The varieties of knowledge and skill-based pay design: A comparison of seven new pay systems for K-12 teachers

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Volumn 11, Issue , 2003, Pages

  Milanowski, Anthony ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin Madison ^*  (United States)

^c Wisconsin Dept of Employment Rel   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042613716     PISSN: 10682341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bembry, K. L., Jordan, H.R., Gomez, E., Anderson, M.C., & Mendro, R.L. (1998, April). Policy implications of long- term teacher effects on student achievement. Paper presented at the 1998 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
2. Cohen, D. &, Hill, H. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record 102 (2), 294-343.
3. Conley, S.C., & Odden, A. (1995). Linking teacher compensation to teacher career development. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis 17 (2), 219-237.
4. Daniels, D.R. (1997). Competency-based compensation approaches. In P. T. Chingos (Ed.), Paying for performance: A guide to compensation management (pp. 72-95). New York: Wiley.
5. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
6. Dwyer, C.A. (1998). Psychometrics of PRAXIS III: Classroom performance assessments. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 12 (2), 163-187.
7. Ferguson, R., & Ladd, H. (1996). How and why money matters: An analysis of Alabama schools. In H. Ladd, (Ed.), Holding schools accountable (pp. 265-298). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
8. Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
9. Gorsline, K. (1996). A competency profile for human resources: No more shoemaker's children. Human Resource Management 35 (1), 53-66.
10. Gupta, N., Jenkins, G.D. Jr., & Curington, W.P. (1986). Paying for knowledge: Myths and realities. National Productivity Review 5 (2), 107-123.
11. Hall, G. E., & Caffarella, E.P. (1997). Third year implementation assessment of the Douglas County, Colorado school district performance pay plan for teachers. No city: Authors.
12. Heneman R. L.. & Ledford, G.E. (1998). Competency pay for professionals and managers in business: A review and Implications for teachers. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 12 (2), 103-122.
13. Heneman, R. L., & Thomas, A.L. (1997). Using strategic performance management to drive brand leadership. Compensation and Benefits Review 27 (6), 33-40.
14. Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. (1992). Model standards for beginning teacher licensing and development: A resource for state dialog. Washington, DC: Author.
15. Iowa Department of Education (2000, November). A proposal for a new teacher compensation system based on teacher performance, career development, and the national labor market. Des Moines, IA: Author.
16. Jaeger, R.J. (1998). Evaluating the psychometric qualities of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards' Assessments: A methodological accounting. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 12 (2), 189-210.
17. Jenkins, G.D., Jr., Ledford, G.E., Jr., Gupta, N., & Doty, D.H. (1992). Skill-based pay: Practices, payoffs, pitfalls and prescriptions. Scottsdale, AZ: American Compensation Association.
18. Jones, T.W. (1995). Performance management in a changing context: Monsanto pioneers a competency-based developmental approach. Human Resource Management 34 (3), 425-442.
19. Lawler, E.E. III (2000). Rewarding excellence: Pay strategies for the new economy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. rd ed, pp. 199-217). New York: McGraw Hill.
21. th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
22. Mansfield, R.S. (1996). Building competency models: Approaches for HR professionals. Human Resource Management 35 (1), 7-18.
23. Milanowski, A.T., & Kellor, E. (1999) Vaughn Next Century Learning Center performance pay survey: Preliminary report. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin- Madison.
24. Milanowski, A.T., & Kellor, E. (2000a). Vaughn Next Century Learning Center performance pay survey: School report. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
25. Milanowski, A.T., & Kellor, E. (2000b). Teacher and evaluator reactions to standards-based teacher evaluation in the Cincinnati Public Schools: An evaluation of the 1999- 2000 field test of the new evaluation system. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
26. Milanowski, A., Odden, A. & Youngs, P. (1998). Teacher knowledge and skill assessment and teacher compensation: An overview of measurement and linkage issues. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 12 (2), 83-101.
27. Mohrman, A., Mohrman, S.A., & Odden A. (1996). Aligning teacher compensation with systemic school reform: Skill-based pay and group -based performance rewards. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 18 (1), 51-71.
28. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2001). State Incentives. Retrieved from http://www.nbpt.org/news/_center/facts/ state_incentives.html.
29. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1999). What teachers should know and be able to do. Arlington, VA: Author.
30. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: Author.
31. Odden, A. (2000). New and better forms of teacher compensation are possible. Phi Delta Kappan 81 (5), 361-366.
32. Odden, A., & Kelley, C. (1997). Paying teachers for what they know and do: New and smarter compensation strategies to improve schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
33. Ross, S.M. (2000). How to evaluate comprehensive school reform models. Getting Better by Design Series 8, 1-14. Arlington, VA: New American Schools Development Corporation.
34. Shippmann, J. S., Ash, R. A., Battista, M., Carr, L., Eyde, L. D., Hesketh, B., Kehoe, J., Pearlman, K., Prien, E. P., & Sanchez, J. I. (2000). The practice of competency modeling. Personnel Psychology 53 (3), 703-740.
35. Slavin, R., & Fashola, O. (1998). Show me the evidence! Proven and promising programs for America's schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
36. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review 57 (1), 1-22.
37. Smith, L., Ross, S., McNelis, M., Squires, M., Wasson, R., Maxwell, S., Weddle, K., Nath, L., Grehan, A., & Buggey, T. (1998). The Memphis restructuring initiative: Analysis of activities and outcomes that affect implementation success. Education and Urban Society 30 (3), 296-325.
38. Spencer, L.M., & Spencer, S.M. (1993). Competence at work: Models for superior performance. New York: Wiley.
39. Tucker, S.A., & Cofsky, K.M. (1994). Competency- based pay on a banding platform. ACA Journal 3 (1), 30-45.
40. Vroom, V.H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
41. Wise, A.E., Darling-Hammond, L., McLaughlin, M.W., & Bernstein, H.T. (1984). Teacher evaluation: A study of effective practices. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
42. Wilson, T.B., & Phalen, C.P. (1996). Rewarding group performance: An approach to designing and implementing incentive pay programs. Scottsdale, AZ: American Compensation Association,
43. Wright, S.P., Horn, S.P, & Sanders. W.L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 11, 57-67.
44. Zingheim, P.K., Ledford, G.E. Jr., & Schuster, J.R. (1996). Competencies and competency models: Does one size fit all? ACA Journal 5 (1), 56-65.