An Examination of the Systemic Reach of Instructional Design Models: a Systematic Review

TechTrends

Volumn 64, Issue 5, 2020, Pages 710-719

  Stefaniak, Jill ^a   Xu, Meimei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

ADDIE; Instructional design; Models

Indexed keywords

EID: 85089067927     PISSN: 87563894     EISSN: 15597075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11528-020-00539-8     Document Type: Article

References (120)

1. Abidin, N. Z., & Tho, S. (2018). The development of an innovative resonance experiment using smartphones with free mobile software applications for tertiary education. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 14(1).
2. Alias, N., & Siraj, S. (2012). Design and development of physics module based on learning style and appropriate technology by employing Isman Instructional Design Model. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 84–93.
3. Alnajdi, S. M. (2018). The effectiveness of designing and using a practical interactive lesson based on ADDIE model to enhance Students' learning performances in University of Tabuk. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(6), 212–221.
4. Alodwan, T., & Almosa, M. (2018). The effect of a computer program based on analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation (ADDIE) in improving ninth Graders' listening and Reading comprehension skills in English in Jordan. English Language Teaching, 11(4), 43–51.
5. An, A., & Quail, S. (2018). Building BRYT: A case study in developing an online toolkit to promote business information literacy in higher education. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 12(3–4), 71–89.
6. Angwal, Y. A., Saat, R. M., & Sathasivam, R. V. (2019). Preparation and validation of an integrated STEM instructional material for genetic instruction among year 11 science students. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(2), 41–56.
7. Andrews, D. H., & Goodson, L. A. (1980). A comparative analysis of models of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 3(4), 2–16.
8. Balan, H. R. (2018). Use of study guide as intervention tool in enhancing Students' motivation in grade 8 genetics concepts. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2), 75–84.
9. Balta, N. (2015). A systematic planning for science laboratory instruction: Research-based evidence. Eurasia journal of mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5).
10. Banathy, B. H. (1997). Designing social systems in a changing world: Contemporary systems thinking. New York, NY: Springer.
11. Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 21–24.
12. Baris, M. F., & Tosun, N. (2013). Can social networks and e-portfolio be used together for enhancing learning effects and attitudes? Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 51–62.
13. Bawden, R. (1991). Towards action research systems. In O. Zuber-Skerritt (Ed.), Action research for change and development. Avebury: Brookfield, VT.
14. Bichelmeyer, B., Boling, E., & Gibbons, A. S. (2006). Instructional design and technology models: Their impact on research and teaching in instructional design and technology. Educational media and technology yearbook, 31, 33–73.
15. Branch, R. M. (2017). Characteristics of foundational instructional design models. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (4th ed., pp. 23–30). New York, NY: Pearson.
16. Branch, R. M., & Dousay, T. A. (2015). Survey of instructional design models (5th ed.). Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
17. Branson, R.K. (1975). Interservice procedures for instructional systems development: Executive summary and model. Tallahassee, Fla.: Center for Educational Technology, Florida State University. (National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161. Document Nos. AD-A019 486 to AD-A019 490). Public domain document.
18. Brinkerhoff, D. A. (2001). Survey of instructional development models. TechTrends, 45(1), 48.
19. Budoya, C., Kissaka, M., & Mtebe, J. (2019). Instructional design enabled agile method using ADDIE model and feature driven development method. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 15(1).
20. Bush, M. D. (2010). Born in Zanzibar, computerized in Provo, Utah: A systematic instructional design approach for Swahili CALL. CALICO Journal, 27(3), 505–516.
21. Cabrera, D. (2009). Systems thinking: Four universal patterns of thinking. Saarbrucken: DV Verlag Dr. Muller.
22. Cabrera, D., & Cabrera, L. (2015). Systems thinking: New hope for solving wicked problems. Ithaca, NY: Odyssean Press.
23. Cabrera, D., & Cabrera, L. (2019). What is systems thinking? In M. J. Spector, B. B. Lockee, & M. D. Childress (Eds.), Learning, design, and technology: An international compendium of theory, research, practice, and policy (pp. 1–28). New York: Springer.
24. Campbell, P. C. (2014). Modifying ADDIE: Incorporating new technologies in library instruction. Public Services Quarterly, 10(2), 138–149.
25. Cennamo, K. (2003). Design as knowledge construction: Model. Constructing knowledge of design. Computers in the Schools, 20(4), 13–35.
26. Çetinkaya, M. (2016). Design of Personalized Blended Learning Environments Based on web- assisted Modelling in science education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 5(4), 323–330.
27. Chen, C. J., & Teh, C. S. (2013). Enhancing an instructional design model for virtual reality-based learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(5).
28. Crawford, C. (2004). Non-linear instructional design model: Eternal, synergistic design and development. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 413–420.
29. Cropper, G. L. (2015). Evaluating instructional design models: A proposed research approach. Educational Technology, 13-20.
30. Croxton, R. A., & Chow, A. S. (2015). Using Addie and systems thinking as the framework for developing a MOOC: A case study. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 16(4), 83.
31. Dalle, J. (2017). Interactive courseware for supporting learners competency in practical skills. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(3).
32. Diamond, R. M. (2008). Designing and assessing courses and curricula: A practical guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
33. Dick, W. (1995). Instructional design and creativity: A response to the critics. Educational Technology, 35(4), 5–11.
34. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. (2009). The systematic design of instruction (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
35. Dorsey, L., Goodrum, D., & Schwen, T. (1997). Rapid collaborative prototyping as an instructional development paradigm. In C. Dills & A. Romiszowski (Eds.), Instructional development paradigms (pp. 445–465). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications.
36. Durak, G., & Ataizi, M. (2016). The ABC's of online course design according to Addie model. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(9), 2084–2091.
37. Easter, J., Bailey, S., & Klages, G. (2014). Faculty and librarians unite! How two librarians and one faculty member developed an information literacy strategy for distance education students. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 8(3–4), 242–262.
38. Edmonds, G. S., Branch, R. C., & Mukherjee, P. (1994). A conceptual framework for comparing instructional design models. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(4), 55–72.
39. Ertmer, P. A., & Cennamo, K. S. (1995). Teaching instructional design: An apprenticeship model. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(4), 43–58.
40. Fang, J., & Strobel, J. (2011). How ID models help with game-based learning: An examination of the gentry model in a participatory design project. Educational Media International, 48(4), 287–306.
41. Faulds, D. J., & Mangold, W. G. (2014). Developing a social media and marketing course. Marketing Education Review, 24(2), 127–144.
42. Frick, T. W., Chadha, R., Watson, C., Wang, Y., & Green, P. (2009). College student perceptions of teaching and learning quality. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(5), 705–720.
43. Gentry, C. G. (1994). Introduction to instructional development: Process and technique. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
44. Gibbons, A. S. (2003). What and how do designers design? TechTrends, 47(5), 22–27.
45. Gibbons, A. S. (2013). An architectural approach to instructional design. New York: Routledge.
46. Gibbons, A. S. (2014). Eight views of instructional design and what they should mean to instructional designers. In B. Hokanson & A. S. Gibbons (Eds.), Design in educational technology (pp. 15–36). New York, NY: Springer.
47. Gibbons, A. S., Boling, E., & Smith, K. M. (2014). Instructional design models. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 607–615). New York, NY: Springer.
48. Göksu, I., Özcan, K. V., Çakir, R., & Göktas, Y. (2017). Content analysis of research trends in instructional design models: 1999-2014. Journal of Learning Design, 10(2), 85–109.
49. Gray, C. M. (2013). Factors that shape design thinking. Design and Technology Education, 18(3), 8–20.
50. Gray, C. M., Dagli, C., Demiral-Uzan, M., Ergulec, F., Tan, V., Altuwaijri, A. A., et al. (2015). Judgment and instructional design: How ID practitioners work in practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 28(3), 25–49.
51. Günaydin, S., & Karamete, A. (2016). Material development to raise awareness of using smart boards: An example design and development research. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 1, 114–122.
52. Guney, Z. (2019). A sample design in programming with four-component instructional design (4c/id) model. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology.
53. Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (1997). Revisioning models of instructional development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 73–89.
54. Hegstad, C. D., & Wentling, R. M. (2004). The development and maintenance of exemplary formal mentoring programs in fortune 500 companies. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(4), 421–448.
55. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russell, J. (1981). Instructional media and the new technologies of instruction. New York. NY: John Wiley, and sons.
56. Hirumi, A. (2002). Student-centered, technology-rich learning environments (SCenTRLE): Operationalizing constructivist approaches to teaching and learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 497–537.
57. Hokanson, B., & Gibbons, A. S. (2013). Design in educational technology. Design thinking, design processes, and the design studio. New York: Springer.
58. Honebein, P. C. (2019). Exploring the galaxy question: the influence of situation and first principles on designers’ judgments about useful instructional methods. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 665–689.
59. Howard, C. D., Boling, E., Rowland, G., & Smith, K. M. (2012). Instructional design cases and why we need them. Educational Technology, 52(3), 34.
60. Huun, K., & Hughes, L. (2014). Autonomy among thieves: Template course Design for Student and Faculty Success. Journal of Educators Online, 11(2).
61. Hur, J. W., & Suh, S. (2010). The development, implementation, and evaluation of a Summer School for English language learners. Professional Educator, 34(2), n2.
62. Hutchinson, A., & Tracey, M. W. (2015). Design ideas, reflection, and professional identity: How graduate students explore the idea generation process. Instructional Science, 43(5), 527–544.
63. İneç, Z. F., & Akpinar, E. (2018). Authentic social studies teaching: The effect of semantic geo-media material on learning. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 8(2), 273–310.
64. Jirasatjanukul, K., & Jeerungsuwan, N. (2018). The Design of an instructional model based on connectivism and constructivism to create innovation in real world experience. International Education Studies, 11(3), 12–17.
65. Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: THE ARCS model approach. New York, NY: Springer.
66. Kert, S. B., Kalelioglu, F., & Gulbahar, Y. (2019). A holistic approach for computer science education in secondary schools. Informatics in Education, 18(1), 131–150.
67. Knowles, E., & Kalata, K. (2007). A model for enhancing online course development. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4(2).
68. Köksal, M. S. (2009). An instructional design model to teach nature of science. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 1–18.
69. Korkmaz, A., & Harwood, W. S. (2004). Web-supported chemistry education: Design of an online tutorial for learning molecular symmetry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 243–253.
70. Kowch, E. G. (2016). Surviving the next generation of organizations- as leaders. In N. Rushby & D. Surry (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of learning technology (pp. 484–507). Oxford: Wiley.
71. Kowch, E. G. (2019). Introduction to systems thinking and change. In M. J. Spector, B. B. Lockee, & M. D. Childress (Eds.), Learning, design, and technology: An international compendium of theory, research, practice, and policy (pp. 1–14). New York: Springer.
72. Lee, S. H., & Tseng, H. C. (2008). Investigation of technology integrated instruction in art education: A case study of exploring learning achievement. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(3), 337–361.
73. Lee, K. W., & James, C. C. (2018). Exploring a transformative teacher professional development model to engender technology integration in the 21st Century ESL language classrooms. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 8(4), 13–31.
74. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 65–94.
75. Meadows, D. (2008). Thinking in systems. White River Junction, BT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
76. Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.
77. Merrill, M.D. (2009). First principles of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth and a Carr (Eds.), Instrutional design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. III). New York, NY: Routledge.
78. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., et al. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (Chinese edition). Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine, 7(9), 889–896.
79. Moallem, M. (1998). An expert teacher's thinking and teaching and instructional design models and principles: An ethnographic study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(2), 37–64.
80. Moore, R. L. (2016). Developing distance education content using the TAPPA Process. TechTrends, 60(5), 425–432.
81. Nelson, H. G. (2020). The promise of systemic designing: Giving form to water. In M. J. Spector, B. B. Lockee, & M. D. Childress (Eds.), Learning, design, and technology: An international compendium of theory, research, practice, and policy (pp. 1–49). New York: Springer.
82. Nichols Hess, A., & Greer, K. (2016). Designing for engagement: Using the ADDIE model to integrate high-impact practices into an online information literacy course. Communications in Information Literacy, 10(2), 6.
83. Ozmen, B., Tansel, T. E. P. E., & Tuzun, H. (2018). Adapting a residential course to web-based blended learning. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 18(75), 115–136.
84. Plass, J. L., & Salisbury, M. W. (2002). A living-systems design model for web-based knowledge management systems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(1), 35–56.
85. Pontes, T. B., Miranda, G. L., & Celani, G. C. (2018). Algorithm-aided design with Python: Analysis of technological competence of subjects. Education Sciences, 8(4), 200.
86. Rahman, M., Abd, J., & Ismail, M. (2014). Development and evaluation of the effectiveness of computer-assisted physics instruction. International Education Studies, 7(13), 14–22.
87. Ravi, R., & Malathy, V. A. (2010). Multimedia as an interactive platform in learning volcanoes in social sciences among upper primary students--An experiment. Journal on School Educational Technology, 6(2), 42–46.
88. Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part II: A history of instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 57–67.
89. Reiser, R. A. (2017). A history of instructional design and technology. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (4th ed., pp. 8–22). New York, NY: Pearson.
90. Richey, R. C. (2005). Validating instructional design and development models. Innovations in instructional technology: Essays in honor of M. David Merrill, 171–185.
91. Rim, H. M., & Choi, I. S. (2012). A Case study on the effect of designing instruction according to the ASSURE model to mathematics teacher's TPACK and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 22(2), 179–202.
92. Robin, B. R., & McNeil, S. G. (2012). What educators should know about teaching digital storytelling. Digital Education Review, 22, 37–51.
93. Rothwell, W. J., & Kazanas, H. C. (2011). Mastering the instructional design process: A systematic approach. New York: NY: John Wiley & Sons.
94. Rowland, G., & Adams, A. M. (1999). Systems thinking in instructional design. In J. van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 29–44). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
95. Ruark, B. E. (2008). ISD model building: From tabula rasa to apple peel. Performance Improvement, 47(7), 24–30.
96. Samur, Y. (2019). Kes Sesi: A mobile game designed to improve kindergarteners' recognition of letter sounds. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(2), 294–304.
97. Sarfo, F. K., & Elen, J. (2007). Developing technical expertise in secondary technical schools: The effect of 4C/ID learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 10(3), 207–221.
98. Sarfo, F. K., & Elen, J. (2008). The moderating effect of instructional conceptions on the effect of powerful learning environments. Instructional Science, 36(2), 137–153.
99. Shibley, I., Amaral, K. E., Shank, J. D., & Shibley, L. R. (2011). Designing a blended course: Using ADDIE to guide instructional design. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(6), 80.
100. Singh, C. K. S., Singh, R. K. A., Singh, T. S. M., Mostafa, N. A., & Mohtar, T. M. T. (2018). Developing a higher order thinking skills module for weak ESL learners. English Language Teaching, 11(7), 86–100.
101. Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., Russell, J. D., & Mims, C. (2015). Instructional technology and media for learning (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
102. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional design. New York: Macmillan.
103. Smith, K. M., & Boling, E. (2009). What do we make of design? Design as a concept in educational technology. Educational Technology, 3-17.
104. Spector, J. M. (2008). Theoretical, foundations. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 21–28). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
105. Stefaniak, J. (2020). The utility of design thinking to promote systemic instructional design practices in the workplace. TechTrends, 64(2), 202–210.
106. Sugrue, B. (2002). Performance-based instructional design for E-learning. Performance Improvement, 41(7), 47–53.
107. Tessmer, M., & Wedman, J. F. (1990). A layers-of-necessity instructional development model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(2), 77–85.
108. Thienthong, A., & Suppasetseree, S. (2016). A WordPress-based instructional model for developing semantically-driven academic writing lessons for Thai EFL university students. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 9(2), 22–43.
109. Tiantong, M., & Teemuangsai, S. (2013). Student team achievement divisions (STAD) technique through the Moodle to enhance learning achievement. International Education Studies, 6(4), 85–92.
110. Trust, T., & Pektas, E. (2018). Using the ADDIE model and universal Design for Learning Principles to develop an open online course for teacher professional development. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(4), 219–233.
111. Türker, F. M. (2016). Design process for online websites created for teaching Turkish as a foreign language in web based environments. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(8), 642–655.
112. Usta, N. D., & Güntepe, E. T. (2017). Pre-service Teachers' material development process based on the ADDIE model: E-book design. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(12), 199–210.
113. Van Merrienboer, J., & Kirschner, P. (2007). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
114. Wang, S. K., & Hsu, H. Y. (2009). Using the ADDIE model to design second life activities for online learners. TechTrends, 53(6), 77.
115. Yang, L., & Congzhou, Y. (2019). The loss and return of Chinese culture in English teaching: Teaching Design of Chinese tea Culture in English class based on ADDIE model. International Education Studies, 12(11).
116. Yang, C. S., Moore, D. M., & Burton, J. K. (1995). Managing courseware production: An instructional design model with a software engineering approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(4), 60–70.
117. Yulastri, A., & Hidayat, H. (2017). Developing an entrepreneurship module by using product- based learning approach in vocational education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(5), 1097–1109.
118. Yüzen, A., & Karamete, A. (2016). Computer assisted educational material preparation for fourth grade primary school students' english language class in teaching numbers. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 15(1), 94–104.
119. Zain, I. M. (2017). The Collaborative Instructional Design System (CIDS): Visualizing 21st century learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(12), 2259–2266.
120. Zain, I. M., Muniandy, B., & Hashim, W. (2016). An integral ASIE ID model: The 21st century instructional design model for teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 547–554.