Teacher accountability measures and links to learning

Measuring School Performance & Efficiency: Implications for Practice and Research

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 137-158

  Milanowski, Anthony T ^a   Kimball, Steven M ^a   Odden, Allan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85120925097     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Bommer, W. H., Johnson, J. L., Rich, G. A., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1995). On the interchangeability of objective and subjective measures or employee performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 48, 587-605.
2. Borman, G. D., & Kimball, S. M. (2004). Teacher quality and educational quality: Do teachers with higher standards-based evaluation ratings close student achievement gaps? Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
3. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
4. Danielson, C, & McGreal, T. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
5. Ellett, C. D. (1997). Classroom-based assessments of teaching and learning. In J. Stronge (Ed.) Evaluating Teaching: A Guide to Current Thinking and Best Practice, pp. 107-128. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Ellett, C. D., Annunziata, J., & Schiavone, S. (2002). Web-based support for teacher evaluation and professional growth: The professional assessment and comprehensive evaluation system (Paces). Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 16(1), 63-74.
7. Fritsche, L., Weerasinghe, D., & Babu, S. (2003). Making the connection: Linking the teacher evaluation results to the district accountability system. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
8. Fuhrman, S. H. (2003). Redesigning accountability systems for education (CPRE Policy Brief RB-38). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
9. Gallagher, H. A. (in press, 2004). Vaughn Elementary's innovative teacher evaluation system: Are teacher evaluation scores related to growth in student achievement. Peabody Journal of Education.
10. Heneman, H. G. III, & Milanowski, A. T. (in press, 2004). Continuing assessment of teacher reactions to a Standards-Based Teacher Evaluation System. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education.
11. Heneman, R. L. (1986). Relationship between supervisory ratings and results-oriented measures of performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 39, 811-26.
12. Kelley, C., Heneman, H. G. III, & Milanowski, A. T. (2001). School-based performance awards: Research findings and future directions. Educational Administration Quarterly.
13. Kellor, E. M. (2003). Catching up with the Vaughn express: Four years of performance pay and standards-based teacher evaluation (CPRE-UW Working Paper TC-03-02). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
14. Kellor, E. M., Milanowski, A. T., Odden, A. R., & Gallagher, H. A. (2001). How Vaughn Next Century Learning Center developed a knowledge-and skill-pay program. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
15. Kimball, S. M. (2002). Analysis of feedback, enabling conditions and fairness perceptions of teachers in three school districts with new standards-based evaluation systems, Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 16(4), 241-268
16. Kimball, S., Milanowski, A. T., & Heneman, H. G. III (2003). Research results and formative recommendations from the study of the Washoe County teacher performance evaluation system. Paper presented at the American Evaluation Association, Sparks, Nevada.
17. Kimball, S., White, B., Milanowski, A. T., & Borman G. (in press, 2004). Examining the relationship between teacher evaluation and student assessment results in Washoe County. Peabody Journal of Education.
18. Koretz, D. M. (2002). Limitations in the use of achievement tests as measures of educators' productivity, Journal of Human Resources, 37(4), 752-777.
19. Medley, D. M., & Coker, H. (1987). Accuracy of principals' judgments of teacher performance, Journal of Educational Research 80(4), 242-247.
20. Milanowski, A. T. (in press, 2004). Relationship between teacher performance evaluation scores and student achievement: Evidence from Cincinnati. Peabody Journal of Education.
21. Milanowski, A. T. (2004). Relationships among dimension scores of standards-based teacher evaluation systems, and the stability of evaluation score-student achievement relationships over time. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
22. Milanowski, A. T. (2002). Varieties of knowledge and skill-based pay design: A comparison of seven new pay systems for K-12 teachers. Education Policy Analysis Archives 11(4). Retrieved June, 2004. from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n4/.
23. Milanowski, A. T., & Heneman, H. G. III. (2001). Assessment of teacher reactions to a standards-based teacher evaluation system: A pilot study, Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 15(3). 193-212.
24. Milanowski, A. T., Kimball, S., & White, B. (2004). The relationship between standards-based teacher evaluation scores and student achievement: Replication and extensions at three sites. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
25. Odden, A., & Kelley, C. (2002). Paying teachers for what they know and do: New and smarter compensation strategies to improve schools. (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
26. Peterson, K. D. (2000). Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive guide to new directions and practice. (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
27. Porter, A., Youngs, P., & Odden, A. (2001). Advances in teacher assessment and their uses. In V. Richardson (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Teaching, (pp. 259-297). New York: Macmillan.
28. Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. J. (2002). What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the Prospects study of elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1525-1567.
29. Shadish, W. R., & Haddock, C. K. (1994). Combining estimates of effect size. In H. Cooper and L. V. Hedges (Eds.) Handbook of Research Synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
30. Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage Publications.
31. Stronge, J. (1997). Improving schools through teacher evaluation. In J. Stronge (Ed.) Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice, (pp. 1-23). Newbury Park, CA.
32. White, B. (2004). Relationship between teacher evaluation scores and student achievement: evidence from Coventry, RI. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.