Corpus linguistic techniques applied to textlinguistics

System

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 541-552

  Flowerdew, L ^a  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040095873     PISSN: 0346251X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0346-251X(98)00039-6     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aijmer, K., Altenberg, B. (Eds.), 1991. English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik. Longman, London.
2. Biber, D., 1988. Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Butler, C., 1990. Qualifications in Science: modal meanings in scientific text. In: Nash, W. (Ed.), The Writing Scholar. Sage Publications, London, pp. 137-170.
4. Crombie, W., 1985. Discourse and Language Learning: A Relational Approach to Syllabus Design. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
5. de Beaugrande R. The pragmatics of doing language science: the warrant for large-corpus linguistics. Journal of Pragmatics. 25:1996;503-535.
6. Flowerdew, J., 1996. Concordancing in language learning. In: Pennington M. (Ed.), The Power of CALL, Athelstan, Houston, TX, pp. 97-113.
7. Flowerdew L. Interpersonal Strategies: investigating interlanguage corpora. RELC Journal. 28:(1):1997;72-88.
8. Flowerdew L. Concordancing on an expert and learner corpus for ESP. CALL Journal. 8:(3):1998;3-7.
9. Flowerdew, L., 1998b. Integrating expert and interlanguage computer corpora findings on causality: discoveries for teachers and students. English for Specific Purposes 17 (4), 329-345.
10. Francis, G., 1986. Anaphoric nouns: discourse analysis monograph 11. English Language Research, University of Birmingham.
11. Francis G. Thematic selection and distribution in written discourse. Word. 40:(1/2):1989;201-221.
12. Ghadessy, M., 1995. Thematic development and its relationship to registers and genres. In: Ghadessy, M. (Ed.), Thematic Development in English Texts, Pinter, London, pp. 129-140.
13. Gledhill, C., 1995. Collocation and genre analysis: the discourse function of collocation in cancer research abstracts and articles. Zeitschrift fur Anglistik und Amerikanistik, Vol. 1, 1-26.
14. Gledhill, C., 1996. Science As a Collocation: Phraseology in Cancer Research Articles. Paper presented at TALC Conference, Lancaster University, UK, 1996.
15. Grabe, W., Kaplan, R., 1996. Theory and Practice of Writing. Longman, London.
16. Granger, S. (Ed.), 1998. Learner English on Computer. Longman, London.
17. Granger, S., in press. On identifying the syntactic and discourse features of participle clauses in academic English: native and non-native writers compared. In: Aarts, J., Wekker, H. (Eds.), Studies in English Language Teaching and Research. Rodopi, Amsterdam.
18. Granger, S., Meunier, F., Tyson, S., 1994. New insights into the learner lexicon: a preliminary report from the international corpus of learner English. In: Flowerdew, L., Tong, K.K. (Eds.), Entering Text, Language Centre, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, pp. 102-113.
19. Halliday, M.A.K., 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold, London.
20. Hoey, M., 1991. Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
21. Hoey, M., 1993. A common signal in discourse: how the word reason is used in texts. In: Sinclair, J.M., Hoey, M., Fox, G. (Eds.), Techniques of Description, Routledge, London, pp. 67-82.
22. Holmes J. Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Applied Linguistics. 9:(1):1988;21-44.
23. Hyland K. Nurturing hedges in the ESP curriculum. System. 24:(4):1996;477-490.
24. Hyland K., Milton J. Qualifications and certainty in L1 and L2 students' writing. Journal of Second Language Writing. 6:(2):1997;183-205.
25. Johns, T., 1994. From printout to handout: grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of data-driven learning. In: Odlin, T. (Ed.), Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 293-313.
26. Kennedy, G., 1992. Preferred ways of putting things with implications for language teaching. In: Svartvik (Ed.), Directions in Corpus Linguistics: Proceedings of the Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm 1991. Morton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 335-373.
27. Kennedy, G., 1995. English as system and probability in academic and professional communication. In: Bruthiaux, P., Boswood, T., Du-Babcock, B. (Eds.), Explorations in English for Professional Communication, City University of Hong Kong, pp. 139-154.
28. Kjellmer, G., 1987. Aspects of English collocations. In: Meijs, W. (Ed.), Corpus Linguistics and Beyond, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 133-140.
29. Leech, G., 1991. The state of the art in corpus linguistics. In: Aijmer, K., Altenberg, B. (Eds.), pp. 8-29.
30. Matthiessen, C., 1997. The relationship between grammar and discourse: an exploration based on computational tools. Paper presented at International Conference on Discourse Analysis, University of Macau, 1997.
31. Meijs, W., 1988. All But and If Not in Brown and LOB. In: Kytö, M., Ihalainen, O., Rissanen, M. (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics, Hard and Soft, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 181-195.
32. Milton, J., 1998. Exploiting L1 and interlanguage corpora in the design of an electronic and language learning and production environment. In: Granger, S. (Ed.), pp. 186-198.
33. Murison-Bowie S. Linguistic corpora and language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 16:1996;182-199.
34. Scott, M.R., 1996. WordSmith. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
35. Scott M.R. PC analysis of key words - and key key words. System. 25:(2):1997;233-245.
36. Sinclair, J.M., 1987. Looking Up: An Account of the COBUILD Project in Lexical Computing. Collins, London.
37. Sinclair, J.M., 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
38. Stubbs, M., 1996. Text and Corpus Linguistics. Blackwell, Oxford.
39. Swales, J., 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
40. Tribble, C., 1991. Some uses of electronic text in English for academic purposes. In: Milton, Tong, K.S.T. (Eds.), Text Analysis in Computer Assisted Language Learning, Language Centre, University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, pp. 4-14.
41. Tribble, C., 1998. Genres, keywords, teaching: towards a pedagogic account of the language of project proposals. In: Teaching and Language Corpora '98 Conference, Seacourt Press. Oxford, pp. 188-198.
42. Tribble, C., Jones, G., 1990. Concordances in the Classroom: A Resource Book for Teachers. Longman, Harlow.
43. Willis, D., 1990. The Lexical Syllabus. Harper, New York; Collins, London.
44. Willis, D., Willis, J., 1989. Collins COBUILD English Course, Books 1-3. Collins, London.
45. Winter E.O. A clause-relational approach to English texts: a study of some predictive lexical items in written discourse. Instructional Science. 6:(1):1977;1-92.
46. Wu M.H. Towards a contextual lexico-grammar: an application of concordance analysis in EST teaching. RELC Journal. 23:(2):1992;18-34.
47. Yang H. A new technique for identifying scientific/technical terms and describing science texts. Literary and Linguistic Computing. 1:1986;93-103.
48. Zhu Q. A quantitative look at the Guangzhou Petroleum English Corpus. ICAME Journal. 13:1989;28-38.