Assessment in collaborative learning

The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 280-296

  Van Aalst, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85086216766     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203837290-25     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Assessment of 21st Century Skills (ACT21) Project. (n.d.). Retrieved from www.act21.org
3. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307-359.
4. Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (Vol. 2, pp. 269-292). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Biggs, J. (Ed.). (1996). Testing: To educate or to select? Education in Hong Kong at the crossroads. Hong Kong SAR, China: Hong Kong Educational.
6. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. New York: Open University Press.
7. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 5, 7-74.
8. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5-31.
9. Center for Curriculum Development (CDC). (2000). Learning to learn: The way forward in curriculum development. Hong Kong SAR, China: Author.
10. Center for Curriculum Development (CDC)/Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority (HKEAA). (2007). Liberal studies curriculum and assessment guide (secondary 4-6). Hong Kong SAR, China: Author.
11. Chan, C. K. K., & van Aalst, J. (2004). Learning, assessment, and collaboration in computer-supported learning environments. In J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, & R. L. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education (pp. 87-112). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
12. Chen, C.-M., & Chen, M.-C. (2009). Mobile formative assessment tool based on data mining techniques for supporting web-based learning. Computers & Education, 52, 256-273.
13. Colbeck, C., Campbell, S., & Bjorklund, S. (2000). Grouping in the dark: What college students learn from group projects. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(1), 60-83.
14. Dannefer, E. F., Henson, L. C., Bierer, S. B., Grady-Weliky, T. A., Meldrum, S., Nofziger, A. C., & Epstein, R. M. (2005). Peer assessment of professional competence. Medical Education, 39, 713-722.
15. Davis, N. T., Kumtepe, E. G., & Aydeniz, M. (2007). Fostering continuous improvement and learning through peer assessment: Part of an integral model of assessment. Educational Assessment, 12, 113-135.
16. de Laat, M., Lally, V., & Lipponen, L. (2007). Investigating patterns of interaction in networked learning and computer-supported collaborative learning: A role for social network analysis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 87-103.
17. Foltz, P. (1997). Latent semantic analysis for text-based research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 28, 197-202.
18. Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Revised and updated edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
19. Gipps, C. V. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. Abingdon, England: RoutledgeFalmer.
20. Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000). Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 437-469.
21. Hagel, J. III, & Seely Brown, J. (2005). The only sustainable edge: Why business strategy depends on productive friction and dynamic specialization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
22. Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Emergence of progressive-inquiry culture in computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning Environments Research, 6, 199-220.
23. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
24. Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). Building social networks via computer networks: Creating and sustaining distributed learning communities. In K. A. Renniger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 159-190). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Hewitt, J. (2005). Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 567-589.
26. Hsi, S., & Hoadley, C. M. (1997). Productive discussion in science: Gender equity through electronic discourse. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6, 23-36.
27. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J.,… Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting Learning by Design into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 495-547.
28. Ladouceur, M. G., Rideout, E. M., Black, M. E. A., Crooks, D. L., O’Mara, L. M., & Schmuck, M. L. (2004). Development of an instrument to assess individual student performance in small group tutorials. Journal of Nursing Education, 43, 447-455.
29. Landauer, T. K., Laham, D., & Foltz, P. (2003). Automatic essay assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 295-308.
30. Lee, E. Y. C., Chan, C. K. K., & van Aalst, J. (2006). Students assessing their own collaborative knowlegde building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 277-307.
31. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author..
32. National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
33. Pauli, R., Mohiyeddini, C., Bray, D., Michie, F., & Street, B. (2008). Individual differences in negative group work experiences in collaborative student learning. Educational Psychology, 28, 47-58.
34. Perrenoud, P. (1998). From formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning processes. Towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 85-102.
35. Prins, F. J., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2005). Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment: A case study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 417-444.
36. Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28, 4-13.
37. Ross, J. A., & Starling, M. (2008). Self-assessment in a technology-supported environment: The case of grade 9 geography. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15, 183-199.
38. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 57-84.
39. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-115). New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. Tyler, R. Gagne, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives on curriculum evaluation (pp. 121-132). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
41. Shepard, L. E. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 1-14.
42. Stahl, G. (2002). Rediscovering CSCL. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 169-181). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Stahl, G. (2010). Group cognition as a foundation for the new science of learning. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), The new science of learning: Cognition, computers and collaboration in education (pp. 23-44). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
44. Taras, M. (2009). Summative assessment: The missing link for formative assessment. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33, 57-69.
45. Tiwari, A., & Tang, C. (2003). From process to outcome: The effect of portfolio assessment on student learning. Nurse Education Today, 23(4), 269-277.
46. van Aalst, J. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge sharing, construction, and creation discourses. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 259-288.
47. van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2007). Student-directed assessment of knowledge building using electronic portfolios. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 175-220.
48. Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., Chizhik, A. W., & Sugrue, B. (1998). Equity issues in collaborative group assessment: Group composition and performance. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 607-651.
49. Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., & Zuniga, S. (2002). Short circuits or superconductors? Effects of group composition on high-achieving students’ science assessment performance. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 943-989.
50. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
51. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 1-118.
52. Willis, S. C., Jones, A., Bundy, C., Burdett, K., Whitehouse, C. R., & O’Neill, P. A. (2002). Small-group work and assessment in a PBL curriculum: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation of student perceptions of the process of working in small groups and its assessment. Medical Teacher, 24, 495-501.
53. Winne, P., & Hadwin, A. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45, 477-501.
55. Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 7-44.