Understanding Special Educational Needs: A Guide for Student Teachers

Understanding Special Educational Needs: A Guide for Student Teachers

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-160

  Farrell, Michael ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85139696660     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203562789     Document Type: Book

References (103)

1. Ainscow, M. (1999) Understanding the Development of Inclusive Schools, London: Falmer Press.
2. Bailey, J. (1998) ‘Australia; inclusion through categorisation’, in T. Booth and M. Ainscow (eds) From Them to Us: An International Study of Inclusion in Education, London: Routledge.
3. Ballard, K. (1995) ‘Inclusion, paradigms, power and participation’, in C. Clarke, A. Dyson and A. Millward (eds) Towards Inclusive Schools?, London: David Fulton Publishers.
4. Barton, L. (1995) ‘The politics of education for all’, Support for Learning, 10, 4, 156-160.
5. Berger, A., Henderson, J. and Morris, D. (1999) Implementing the Literacy Hour for Pupils with Learning Difficulties, London: David Fulton.
6. Booth, T. and Ainscow, M. (1998) From Them to Us: An International Study of Inclusion in Education, London: Routledge.
7. Booth, T., Ainscow, M., Black-Hawkins, K., Vaughn, M. and Shaw, L. (2000) Index for Inclusion: Developing Learning and Participation in Schools, Bristol: Centre for Studies in Inclusive Education.
8. British Psychological Society (1999) Dyslexia, Literacy and Psychological Assessment, Leicester: BPS.
9. Brooks, G. (2002) What Works for Children with Learning Difficulties? The Effectiveness of Intervention Schemes, London: Department for Education and Skills.
10. Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education (undated) brochure Inclusive Education: The Right to Belong to the Mainstream, Bristol: CSIE.
11. Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education (1999) The Inclusion Charter: Ending Segregation in Education for All Children and Young People with Disabilities and Learning Difficulties, Bristol: CSIE.
12. Clarke, C., Dyson, A. Millward, A. and Robson, S. (1999) ‘Theories of inclusion, theories of schools: deconstructing and reconstructing the inclusive school’, British Educational Research Journal, 25(2), 157-177.
13. Cline, T. (1997) ‘Special educational needs and language proficiency’, in C. Leung and C. Cable (eds) English as an Additional Language: Changing Perspectives, Watford: National Association for Language Development in the Curriculum.
14. Croll, P. and Moses, D. (1985) One in Five: The Assessment and Incidence of Special Educational Needs, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
15. Croll, P. and Moses, D. (2000) ‘Discussants’ papers - Paper 3: Resources, policies and educational practice’, in B. Norwich (ed.) Policy Options Steering Group: Policy Option Paper 2 (3rd Series), Tamworth: National Association for Special Educational Needs.
16. Crutchley, A., Botting, N. and Conti-Ramsden, G. (1997a) ‘Bilingualism and specific language impairment in children attending language units’, European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 32, 267-276.
17. Crutchley, A., Conti-Ramsden, G. and Botting, N. (1997b) ‘Bilingual children with specific language impairment and standardised assessment: preliminary findings from a study of children in language units’, International Journal of Bilingualism, 1(2), 117-134.
18. Cummins, J. (1984) Bilingualism and Special Education: Issues in Assessment and Pedagogy, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
19. Daniels, H., Hey, V., Leonard, D. and Smith, M. (1999) ‘Issues of equity in special needs education from a gender perspective’, British Journal of Special Education, 26(4), 189-195.
20. Daniels, A. and Williams, H. (2000) ‘Reducing the need for exclusions and statements for behaviour: The framework for intervention (Part 1)’, Educational Psychology in Practice, 15(4), 220-227.
21. Department for Education and Employment (1997) Excellence for All Children: Meeting Special Educational Needs, London: DfEE.
22. Department for Education and Employment (1998a) Meeting Special Educational Needs: A Programme of Action, London: DfEE.
23. Department for Education and Employment (1998b) The National Literacy Strategy: Framework for Teaching, London: DfEE.
24. Department for Education and Employment (1999a) Circular 10/99 Social Inclusion: Pupil Support, London: DfEE.
25. Department for Education and Employment (1999b) Circular 11/99 Social Inclusion: The LEA Role in Pupil Support, London: DfEE.
26. Department for Education and Employment (1999c) The National Numeracy Strategy: Framework for Teaching Mathematics from Reception to Year 6, London: DfEE.
27. Department for Education and Employment (2000a) Educational Psychology Service (England): Current Role, Good Practice and Future Directions - Report of the Working Group, London: DfEE.
28. Department for Education and Employment (2000b) Educational Psychology Service (England): Current Role, Good Practice and Future Directions - The Research Report, London: DfEE.
29. Department for Education and Employment (2000c) The Role of the Local Education Authority in School Education, London: DfEE.
30. Department for Education and Employment (2000d) SEN Code of Practice on the Identification and Assessment of Pupils with Special Educational Needs and SEN Thresholds: Good Practice Guidelines on Identification and Provision for Pupils with Special Educational Needs, London: DfEE.
31. Department for Education and Employment (2001a) Supporting the Target Setting Process (Revised March 2001): Guidance for Effective Target Setting for Pupils with Special Educational Needs, London: DfEE.
32. Department for Education and Employment (2001b) The Key Stage 3 National Strategy: Literacy Across the Curriculum, London: DfEE.
33. Department for Education and Employment (2001c) The Key Stage 3 National Strategy: Numeracy Teaching Units for Summer Schools, London: DfEE.
34. Department for Education and Employment (2001d) The Key Stage 3 National Strategy: Numeracy Across the Curriculum Notes for School Based Training London: DfEE.
35. Department for Education and Employment/Department of Health (2000) Guidance on the Education of Children and Young People in Public Care, London: DfEE/DoH.
36. Department for Education and Employment/Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (1999a) The National Curriculum: Handbook for Primary Teachers in England Key Stages 1 and 2, London: DfEE/QCA.
37. Department for Education and Employment/Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (1999b) The National Curriculum: Handbook for Secondary Teachers in England Key Stages 3 and 4, London: DfEE/QCA.
38. Department for Education and Skills (2000) Special Educational Needs Code of Practice London: DFES
39. Department for Education and Skills (2000a) Governors’ Annual Reports and School Prospectuses in Primary Schools, London: DfES.
40. Department for Education and Skills (2000b) Governors’ Annual Reports and School Prospectuses in Secondary Schools, London: DfES.
41. Department for Education and Skills (2001a) Special Educational Needs Code of Practice, London: DfES.
42. Department for Education and Skills (2001b) SEN Toolkit Section 2: Parent Partnership Services, London: DfEE.
43. Department for Education and Skills (2001c) SEN Toolkit Section 3: Resolution of Disagreements, London: DfEE.
44. Department for Education and Skills (2001d) SEN Toolkit-Section 5: Managing Individual Education Plans, London: DfEE.
45. Department for Education and Skills (2001e) The National Numeracy Strategy; Towards the National Curriculum for Mathematics: Examples of What Pupils with Special Educational Needs Should Be Able to Do at Each P Level, London: DfES.
46. Department for Education and Skills (2002) The Induction Period for Newly Qualified Teachers, London: DfES.
47. Department of Health/Department of Education and Employment/Home Office (2000) Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families, London: The Stationery Office.
48. Deponio, P., Landon, J., Mullin, K. and Reid, G. (1999) ‘An audit of the processes involved in identifying and assessing bilingual learners suspected of being dyslexic: a Scottish study’, paper presented at the Multilingualism and Dyslexia: British Dyslexia Association International Conference, Manchester, 17-19 June.
49. Disability Rights Commission (2001a) Draft Code of Practice (Schools) DRC: Special Educational Needs and Disability Act 2001, London: The Stationery Office.
50. Disability Rights Commission (2001b) Code of Practice (Post 16): New Duties from 2002 in the Provision of Post 16 Education and Related Services for Disabled People and Students, London: The Stationery Office.
51. Dowling, E. and Osborne, E. (1994) The Family and the School: A Joint Systems Approach to Problems with Children, London: Routledge.
52. Farrell, M. (1999) Key Issues for Primary Schools, London: Routledge.
53. Farrell, M. (2001a) Key Issues for Secondary Schools, London: Routledge.
54. Farrell, M. (2001b) Standards and Special Educational Needs, London: Continuum.
55. Farrell, M. (2002) Special Education Handbook, 3rd edn, London: David Fulton Publishers.
56. Farrell, M. (2003) ‘The role of the special needs officer’, Special Educational Needs Briefing, Kingston upon Thames: Croner.
57. Farrell, M., Kerry, T. and Kerry, C. (1995) The Blackwell Handbook of Education, Oxford: Blackwell.
58. Frederickson, N., Frith, U. and Reason, R. (1997) Phonological Assessment Battery, Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
59. Frederickson, N. and Cline, T. (2002) Special Educational Needs, Inclusion and Diversity: A Textbook, Buckingham: Open University Press.
60. Garner, P. (2000) ‘Pretzel only policy? Inclusion and the real world of teacher education’, British Journal of Special Education, 27(3), 111-116.
61. Garner, P. (2001) ‘Goodbye Mr Chips: special needs, inclusive education and the deceit of initial teacher training’, in T. O’Brien (ed.) Enabling Inclusion: Blue Skies… Dark Clouds, London: The Stationery Office.
62. Garner, P. and Davies, J. D. (2001) Introducing Special Educational Needs: A Companion Guide for Student Teachers, London: David Fulton Publishers.
63. Gordon, M. and Williams, A. (2002) Special Educational Needs and Disability in Mainstream School: A Governors’ Guide, Stafford: National Association of Special Educational Needs.
64. Gross, J., Berger, A. and Garnett, J. (1999) ‘Special needs and the literacy hour: Some general principles’, in A. Berger and J. Gross (eds) Teaching the Literacy Hour in an Inclusive Classroom, London: David Fulton Publishers.
65. Hall, D. (1995) Assessing the Needs of Bilingual Pupils: Living in Two Languages, London: David Fulton Publishers.
66. Harter, S. (1985) Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Children, Denver, CO: University of Denver.
67. Kelly, B. (1999) ‘Circle time: a systems approach to emotional and behavioural difficulties’, Educational Psychology in Practice, 15(1), 40-44.
68. Keogh, B. K., Gallimore, R. and Weisner, T. (1997) ‘A sociocultural perspective on learning and learning disabilities’, Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 12(2), 107-113.
69. Lingard, T. (2001) ‘Does the Code of Practice help secondary SENCOs to improve learning?’, British Journal of Special Education, 28(4), December.
70. Martin, D. (2000) ‘Communication difficulties in a multicultural context’, in J. Law, S. Parkinson, R. Tamhne (eds) Communication Difficulties in Childhood: A Practical Guide, Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press.
71. Mittler, P. (2000) Working Towards Inclusion: Social Contexts, London: David Fulton Publishers.
72. Moore, J. (2000) ‘Developments in additional resources allocation to promote greater inclusion (SEN)’, in B. Norwich (ed.) Policy Options Steering Group: Policy Option Paper 2 (3rd Series), Tamworth: National Association for Special Educational Needs.
73. Mortimore, P., Sammons, P. and Echob, R. (1988) School Matters: The Junior Years, Salisbury: Open Books.
74. Mutter, V., Hulme, C. and Snowling, M. (1997) Phonological Abilities Test, London: The Psychological Corporation.
75. Norwich, B. (2000) ‘Inclusion in education: from concepts, values and critique to practice’, in H. Daniels (ed.) Special Education Re-formed: Beyond Rhetoric?, London: Falmer Press.
76. Office for Standards in Education (1999a) Inspection of Newham Local Education Authority January 1999, London: OfSTED.
77. Office for Standards in Education (1999b) Special Education 1994-1998: A Review of Special Schools, Secure Units and Pupil Referral Units in England, London: The Stationery Office.
78. Office for Standards in Education (1999c) Handbook for Inspecting Primary and Nursery Schools with Guidance on Self-Evaluation, London: OfSTED.
79. Office for Standards in Education (1999d) Handbook for Inspecting Secondary Schools with Guidance on Self-Evaluation, London: OfSTED.
80. Office for Standards in Education (2000) Evaluating Educational Inclusion: Guidance for Inspectors and Schools, London: OfSTED.
81. Office for Standards in Education (2002) Information and Communications Technology: Efect of Government Initiatives: Pupils’ Achievement, London: OfSTED.
82. Ostad, S. A. (1997) ‘Developmental differences in addition strategies: a comparison of mathematically disabled and mathematically normal children’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 345-357.
83. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (2001a) Planning, Teaching and Assessing the Curriculum for Pupils with Learning Difficulties: General Guidelines, London: QCA.
84. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (2001b) Planning, Teaching and Assessing the Curriculum for Pupils with Learning Difficulties: English, London: QCA.
85. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (2001c) Planning, Teaching and Assessing the Curriculum for Pupils with Learning Difficulties: Mathematics, London: QCA.
86. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority/Department for Education and Employment (2001) Supporting the Target Setting Process: Guidance for Efective Target Setting for Pupils with Special Educational Needs, London: QCA/DfEE.
87. Reid, M. K. and Borkowski, J. G. (1987) ‘Causal attributions of hyperactive children: implications for teaching strategies and self-control’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 296-307.
88. Riddell, S. (1996) ‘Gender and special educational needs’, in G. Lloyd (ed.) Knitting Progress Unsatisfactory: Gender and Special Issues in Education, Edinburgh: Moray House Publications.
89. Riddell, S., Brown, S. and Duffield, J. (1994) ‘Parental power and special educational needs: the case of specific learning difficulties’, British Educational Research Journal, 20(3), 327-345.
90. Robertson, C. (1999) ‘Initial teacher education and inclusive schooling’, Support for Learning, 14(4), 169-173.
91. Rose, R. (2002) ‘Primary school teacher perceptions of the conditions required to include pupils with special educational needs’, Educational Review, 53(2), 147-155.
92. Schon, D. A. (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
93. Slee, R. (1996) ‘Disability, class and poverty: school structures and policing identities’, in C. Christensen and F. Rizvi (eds) Disability and the Dilemmas of Education and Justice, Buckingham: Open University Press.
94. Snowling, M. (1998) ‘Dyslexia as a phonological deficit: evidence and implications’, Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review, 3(1), 4-11.
95. Solity, J. (1996) ‘Discrepancy definitions of dyslexia: an assessment through teaching approach’, Educational Psychology in Practice, 12(3), 141-151.
96. Stanovich, K. E. and Stanovich, P. J. (1997) ‘Further thought on aptitude/ achievement discrepancy’, Educational Psychology in Practice, 13(1), 3-8.
97. Teacher Training Agency (1998) The National Standards for Special Educational Needs Co-ordinators, London: TTA.
98. Teacher Training Agency (2002a) Qualifying to Teach: Professional Standards for Qualified Teacher Status and Requirements for Initial Teacher Training, London: TTA.
99. Teacher Training Agency (2002b) Induction Standards (Draft Proposals for September 2002), London: TTA.
100. Teacher Training Agency (2002c) Handbook of Guidance on QTS Standards and ITT Requirements, London: TTA.
101. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (1994) World Conference on Special Needs Education: Access and Quality, Paris: UNESCO.
102. Wade, J. (1999) ‘Including all learners: QCA’s approach’, British Journal of Special Education, 26(2), 80-82.
103. Winter, K. (1999) ‘Speech and language therapy provision for bilingual children: aspects of the current service’, International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 34(1), 85-98.