Edinburgh's syntax-based systems at wmt 2015

10th Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, WMT 2015 at the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2015 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 199-209

  Williams, Philip ^a   Sennrich, Rico ^a   Nadejde, Maria ^a   Huck, Matthias ^a   Koehn, Philipp ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

FINNISH; FRENCH-ENGLISH; LANGUAGE PAIRS; MORPHOLOGICAL SEGMENTATION; STRING MODELS; UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 85119987791     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Nora Aranberri. 2015. Smt error analysis and mapping to syntactic, semantic and structural fixes. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Syntax, Semantics and Structure in Statistical Translation, pages 30-38, Denver, Colorado, USA, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
2. Stanley F. Chen and Joshua Goodman. 1998. An empirical study of smoothing techniques for language modeling. Technical report, Harvard University.
3. Danqi Chen and Christopher Manning. 2014. A Fast and Accurate Dependency Parser using Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 740-750, Doha, Qatar.
4. Colin Cherry and George Foster. 2012. Batch Tuning Strategies for Statistical Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 427-436, Montréal, Canada, June.
5. David Chiang. 2007. Hierarchical phrase-based translation. Comput. Linguist., 33(2):201-228.
6. Tagyoung Chung, Licheng Fang, and Daniel Gildea. 2011. Issues concerning decoding with synchronous context-free grammar. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 413-417, Portland, Oregon, USA, June.
7. Adrià de Gispert, Sami Virpioja, Mikko Kurimo, and William Byrne. 2009. Minimum bayes risk combination of translation hypotheses from alternative morphological decompositions. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Companion Volume: Short Papers, pages 73-76, Boulder, Colorado, June.
8. Jacob Devlin, Rabih Zbib, Zhongqiang Huang, Thomas Lamar, Richard Schwartz, and John Makhoul. 2014. Fast and Robust Neural Network Joint Models for Statistical Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1370-1380, Baltimore, MD, USA, June.
9. Chris Dyer, Victor Chahuneau, and Noah A. Smith. 2013. A Simple, Fast, and Effective Reparameterization of IBM Model 2. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 644-648, Atlanta, GA, USA, June.
10. Jason Eisner. 2003. Learning non-isomorphic tree mappings for machine translation. In The Companion Volume to the Proceedings of 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 205-208, Sapporo, Japan, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
11. Michel Galley, Mark Hopkins, Kevin Knight, and Daniel Marcu. 2004. What's in a Translation Rule? In HLT-NAACL '04.
12. Michel Galley, Jonathan Graehl, Kevin Knight, Daniel Marcu, Steve DeNeefe, Wei Wang, and Ignacio Thayer. 2006. Scalable inference and training of context-rich syntactic translation models. In ACL-44: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 961-968, Morristown, NJ, USA.
13. Qin Gao and Stephan Vogel. 2008. Parallel implementations of word alignment tool. In Software Engineering, Testing, and Quality Assurance for Natural Language Processing, SETQA-NLP '08, pages 49-57, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
14. Kenneth Heafield and Alon Lavie. 2010. Combining Machine Translation Output with Open Source The Carnegie Mellon Multi-Engine Machine Translation Scheme. The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, 93:27-36.
15. Kenneth Heafield, Ivan Pouzyrevsky, Jonathan H. Clark, and Philipp Koehn. 2013. Scalable modified Kneser-Ney language model estimation. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 690-696, Sofia, Bulgaria, August.
16. Teresa Herrmann, Jan Niehues, and Alex Waibel. 2014. Manual analysis of structurally informed reordering in german-english machine translation. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2014). European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
17. Mark Hopkins and Greg Langmead. 2010. SCFG decoding without binarization. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 646-655, Cambridge, MA, October.
18. Matthias Huck, Hieu Hoang, and Philipp Koehn. 2014. Preference Grammars and Soft Syntactic Constraints for GHKM Syntax-based Statistical Machine Translation. In Proceedings of SSST-8, Eighth Workshop on Syntax, Semantics and Structure in Statistical Translation, pages 148-156, Doha, Qatar.
19. Philipp Koehn, Franz Josef Och, and Daniel Marcu. 2003. Statistical phrase-based translation. In NAACL '03: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology, pages 48-54, Morristown, NJ, USA.
20. Ding Liu and Daniel Gildea. 2005. Syntactic Features for Evaluation of Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization, pages 25-32, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
21. Arle Lommel, Aljoscha Burchardt, Maja Popović, Kim Harris, Eleftherios Avramidis, and Hans Uszkoreit. 2014. Using a new analytic measure for the annotation and analysis of mt errors on real data. In Proceedings of 17th Annual conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, pages 165-172.
22. Maria Nadejde, Philip Williams, and Philipp Koehn. 2013. Edinburgh's Syntax-Based Machine Translation Systems. In Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 170-176, Sofia, Bulgaria, August.
23. Graham Neubig and Kevin Duh. 2014. On the elements of an accurate tree-to-string machine translation system. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 143-149, Baltimore, Maryland, June.
24. Joakim Nivre and Jens Nilsson. 2005. Pseudo-Projective Dependency Parsing. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'05), pages 99-106, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
25. Franz Josef Och and Hermann Ney. 2003. A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models. Comput. Linguist., 29(1):19-51, March.
26. Franz Josef Och. 1999. An Efficient Method for Determining Bilingual Word Classes. In Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), pages 71-76.
27. Franz Josef Och. 2003. Minimum error rate training in statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - Volume 1, ACL '03, pages 160-167, Morristown, NJ, USA.
28. Slav Petrov and Dan Klein. 2007. Improved Inference for Unlexicalized Parsing. In Human Language Technologies 2007: The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics; Proceedings of the Main Conference, pages 404-411, Rochester, New York, April.
29. Slav Petrov, Leon Barrett, Romain Thibaux, and Dan Klein. 2006. Learning accurate, compact, and interpretable tree annotation. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL-44, pages 433-440.
30. Rico Sennrich and Barry Haddow. 2015. A Joint Dependency Model of Morphological and Syntactic Structure for Statistical Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Lisbon, Portugal. Association for Computational Linguistics.
31. Rico Sennrich, Martin Volk, and Gerold Schneider. 2013. Exploiting Synergies Between Open Resources for German Dependency Parsing, POStagging, and Morphological Analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing 2013, pages 601-609, Hissar, Bulgaria.
32. Rico Sennrich. 2014. A cyk+ variant for scfg decoding without a dot chart. In Proceedings of SSST-8, Eighth Workshop on Syntax, Semantics and Structure in Statistical Translation, pages 94-102, Doha, Qatar, October.
33. Rico Sennrich. 2015. Modelling and Optimizing on Syntactic N-Grams for Statistical Machine Translation. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3:169-182.
34. Andreas Stolcke. 2002. SRILM - an Extensible Language Modeling Toolkit. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), volume 3, Denver, CO, USA, September.
35. Antonio Toral, Sudip Kumar Naskar, Joris Vreeke, Federico Gaspari, and Declan Groves. 2013. A web application for the diagnostic evaluation of machine translation over specific linguistic phenomena. In Proceedings of the 2013 NAACL HLT Demonstration Session, pages 20-23, Atlanta, Georgia, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
36. Ashish Vaswani, Yinggong Zhao, Victoria Fossum, and David Chiang. 2013. Decoding with Large-Scale Neural Language Models Improves Translation. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1387-1392, Seattle, WA, USA.
37. David Vilar, Jia Xu, Luis Fernando D'Haro, and Hermann Ney. 2006. Error analysis of statistical machine translation output. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 06), pages 697-702.
38. Sami Virpioja, Peter Smit, Stig-Arne Grönroos, and Mikko Kurimo. 2013. Morfessor 2.0: Python implementation and extensions for morfessor baseline. Technical report, Aalto University, Helsinki.
39. Philip Williams and Philipp Koehn. 2012. GHKM Rule Extraction and Scope-3 Parsing in Moses. In Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 388-394, Montréal, Canada, June.
40. Philip Williams, Rico Sennrich, Maria Nadejde, Matthias Huck, Eva Hasler, and Philipp Koehn. 2014. Edinburgh's Syntax-Based Systems at WMT 2014. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 207-214, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, June.
41. Hui Zhang, Min Zhang, Haizhou Li, and Chew Lim Tan. 2009. Fast translation rule matching for syntax-based statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1037-1045, Singapore, August.