Fostering continuous improvement and learning through peer assessment: Part of an integral model of assessment

Educational Assessment

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 113-135

  Davis, Nancy T ^a   Kumtepe, Evrim Genc ^b   Aydeniz, Mehmet ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ANADOLU UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249729444     PISSN: 10627197     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10627190701232720     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1998). Blueprints on-line (Project 2061; ENC-0133773). Retrieved September 20, 2004, from http://www.project2061.org/publications/bfr/ online/Assessm/text.htm
2. Becker, H. (1992). A model for improving the performance of integrated learning systems: Mixed individualized/group/whole class lessons, cooperative learning, and organizing time for teacher-led remediation of small groups. Educational Technology, 32, 6-15.
3. Bentley, T. (1998). Learning beyond the classroom: Education for a changing world. London: Routledge.
4. Bloxham, S., & West, A. (2004). Understanding the rules of the game: Marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students' conceptions of assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 721-733.
5. Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 413-426.
6. Bruffee, K. (1999). Collaborative learning: Higher education, independence and the authority of knowledge (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
7. Burnaford, G. E., Fischer, J., & Hobson, D. (Eds.). (2001). Teachers doing research: The power of action through inquiry (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. ( 1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. Lewes, England: Palmer.
9. Clark, C. M. (1995,). Thoughtful teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
10. Cobb, P. ( 1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and socioculturel perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23, 13-20.
11. Cook-Sather, A. (2002). Authorizing students' perspectives: Toward trust, dialogue, and change in education. Educational Researcher, 31(4), 3-14.
12. Corbett, D., & Wilson, B. (1995). Make a difference with, not for, students. Educational Researcher 24, 12-17.
13. Davis, B. (2004) Inventions of teaching: A genealogy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14. Dochy, P., & Moerkerke, G. ( 1997). The present, the past and the future of achievement testing and performance assessment. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 415-432.
15. Elwood, J., & Klenowski, V. (2002). Creating communities of shared practice: The challenges of assessment use in learning and teaching. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 27, 243-256.
16. Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving assessment through student involvement. London: Routledge.
17. Fallows, S., & Chandramohan, B. (2001). Multiple approaches to assessment: Reflections on use of tutor, peer and self-assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 6, 229-246.
18. Finders, M. (1997). Just girls: Hidden literacies and life in junior high. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Freeman, M. (1995). Peer assessment by groups of group work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 20, 289-300.
20. Gipps, C. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: Palmer.
21. Gore, J. M., & Zeichner, K. M. (1991). Action research and reflective teaching in preservice teacher education: A case study from the United States. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 119-136.
22. Grant, C., & Zeichner, K. (1984). On becoming a reflective teacher. In C. Grant (Ed.), Preparing for reflective teaching (pp. 1-18). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
23. Ingram, D., Louis, K. S., & Schroeder, R. G. (2004). Accountability policies and teacher decision making: Barriers to the use of data to improve practice. Teachers College Record, 106, 1258-1287.
24. Juwah, C. (2003). Using peer assessment to develop skills and capabilities. Journal of the United States Distance Learning Association, 17. Retrieved June 24, 2005, from http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/ JAN03_Issue/article04.html
25. Kohn, A. (1992). No contest: The case against competition. Boston: Hougton Mifflin.
26. Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics (G. W. Lewin, Ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
27. Macdonald, J. (2004). Developing competent e-learners: The role of assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 215-226.
28. Marshall, H. ( 1988). Work or learning: Metaphors in classroom. Educational Researcher, 17(9), 9-16.
29. McDowell, L. ( 1995). The impact of innovative assessment on student learning. Journal of Innovations in Education and Training International, 32, 302-313.
30. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Retrieved December 10, 2003, from http://www.nap.edu/html/nses/ pdf/chap5.pdf
31. National Research Council. (2001a). Classroom assessment and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
32. National Research Council. (2001 b). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
33. National Research Council. (2005). How students learn: Science in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
34. Nilson, L. (2003). Improving student peer feedback. College Teaching, 51, 34-38.
35. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (1996). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. New York: Peter Lang.
37. Pringle, R. M. (2000). When grades get in the way of learning: An interpretative study of developing assessment as continuous improvement in science teacher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
38. Riding, P., Fowell, S., & Levy, P. (1995). An action research approach to curriculum development. Information Research, 1. Retrieved June 24, 2005, from http://informationr.net/ir/1-1/paper2.html
39. Ropers-Huilman, B. ( 1998). Feminist teaching in theory and practice: Situating power and knowledge in poststructural classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
40. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
41. Sadler, D. R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 175-194.
42. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
43. Schwartz, P., & Webb, G. (Eds.). (2002). Assessment: Case studies, experience and practice. London: Kogan Page.
44. Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29 (7), 4-15.
45. Shultz, J., & Cook-Sather, A. (Eds.). (2001). In our own words: Students' perspectives on school. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
46. Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. (2002). Peer assessment training in teacher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 443-454.
47. St. Pierre, E. A. (2000). Poststructural feminism in education: An overview. Qualitative Studies in Education, 73, 477-515.
48. Strachan, I. B., & Wilcox, S. (1996). Peer and self assessment of group work: Developing an effective response to increased enrolment in a third-year course in microclimatology. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20, 343-353.
49. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. Stringer, E. T. (1999) Action research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Svinicki, M. D. (2001). Encouraging your students to give feedback. In K. G. Lewis (Ed.), Techniques and strategies for interpreting student evaluations: New directions in teaching and learning (pp. 17-24). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
52. Swann, J., & Ecclestone, K. (1999). Improving lecturers' assessment practice in higher education: A problem-based approach. Educational Action Research, 7, 63-86.
53. Tomal, D. R. (2003). Action research for educators. Latham, ME: Scarecrow.
54. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in college and university. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249-276.
55. von Glasersfeld, E. (1993). Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 23-38). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
56. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
58. Wilber, K. (2000). Integral psychology. Boston: Shambhala Publications.
59. Wilber, K. (2004). Kosmic consciousness [CD], Boulder, CO: Sounds True.
60. Williams, E. (1992). Student attitudes towards approaches to learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 17, 45-58.
61. Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1982). Action research in higher education. London: Kogan Page.