Impact at the student level: A study of the effects of a teacher development intervention on students' mathematical thinking

Journal of Mathematical Behavior

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 209-231

  Schorr, Roberta Y ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Mathematics education; Problem solving; Teacher development

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042185340     PISSN: 07323123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0732-3123(00)00045-6     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alston A.S., Davis R.B., Maher C.A., Schorr R.Y. A framework for assessing teacher development. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. vol. 3:1995;272-279 Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
2. Baroody A.J., Ginsburg H.P. A cognitive view of children's mathematical learning. Davis R.B., Maher C.A., Noddings N. Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph No. 4:1990;51-78 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.
3. Clement J. Analysis of clinical interviews: foundations and model viability. Kelly A.E., Lesh R. Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. 2000;547-590 Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
4. Cobb P., Wood T., Yackel E. Classrooms as learning environments for teachers and researchers. Davis R.B., Maher C.A., Noddings N. Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. 1990;140-168 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.
5. Cobb P., Wood T., Yackel E., McNeal E. Mathematics as procedural instructions and mathematics as meaningful activity: the reality of teaching for understanding. Davis R.B., Maher C.A. Schools, mathematics and the world of reality. 1993;119-134 Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.
6. Damarian S. Fairness in dealing: diversity, psychology, and mathematics education. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. 1:1995;30-53. Columbus, OH.
7. Davis R.B. Learning mathematics: the cognitive science approach to mathematics education. 1984;Routledge, London, England.
8. Davis, R. B. (1996). A report presented to the Johnson & Johnson.
9. Davis R.B., Maher C.A., Noddings N. Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph No. 4:1990;1-4 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.
10. Dilworth R.P., Warren L. Final report: specialized teacher project, 1971-72. 1973;California State Department of Education, Sacramento, CA.
11. Esty E.T., Hall E.R., Fisch S.M. Children's problem-solving behavior and their attitudes toward mathematics: a study of the effects of Square One TV on children's problem solving. vol. II:1990;Children's Television Workshop, New York, NY.
12. Fennema E., Carpenter T.P., Franke M.L., Levi L., Jacobs V.R., Empson S.B. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education. 27(4):1996;403-434.
13. Ginsburg H.P. Entering the child's mind: the clinical interview in psychological research and practice. 1997;Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
14. Ginsburg H.P., Jacobs S.F., Lopez L.S. The teachers guide to flexible interviewing in the classroom: learning what children know about math. 1998;Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.
15. Goldsmith L.T., Schifter D. Characteristics of a model for the development of mathematics teaching. Reports and papers in progress. 1993;Center for Learning, Teaching and Technology, Education Development Center, Newton, MA.
16. Howson G., Keitel C., Kilpatrick J. Curriculum development in mathematics. 1981;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England.
17. Lesh R., Clarke D. Formulating operational definitions of desired outcomes of instruction in mathematics and science education. Kelly A.E., Lesh R. Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. 2000;113-150 Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
18. Lesh R., Hoover M., Kelly A. Equity, assessment, and thinking mathematically: principles for the design of model-eliciting activities. Wirszup I, Streit R. Developments in school mathematics education around the world. Proceedings of the Third UCSMP International Conference on Mathematics Education. vol. 3:1992;104-129 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.
19. Lesh R., Lamon S.J., Behr M., Lester F. Future directions for mathematical assessment. Lesh R., Lamon S.J. Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics. 1992;379-426 AAAS Press, College Station, TX.
20. Maher C.A. Is dealing with mathematics as a thoughtful subject compatible with maintaining satisfactory test scores? A nine-year study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 10(3):1991;225-248.
21. Maher C.A., Alston A.S. Is meaning connected to symbols? Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 8(3):1989;241-248.
22. Maher C.A., Davis R.B., Alston A. Implementing a "thinking curriculum" in mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 10(3):1991;219-224.
23. Maher C.A., Davis R.B., Alston A.S. Brian's representations and development of mathematical knowledge: a 4-year study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 10(2):1991;163-210.
24. Overview and analysis of school mathematics, Grades K-12. 1975;Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, National Advisory Committee on Mathematical Education, Washington, DC.
25. Peel T., Rockwell A., Esty E., Gonzer K. Square One Television: the comprehensive and problem-solving study: final report. 1987;Children's Television Workshop, New York, NY.
26. Romberg T.A., Wilson L.D. Issues related to the development of an authentic assessment system for school mathematics. Romberg T.A. Reform in school mathematics and authentic assessment. 1995;State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
27. Schorr, R. Y. (1996). Does dealing with mathematics as a thoughtful subject influence the mathematical achievement of urban students? Unpublished doctoral dissertation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
28. Schorr R.Y., Lesh R. Using thought-revealing activities to stimulate new instructional models for teachers. Berenson S., Dawkins K., Blanton M., Coulcombe W., Kolb J., Norwood K., Stiff L. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. 1998;723-731. Raleigh, NC.
29. Schorr R.Y., Maher C.A., Davis R.B. Does teaching mathematics as a thoughtful subject influence the problem-solving behaviors of urban students? Proceedings of the 21st International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Finland. 1997.
30. Simon M.A., Tzur R. Exploring the teacher's perspective from the researchers' perspectives: generating accounts of mathematics teachers' practice. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education. 30(3):1999;252-264.
31. Stake R.E. The invalidity of standardized testing for measuring mathematics achievement. Romberg T.A. Reform in school mathematics and authentic assessment. 1995;State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
32. Steinberg L. Beyond the classroom. 1996;Simon & Schuster, New York.
33. Wood T., Sellers P. Assessment of a problem-centered mathematics program: third grade. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education. 27(3):1997;337-353.