The rhetoric of precaution

The Reality of Precaution: Comparing Risk Regulation in the United States and Europe

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 3-35

  Wiener, Jonathan B ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85123902985     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (161)

1. Alemanno, Alberto. 2007. Trade in Food: Regulatory and Judicial Approaches in the EC and the WTO. London: Cameron May.
2. Ansell, Christopher, and David Vogel. 2006. What's the Beef? The Contested Governance of European Food Safty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Applegate, John. 2000. The Precautionary Preference: An American Perspective on the Precautionary Principle. Human Ecological Risk Assessment 6: 413-443.
4. Arnold, M. L. 1997. Natural Hybridization and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Ash, Timothy Garton. 2003. Anti-Europeanism in America. New York Review of Books (February 13): 32-34.
6. Ashenfelter, Orley, Theodore Eisenberg, and Stewart J. Schwab. 1995. Politics and the Judiciary: The Influence of Judicial Background on Case Outcomes. Journal of Legal Studies 24: 257-281.
7. Baker, Randall, eds. 1997. Environmental Law and Policy in the EU and the US. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing.
8. Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society. London: Sage.
9. Berlin, Isaiah. 1953. The Hedgehog and the Fox: An Essay on Tolstoy's View of History. New York: Simon and Schuster.
10. Bernauer, Thomas, and Erika Meins. 2003. Technological Revolution Meets Policy and the Market: Explaining Cross-National Differences in Agricultural Biotechnology Regulation. European Journal of Political Research 42: 643-684.
11. Bernstein, Peter L. 1996. Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
12. Blake, William. 1814. Annotations to Sir Joshua Reynolds' Discourses. In The Complete Poetry and Prose of William Blake (rev. ed.; 1988), edited by David V. Erdman. New York: Anchor Books.
13. Blomquist, William. 2007. The Policy Process and Large-N Comparative Studies. In Theories of the Policy Process.2nd ed., edited by Paul A. Sabatier. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 261-291.
14. Bodansky, Daniel. 2004. Deconstructing the Precautionary Principle. In Bringing New Law to Ocean Waters,edited by D. D. Caron and H. N. Scheiber. Leiden, Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV.
15. Boehmer-Christiansen, S. 1994. The Precautionary Principle in Germany: Enabling Government. In Interpreting the Precautionary Principle,edited by Timothy O'Riordan and James Cameron. London: Cameron May, 31-60.
16. Bourg, Dominique, and Jean-Louis Schlegel. 2001. Parer aux Risques de Demain: Le Principe de Précaution. Paris: Seuil.
17. Brady, Henry E., and David Collier, eds. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Berkeley, CA: Rowman and Littlefield and Berkeley Public Policy Press.
18. Breggin, Linda, Robert Falkner, Nico Jaspers, John Pendergrass, and Read Porter. 2009. Securing the Promise of Nanotechnologies: Towards Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation. London: Chatham House.
19. Breyer, Stephen, and Veerle Heyvaert. 2000. Institutions for Regulating Risk. In Environmental Law, the Economy, and Sustainable Development: The United States, the European Union, and the International Community,edited by Richard L. Revesz, Phillipe Sands, and Richard B. Stewart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 283-352.
20. Brickman, Ronald, Sheila Jasanoff, and Thomas Ilgen. 1985. Controlling Chemicals: The Politics of Regulation in Europe and the United States.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21. Brizendine, Louann. 2006. The Female Brain.New York: Broadway/Morgan Road Books.
22. Butti, Luciano. 2007. The Precautionary Principle in Environmental Law: Neither Arbitrary nor Capricious if Interpreted with Equilibrium. Milan: Giuffré Editore.
23. Cameron, James, and Juli Abouchar. 1991. The Precautionary Principle: A Fundamental Principle of Law and Policy for the Protection of the Global Environment. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 14: 1-27.
24. Cameron, James, and Juli Abouchar. 1996. The Status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law. In The Precautionary Principle and International Law,edited by David Freestone and Ellen Hey. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 29-52.
25. Charnovitz, Steven. 2000. The Supervision of Health and Biosafety Regulation by World Trade Rules. Tulane Environmental Law Journal 13: 271-302.
26. Christoforou, Theofanis. 2004. The Precautionary Principle, Risk Assessment, and the Comparative Role of Science in the European Community and the United States Legal Systems. In Green Giants? Environmental Policies of the United States and the European Union,edited by Norman J. Vig and Michael G. Faure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 17-52.
27. Cone, Marla. 2005. Europe's Rules Forcing US Firms to Clean Up. Los Angeles Times, May 16.
28. Cross, Frank. 1996. Paradoxical Perils of the Precautionary Principle. Washington and Lee Law Review 53: 851-925.
29. Daalder, Ivo. 2001. Are the United States and Europe Headed for Divorce? International Affairs 77: 553-557.
30. Daley, Suzanne. 2000. Europe's Dim View of U.S. Is Evolving into Frank Hostility. New York Times, April 9, A1.
31. de Sadeleer, Nicholas. 2002. Environmental Principles: From Political Slogans to Legal Rules.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. de Sadeleer, Nicholas., ed. 2007. Implementing Precaution: Approaches from Nordic Countries, the EU, and the USA. London: Earthscan.
33. de Sadeleer, Nicholas. 2009. The Precautionary Principle as a Device for Greater Environmental Protection: Lessons from the EC Courts. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 18 (April): 3-10.
34. Desai, Uday, ed. 2002. Environmental Politics and Policy in Industrialized Countries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. de Tocqueville, Alexis. 1840. Democracy in America,Online version available from the University of Virginia at http://xroads.virginia.edu/~ HYPER/DETOC/toc_indx.html (accessed October 19, 2010).
36. Dryzek, John S. 1997. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Dryzek, John S. 2006. Deliberative Global Politics: Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
38. Dryzek, John S. 2007. Paradigms and Discourses. In Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, edited by Daniel Bodansky, Jutta Brunnee, and Ellen Hey. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 44-62.
39. Dwyer, John P., Richard W. Brooks, and Alan C. Marco. 2000. The Air Pollution Permit Process for U.S. and German Automobile Assembly Plants. In Regulatory Encounters: Multinational Corporations and American Adversarial Legalism,edited by Robert A. Kagan and Lee Axelrad. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 173-224.
40. The Economist.2004. The Price of Prudence. January 22. www.economist.com/surveys/displaystory. cfm?story_id=2347855 (accessed July 23, 2009).
41. Esty, Daniel, and Michael Porter. 2005. National Environmental Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Policy Results and Determinants. Environment and Development Economics 10: 391-434.
42. European Commission. 2000. Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle. Doc. COM(2000)1. February 2. Brussels.
43. Fisher, Elizabeth, Judith Jones and Rene von Schomberg, eds. 2006. Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Perspectives and Prospects.Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
44. Freestone, David. 1991. The Precautionary Principle. In International Law and Global Climate Change,edited by Robin Churchill and David Freestone. London: Graham and Trotman.
45. Godard, Olivier. 2006. The Precautionary Principle and Catastrophism on Tenterhooks: Lessons from Constitutional Reform in France. In Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Perspectives and Prospects,edited by Elizabeth Fisher, Judith Jones, and Rene von Schomberg. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 63-87.
46. Goklany, Indur. 2001. The Precautionary Principle: A Critical Appraisal of Environmental Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
47. Goodman, Ellen. 2007. The Mythical Chat Gap Boston Globe, July 20.
48. Graham, John D., and Jonathan Baert Wiener, eds. 1995. Risk vs. Risk: Tradeoffs in Protecting Health and the Environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49. Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice, eds. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50. Hammitt, James K., Jonathan B. Wiener, Brendon Swedlow, Denise Kall, and Zheng Zhou. 2005. Precautionary Regulation in Europe and the United States: A Quantitative Comparison. Risk Analysis 25: 1215-1228.
51. Harremoes, Poul, David Gee, Malcolm MacGarvin, Andy Stirling, Jane Keys, Brian Wynne, and Sofia Guedes Vaz, eds. 2002. The Precautionary Principle in the Twentieth Century: Late Lessons from Early Warnings.London: Earthscan.
52. Harrington, Winston, Richard D. Morgenstern, and Thomas Sterner, eds. 2004. Choosing Environmental Policy: Comparing Instruments and Outcomes in the United States and Europe. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.
53. Henningsen, Jorgen. 1992. The Seven Principles of European Environmental Policies Toward a Transatlantic Environmental Policy. Washington DC: European Institute, 25-26.
54. Hinich, Melvin, and Michael Munger. 1998. Empirical Studies in Comparative Politics. Public Choice 97: 219-227.
55. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1986. Risk Management and Political Culture. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
56. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1998. Contingent Knowledge: Implications for Implementation and Compliance. In Engaging Countries: Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords,edited by E. Brown Weiss and H. Jacobson. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Jasanoff, Sheila. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58. Jordana, Jacint, David Levi-Faur, and Xavier Fernandez i Marin. 2008. The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Agencies and the Restructuring of the State. Draft. http://poli.haifa.ac.il/~ levi/jlx.pdf (accessed January 11, 2009).
59. Kagan, Robert. 2003. Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order. New York: Knopf.
60. Kagan, Robert A. 2007. Globalization and Legal Change: The "Americanization" of European Law? Regulation and Governance 1: 99-120.
61. Kagan, Robert A., and Lee Axelrad, eds. 2000. Regulatory Encounters: Multinational Corporations and American Adversarial Legalism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
62. Kelemen, R. Daniel. 2004. Environmental Federalism in the United States and the European Union. In Green Giants: Environmental Policies of the United States and the European Union,edited by Norman Vig and Michael Faure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 113-134.
63. Kelemen, R. Daniel, and David Vogel. 2010. Trading Places: The Role of the US and EU in International Environmental Politics. Comparative Political Studies 43: 427-456.
64. Kelman, Steven. 1981. Regulating America, Regulating Sweden: A Comparative Study of Occupational Safety and Health Policy. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
65. Kempton, Willett, and Paul P. Craig. 1993. European Perspectives on Global Climate Change. Environment (April) 16-20, 41-45.
66. King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
67. Kobe, Andrej, and Katerina Varenne. 2010. Europe Fights Particle Pollution: Insight into Implementation of EU Law. Natural Resources and Environment 24 (4): 30-33, 63.
68. Kohut, Andrew, and Bruce Stokes. 2006. America Against the World: How We Are Different and Why We Are Disliked.New York: Times Books.
69. Kramer, Ludwig. 2004. The Roots of Divergence: A European Perspective. In Green Giants? Environmental Policies of the United States and the European Union,edited by Norman J. Vig and Michael G. Faure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 53-72.
70. La Porta, Rafael,Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes,and Andrei Shleifer.2008. The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins. Journal of Economic Literature 46: 285-332.
71. La Rochefoucauld, Francois. 1665 [1946]. Moral Maxim No. 106. Maximes,61. Montreal: Les Editions Variétés.
72. Lazarus, Richard. 2004. The Making of Environmental Law.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
73. Levi-Faur, David. 2004. Comparative Research Designs in the Study of Regulation: How to Increase the Number of Cases without Compromising the Strengths of Case-Oriented Analysis. In The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age ofGovernance,edited by Jacint Jordana and David Levi-Faur. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 177-199.
74. Levi-Faur, David. 2005. The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598: 12-32.
75. Levy, David L., and Peter Newell. 2000. Oceans Apart? Business Responses to Global Environmental Issues in Europe and the United States. Environment (November): 9-10.
76. Lieberman, Evan S. 2005. Nested Analysis as aMixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research. American Political Science Review 99: 435-452.
77. Lindseth, Peter L., Alfred C. Aman Jr., and Alan C. Raul. 2008. Administrative Law of the European Union: Oversight. Chicago: American Bar Association (ABA).
78. Loewenberg, Samuel. 2003. Precaution Is for Europeans. New York Times,May 18, 2003.
79. Lofstedt, Ragnar. 2004. The Swing of the Regulatory Pendulum in Europe: From Precautionary Principle to (Regulatory) Impact Analysis. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 28: 237-260.
80. Lofstedt, Ragnar, and David Vogel. 2001. The Changing Character of Regulation: A Comparison of Europe and the United States. Risk Analysis 21: 399-405.
81. Lynch, Diahanna, and David Vogel. 2000. Apples and Oranges: Comparing the Regulation of Genetically Modified Food in Europe and the United States. Paper prepared for the American Political Science Association annual meeting. August 31 -September 3.
82. Lynch, Diahanna, and David Vogel. 2001. The Regulation of GMOs in Europe and the United States: A Case-Study of Contemporary European Regulatory Politics. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
83. Marchant, Gary E., and Kenneth L. Mossman. 2004. Arbitrary and Capricious: The Precautionary Principle in the EU Courts. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
84. Markovits, Andrei. 2007. Uncouth Nation: Why Europe Dislikes America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
85. McIntyre, Owen, and Thomas Mosedale. 1997. The Precautionary Principle as a Norm of Customary International Law. Journal of Environmental Law 9: 221-241.
86. Mehl, M. R., S. Vazire, N. Ramirez-Esparza, R. B. Slatcher, and J. W. Pennebaker. 2007. Are Women Really More Talkative Than Men? Science 317 (July 6): 82.
87. Mock, Douglas W. 2004. More Than Kin and Less Than Kind: The Evolution of Family Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
88. Mokdad, Ali H., James S. Marks, Donna F. Stroup, and Julie L. Gerberding. 2004. Actual Causes of Death in the United States, 2000. Journal of the American Medical Association 291: 1238-1245.
89. Morris, Julian, ed. 2000. Rethinking Risk and the Precautionary Principle.London: ButterworthHeinemann.
90. NAS/NRC (National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council). 1983. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
91. Patten, Chris. 2006. Cousins and Strangers: America, Britain and Europe in a New Century.New York: Times Books.
92. Peretti-Watel, Patrick. 2000. Sociologie du Risque. Paris: Armand-Colin.
93. Peretti-Watel, Patrick. 2001. La Société du Risque.Paris: Editions La Découverte.
94. Pollack, Mark A., and Gregory C. Shaffer, eds. 2001. Transatlantic Governance in the Global Economy. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
95. Pollack, Mark A., and Gregory C. Shaffer, eds. 2009. When Cooperation Fails: The International Law and Politics of Genetically Modified Foods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
96. Posner, Richard A. 2003. Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
97. Posner, Richard A. 2004. Catastrophe: Risk and Response. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
98. Priest, George L. 1977. The Common Law Process and the Selection of Efficient Rules. Journal of Legal Studies 6: 65-82.
99. Priest, George, and Benjamin Klein. 1984. The Selection of Disputes for Litigation. Journal of Legal Studies 13: 1-55.
100. Raffensperger, Carolyn, and Joel Tickner, eds. 1999. Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle. Washington, DC: Island Press.
101. Redwood, John. 2001. Stars and Strife: The Coming Conflicts between the USA and the European Union. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave.
102. Rehbinder, Eckard, and Richard Stewart. 1985. Environmental Protection Policy: Legal Integration in the United States and the European Community.New York: De Gruyter.
103. Reid, T. R. 2001. In Europe, the Ordinary Takes aFrightening Turn: Health Scares Confound Continent. Washington Post,March 1, A01.
104. Reid, T. R. 2004. The United States of Europe: The New Superpower and the End of American Supremacy. New York: Penguin Press.
105. Renn, Ortwin, and Bernd Rohrmann, eds. 2000. Cross-Cultural Risk Perception: A Survey of Empirical Studies. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
106. Richter, Stephan-Götz. 2000. The U.S. Consumer's Friend. New York Times Sept. 21, A31.
107. Rifkin, Jeremy. 2004. The European Dream.New York: Tarcher/Penguin.
108. Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1995. Controlling Environmental Policy: The Limits of Public Law in Germany and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
109. Rose-Ackerman, Susan, and Peter Lindseth,eds. 2010. Comparative Administrative Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
110. Sand, Peter H. 2000. The Precautionary Principle: A European Perspective. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 6: 445-458.
111. Sandin, Per. 1999. Dimensions of the Precautionary Principle. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 5: 889-907.
112. Sands, Philippe. 1995. Principles of International Environmental Law.New York: Manchester University Press.
113. Schapiro, Mark. 2004. New Power for 'Old Europe.' The Nation,Dec. 27. www.thenation.com/doc/20041227/schapiro (accessed December 21, 2005).
114. Schreurs, Miranda. 2002. Environmental Politics in Japan, Germany, and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
115. Scruggs, Lyle. 1999. Institutions and Environmental Performance in Seventeen Western Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 29: 1-31.
116. Scruggs, Lyle. 2001. Is There Really aLink between Neo-Corporatism and Environmental Performance? Updated Evidence and New Data for the 1980s and 1990s. British Journal of Political Science 31: 686-692.
117. Scruggs, Lyle. 2003. Sustaining Abundance: Environmental Performance in Industrialized Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
118. Scruggs, Lyle. 2009. Democracy and Environmental Protection: An Empirical Analysis. Draft of April 2009. http://sp.uconn.edu/~scruggs/mpsa09e.pdf (accessed August 5, 2009).
119. Selin, Henrik, and Stacy VanDeveer. 2006. Raising Global Standards. Environment 48 (10): 6-17.
120. Sen, Amartya. 2006. Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny.New York: Norton.
121. Servan-Schreiber, Jean-Jacques. 1967. Le DefiAmericain [The American Challenge].Paris: Denoël.
122. Siegelman, Peter, and John J. Donohue III. 1990. Studying the Iceberg from Its Tip: A Comparison of Published and Unpublished Employment Discrimination Cases. Law and Society Review 24: 1133-1170.
123. Simmons, Beth A., Frank Dobbin, and Geoffrey Garrett, eds. 2008. The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
124. Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
125. Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2009. The Networked Century. Foreign Affairs 88 (January/February): 94.
126. Stewart, Richard B., and Jonathan B. Wiener. 2003. Reconstructing Climate Policy: Beyond Kyoto. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
127. Stone, Christopher D. 2001. Is There a Precautionary Principle? Environmental Law Reporter 31: 10790-10799.
128. Sunstein, Cass R. 2005. The Laws ofFear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
129. Sunstein, Cass R. 2007. Worst Case Scenarios. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
130. Sur, Serge. 2004. Ni Mars ni Venus: Achille ou. Documentation Française: Questions Internationales 9 (September/October) www.afri-ct.org/membres/sergesur/spip.php?article104 (accessed July 13, 2010).
131. Susskind, Lawrence. 1 4. Environmental Diplomacy.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
132. Tajfel, Henri. 1970. Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination. Scientific American 223: 96-102.
133. Trouwborst, Arie. 2002. Evolution and Status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law.The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
134. Uruena, Rene.2008. Risk and Randomness in International Legal Argument. Leiden Journal of International Law 21: 782-822.
135. Vander Zwaag, David. 1999. The Precautionary Principle in Environmental Law and Policy: Elusive Rhetoric and First Embraces. Journal of Environmental Law and Practice 8: 355-375.
136. Vig, Norman, and Michael Faure, eds. 2004. Green Giants: Environmental Policies of the United States and the European Union. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
137. Vogel, David. 1986. National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
138. Vogel, David. 2001. Ships Passing in the Night: The Changing Politics of Risk Regulation in Europe and the United States. European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. Working Paper 16: 1-137.
139. Vogel, David. 2002. Risk Regulation in Europe and the United States Yearbook of European Environmental Law. Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
140. Vogel, David. 2003. The Hare and the Tortoise Revisited: The New Politics of Consumer and Environmental Regulation in Europe. British Journal of Political Science 33: 557-580.
141. Vogel, David. Forthcoming. The Politics of Precaution: Regulating Health, Safety and Environmental Risks in the United States and Europe.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
142. Weber, Elke U., and Christopher K. Hsee. 1998. Cross-Cultural Differences in Risk Perception, but Cross-Cultural Similarities in Attitudes towards Perceived Risks. Management Science 44: 1205-1217.
143. Whiteside, Kerry H. 2006. Precautionary Politics: Principle and Practice in Confronting Environmental Risk. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
144. Whitford, Andrew B., and Karen Wong. 2009. Political and Social Foundations for Environmental Sustainability. Political Research Quarterly 62: 190-204.
145. Wiener, Jonathan B. 1998. Managing the Iatrogenic Risks of Risk Management. Risk: Health Safety and Environment 9: 39-82.
146. Wiener, Jonathan B. 1999. On the Political Economy of Global Environmental Regulation. Georgetown Law Journal 87: 749-794.
147. Wiener, Jonathan B. 2001. Something Borrowed for Something Blue: Legal Transplants and the Evolution of Global Environmental Law. Ecology Law Quarterly 27: 1295-1371.
148. Wiener, Jonathan B. 2002. Precaution in a Multirisk World. In Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: Theory and Practice,edited by Dennis D. Paustenbach. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1509-1531.
149. Wiener, Jonathan B. 2003. Whose Precaution after All? AComment on the Comparison and Evolution of Risk Regulatory Systems. Duke Journal ofInternational and Comparative Law 13: 207-262.
150. Wiener, Jonathan B. 2006. Better Regulation in Europe. Current Legal Problems 59: 447-518.
151. Wiener, Jonathan B. 2007. Precaution. In Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, edited by Daniel Bodansky, Jutta Brunnee, and Ellen Hey. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 597-612.
152. Wiener, Jonathan B. 2008. Issues in the Comparison of Regulatory Oversight Bodies. Paper prepared for the OECD Working Party on Regulation. October 21.
153. Wiener, Jonathan B. 2009. Toward aGlobal Policy Laboratory. Remarks at the SRA-RFF conference on New Ideas for Risk Regulation. June 22. www.rff.org/Events/Pages/New-Ideas-for-Risk-Regulation.aspx (accessed July 13, 2010).
154. Wiener, Jonathan B., and Alberto Alemanno. 2010. Comparing Regulatory Oversight Bodies across the Atlantic: The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the U.S. and the Impact Assessment Board in the E.U. In Comparative Administrative Law,edited by Susan Rose-Ackerman and Peter Lindseth. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
155. Wiener, Jonathan B., and Barak D. Richman. 2010. Mechanism Choice. In Public Choice and Public Law,edited by Daniel Farber and Anne Joseph O'Connell. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
156. Wiener, Jonathan B., and Michael D. Rogers. 2002. Comparing Precaution in the U.S. and Europe. Journal of Risk Research 5: 317-349.
157. Wildavsky, Aaron. 1995. But Is It True? ACitizen's Guide to Environmental Health and Safety Issues. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
158. Yandle, Bruce 1989 Bootleggers and Baptists in the Market for Regulation In The Political Economy of Government Regulation, edited by Jason F Shogren Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 29-54
159. Yandle, Bruce, and Stuart Buck 2002 Bootleggers, Baptists, and the Global Warming Battle Harvard Environmental Law Review 26: 177-229
160. Zander, Joakim 2010 The Application of the Precautionary Principle in Practice: Comparative Dimensions Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
161. Zweigert, Konrad, and Hein Kotz. 1998. An Introduction to Comparative Law. Translated by Tony Weir. Oxford: Oxford University Press.