Identifying feedback that has impact

The Impact of Feedback in Higher Education: Improving Assessment Outcomes for Learners

Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages 15-34

  Henderson, Michael ^a   Ajjawi, Rola ^b   Boud, David ^b,c,d   Molloy, Elizabeth ^e  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85082396694     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3_2     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2018). Examining the nature and effects of feedback dialogue. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1106-1119. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1434128.
2. Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698-712.
3. Boud, D., Ajjawi, R., Dawson, P., & Tai, J. (Eds.). (2018). Developing evaluative judgement in higher education: Assessment for knowing and producing quality work. London: Routledge.
4. Carless, D. (2009). Trust, distrust and their impact on assessment reform. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 79-89.
5. Carless, D. (2013). Trust and its role in facilitating dialogic feedback. In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education (pp. 100-113). London: Routledge.
6. Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in university assessment: Learning from award-winningpractice. London: Routledge.
7. Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018, May 3). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Published Online. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
8. Crossman, J. (2007). The role of relationships and emotions in student perceptions of learning and assessment. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(3), 313-327.
9. Dawson, P., Boud, D., Henderson, M., Phillips, M., Molloy, E., & Ryan, T. (2018). What makes for effective feedback: Staff and student perspectives. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877.
10. Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (2007). Assessment and emotion: The impact of being assessed. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 144-155). Oxon: Routledge.
11. Farrell, L., Bourgeois-Law, G., Ajjawi, R., & Regehr, G. (2017). An autoethno-graphic exploration of the use of goal oriented feedback to enhance brief clinical teaching encounters. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 22(1), 91-104.
12. Gorard, S. (2002). The role ofcausal models in evidence-informed policy making and practice. Evaluation & Research in Education, 16(1), 51-65.
13. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
14. Maxwell, J. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3-11. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3699970.
15. Molloy, E. (2009). Time to pause: Giving and receiving feedback in clinical education. In C. Delaney & E. Molloy (Eds.), Clinical Education in the Health Professions: An Educator's Guide. Chatswood, New South Wales: Elsevier Australia.
16. Molloy, E., Borrell-Carrio, F., & Epstein, R. (2013). The impact of emotions in feedback. In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education (pp. 60-81). London: Routledge.
17. Morrison, K. (2009). Causation in educational research. London: Routledge.
18. Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501-517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559.
19. Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2005). Biology students' utilization of tutors' formative feedback: A qualitative interview study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 369-386.
20. Poulos, A., & Mahony, M. J. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: The students' perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 143-154.
21. Rowe, A. D. (2017). Feelings about feedback: The role of emotions in assessment for learning. In D. Carless, S. Bridges, C. Chan, & R. Glofcheski (Eds.), Scaling up assessment for learning in higher education: The enabling power of assessment, pp. 159-172. Singapore: Springer.
22. Ryan, T., & Henderson, M. (2017). Feeling feedback: Students' emotional responses to educator feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.l4l6456.
23. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714.
24. Sargeant, J., Mann, K., Sinclair, D., Van der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. (2007). Challenges in multisource feedback: Intended and unintended outcomes. Medical Education, 41(6), 583-591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02769.x.
25. Sargeant, J., Mann, K., Sinclair, D., Van der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. (2008). Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multisource feedback acceptance and use. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13, 275-288.
26. Sutton, P., & Gill, W. (2010). Engaging feedback: Meaning, identity and power. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 4(1), 3-13.
27. Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality ofwork. Higher Education, 76(3), 467-481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3.
28. Telio, S., Regehr, G., & Ajjawi, R. (2016). Feedback and the educational alliance: Examining credibility judgements and their consequences. Medical Education, 50, 933-942.
29. Timmerman, A. A., & Dijkstra, J. (2017). A practice approach to programmatic assessment design. Advances in Health Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10459-017-9756-3.
30. van der Vleuten, C. P., Schuwirth, L. W. T., Driessen, E. W., Dijkstra, J., Tigelaar, D., Baartman, L. K. J., & vanTartwijk, J. (2012). A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Medical Teacher, 34(3), 205-214. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2012.652239.
31. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
32. Wiener, N. (1989). The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. London: Free Association Books.