Disciplinary Socialization: Learning to Evaluate the Quality of Scholarly Literature

Advances in Library Administration and Organization

Volumn 25, Issue , 2007, Pages 33-59

  Kautto, Vesa ^a   Talja, Sanna ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248682656     PISSN: 07320671     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0732-0671(07)25002-3     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. American Library Association Presidential Committee on Information Literacy (January 1989). Available at http://www.infolit.org/documents/89Report.htm (accessed May 18, 2004).
2. Association of College and Research Libraries (2000). Information competency standards for higher education. Available at http://www.ala.org/acrl/ilcomstan.html (accessed May 18, 2004).
3. Becher T. Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines (1989), The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University, Milton Keynes
4. Becher T., and Kogan M. Process and structure in higher education (1992), Routledge, London
5. Becher T., and Trowler P.R. Academic tribes and territories. 2nd ed. (2001), The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, London
6. Biglan A. The characteristics of subject matter in scientific areas. Journal of Applied Psychology 57 (1973) 195-203
7. Bishop A.P. Document structure and digital libraries: How researchers mobilize information in journal articles. Information Processing and Management 35 (1999) 255-279
8. Cheuk, B. W. (2002). Information literacy in the workplace context: Issues, best practices and challenges. White Paper prepared for UNESCO, the U.S. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and the National Forum on Information Literacy, for use at the Information Literacy Meeting of Experts, Prague, The Czech Republic (July 2002). Available at http://www.nclis.gov/libinter/infolitconfandmeet/papers/cheuk-fullpaper.pdf (accessed May 18, 2004).
9. Davenport E., and Cronin B. Texts at work: Some thoughts on "just for you" service in the context of domain expertise. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 39 (1998) 264-274
10. Eco, U. (1990). Oppineisuuden osoittaminen eli miten tutkielma tehdään (2nd ed.). [Translated from Come si fa una tesi di laurea.]. Tampere: Vastapaino.
11. Fry, J., & Talja, S. (2004). The cultural shaping of scholarly communication: Explaining e-journal use within and across academic fields. In: ASIST 2004: Proceedings of the 67th ASIST Annual Meeting, Medford, NJ: Information Today (Vol. 41, pp. 120-130).
12. Halttunen, K. (2004). Two information retrieval environments: Their design and evaluation. Doctoral dissertation, Tampere, University of Tampere. Available at http://acta.uta.fi/pdf/951-44-6009-X.pdf
13. Holmberg-Marttila D., Hakkarainen K., Viljo I., and Nikkari S. A tutorial script in medical education - the PBL-model designed for local needs. In: Poikela E., and Poikela S. (Eds). PBL in context - Bridging work and education (2005), Tampere University Press, Tampere 135-144
14. Information Literacy Meeting of Experts (2003). The Prague declaration: Towards an information literate society. National Commission on Library and Information Science; National Forum on Information Literacy & UNESCO. Available at: http://www.nclis.gov/libinter/infolitconf&meet/post-infolitconf&meet/post-infolitconf&meet.html
15. Johnston B., and Webber S. Information literacy in higher education: A review and case study. Studies in Higher Education 28 (2003) 335-352
16. Julien, H. (2005). A longitudinal analysis of information literacy instruction in Canadian academic libraries. In: L. Vaughan (Ed.), Data, information, and knowledge in a networked world. Annual Conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science, London, Ontario, June 2-4, 2005.
17. Julien H., and Given L. Faculty-librarian relationships in the information literacy context: Faculty attitudes and pedagogical practices. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 27 (2003) 65-87
18. Kapitzke C., and Bruce B.C. Libr@ries: Changing information space and practice (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
19. Kautto, V. (2004). Tieteellisen kirjallisuuden arvioinnin ohjaus yliopisto-opetuksessa. Neljän tieteenalan tarkastelu. [Teaching research literature evaluation in higher education: An analysis of four disciplines.] Doctoral dissertation, University of Oulu, Oulu. Available at: http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9514274725/
20. Khan K.S., Kunz R., Klijnen J., and Antes G. Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine (2003), Royal Society of Medicine Press, London
21. Kling, R., & Covi, L. (1997). Digital libraries and the practices of scholarly communication: Report of a project. Available at: http://www.slis.indiana.edu/kling/SCIT/SCIT97.htm (accessed September 13, 2000).
22. Kling R., and McKim G. Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51 (2000) 1306-1320
23. Kolb D.A. Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In: Chickering A. (Ed). The modern American college (1981), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 232-255
24. Lave J. Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life (1988), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
25. Lave J., and Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (1991), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
26. Leckie G., and Fullerton A. Information literacy in science and engineering undergraduate education: Faculty attitudes and pedagogical practices. College and Research Libraries 60 (1999) 9-29
27. Rader H. Information literacy 1973-2002: A selected literature review. Library Trends 51 (2002) 242-259
28. Rorty R. Philosophy and the mirror of nature (1979), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
29. Society of College, National and University Libraries (1999). Information skills in higher education: A SCONUL position paper. Available at: http://www.sconul.ac.uk/pubs_stats/pubs/99104Rev1.doc (accessed May 18, 2004).
30. Sundin O. Användarundervisning inför informationssökning i yrkeslivet: en kunskapsöversikt [User information seeking education in professional life: A review]. Human IT 7 (2004) 265-321
31. Sundin, O. (2005). Conflicting approaches to user information seeking education in Scandinavian web-based tutorials. In: ASIST 2005: Proceedings of the 68th ASIST Annual Meeting. Medford, NJ: Information Today (Vol. 42).
32. Talja S. Information sharing in academic communities: Types and levels of collaboration in information seeking and use. New Review of Information Behavior Research 3 (2003) 143-159
33. Talja S. The social and discursive construction of computing skills. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 56 (2005) 13-22
34. Talja S. The domain analytic approach to scholars' information practices. In: Fisher K., Erdelez S., and McKechnie L. (Eds). Theories of information behavior: A researcher's guide (2005), Information Today, Medford, NJ 123-127
35. Talja S., and Hansen P. Information sharing. In: Spink A., and Cole C. (Eds). New directions in human information behavior (2005), Springer, Dordrecht
36. Talja S., and Maula H. Reasons for the use and non-use of electronic journals and databases: A domain analytic study in four scholarly disciplines. Journal of Documentation 59 (2003) 673-691
37. Talja, S., Savolainen, R., & Maula, H. (2004). Field differences in the use and perceived usefulness of scholarly mailing lists. Information Research, 10. http://informationr.net/ir/10-1/paper200.html
38. Tuominen K., Savolainen R., and Talja S. Information literacy as a socio-technical practice. Library Quarterly 73 (2005) 329-345
39. Webber, S., & Johnston, B. (2004). Information literacy in the curriculum: Selected findings from a phenomenographic study of UK conceptions of, and pedagogy for, information literacy. In: C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Diversity and inclusivity. Proceedings of the 11th ISL symposium, Birmingham, 6-8 September 2004. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University.
40. Whitley R. The intellectual and social organization of the sciences (1984), Clarendon Press, Oxford
41. Whitmire E. Disciplinary differences and undergraduates' information seeking behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53 (2002) 631-638