Syntactic features for evaluation of machine translation

Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization, Proceedings of the Workshop ACL 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 25-32

  Liu, Ding ^a   Gildea, Daniel ^a  

^a University of Rochester   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER AIDED LANGUAGE TRANSLATION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

AUTOMATIC EVALUATION; EVALUATION METRICS; HUMAN JUDGMENTS; LEVEL CORRELATION; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; N-GRAMS; SENTENCE LEVEL; SYNTACTIC FEATURES; SYNTACTIC INFORMATION; SYSTEM OUTPUT;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 49549122714     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Hiyan Alshawi, Srinivas Bangalore, and Shona Douglas. 2000. Learning dependency translation models as collections of finite state head transducers. Computational Linguistics, 26(1):45–60.
2. John Blatz, Erin Fitzgerald, George Foster, Simona Gandrabur, Cyril Goutte, Alex Kulesza, Alberto Sanchis, and Nicola Ueffing. 2003. Confidence estimation for machine translation. Technical report, Center for Language and Speech Processing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. Summer Workshop Final Report.
3. Eugene Charniak, Kevin Knight, and Kenji Yamada. 2003. Syntax-based language models for machine translation. In Proc. MT Summit IX.
4. Michael Collins and Nigel Duffy. 2001. Convolution kernels for natural language. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
5. Michael John Collins. 1999. Head-driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
6. G. Doddington. 2002. Automatic evaluation of machine translation quality using n-gram co-occurrence statistics. In In HLT 2002, Human Language Technology Conference, San Diego, CA.
7. Heidi J. Fox. 2002. Phrasal cohesion and statistical machine translation. In In Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2002), pages 304–311.
8. Alex Kulesza and Stuart M. Shieber. 2004. A learning approach to improving sentence-level MT evaluation. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation (TMI), Baltimore, MD, October.
9. Dekang Lin. 2004. A path-based transfer model for machine translation. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-04), pages 625–630, Geneva, Switzerland.
10. Franz Josef Och, Daniel Gildea, Sanjeev Khudanpur, Anoop Sarkar, Kenji Yamada, Alex Fraser, Shankar Kumar, Libin Shen, David Smith, Katherine Eng, Viren Jain, Zhen Jin, and Dragomir Radev. 2004. A smorgasbord of features for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2004 Meeting of the North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL-04), Boston.
11. Franz Josef Och. 2003. Minimum error rate training for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 41th Annual Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-03).
12. Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-02), Philadelphia, PA.