Postcolonialism, Indigenous Students, and Science Education

Handbook of Research on Science Education

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 199-226

  McKinley, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85080143166     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203824696-10     Document Type: Chapter

References (118)

1. Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1-52.
2. Aikenhead, G. S. (1997). Toward a first nations cross-cultural science and technology curriculum. Science Education, 81, 217-238.
3. Aikenhead, G. (2001). Integrating Western and Aboriginal sciences: Cross-cultural science teaching. Research in Science Education, 31, 337-355.
4. Aikenhead, G., and Huntley, B. (1999). Teachers’ views on aboriginal students learning western and aboriginal science. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 23(2), 159-175.
5. Allen, N. J., and Crawley, F. E. (1998). Voices from the bridge: Worldview conflicts of Kickapoo students of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 111-132.
6. Aoki, T. T., and Jacknicke, K. (2005). Language, culture and curriculum. In W. F. Pinar and R. L. Irwin (Eds.), Curriculum in a new key: The collected works of Ted T. Aoki (pp. 321-329). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., and Tiffin, H. (Eds.). (1995). The post-colonial studies reader. London:Routledge.
8. Atwater, M., and Crockett, D. (2003). Prospective teachers’ education worldview and teacher education programs: Through the eyes of culture, ethnicity, and class. In S. M. Hines (Ed.), Multicultural science education: Theory, practice, and promise (pp. 55-86). New York: Peter Lang.
9. Barker, M. (1999). The Maori language science curriculum in Aotearoa/New Zealand: A contribution to sustainable development. Waikato Journal of Education, 5, 51-60.
10. Barnhardt, C. (2001). A history of schooling for Alaska native people. Journal of American Indian Education, 40(1), 1-30.
11. Battiste, M., and Henderson, J. Y. (2000). Protecting indigenous knowledge and heritage. Saskatoon, SK, Canada: Purich.
12. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. New York: Routledge.
13. Bishop, R., and Glynn, T. (1999). Culture counts: Changing power relations in education. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.
14. Blades, D. W. (1997). Procedures of power and curriculum change: Foucault and the quest for possibilities in science education. New York: Peter Lang.
15. Bryan, L., and Atwater, M. (2002). Teacher beliefs and cultural models: A challenge for science teacher preparation programs. Science Education, 86, 821-839.
16. Cajete, G. (1986). Science: A Native American perspective-a culturally based science education curriculum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, International College, Los Angeles.
17. Cajete, G. (2000). Native science: Natural law of interdependence. Santa Fe, NM: Clearlight.
18. Carter, L. (2004). Thinking differently about cultural diversity: Using postcolonial theory to (re)read science education. Science Education, 88, 1-18.
19. Carter, N. P., Larke, P. J., Singleton-Taylor, G., and Santos, E. (2003). Multicultural science education:Moving beyond tradition. In S. M. Hines (Ed.), Multicultural science education: Theory, practice, and promise (pp. 1-19). New York: Peter Lang.
20. Castellano, M. B. (2000). Updating of aboriginal traditions of knowledge. In G. J. S. Dei, B. L. Hall, and D. G. Rosenberg (Eds.), Indigenous knowledges in global contexts. Multiple readings of our world (pp. 21-36). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
21. Chang, P. J., and Rosiek, J. (2003). Anti-colonialist antimonies in a biology lesson: Asonata form case study of cultural conflict in a science classroom. Curriculum Inquiry, 33, 251-290.
22. Christie, M. J. (1991). Aboriginal science for the ecologically sustainable future. Australasian Science Teachers Journal, 31(1), 26-31.
23. Clark, D. A. T. (2004). Not the end of the stories, not the end of the songs. In D. A. Mihesuah and A. C. Wilson (Eds.), Indigenizing the academy (pp. 218-232). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
24. Cobern, W. W. (1993). Contextual constructivism: The impact of culture on the learning and teaching of science. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 51-69). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
25. Cobern, W. W. (1996). Worldview theory and conceptual change in science education. Science Education, 80, 579-610.
26. Cobern, W. W., and Loving, C. C. (2000). Defining science in a multicultural world: Implications for science education. Science Education, 85, 50-67.
27. Corsiglia, J., and Snively, G. (2000). Rejoinder: Infusing indigenous science into western modern science for a sustainable future. Science Education, 85, 82-86.
28. Crosby, A. (2004). Ecological imperialism: The biological expansion of Europe, 900-1900. London:Cambridge University Press.
29. Davison, D. M., and Miller, K. W. (1998). An ethnoscience approach to curriculum issues for American Indian students. School Science and Mathematics, 98, 260-265.
30. Dei, G. J. S. (2000). African development: The relevance and implications of ‘indigenousness’. In G. J. S. Dei, B. L. Hall, and D. G. Rosenberg (Eds.), Indigenous knowledges in global contexts:Multiple readings of our world (pp. 70-86). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
31. Dukepoo, F. (2001). The Native American honor society: Challenging Indian students to achieve. In K. James (Ed.), Science and Native American communities: Legacies of pain, visions of promise (pp. 36-42). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
32. Durie, M. H. (1996). Maori, science, and Maori development. People and Performance, 4(3), 20-25.
33. Dyck, L. (2001). A personal journey into science, feminist science, and aboriginal science. In K. James (Ed.), Science and Native American communities: Legacies of pain, visions of promise (pp. 22-28). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
34. Dzama, E. N. N., and Osborne, J. F. (1999). Poor performance in science among African students: An alternative explanation to the African worldview thesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 387-405.
35. Ermine, W. J. (1995). Aboriginal epistemology. In M. Battiste and J. Barman (Eds.), First nations education in Canada: The circle unfolds (pp. 101-112). Vancouver, BC, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
36. George, J. M. (1999). Indigenous knowledge as a component of the school curriculum. In L. M. Semali and J. L. Kincheloe (Eds.), What is indigenous knowledge? Voices from the academy (pp. 79-94). New York: Falmer Press.
37. George, J., and Glasgow, J. (1988). Street science and conventional science in the West Indies. Studies in Science Education, 15, 109-118.
38. Goes in Center, J. (2001). Land, people, and culture: Using geographic information systems to build community capacity. In K. James (Ed.), Science and Native American communities: Legacies of pain, visions of promise (pp. 119-125). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
39. Hammond, L., and Brandt, C. (2004). Science and cultural process: Defining an anthropological approach to science education. Studies in Science Education, 40, 1-47.
40. Haraway, D. (1996). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In E. F. Keller and H. E. Longino (Eds.), Feminism and science (pp. 249-263). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
41. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press
42. Harding, S. (Ed.). (1993). The “racial” economy of science: Towards a democratic future. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
43. Harding, S. (1998). Is science multicultural? Postcolonialisms, feminisms and epistemologies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
44. Hemara, W. (2000). Mäori pedagogies (A view from the literature). Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
45. Hill, J., and Hawk, K. (2000). Making a difference in the classroom: Effective teaching practice in low decile, multicultural schools. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
46. Hipkins, R., Bolstad, R., Baker, R., Jones, R., Barker, M., Bell, B., et al. (2002). Curriculum, learning and effective pedagogy: A literature review in science education. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
47. Hodson, D. (1999). Critical multiculturalism in science and technology education. In S. May (Ed.), Critical multiculturalism: Rethinking multicultural and antiracist education (pp. 216-244). New York: Falmer Press.
48. Irvine, J. J., and York, D. E. (1995). Learning styles and culturally diverse students: A literature review. In J. A. Banks and A. Cherry (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 484-497). New York: Macmillan.
49. Irzik, G. (2000). Universalism, multiculturalism and science education. Science Education, 85, 71-73.
50. James, K. (2001). Fires need fuel: Merging science education with American Indian community needs. In K. James (Ed.), Science and Native American communities: Legacies of pain, versions of promise (pp. 1-8). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
51. Jegede, O. (1988). The development of science, technology and society curricula in Nigeria. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 399-408.
52. Jegede, O. (1995). Collateral learning and the eco-cultural paradigm in science and mathematics education in Africa. Studies in Science Education, 25, 97-137.
53. Jegede, O. (1997). Traditional cosmology and collateral learning in non-western science classrooms. In M. Ogawa (Ed.), Effects of traditional cosmology on science education: Report of an international scientific research program (pp. 63-73). Ibaraki, Japan: Faculty of Education.
54. Jegede, O. (1998). Worldview presuppositions and science and technology education. In D. Hodson (Ed.), Science, technology education, and ethnicity: An Aotearoa/New Zealand perspective (pp. 76-88). Wellington, New Zealand: The Royal Society.
55. Jegede, O. J., and Okebukola, P. A. (1991). The effect of instruction on socio-cultural beliefs hindering the learning of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 275-285.
56. Kawagley, A. O. (1995). A Yupiaq worldview. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
57. Kawagley, A. O. (1999). Alaska native education: History and adaptation in the new millennium. Journal of American Indian Education, 39, 31-51
58. Kawagley, A. O. (2001). Tradition and education: The world made seamless again. In K. James (Ed.), Science and Native American communities: Legacies of pain, visions of promise (pp. 51-56). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
59. Kawasaki, K. (1996). The concepts of science in Japanese and Western education. Science and Education, 5, 1-20.
60. Kawasaki, K. (2002). A cross-cultural comparison of English and Japanese linguistic assumptions influencing pupil’s learning of science. Canadian and International Education, 31(1), 19-51.
61. Key, S. (2003). Enhancing the science interest of African American students using cultural inclusion. In S. M. Hines (Ed.), Multicultural science education: Theory, practice, and promise (pp. 87-101). New York: Peter Lang.
62. Krugley-Smolska, E. (1996). Scientific culture, multiculturalism and the science classroom. Science and Education, 5, 21-29.
63. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64. Lather, P. (1999). To be of use: The work of reviewing. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 2-7
65. Lee, O. (2003). Equity for linguistically and culturally diverse students in science education: A research agenda. Teachers College Record, 105, 465-489.
66. Lewis, B. F., and Aikenhead, G. S. (2000). Introduction: Shifting perspectives from universalism to cross-culturalism. Science Education, 85, 4-5.
67. Loving, C. C., and de Montellano, B. R. O. (2003). Good versus bad culturally relevant science:Avoiding the pitfalls. In S. M. Hines (Ed.), Multicultural science education: Theory, practice, and promise (pp. 147-166). New York: Peter Lang.
68. Lujan, J. (2001). American Indian community development: Needs and strategies. In K. James (Ed.), Science and Native American communities: Legacies of pain, visions of promise (pp. 76-82). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
69. Lynch, P. P. (1996). Students’ alternative frameworks for the nature of matter: A cross-cultural study of linguistic and cultural interpretations. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 743-752.
70. Maddock, M. N. (1981). Science education: An anthropological viewpoint. Studies in Science Education, 8, 1-26.
71. Marker, M. (2004). Theories and disciplines as sites of struggle: The reproduction of colonial dominance through the controlling of knowledge in the academy. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 28(1/2), 102-110.
72. Martin, P. (1996). He tiro arotahi ki te Putaiao, te Pangarau me te Hangarau [Maori into science, maths and technology]. Wellington, New Zealand: Te Puni Kokiri.
73. McGovern, S. (1999). Education, modern development, and indigenous knowledge: An analysis of academic knowledge production. New York: Garland.
74. McKinley, E. (1995). Apower/knowledge nexus: Writing a science curriculum in Maori. Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato.
75. McKinley, E. (1996). Towards an indigenous science curriculum. Research in Science Education, 26, 155-167.
76. McKinley, E. (1997). Maori and science education: Participation, aspirations and school curricula. In B. Bell and R. Baker (Eds.), Developing the science curriculum in Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 213-226). Auckland, New Zealand: Longman.
77. McKinley, E. (1999). Maori science education: The urgent need for research. In G. Haisman (Ed.), Exploring issues in science education: Research seminar on science education in primary schools (pp. 33-40). Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
78. McKinley, E. (2001). Cultural diversity: Masking power with innocence. Science Education, 85, 74-76.
79. McKinley, E. (2003). Brown bodies, white coats: Postcolonialism, Maori women and science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
80. McKinley, E., Stewart, G., and Richards, P. (2004). Maori knowledge, language and participation in mathematics and science education. Final report for Nga Pae o te Maramatanga. Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland, National Institute of Research Excellence for Mäori Development and Advancement.
81. McKinley, E., Waiti, P., and Aislabie, J. (2004). Science, matauranga Maori and schools. Final report for Nga Pae o te Maramatanga. Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland, National Institute of Research Excellence for Mäori Development and Advancement.
82. McKinley, E., Waiti, P., and Bell, B. (1992). Language, culture and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 579-595.
83. McPherson Waiti, P. (1990). AMaori person’s viewpoint on the education of Maori children and in particular, science education. SAMEpapers, 1990, 177-201.
84. Michie, M., and Linkson, M. (1999). Interfacing western science and indigenous knowledge: A northern territory perspective. SAMEpapers, 1999, 265-286.
85. Mihesuah, D. A., and Wilson, A. C. (2004). Indigenizing the academy. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
86. Mohanram, R. (1999). Black body. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
87. Monhardt, R. M. (2003). The image of a scientist through the eyes of Navajo children. Journal of American Indian Education, 42(3), 25-38.
88. Nelson-Barber, S., and Estrin, E. T. (1995). Bringing Native American perspectives to mathematics and science teaching. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 174-185.
89. Ninnes, P. (2001). Writing multicultural science textbooks: Perspectives, problems, possibilities and power. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 47(4), 18-27.
90. Ninnes, P. (2003). Rethinking multicultural science education: Representations, identities, and texts. In S. M. Hines (Ed.), Multicultural science education: theory, practice, and promise (pp. 167-186). New York: Peter Lang.
91. Ogawa, M. (1989). Beyond the tacit framework of “science” and “science education” among science educators. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 247-250.
92. Ogawa, M. (1995). Science education in a multi-science perspective. Science Education, 79, 583-593.
93. Ogawa, M. (1997). Effects of traditional cosmology on science education: Report of an international scientific research program. Mito, Japan: Ibaraki University.
94. O’Loughlin, M. (1992). Re-thinking science education: Beyond Piaget constructivism toward a sociocultural model of teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 791-820.
95. Pomeroy, D. (1992). Science across cultures: Building bridges between traditional western and Alaskan native sciences. In S. Hills (Ed.), History and philosophy of science in science education (Vol. 2, pp. 257-267). Kingston, ON, Canada: Queen’s University.
96. Poodry, C. (2001). How to get what Indian communities need from science. In K. James (Ed.), Science and Native American communities: Legacies of pain, visions of promise (pp. 29-35). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska.
97. Rikihana, T. (1996). Te Matauranga putaiao hangarau me nga momo tikanga-a-iwi he tirohanga no Aotearoa. In Royal Society (Ed.), Science, technology education, and ethnicity: An Aotearoa/New Zealand perspective (pp. 24-29). Wellington, New Zealand: The Royal Society of New Zealand.
98. Roberts, M. (1996). Indigenous knowledge and Western science: perspectives from the Pacific. In Royal Society (Ed.), Science, technology education, and ethnicity: An Aotearoa/New Zealand perspective (pp. 59-75). Wellington, New Zealand: The Royal Society of New Zealand.
99. Rowland, P. M., and Adkins, C. R. (2003). Native American science education and its implications for multicultural science education. In S. M. Hines (Ed.), Multicultural science education:Theory, practice, and promise (pp. 103-120). New York: Peter Lang.
100. Rutherford, M., and Nkopodi, N. (1990). A comparison of the recognition of some science concept definitions in English and North Sotho for second language English speakers. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 443-456.
101. Said, E. (1994). Culture and imperialism. London: Vintage.
102. Scantlebury, K., McKinley, E., and Jesson, J. (2002). Imperial knowledge: science, education and equity. In B. E. Hernanadez-Truyol (Ed.), Moral imperialism: A critical anthology (pp. 229-240). New York: New York University Press.
103. Semali, L. M., and Kincheloe, J. L. (1999). What is indigenous knowledge? Voices from the academy. New York: Falmer Press.
104. Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago Press.
105. Smith, M. R. (1996). First nations and western science in schools. Canadian society for the study in education. St. Catherines, ON, Canada: Brock University.
106. Snively, G., and Corsiglia, J. (2001) Discovering indigenous science: Implications for science education. Science Education, 85, 6-34.
107. Solomon, J. (1987). Social influences on the construction of pupil’s understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 14, 63-82.
108. Solomon, J. (1994). The rise and fall of constructivism. Studies in Science Education, 23, 1-19.
109. Stanley, W. B., and Brickhouse, N. (2001). Teaching sciences: The multicultural question revisited. Science Education, 85, 35-49.
110. Sutherland, D. (1999). The treatment of knowledge. The Science Teacher, 66(3), 40-43.
111. Sutherland, D., and Dennick, R. (2002). Exploring culture, language and the perception of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 1-25.
112. Taylor, N., and Macpherson, C. (1997). Traditional and religious beliefs and the teaching of science in Fiji. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 32(2), 181-205.
113. Thijs, G. D., and van den Berg, E. (1995). Cultural factors in the origin and remediation of alternative conceptions in physics. Science and Education, 4, 317-347.
114. Walkerdine, V. (1984). Developmental psychology and the child-centred pedagogy: The insertion of Piaget into early education. In J. Henriques, W. Holloway, C. Urwin, C. Venn, and V. Walkerdine (Eds.), Changing the subject (pp. 153-202). London: Methuen.
115. Yakabu, J. M. (1994). Integration of indigenous thought and practice with science and technology:A case study of Ghana. International Journal of Science Education, 16, 343-360.
116. Young, M. F. D. (1974). Notes for a sociology of science education. Studies in Science Education, 1, 51-60.
117. Zaslavsky, C. (1994). “Africa Counts” and ethnomathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(2), 3-8.
118. Zepeda, O. (2001). Rebuilding languages to revitalize communities and cultures. In K. James (Ed.), Science and Native American communities: Legacies of pain, visions of promise (pp. 57-62). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.