The contribution of learner corpora to second language acquisition and foreign language teaching A critical evaluation

Studies in Corpus Linguistics

Volumn 33, Issue , 2009, Pages 13-32

  Granger, Sylviane ^a  

^a KARLSTAD UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85105518450     PISSN: 13880373     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/scl.33.04gra     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Abe, M. & Tono, Y. 2005. Variations in L2 spoken and written English: Investigating patterns of grammatical errors across proficiency levels. The Corpus Linguistics Conference Series 1.1. Corpus Linguistics 2005. Downloaded from http://www.corpus.bham.ac.uk/PCLC/
2. Ädel, A. 2006. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
3. Altenberg, B. & Granger, S. 2001. The grammatical and lexical patterning of make in native and non-native student writing. Applied Linguistics 22(2): 173-194.
4. Barlow, M. 2000. Review of Learner English on Computer, S. Granger (ed.). London: Longman. 1998. Language Learning and Technology 3(2): 15-17. Downloaded from http://llt.msu.edu/vol3num2/review/review1/index.html
5. Bley-Vroman, R. 1983. The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity. Language Learning 33: 1-17.
6. Brown, R. 1973. A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Carter, R. & McCarthy, M. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English. A Comprehensive Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Chuang, F.-Y. & Nesi, H. 2006. An analysis of formal errors in a corpus of Chinese student writing. Corpora 1(2): 251-271.
9. Cobb, T. 2003. Analyzing late interlanguage with learner corpora: Québec replications of three European studies. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes 59(3): 393-423.
10. Cowan, R., Choi, H. E. & Kim, D. H. 2003. Four questions for error diagnosis and correction in CALL. CALICO 20(3): 451-463.
11. Dagneaux, E., Denness, S. & Granger, S. 1998. Computer-aided Error Analysis. System. An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics 26(2): 163-174.
12. De Cock, S. 2004. Preferred sequences of words in NS and NNS speech. Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures (BELL), New Series 2: 225-246.
13. De Cock, S. & Granger, S. 2005. Computer learner corpora and monolingual learners' dictionaries: The perfect match. Lexicographica 20: 72-86.
14. De Haan, P. 1999. Review of Learner English on Computer, S. Granger (ed.). London: Longman. 1998. The Clarion 5: 28-31.
15. Delier, S. 2006. Relative Pronouns in Native and Non-native English Academic Writing. A Corpus-based Study. MA thesis. Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve.
16. Ellis, N. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing. A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 143-188.
17. Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G. 2005. Analysing Learner Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Flowerdew, L. 1998. Corpus-linguistic techniques applied to textlinguistics. System 26: 541-552.
19. Franca, V. 1999. Using student-produced corpora in the L2 classroom. In IATEFL 1999 Edinburgh Conference Selections, P. Grundy (ed.), 116-117. Whitstable: IATEFL.
20. Gass, S. M. & Selinker, L. 2001. Second Language Acquisition. An Introductory Course. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Gillard, P. & Gadsby, A. 1998. Using a learners' corpus in compiling ELT dictionaries. In Learner English on Computer, S. Granger (ed.), 159-171. London: Addison Wesley Longman.
22. Gilquin, G., Granger, S. & Paquot, M. 2007. Learner corpora: The missing link in EAP pedagogy. In Corpus-based EAP Pedagogy, P. Thompson (ed.). Special issue of Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(4): 319-335.
23. Granger, S. 1993. The International Corpus of Learner English. In English Language Corpora: Design, Analysis and Exploitation, J. Aarts, P. de Haan & N. Oostdijk (eds), 57-69. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
24. Granger, S. 1994. The learner corpus: A revolution in applied linguistics. English Today 39(10/3): 25-29.
25. Granger, S. 1996. From CA to CIA and back: An integrated approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora. In Languages in Contrast. Text-based cross-linguistic studies [Lund Studies in English 88], K. Aijmer, B. Altenberg & M. Johansson (eds), 37-51. Lund: Lund University Press.
26. Granger, S. 1997a. Automated retrieval of passives from native and learner corpora: Precision and recall. Journal of English Linguistics 25(4): 365-374.
27. Granger, S. 1997b. On identifying the syntactic and discourse features of participle clauses in academic English: Native and non-native writers compared. In Studies in English Language and Teaching, J. Aarts, I. de Mönnink & H. Wekker (eds), 185-198. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
28. Granger, S. 1998. Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: Collocations and formulae. In Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications, A. Cowie (ed.), 145-160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Granger, S. 2003. The International Corpus of Learner English: A new resource for foreign language learning and teaching and second language acquisition research. TESOL Quarterly 37(3): 538-546.
30. Granger, S., Dagneaux, E. & Meunier, F. 2002. The International Corpus of Learner English. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain. Available from http://www.i6doc.com.
31. Granger, S. & Tribble, C. 1998. Learner corpus data in the foreign language classroom: Form-focused instruction and data-driven learning. In Learner English on Computer, S. Granger (ed.), 199-209. London: Addison Wesley Longman.
32. Granger, S. & Wynne, M. 1999. Optimising measures of lexical variation in EFL learner corpora. In Corpora Galore, J. Kirk (ed.), 249-257. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
33. Greenbaum, S. (ed.). 1996. Comparing English Worldwide. The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
34. Gries, S. & Stefanowitsch, A. (eds). 2006. Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics. Corpus-Based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
35. Gut, U., Milde, J.-T., Voormann, H. & Heid, U. 2004. Querying annotated speech corpora. In Speech Prosody 2004, B. Bel & I. Marlien (eds), 569-572. ISCA Archive, 56. Available from http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/sp2004/sp04_569.pdf
36. Harris, C. 1997. Psycholinguistic studies of entrenchment. In Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, J. P. Koenig (ed.), 55-70. Stanford CA: CSLA.
37. Housen, A. 2002. A corpus-based study of the L2-acquisition of the English verb system. In Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching, S. Granger, J. Hung & S. Petch-Tyson (eds), 77-116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
38. Izumi, E., Uchimoto, K. & Isahara, H. 2005. Error Annotation for Corpus of Japanese Learner English. Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Linguistically Interpreted Corpora (LINC-2005). Downloaded from http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/I/I05/I05-6009.pdf
39. Jarvis, S. 2000. Methodological rigor in the study of transfer: Identifying L1 influence in the interlanguage lexicon. Language Learning 50: 245-309.
40. Jenkins, J. 2000. The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Jenkins, J. 2005. ELF at the gate: the position of English as a Lingua Franca. Humanising Language Teaching 7(2). Downloaded from http://www.hltmag.co.uk/mar05/idea.htm
42. Jonghak Baik, M. & Jinyoung Shim, R. 2002. Teaching world Englishes via the Internet. World Englishes 21(3): 427-430.
43. Källkvist, M. 1999. Form-class and Task-type Effects in Learner English. A Study of Advanced Swedish Learners. Lund: Lund University Press.
44. Kaneko, T. 2005. Semantic network makes things problematic: Use of vertical axis prepositions by Japanese learners of English. Proceedings of the NICT JLE Corpus Symposium, Kyoto, 7-10.
45. Kung, S.-C. 2004. Synchronous electronic discussions in an EFL reading class. ELT Journal 58(2): 164-173.
46. Kushner, J., Lantolf, J., Thorne, S., Jimenez-Jimenez, A. & Ross, B. 2001. Spanish acquisition: Analysis of learner corpora generated through inter-cultural telecollaboration. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural 27: 301. http://www.sepln.org/revistaSEPLN/revista/27/27-proyecto6.pdf
47. Leech, G. 1998. Learner corpora: What they are and what can be done with them. In Learner English on Computer, S. Granger (ed.), xiv-xx. London: Addison Wesley Longman.
48. Liu, E. T. K. & Shaw, P. M. 2001. Investigating learner vocabulary: A possible approach to looking at EFL/ESL learners' qualitative knowledge of the word. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL) 39(3): 171-194.
49. Lowenberg, P. H. 2002. Assessing English proficiency in the expanding circle. World Englishes 21(3): 431-435.
50. Lüdeling A., Maik, W., Kroymann, E. & Adolphs, P. 2005. Multi-level error annotation in learner corpora. The Corpus Linguistics Conference Series 1, 1: Corpus Linguistics 2005. Downloaded from http://www.corpus.bham.ac.uk./PCLC
51. Mackenzie, I. 2003. English as a Lingua Franca. The European Messenger 12(1): 59-61.
52. Matsuda P. K., Canagarajah, A. S., Harklau L., Hyland, K. & Warschauer, M. 2003. Changing currents in second language writing research: A colloquium. Journal of Second Language Writing 12: 151-179.
53. McKay, S. L. 2003. Toward an appropriate EIL pedagogy: Re-examining common ELT assumptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 13(1): 1-22.
54. Meyer, C. 2002. English Corpus Linguistics. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Milton, J. & Chowdhury, N. 1994. Tagging the interlanguage of Chinese learners of English. In Entering Text, L. Flowerdew & K. K. Tong (eds), 127-143. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
56. Mollin, S. 2006. Euro-English. Assessing Variety Status. Tübingen: Narr.
57. Mukherjee, J. 2005. The native speaker is alive and kicking - Linguistic and language-pedagogical perspectives. Anglistik 16(2): 7-23.
58. Mukherjee, J. & Rohrbach, J.-M. 2006. Rethinking applied corpus linguistics from a language-pedagogical perspective: New departures in learner corpus research. In Planing, Painting and Gluing Corpora. Inside the Applied Corpus Linguist's Workshop, B. Kettemann & G. Marko (eds), 205-232. Frankfurt: Lang.
59. Myles, F. 2005. Review article: Interlanguage corpora and second language acquisition research. Second Language Acquisition Research 21(4): 373-391.
60. Nesselhauf, N. 2005. Collocations in a Learner Corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
61. Nicholls, D. 2003. The Cambridge Learner Corpus - error coding and analysis for lexicography and ELT. In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2003 Conference, D. Archer, P. Rayson, A. Wilson & T. McEnery (eds), 572-581. Lancaster: UCREL, Lancaster University.
62. Paquot, M. 2008. Exemplification in learner writing: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Phraseology in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching, F. Meunier & S. Granger (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
63. Purdy, J. D. (ed.) 2004. Commentaries on the Comparative Fallacy in second language research. Working Papers in TESOL and Applied Linguistics 4(1). Available from http://journals.tc-library.org/index.php/tesol/article/view/172/169
64. Ragan, P. H. 2001. Classroom use of a systemic functional small learner corpus. In Small Corpus Studies and ELT: Theory and Practice, M. Ghadessy, A. Henry & R. L. Roseberry (eds), 207-236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
65. Scott, M. 2004. WordSmith Tools, version 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66. Seidlhofer, B. 2004. Research perspectives on teaching English as a Lingua Franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24: 209-239.
67. Sinclair, J. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68. Sinclair, J. 1995. Corpus typology - a framework for classification. In Studies in Anglistics, G. Melchers & B. Warren (eds), 17-33. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
69. Skehan, P. 1998. A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Smits, A. 2002. How Writers Begin Their Sentences. Complex Beginnings in Native and Learner English. Utrecht: LOT.
71. Smrz, P. 2004. Integrating Natural Language Processing into e-learning - A case of Czech. Paper presented at COLING 2004. Downloaded from http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/coling2004/W6/ps/1.ps
72. Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S. T. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2): 209-243.
73. Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S. T. 2006. Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
74. Sung Park, E. 2004. The Comparative Fallacy in UG Studies. Working Papers in TESOL and Applied Linguistics 4(1). Available from http://www.tc.columbia.edu/academic/tesol/Webjournal/forum2004.htm
75. Tenfjord, K., Meurer, P. & Hofland, K. 2004. The ASK corpus - a language learner corpus of Norwegian as a second language. Paper presented at the TALC 2004 conference, Granada - Spain, 6-9 July 2004.
76. Tenfjord, K., Hagen, J. E. & Johansen, H. 2006. The hows and whys of coding categories in a learner corpus (or 'how and why an error tagged learner corpus is not ipso facto one big comparative fallacy'). Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata (RiPLA) VI(3): 93-108.
77. Van Rooy, B. & Schäfer, L. 2003. Automatic POS tagging of a learner corpus: The influence of learner error on tagger accuracy. In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2003 Conference (CL 2003) [Technical Papers 16], D. Archer, P. Rayson, A. Wilson & T. McEnery (eds), 835-844. Lancaster University: University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language.
78. Wible, D., Huo, C.-H., Chien, F.-Y., Liu, A. & Tsao, N.-L. 2001. A web-based EFL writing environment: Integrating information for learners, teachers, and researchers. Computers and Education 37: 297-315.
79. Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S. & Kim, H.-Y. 1998. Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy and Complexity. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai'i Press.