Reconsidering the relationship between generic and situated IL approaches: The Dreyfus model of skill acquisition in formal information literacy learning environments, Part II

Library Philosophy and Practice

Volumn 2013, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Farrell, Robert ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85085297574     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15220222     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Badke, W. B. (2012). Teaching research processes: The faculty role in the development of skilled student researchers. Witney, UK: Chandos Publishing.
2. Bailin, A., &. Grafstein, A. (2010). The critical assessment of research: Traditional and new methods of evaluation. Oxford, UK: Chandos.
3. Beck, S. E. (2009). The good, the bad & the ugly or, why it's a good idea to evaluate web sources. Retrieved March 10, 2012 from http://lib.nmsu.edu/instruction/eval.html.
4. Booth, C. (2011). Reflective teaching, effective learning: Instructional literacy for library educators. Chicago: American Library Association.
5. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
6. Cohen, L. & Jacobson, T. E. (2009). Evaluating web content. Retrieved March 10, 2012 from http://library.albany.edu/usered/eval/evalweb/.
7. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., and Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser, pp. 453-494. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Deleo, P. A., Eichenholtz, S., & Sosin, A. A. (2009). Bridging the information literacy gap with clickers. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 35(5), 438-444.
9. Diekema, A. R., Holliday, W., & Leary, H. (2011). Re-framing information literacy: Problem-based learning as informed learning. Library Information Science Research 33(4), 261-268.
10. Dreyfus, H. L. (2002). Intelligence without representation-Merleau-Ponty's critique of mental representation the relevance of phenomenology to scientific explanation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1(4), 367-383.
11. Dreyfus, H. L. (2004). What could be more intelligible than everyday intelligibility? Reinterpreting Division I of Being and Time in the light of Division II. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 24(3), 265-274.
12. Dreyfus, H. L. (2006). Overcoming the myth of the mental. Topoi, 25(1-2), 43-49.
13. Dreyfus, H. L. 2009. On the Internet. New York: Routledge.
14. Dreyfus, S. E., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1980). A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition. Berkeley: Operations Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
15. Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1988). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press.
16. Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (2005). Expertise in real world contexts. Organization Studies, 26(5), 779-792.
17. Eldredge, J. D. (2004). The librarian as tutor/facilitator in a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum. Reference Services Review. 32(1), 54-59.
18. Elmborg, J. (2002). Teaching at the desk: Toward a reference pedagogy. Portal: Libraries and the Academy. 2(3), 455-464.
19. Elmborg, J. (2006). Critical information literacy: implications for instructional practice. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 32(2), 192-199.
20. Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T, & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363-496.
21. Fafeita, J., & Lloyd, A. (2012). Plating up information literacy as a social practice: A slice of the literature. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 43(2), 92-101.
22. Farrell, R. (2012). Reconsidering the relationship between generic and situated IL approaches: the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition in formal information literacy learning environments, part I. Library Philosophy and Practice. Paper 842. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://digitalcommons.uni.edu/libphilprac/842.
23. Fister, B. (1990). Teaching research as a social act: collaborative learning and the library. RQ. 29, 505-509.
24. Gaphery, J. & White, E. (2012). Library use of web-based research guides. Information Technologies and Libraries. 31(1), 21-31.
25. Gates Auto Aftermarket. (2011, July 25). GATES: Diagnosing belt noise-the spray bottle test [Video file]. Retrieved August 3, 2013 from http://youtu.be/fPjmBQc2gGQ.
26. Gewirtz, S. (2012). Make your library instruction interactive with Poll Everywhere. College & Research Libraries News, 73(7), 400-403.
27. Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Ginder, S. A., & Kelly-Reid, J. E. Postsecondary institutions and cost of attendance in 2012-13; degrees and other awards conferred, 2011-12; and 12-month enrollment, 2011-12 first look (provisional data). NCES 2013-289rev. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved August 3, 2013 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2013/2013289rev.pdf.
29. Grassian, E. Thinking critically about world wide web resources. 2008. Retrieved March 10, 2012 from http://www2.library.ucla.edu/libraries/college/11605_12337.cfm.
30. Grose, C. (2013). Beyond skills training, revisited: The clinical education spiral. Clinical Law Review, 19(2), 489-515.
31. Gross, M.. 2005. The impact of low-level skills on information-seeking behavior: Implications of competency theory for research and practice. Reference & User Services Quarterly. 45(2), 155-162.
32. Hjorland, B. (2011). Evaluation of an information source illustrated by a case study: Effect of screening for breast cancer. Journal of the American Society: for Information Science and Technology. 62(10), 1892-1898.
33. Holler, C. M.. (2008). Building bridges early: Embedding future information professionals in an MBA student consulting organization. Contributed Papers of the Annual Conference of the Special Libraries Association. Retrieved March 10, 2012 from http://www.sla.org/pdfs/2008CP_Holler.pdf.
34. Hoyer, J. (2011). Information is social: information literacy in context. Reference Services Review. 39(1), 10-23.
35. Jacobs H.L.M. 2008. Information literacy and reflective pedagogical praxis. Journal of Academic Librarianship. 34(3), 256-262.
36. Johnson, J. (2003). On contexts of information seeking. Information Processing & Management. 39(5), 735-760.
37. Kautto, V., & Talja, S. (2007). Disciplinary socialization: Learning to evaluate the quality of scholarly literature. Advances in Library Administration and Organization. 25, 33-59.
38. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (2008). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39. Lloyd, A. (2005). Information literacy: Different contexts, different concepts, different truths? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 37(2), 82-88.
40. Lloyd, A. (2006). Information literacy landscapes: an emerging picture. Journal of Documentation, 62(5), 570-583.
41. Lloyd, A. (2007). Recasting information literacy as sociocultural practice: Implications for library and information science researchers. Information Research, 12(4). Retrieved March 10, 2012 from http://informationr.net/ir/12-4/colis34.html.
42. Lloyd A. (2010). Framing information literacy as information practice: Site ontology and practice theory. Journal of Documentation, 66(2), 245-258.
43. Markless, S. and Streatfield, D. (2007). Three decades of information literacy: Redefining the parameters. In S. Andretta (Ed.), Change and challenge: information literacy for the 21st Century (pp. 15-36). Adelaide: Auslib. Retrieved March 10, 2012 from http:/www.informat.org/pdfs/streatfield-markless.pdf.
44. Markless, S. and Streatfiled, D. (2010). Reconceptualizing information literacy for the Web 2.0 Environment? In S. Dasgupta, (Ed.), Social computing: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications (pp. 137-155). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
45. Meóla, M.. (2004). Chucking the checklist: A contextual approach to teaching undergraduates web-site evaluation. Portal: Libraries and the Academy. 4(3), 331-344.
46. Meriam Library-California State University, Chico. (2010). Evaluating information-applying the CRAAP test. Retrieved March 10, 2012 from http://www.csuchico.edu/lins/handouts/evalsites.html.
47. Nichols, J. T., Hart, E., Shockey, K., & Pritting, S. (2009). Lake effect research challenge. Retrieved March 10, 2012 from http://librarvguides.oswego.edu/content.php7pidM63161.
48. Nichols, J.T. (2009). The 3 directions: Situated information literacy. College and Research Libraries, 70(6), 515-530.
49. Nussbaum, M.. C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50. Ormondroyd, J., Engle, M.., & Cosgrave, T. 2011. Critically analyzing information sources. Retrieved March 10, 2012 from http://ohnuris.library.comell.edu/ref/research/skill26.htm.
51. Riddle, J. S. (2010). Information and service learning. In M.. T. Accardi, E. Drabinski, & A. Kumbier, (Eds.), Critical library instruction: Theories and methods (pp. 133-148). Duluth, MN: Library Juice Press.
52. Rietveld, E. (2010). McDowell and Dreyfus on unreflective action. Inquiry:, 53(2), 183-207.
53. Rietveld, E. (2008). Situated normativity: The normative aspect of embodied cognition in unreflective action. Mind, 117(468), 973-1001.
54. Ross, A., & Fumo, C. (2011). Active learning in the library instruction environment: An exploratory study. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(4), 953-970.
55. Roy, L., Jensen, K., & Meyers, A. H. (2009). Service learning: Linking library education and practice. Chicago: American Library Association.
56. Sadler, E. (B.), & Given, L. M. (2007). Affordance theory: a framework for graduate students' information behavior. Journal of Documentation, 63(1), 115-141.
57. Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
58. Simmons, M. H. (2005). Librarians as disciplinary discourse mediators: Using genre theory to move toward critical information literacy. Portal: Libraries and the Academy. 5(3), 297-311.
59. Smale, M.. A. (2012). Get in the game: Developing an information literacy classroom game. Journal of Library Innovation, 3(1), 126-147. Retrieved from http://www.libraryinnovation.org/article/view/182.
60. Smale. M.. A. (2011). Quality counts: Evaluating internet sources. In T. McDevitt, (Ed)., Let the games begin! Engaging students with interactive information literacy instruction, (pp. 96-98). New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc.
61. Stagg, A., & Lane, M.. (2010). Using clickers to support information literacy skills development and instruction in first-year business students. Journal of Information Technology: Education. 9, 197-215.
62. Sweeney J.K. (2008). Transforming the rational perspective on skill development: The Dreyfus model in library reference work. Advances in Library Administration and Organization, 26, 1-39.
63. Talja, S., Tuominen, K., & Savolainen, R. (2005). "Isms" in information science: constructivism, collectivism and constructionism. Journal of Documentation. 61(1), 79-101.
64. Wang, L. (2007). Sociocultural learning theories and information literacy teaching activities in higher education. Reference & User Services Quarterly. 47(2), 149-158.
65. Wegener, C. (1978). Liberal education and the modern university. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
66. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Woolwine, D. E. (2010). Generic versus discipline-specific skills. In A. Lloyd and S. Talja (Eds.), Practising information literacy: bringing theories of learning, practice and information literacy together (pp. 169-188). Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University.