Reconsidering the relationship between generic and situated IL approaches: The Dreyfus model of skill acquisition in formal information literacy learning environments, Part I

Library Philosophy and Practice

Volumn 2012, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Farrell, Robert ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85085206077     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15220222     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. ACRL (Association of College and Research Libraries). (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Retrieved March 10, 2012 from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency
2. ACRL (Association of College and Research Libraries-Bibliographic Instruction Section). (1981). Think tank recommendations for bibliographic instruction. " College & Research Libraries News 42(December), 394-398.
3. Batalden, P., Leach, D., Swing, S., Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (2002). General competencies and accreditation in graduate medical education. Health Affairs, 21(5), 103-111.
4. Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert: excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. California: Addison-Wesley.
5. Benner, P. E.,. Tanner, C. A, & Chesla, C. A. (2009). Expertise in nursing practice: caring, clinical judgment & ethics. New York: Springer Pub.
6. Brasley, S. (2008). Effective librarian and discipline faculty collaboration models for integrating information literacy into the fabric of an academic institution. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2008, 114, 71-88.
7. Breivik, P. S. (1998). Student learning in the information age. Phoenix, Ariz: American Council on Education/Oryx Press.
8. Budd, J. (1984). The question of questioning. On the coexistence of library instruction and reference. Reference Librarian, 10, 93-100.
9. Budd, J. M. (2008). Cognitive growth, instruction, and student success. College and Research Libraries. 69(4): 319-330.
10. Dolan, D., & Martorella, G. (2003). Discipline-based information literacy and the lifelong learner. International Journal of Learning, 10, 1319-1334.
11. Dreyfus, H. L. (1997). The current relevance of Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology of embodiment. Paper presented at Conference on After Postmodernism, Chicago, IL. Retrieved March 10, 2012 from http://www.focusing.org/apm_papers/dreyfus2.html.
12. Dreyfus, H. L. (2002). Refocusing the question: Can there be skillful coping without propositional representations or brain representations? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1(4), 413-425.
13. Dreyfus, H. L. (2004). What could be more intelligible than everyday intelligibility? Reinterpreting Division I of Being and Time in the light of Division II. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 24(3), 265-274.
14. Dreyfus, H. L. (2006). Overcoming the myth of the mental. Topoi, 25(1-2), 43-49.
15. Dreyfus, H. L. 2009. On the Internet. New York: Routledge.
16. Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1988). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press.
17. Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (2005). Expertise in real world contexts. Organization Studies, 26(5), 779-792.
18. Dreyfus, S. E., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1980). A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition. Berkeley: Operations Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
19. Education and Behavioral Sciences Section. (1981). Bibliographic Competencies for Education Students. College and Research Libraries News, July/Aug., 209-210.
20. Education and Behavioral Sciences Section. (2011). Information literacy standards for teacher education. Retrieved March 10, 2012 from http://www.ala.org/acrl/files/standards/ilstandards_te.pdf
21. Euster, J. (Ed.). (1983). Reactions to the Think Tank recommendations: A symposium [Special Issue]. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 9(1).
22. Foster A.E. (2004). A nonlinear model of information seeking behaviour. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(3), 228-237.
23. Foster, A. E. (2005). A non-linear model of information seeking behaviour. Information Research, 10(2). Retrieved March 10, 2012 from http://informationr.net/ir/10-2/paper222.html
24. Gordon, L., & Bartoli, E. (2012). Using discipline-based professional association standards for information literacy integration: A review and case study. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 31(1), 23-38.
25. Grafstein, A. (2002). A discipline-based approach to information literacy. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(4), 197-204.
26. Gratch, B., et al. (1992). Information retrieval and evaluation skills for education students. College and Research Libraries News, October, 583-588.
27. Gunselman, C., & Blakesley, E. (2012). Enduring visions of instruction in academic libraries: A review of a spirited early twentieth-century discussion. Portal, 12 (3), 259-281.
28. Harris, C. (1980). User needs and User Evaluation. In P. Fox (Ed.), Library User Education: Are New Approaches Needed? British Library Research & Development Report No. 5503 (pp.12-16). London: British Library, Research and Development Department.
29. Harris, B. R. (2008). Communities as necessity in information literacy development: Challenging the standards. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(3), 248-255.
30. Hjorland, B. (2002). Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(4), 257-270.
31. Hogeveen, B. (2011). Skilled coping and sport: Promises of phenomenology. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 5(3), 245-255.
32. Johannisson, J., & Sundin, O. (2007). Putting discourse to work: Information practices and the professional project of nurses. Library Quarterly, 77(2), 199-218.
33. Lipponen, L. (2010). Information literacy as situated and distributed activity. In A. Lloyd and S. Talja (Eds.), Practising information literacy: bringing theories of learning, practice and information literacy together (pp. 51-64). Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University.
34. Lloyd, A. (2005a). Information literacy: Different contexts, different concepts, different truths? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 37(2), 82-88.
35. Lloyd, A. (2006). Information literacy landscapes: an emerging picture. Journal of Documentation, 62(5), 570-583.
36. Lloyd, A. (2007a). Learning to put out the red stuff: becoming information literate through discursive practice. Library Quarterly, 77(2), 181-198.
37. Lloyd, A. (2007b). Recasting information literacy as sociocultural practice: implications for library and information science researchers. Information Research, 12(4). Retrieved March 10, 2012 from http://informationr.net/ir/12-4/colis34.html.
38. Lloyd, A. (2009). Informing practice: information experiences of ambulance officers in training and on-road practice. Journal of Documentation, 65(3), 396-419.
39. Lloyd A. (2010a). Framing information literacy as information practice: Site ontology and practice theory. Journal of Documentation, 66(2), 245-258.
40. Lloyd, A. (2010b). Information literacy landscapes: information literacy in education, workplace and everyday contexts. Oxford: Chandos Pub.
41. Lupton, M., Bruce, C. (2010). Windows on information literacy worlds: generic, situated and transformative perspectives. In A. Lloyd and S. Talja (Eds.), Practising information literacy: bringing theories of learning, practice and information literacy together (pp. 3-27). Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University.
42. Macpherson, K. (2004). An information processing model of undergraduate electronic database information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(4), 333-347.
43. Marcum, J. W. (2002). Rethinking information literacy. Library Quarterly, 72(1), 1-26.
44. Markless, S. and Streatfield, D. (2007). Three decades of information literacy: redefining the parameters. In S. Andretta (Ed.), Change and challenge: information literacy for the 21st Century (pp.15-36). Adelaide: Auslib. Retrieved March 10, 2012 from http:/www.informat.org/pdfs/streatfield-markless.pdf
45. Markless, S. and Streatfiled, D. (2010). Reconceptualizing information literacy for the Web 2.0 Environment? In S. Dasgupta, (Ed.), Social computing: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications (pp. 137-155). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
46. Meola, M. (2004). Chucking the checklist: A contextual approach to teaching undergraduates web-site evaluation. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 4(3), 331-344.
47. Mezirow, J. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
48. Nichols, J.T. (2009). The 3 directions: Situated information literacy. College and Research Libraries, 70(6), 515-530.
49. Olsson, M.R. (2010). All the world's a stage: The information practices and sense-making of theatre professionals. Libri, 60(3), 241-252.
50. Owusu-Ansah, E. K. (2004). Information literacy and higher education: Placing the academic library in the center of a comprehensive solution. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(1), 3-16.
51. Piette, M. I. (1995). Library instruction: Principles, theories, connections, and challenges. Reference Librarian, 51/52, 77-88.
52. Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. Garden City, N. Y: Anchor Books.
53. Reed, D. (2011). Novice to expert. Vital, 8(1), 44-47.
54. Rietveld, E. (2010). McDowell and Dreyfus on unreflective action. Inquiry, 53(2), 183-207.
55. Rietveld, E. (2008). Situated normativity: The normative aspect of embodied cognition in unreflective action. Mind, 117(468), 973-1001.
56. Savolainen, R. (1995). Everyday life information seeking: Approaching information seeking in the context of 'way of life. ' Library & Information Science Research, 17(3), 259-94.
57. Savolainen, R. (2008). Everyday information practices: a socialphenomenologicalperspective. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press.
58. Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press.
59. Smalley, T. N., & Plum, S. H. (1982). Teaching library researching in the humanities and the sciences: a contextual approach. In C. Oberman and K. Strauch (Eds.), Theories of bibliographic education: designs for teaching (pp. 135-170). New York: R. R. Bowker and Company.
60. Spiranec S., & Zorica, M.B. (2010). Information literacy 2.0: Hype or discourse refinement? Journal of Documentation, 66(1), 140-153.
61. Stoffle, C. J., & Pryor, J. M. (1980). Competency-Based Education and Library Instruction. Library Trends, 29(1), 55-67.
62. Sutton, J. (2007). Batting, habit and memory: The embodied mind and the nature of skill. Sport in Society, 10(5), 763-786.
63. Swanson, T. (2006). Information literacy, personal epistemology, and knowledge construction: Potential and possibilities. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 13(3), 93-112.
64. Sweeney J.K. (2008). Transforming the rational perspective on skill development: The Dreyfus model in library reference work. Advances in Library Administration and Organization, 26, 1-39.
65. Talja, S., Tuominen K. & Savolainen, R. (2005). "Isms" in information science: constructivism, collectivism and constructionism. Journal of Documentation, 61(1), 79-101.
66. Thornton T. (2010). Clinical judgment, expertise and skilled coping. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16(2), 284-291.
67. Tuominen, K., Savolainen, R., & Talja, S. (2005). Information literacy as a sociotechnical practice. Library Quarterly, 75(3), 329-345.
68. Tyron J., Frigo E. and O'Kelly, M. (2010). Using teaching faculty focus groups to assess information literacy core competencies at university level. Journal of Information Literacy, 4(2), 62-77. Retrieved March 10, 2012 from http://ois.lboro.ac.uk/ois/index.php/JIL/article/view/LLC-V4-I2-2010-2
69. Veinot, T. C. (2007). "The eyes of the power company": Workplace information practices of a vault inspector. Library Quarterly, 77(2), 157-179.
70. Williams, G. (2007). Unclear on the context: Refocusing on information literacy's evaluative component in the age of Google. Library Philosophy and Practice, 9(3), 1-10.
71. Wilson, P. (1979). Librarians as teachers: The study of an organization fiction. The Library Quarterly, 49(2), 146-162.
72. Woolwine, D. E. (2010). Generic versus discipline-specific skills. In A. Lloyd and S. Talja (Eds.), Practising information literacy: bringing theories of learning, practice and information literacy together (pp. 169-188). Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University.