Pseudo-projective dependency parsing

ACL-05 - 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 99-106

  Nivre, Joakim ^a   Nilsson, Jens ^a  

^a LINNAEUS UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL GRAMMARS;

COMBINED SYSTEM; DEPENDENCY PARSER; DEPENDENCY PARSING; DEPENDENCY STRUCTURES; GRAPH TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUES; PRAGUE DEPENDENCY TREEBANK; PROJECTIVE STRUCTURE; SYNTACTIC PARSING;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 84859901922     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1219840.1219853     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Cahill, A., Burke, M., O'Donovan, R., Van Genabith, J. and Way, A. 2004. Long-distance dependency resolution in automatically acquired wide-coverage PCFG-based LFG approximations. In Proceedings of ACL.
2. Campbell, R. 2004. Using linguistic principles to recover empty categories. In Proceedings of ACL.
3. Charniak, E. 2000. A maximum-entropy-inspired parser. In Proceedings of NAACL.
4. Collins, M., Hajič, J., Brill, E., Ramshaw, L. and Tillmann, C. 1999. A statistical parser for Czech. In Proceedings of ACL.
5. Collins, M. 1999. Head-Driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
6. Covington, M. A. 1990. Parsing discontinuous constituents in dependency grammar. Computational Linguistics, 16:234-236.
7. Daelemans,W., Zavrel, J., van der Sloot, K. and van den Bosch, A. 2003. TiMBL: Tilburg Memory Based Learner, version 5.0, Reference Guide. Technical Report ILK 03-10, Tilburg University, ILK.
8. Dienes, P. and Dubey, A. 2003. Deep syntactic processing by combining shallow methods. In Proceedings of ACL.
9. Duchier, D. and Debusmann, R. 2001. Topological dependency trees: A constraint-based account of linear precedence. In Proceedings of ACL.
10. Eisner, J. M. 1996. Three new probabilistic models for dependency parsing: An exploration. In Proceedings of COLING.
11. Foth, K., Daum, M. and Menzel, W. 2004. A broad-coverage parser for German based on defeasible constraints. In Proceedings of KONVENS.
12. Hajič, J., Krbec, P., Oliva, K., Kveton, P. and Petkevic, V. 2001. Serial combination of rules and statistics: A case study in Czech tagging. In Proceedings of ACL.
13. Hajič, J., Vidova Hladka, B., Panevová, J., Hajičová, E., Sgall, P. and Pajas, P. 2001. Prague Dependency Treebank 1.0. LDC, 2001T10.
14. Hajič, J. 1998. Building a syntactically annotated corpus: The Prague Dependency Treebank. In Issues of Valency and Meaning, pages 106-132. Karolinum.
15. Hellwig, P. 2003. Dependency unification grammar. In Dependency and Valency, pages 593-635. Walter de Gruyter.
16. Holan, T., Kuboň, V. and Plátek, M. 2001. Word-order relaxations and restrictions within a dependency grammar. In Proceedings of IWPT.
17. Holan, T. 2004. Tvorba zavislostniho syntaktickeho analyzatoru. In Proceedings of MIS'2004.
18. Jijkoun, V. and de Rijke, M. 2004. Enriching the output of a parser using memory-based learning. In Proceedings of ACL.
19. Johnson, M. 2002. A simple pattern-matching algorithm for recovering empty nodes and their antecedents. In Proceedings of ACL.
20. Kahane, S., Nasr, A. and Rambow, O. 1998. Pseudoprojectivity: A polynomially parsable non-projective dependency grammar. In Proceedings of ACL-COLING.
21. Kromann, M. T. 2003. The Danish Dependency Treebank and the DTAG treebank tool. In Proceedings of TLT 2003.
22. Levy, R. and Manning, C. 2004. Deep dependencies from context-free statistical parsers: Correcting the surface dependency approximation. In Proceedings of ACL.
23. Mel'čuk, I. 1988. Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. State University of New York Press.
24. Nivre, J. and Scholz, M. 2004. Deterministic dependency parsing of English text. In Proceedings of COLING.
25. Nivre, J., Hall, J. and Nilsson, J. 2004. Memory-based dependency parsing. In Proceedings of CoNLL.
26. Nivre, J. 2003. An efficient algorithm for projective dependency parsing. In Proceedings of IWPT.
27. Oflazer, K., Say, B., Hakkani-Tür, D. Z. and Tür, G. 2003. Building a Turkish treebank. In Treebanks: Building and Using Parsed Corpora, pages 261-277. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
28. Oflazer, K. 2003. Dependency parsing with an extended finitestate approach. Computational Linguistics, 29:515-544. (Pubitemid 39056496)
29. Sleator, D. and Temperley, D. 1993. Parsing English with a link grammar. In Proceedings of IWPT.
30. Tapanainen, P. and Järvinen, T. 1997. A non-projective dependency parser. In Proceedings of ANLP.
31. Wang, W. and Harper, M. P. 2004. A statistical constraint dependency grammar (CDG) parser. In Proceedings of the Workshop in Incremental Parsing (ACL).
32. Yamada, H. and Matsumoto, Y. 2003. Statistical dependency analysis with support vector machines. In Proceedings of IWPT.