Standards Council. (2000). Manufacturing skill standards. Washington, DC: National Skill Standards Board.
297. Mason, J., Burton, L., and Stacey, K. (1982). Thinking mathematically. New York: Addison Wesley.
298. Mayer, R. E. (1985). Implications of cognitive psychology for instruction in mathematical problem solving. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
299. McClain, K., Cobb, P. and Gravemeijer, K. (2000). Supporting students’ ways of reasoning abut data. In M. Burke (Ed.), Learning mathematics for a new century (2001 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
300. McClain, K., McGatha, M., and Hodge, L. (2000). The importance of argumentation in supporting students’ mathematical development. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle Grades, 5(8), 548-553.
301. McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575-596). New York: Macmillan.
302. Mead, G. H. (1910). Social consciousness and the consciousness of meaning. Psychological Bulletin, 7, 397-405.
303. Mead, G. H. (1982). In H.S. Thayer (Ed.) Pragmatism: The classic writings (pp. 337-358). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
304. Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A., and Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 60-70.
305. Menand, L. (Ed.). (1997). Pragmatism: A reader. New York: Random House.
306. Menand, L. (Ed.). (2001). The metaphysical club: A story of ideas in America. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
307. Merrell, F. (1997). Peirce, signs, and meaning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
308. Meyer, M. R., and Fennema, E. (1985). Predicting mathematics achievement for females and males from causal attributions. In S. K. Damarin and M. Shelton (Eds.), Procedings of the seventh annual conference of the North American Chapter for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 201-206). Columbus, OH: Authors.
309. Middleton, J. A. (1999). Curricular influences on the motivational beliefs and practice of two middle school mathematics teachers: A follow-up study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(3), 349-358.
310. Middleton, J. A., Leavy, A., and Leader, L. (1998). Student attitudes and motivation towards mathematics: What happens when you change the rules? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
311. Middleton, J. A., Littlefield, J., and Lehrer, R. (1992). Gifted children’s conceptions of academic fun: An examination of a critical construct in gifted education. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(1), 38-44.
312. Middleton, J. A., and Spanias, P. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations, and criticisms of the recent research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 65-88.
313. Middleton, J. A., and Toluk, Z. (1999). First steps in the development of an adaptive, decision-making theory of motivation. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 99-112.
314. Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., and Eccles, J. S. (1989). Student/teacher relations and attitudes toward mathematics before and after transition to junior high school. Child Development, 60, 981-992.
315. Minsky, M. (1987). The society of mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.
316. Monk, S. (1992). Students’ understanding of a function given by a physical model: The concept of function, aspects of epistemology and pedagogy. MAA Notes, 25, 175-194.
317. Monk, S., and Nemirovsky, R. (1994). The case of Dan: Student construction of a functional situation through visual attributes. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 4, 139-168.
318. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
319. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [Swetz, F., and Hartzler, J. (Eds.)]. (1991). Mathematical modeling in the secondary school curriculum. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
320. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
321. National Council of Teachers in Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics: An overview. National Council of Teachers in Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
322. National Research Council (1999a). Being fluent with information technology. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
323. National Research Council (1999b). The changing nature of work; Implications for occupational analysis. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
324. National Science and Technology Council and the Office of Science and Technology Policy. (1996). Technology in the national interest. (online). Available: http://www.ta.doc.gov/Reports/TechNI/
325. Nemirovsky, R. (1996). Mathematical narratives, modeling and algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, and L. Lee (eds.), Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 197-220). Dordrecht: Holland, Kluwer.
326. Nemirovsky, R., and Monk, S. (2000). If you look at it the other way. An exploration into the nature of symbolizing. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel and K. McClain (Eds.) Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design. Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
327. Nesher, P. (1989). Microworlds in mathematical education: A pedagogical realism. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
328. Newell, A., and Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
329. Noddings, N. (1989). Theoretical and practical concerns about small groups in mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 89, 607-623.
330. Noddings, N. (1990). Constructivism in mathematics education. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, and N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph No. 4) (pp. 7-18). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
331. Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
332. Novak, J. D., and Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
333. Nunes, T. (1992). Ethnomathematics and everyday cognition. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematical teaching and learning (pp. 557-574). New York: Macmillan.
334. Nunes, T., Schliemann, A. D. and Carraher, D. W. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
335. Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel and S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
336. Pearlman, K. (1997). Twenty-first century measures for twenty-first century work. In Transitions in work and learning; Implications for Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
337. Peirce, C. (1878). How to Make our Ideas Clear. Popular Science Monthly, 12, 286-302.
338. Peirce, C. S. (1884). Design and Chance. In N. P. A. Lynn A. Ziegler, Edward C. Moore, Max H. Fisch, Christian J. Kloesel, Don D. Roberts (Ed.) (1982), Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition (Vol. 4, pp. 544-554). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
339. Penner, D. E., Giles, N. D., Lehrer, R., and Schauble, L. (1977). Building functional models: Designing an elbow. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 125-143.
340. Perkins, D. N., Jay, E., and Tishman, S. (1993). Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39(1), 1-21.
341. Perkins, D. N., and Tishman, S. (1998). Dispositional aspects of intelligence. Paper presented at the Winter Colloquium Series, Arizona State University, Tempe.
342. Piaget, J. (1960). The psychology of intelligence. Littlefield, NJ: Adams.
343. Piaget, J. (1964). Development and learning. In R. E. Ripple and V. N. Rockcastle (Eds.), Piaget rediscovered: Report of the conference on cognitive studies and curriculum development. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
344. Piaget, J. (1967). The child’s conception of number. New York: Norton.
345. Piaget, J. (1968). Genetic epistemology. New York Columbia University Press.
346. Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. E. Duckworth (Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
347. Piaget, J. (1983). Piaget’s theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, (4th ed., pp. 103-128). Wiley.
348. Piaget, J., and Beth, E. (1966). Mathematical epistemology and psychology. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.
349. Piaget, J., and Inhelder, B. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
350. Piaget, J., Inhelder, B., and Szeminska, A. (1960). The child’s conception of geometry. London: Butler and Tanner.
351. Pimm, D. (1995). Symbols and meanings in school mathematics. London, England: Routledge.
352. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: W. W. Norton.
353. Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
354. Polya, G. (1968). Mathematics and plausible reasoning (2nd ed., Vols. 1-2). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
355. Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1945)
356. Popper, C. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. New York: Oxford: Clarendon Press.
357. Post, T. (1988). Some notes on the nature of mathematics learning. In T. Post (Ed.), Teaching mathematics in grades K-8 (pp. 1-19). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
358. Post, T., Behr, M., Lesh, R., and Harel, G. (1988). Intermediate teachers’ knowledge of rational number concepts. In E. Fennema, T. Carpenter, and S. J. Lamon (Eds.), Integrating research on teaching and learning mathematics. Madison, WI: National Center for Research in the Mathematical Sciences Education.
359. Post, T., and Cramer, K. (1987). Children’s strategies when ordering rational numbers. Arithmetic Teacher, 35 (2), 33-35.
360. Post, T., Wachsmuth, I., Lesh, R., and Behr, M. (1985). Order and equivalence of rational number: A cognitive analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16 (1), 18-36.
361. Pozzi, S., Noss, R., and Hoyles, C. (1998). Tools in practice, mathematics in use. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36, 105-122.
362. Resnick, M. (1994). Turtles, termites, and traffic jams. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
363. Rissing, S. W., Pollock, G. B., Higgins, M. R., Hagen, R. H., and Smith, D. R. (1989). Foraging specialization without relatedness or dominance among co-founding ant queens. Nature, 338, 420-422.
364. Rissland, E. L. (1985). Artificial intelligence and the learning of mathematics: A tutorial sampling. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
365. Romberg, T. A (1997). (Ed.) Mathematics in context: A connected curriculum for grades 5-8. Chicago, IL: Encyclopedia Britannica Educational Corporation.
366. Rorty, R., (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
367. Russell, B. (1961). Religion and science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
368. Russell, R. S., and Taylor III, R. B. (2000). Operations management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
369. Saldanha, L., and Thompson, P. W. (1998). Re-thinking co-variation from a quantitative perspective: Simultaneous continuous variation. In S. B. Berensen and W. N. Coulombe (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Psychology of Mathematics Education North America. Raleigh: North Carolina State University.
370. Saxe, G. B. (1988). Candy selling and math learning. Educational Researcher, 16(6), 14-21.
371. Saxe, G. B. (1991). Culture and cognitive development: Studies in mathematical understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
372. Schank, R. C. (1990). Tell me a story: Narrative and intelligence. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
373. Shannon, A., and Zawojewski, J. S. (1995). Performance assessment in school mathematics: New rules of the game for students. Mathematics Teacher, 88(9), 752-757.
374. Schifter, D., and Fosnot, C. T. (1993). Reconstructing mathematics education: Stories of teachers meeting the challenges of reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
375. Schmuck, R. A., and Schmuck, P. A. (1983). Group processes in the classroom. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
376. Schnepp, M. J., and Nemirovsky, R. (2001). Constructing a foundation for the fundamental theorem of calculus. In A. Cuoco and F. Curcio (Eds.), The Roles of Representations in School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Yearbook.
377. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1982). Some thoughts on problem-solving research and mathematics education. In F. K. Lester and J. Garofalo (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving: Issues in research (pp. 27-37). Philadelphia, PA: Franklin Institute Press.
378. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Metacognitive and epistemological issues in mathematical understanding. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
379. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
380. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985a). Artificial intelligence and mathematics education: A discussion of Rissland’s paper. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
381. Schoenfeld, A. H. (Ed.). (1987a). Cognitive science and mathematics education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
382. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987b). What’s all the fuss about metacognition? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
383. Schoenfeld, A. (1989). Problem solving in context(s). In R. Charles and E. Silver (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
384. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. Grows (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). New York: Macmillan.
385. Schorr, R. Y. (2000). Impact at the student level. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 19 209-231.
386. Schorr, R. Y., and Alston, A. S. (1999). Teachers evolving ways of thinking about student work. In Fernando Hitt and Manuel Santos, Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 169-177). Cuernavaca: Mexico.
387. Schorr, R. Y., and Firestone, W.A. (2001). Changing mathematics teaching in response to a state testing program: A fine-grained analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
388. Schorr, R. Y., Ginsburg, H. P. (2000). Using clinical interviews to promote pre-service teachers’ understanding of children’s mathematical thinking. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (pp. 599-605). Tucson, AZ.
389. Schorr, R. Y. and Lesh, R. (1998). Using thought-revealing activities to stimulate new instructional models for teachers. In S. Berenson, K. Dawkins, M. Blanton, W. Coulcombe, J. Kolb, K. Norwood, and L. Stiff (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. (pp. 723-731). Raleigh, NC.
390. Schroeder, T. L., and Lester, F. K. (1989). Developing understanding in mathematics via problem solving. In P. R. Trafton (Ed.), New directions for elementary school mathematics (pp. 31-56). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
391. Schwartz, J. L., and Yerushalmy, M. (1992). Getting students to function in and with algebra. In G. Harel and E. Dubinsky (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 261-289). Washington: Mathematical Association of America.
392. Schwartz, J. L., Yerushalmy, M. (1995). On the need for a bridging language for mathematical modeling. For the Learning of Mathematics 15 (2), 29-35
393. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
394. Sfard, A., and Thompson, P. (1994). Problems of reification: Representations and mathematical objects. In D. Kirshner (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education: (Vol. 1, pp. 3-34). Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University.
395. Shafer, M., and Romberg, T. (1999). Assessment in classrooms that promote understanding. In E. Fennema, E. and T. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding. (pp. 159-184) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
396. Shank, G. (1988). Three into two will go: Juxtapositional strategies for empirical research in semiotics. In J. Deely (Ed.), Semiotics 1987 (pp. 123-127). New York: University Press of America.
397. Shank, G., and Cunningham, D. (1996). Modeling the six modes of Peircean abduction for educational purposes. Available at http://www.indiana.edu/~cunningh/
398. Sharan, R. (1980). Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations. Review of Educational Research, 50, 241-271.
399. Shaughnessy, J. M., Garfield, J., and Greer, B. (1996). Data handling in the media. In I. Gal and J. B. Garfield, (Eds.), The assessment challenge in statistics education (pp. 107-121). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
400. Shell Centre for Mathematical Education. (1984). Problems with patterns and numbers. Nottingham, England: Shell Centre.
401. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
402. Sierpinska, A. (1994). Understanding in mathematics. London: The Falmer Press.
403. Silver, E. A. (1982, January). Thinking about problem solving: Toward an understanding of metacognitive aspects of mathematical problem solving. Paper presented at the Conference on Thinking, Suva, Fiji.
404. Silver, E. A. (1985). Research on teaching mathematical problem solving: Some underrepresented themes and needed directions. In E. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 247-266). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
405. Silver, E. A. (Ed.). (1985). Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
406. Silver, E. A. (1988). Teaching and assessing mathematical problem solving: Toward a research agenda. In R. I. Charles and E. A. Silver (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (pp. 273-282). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
407. Silver, E. A., Mamona-Downs, J., Leung, S. S., and Kenny P. A. (1996). Posing mathematical problems: An exploratory study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(3), 293-309.
408. Simmt, E., and Kieran, T. (2000). On being embodied in the body of mathematics: Mathematics knowing in action. In Fernandez (Ed.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. (Vol. 1, pp. 205-211). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
409. Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114-145.
410. Simon, M. A., and Schifter, D. (1991). Towards a constructivist perspective: An intervention study of mathematics teacher development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 309-331.
411. Simon, M.A., Tzur, R., Heinz, K., Kinzel, M., and Smith, M. S. (2000). Characterizing a perspective underlying the practice of mathematics teachers in transition. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 31(5), 579-601.
412. Slavin, R. (Ed.). (1989). School and classroom organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
413. Slavin, R. (1989-1990). Research on cooperative learning: Consensus and controversy. Educational Leadership, 47, 52-54.
414. Slavin, R., Sharan, S., Kagan, S., Lazarowitz, R., Webb, C., and Schmuck, R. (Eds.). (1985). Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn. New York: Plenum.
415. Smith, J. (1999). Tracking the mathematics of automobile production: Are schools failing to prepare students for work? American Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 835-878.
416. Sowder, L. K. (1985). Cognitive psychology and mathematical problem solving: A discussion of Mayer’s paper. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
417. Spiegel, M. R., and Stephens, L. J. (1999). Schaum’s outlines in statistics. (3rd Ed.). Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.
418. Spillane, J. P., and Zeuli, J. S. (1999). Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1) 1-27.
419. Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., and Anderson, D. K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 375-383). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
420. Stacey, K. (1992). Mathematical problem solving in groups: Are two heads better than one? Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 11, 261-275.
421. Steen, L. A. (1987). Mathematics education: A predictor of scientific competitiveness. Science, 237, 251-252, 302.
422. Steen, L. A. (1988). Calculus for a new century: A pump, not a filter. (MAA Notes Number 8). Washington, D C: Mathematical Association of America.
423. Steen, L. A. (1990). Pattern. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), On the shoulders of giants. New approaches to numeracy. (pp. 1-10). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
424. Steffe, L. P. (1990). Mathematics curriculum design: A constructivist’s perspective. In L. P. Steffe and T. Wood (Eds.), Transforming children’s mathematics education (pp. 389-398). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
425. Steffe, L. P. (1994). Children’s multiplying schemes. In G. Harel and J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 3-39). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
426. Steffe, L. P., Cobb, P., and von Glasersfeld, E. (1988). Construction of arithmetical meanings and strategies. New York: Springer-Verlag.
427. Steffe, L. P., and Thompson, P. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In E. Kelly, and R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science Education (pp. 267-306). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
428. Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., and Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 455-488.
429. Stein, M. K., and Smith, M. S (1998). Mathematical tasks as a framework for reflection: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(4), 268-275.
430. Sterman, J. D. (Ed.) (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
431. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ. New York: Cambridge University Press.
432. Sternberg, R. J. (1995). Expertise in complex problem solving: A comparision of alternative conceptions. In P. A. Frensch and J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solving: The European perspective (pp. 295-321). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
433. Stewart, I., and Golubitsky, M. (1992). Fearful symmetry: Is God a geometer? London: Penguin Books.
434. Stigler, J., and Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York, NY: Free Press.
435. Sutherland, R., and Balacheff, N. (1999). Didactical complexity of computational environments for learning of mathematics. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 4(1), 1-26.
436. Suydam, M. N. (1980). Untangling clues from research on problem solving. In S. Krulik (Ed.), Problem solving in school mathematics (pp. 34-50). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
437. Tall, D. (1992). The transition to advanced mathematical thinking: Function, limits, infinity, and proof. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.
438. Tall, D., and Vinner, S. (1981). Concept images and concept definitions in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151-169.
439. Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127-146). New York: Macmillan.
440. Thompson P. W. (1994). Images of rate and operational understanding of the fundamental theorem of calculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 229-274.
441. Thompson, P. W. (1994b). Students, functions, and the undergraduate curriculum. In E. Dubinsky, A. H. Schoenfeld, and J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education, 1. (Vol. 4, pp. 21-44). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
442. Thompson, P. W. and Steffe, L. (Ed.) (2000). Radical constructivism in action: Building on the pioneering work of Ernst Von Glasersfeld. Manhattan, NY: Taylor and Francis.
443. Thorndike, E. L. (1920). Intelligence and its uses. Harper’s Magazine, 140, 227-235.
444. Tierney, C., Nemirovsky, R., and Noble, T. (1996). Patterns of change. Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour Publications.
445. Tzou, C.T. (2000). Supporting students’ understanding of the relationships between data creation and data analysis. In P. Cobb (Chair), Supporting the learning of classroom communities: A case from middle school statistics. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
446. U. S. National Research Center. (1996). Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Report no. 7. Washington, DC: Author.
447. USA Today (May 24, 1996) “Yogi Berra Receives Honorary Doctorate.”
448. Van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
449. Visual Mathematics (1995). Algebra and functions [Curriculum In Hebrew] Center for Educational Technology, Tel-Aviv.
450. von Glasersfeld, E. (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 17-40). New York: Norton.
451. von Glasersfeld, E. (1990a). An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, and N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph No. 4) (pp. 19-29). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
452. von Glasersfeld, E. (1990b). Environment and communication. In L. P. Steffe and T. Wood (Eds.), Transforming children’s mathematics education (pp. 30-38). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
453. von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Taylor and Francis.
454. Vuyk, R. (1981). Overview and critique of Piaget’s genetic epistemology 1965-1980, Vol. 1. London: Academic Press.
455. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thinking and speaking. New York: Cambridge University Press.
456. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
457. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
458. Watson, J. M., and Chick, H. (in press). Factors influencing the outcomes of collaborative mathematical problem solving-An introduction. Mathematical Thinking and Learning.
459. Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 366-389.
460. Webb, N. M., Troper, J. D., and Fall, R. (1995). Constructive activity and learning in small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 406-423.
461. Weinstein, H., Rosenblum, L., Frugoli, P., Moeller, L., Osburn, J., Peirce, B., Veneri, C., and Wash, P. (1999). The many facets of skills. In Report on the American workforce. U.S. Department of Labor. (On-line). Available: http://www.bls.gov/opub/rtaw.
462. Wenger, E. (1998) Communities-of-practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
463. Wertsch, J. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
464. Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach of mediated action. London: Harvester.
465. Wertsch, J., and Toma, C. (1995). Social and cultural dimensions of knowledge. In L. Steffe and J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 175-184) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
466. Wickelgren, W. A. (1974). How to solve problems. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
467. Wigfield, A., and Eccles, J. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265-310.
468. Williams, C. G. (1998). Using concept maps to assess conceptual knowledge of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(4), 414-421.
469. Wilson, J., Fernandez, M., and Hadaway, N. (1993). Mathematical problem solving. In P. S. Wilson (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: High school mathematics. (pp. 57-78). Reston, VA: Macmillan/NCTM.
470. Wisconsin Center for Educational Research and Freudenthal Institute. (Eds.). (1998). Mathematics in context: A connected curriculum for grades 5-8.
471. Womack, J. P., and Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean thinking. New York: Simon and Schuster.
472. Wright, C. (1858). The winds and the weather. Atlantic Monthly, 1, 273.
473. Yackel, E., and Cobb, P. (1996). Socio-mathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458-77.
474. Yackel, E., Cobb, P., and Wood, T. (1991). Small-group interaction as a source of learning opportunities in second-grade mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 390-408.
475. Yackel, E., Cobb, P., Wood, T., Wheatley, G., and Merkel, G. (1990). The importance of social interaction in children’s construction of mathematical knowledge. In T. J. Cooney and C. R. Hirsch (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics in the 1990s (pp. 12-21). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers.
476. Yerushalmy, M. (1997). Mathematizing qualitative verbal descriptions of Situations: A language to support modeling. Cognition and Instruction 15(2), 207-264.
477. Yerushalmy, M., and Shternberg, B. (1993/1998). The function sketcher [Computer software]. Tel-Aviv, Israel: Center for Educational Technology.
478. Yerushalmy, M., and Shternberg, B. (2001). A visual course to the concept of function. In A. Cuoco, and F. Curcio (Eds.), The roles of representations in school mathematics. 2001 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Yearbook.
479. Young, R. M. (1983). Surrogates and mappings: Two kinds of conceptual models for interactive devices. In D. Gentner and A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models. (pp. 35-52). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.