Generic versus discipline-specific skills

Practising Information Literacy: Bringing Theories of Learning, Practice and Information Literacy Together

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 169-188

  Woolwine, David E ^a  

^a HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887487809     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-876938-79-6.50008-X     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) Information competency standards for higher education 2000, viewed 5 October 2009, Chicago, III. http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.cfm.
2. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL), 2001 Objectives for information literacy instruction: A model statement for academic librarians 2001, viewed 16 June 2009, Chicago, III. http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/objectivesinformation.cfm.
3. Badke W. Information literacy and faculty. Online 2008, 32(3):47-49.
4. Caravello P.S., Kain E.L., Kuchi T., Macicak S., Weiss G. Information literacy: The partnership of sociology faculty and social science librarians. Teaching Sociology 2008, vol. 36(1):8-16.
5. Elrod S.L., Somerville M.M. Literature-based scientific learning: A collaboration model. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2008, vol. 33(6):684-691.
6. Frohmann B. Deflating information: From science studies to documentation 2004, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
7. Fry J., Talja S. The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources. Journal of Information Science 2007, vol. 20(10):1-19.
8. Grafstein A. A discipline-based approach to information literacy. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2002, vol. 28(4):197-204.
9. Gullikson S. Faculty perceptions of ACRL's information literacy competency standards for higher education. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2006, vol. 32(6):583-592.
10. Harris B.R. Communities as necessary in information literacy development: Challenging the standards. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2008, vol. 34(3):249-255.
11. Kautto V., Talja S. Disciplinary socialization: Learning to evaluate the quality of scholarly literature. Advances in Library Administration and Organization 2007, vol. 25:33-59. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT. E.D. Garten, D.E. Williams, J.M. Nyce, S. Talja (Eds.).
12. Leckie G.J., Fullerton A. Information literacy in science and engineering undergraduate education. Faculty attitudes and pedagogical practices 1999, vol. 60:9-29. no. I.
13. Manuel K. Generic and discipline specific information literacy competencies: The case of the sciences. Science and Technology Libraries 2004, vol. 24(3/4):279-308.
14. Owusu-Ansah E.K. Information literacy and higher education: Placing the academic library at the center of a comprehensive solution. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2004, vol. 30(1):3-16.
15. Simmons M.H. 'Librarians as disciplinary discourse mediators. Using genre theory to move toward critical information literacy', portal: Libraries and the Academy 2005, vol. 5(3):297-311.
16. Talja S., Kesso H., Pietiläinen T. The production of "context" in information seeking research: A metatheoretical review. Information Processing and Management 1999, vol. 35:751-763.
17. Taylor L.H. Information literacy in subject-specialist vocabularies: A path to critical thinking. College & Undergraduate Libraries 2008, vol. 15(1/2):141-158.
18. Tuominen K., Savolainen R. A social constructionist approach to the study of information use as discursive action. Proceedings of an international conference on research in information needs, seeking and use in different contexts 1996, 81-98. Taylor Graham, London. P. Vakkari (Ed.).
19. Tuominen K., Savolainen R., Talja S. Information literacy as a sociotechnical practice. Library Quarterly 2005, vol. 75(3):329-345.