Simulation Fellowships: Survey of Current Summative Assessment Practices

Simulation in Healthcare

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2019, Pages 300-306

  Meguerdichian, Michael ^a,b   Bajaj, Komal ^c,d   Wong, Nelson ^e,f   Bentley, Suzanne ^g   Walker, Katie ^h   Cheng, Adam ⁱ   Ahmed, Rami A ^j  

^a HARLEM HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Albert Einstein College of Medicine ^*  (United States)

^c ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d NYC Health + Hospitals Jacobi   (United States)

^e STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f SimLEARN   (United States)

^g MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h NYC Health + Hospitals Coney Island in Brooklyn   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^j INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Graduate medical education; Interprofessional education; Medical education; Simulation fellowship

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FOLLOW UP; MEDICAL EDUCATION; SIMULATION; SKILL; VALIDITY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; HUMAN; NORTH AMERICA; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIMULATION TRAINING;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FELLOWSHIPS AND SCHOLARSHIPS; FORMATIVE FEEDBACK; HUMANS; NORTH AMERICA; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIMULATION TRAINING;

EID: 85073096526     PISSN: 15592332     EISSN: 1559713X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000384     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ahmed RA, Frey JA, Hughes PG, Teikan A,. Simulation Fellowship Programs in Graduate Medical Education. Acad Med 2017; 92 (8): 1214.
2. Rolfe I, McPherson J,. Formative assessment: How am I doing? Lancet 1995; 345: 837-839.
3. Kulasegaram K, Rangachari PK,. Beyond "formative": Assessments to enrich student learning. Adv Physiol Educ 2018; 42 (1): 5-14.
4. Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Römer C,. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev 1993; 100 (3): 363-406.
5. Kibble JD,. Best practices in summative assessment. Adv Physiol Educ 2017; 41 (1): 110-119.
6. Coates WC, Lin M, Clarke S,. Defining a core curriculum for education scholarship fellowships in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med 2012; 19 (12): 1411-1418.
7. Ahmed R, Frey J, Gardner AK, Gordon JA, Yudkowsky R,. Characteristics and core curricular elements of medical simulation fellowships in North America. J Grad Med Educ 2016; 8 (2): 252-255.
8. Brett-fleegler M, Rudolph J, Eppich W,. Debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare: Development and psychometric properties. Simul Healthc 2012; 7 (5): 288-294.
9. Arora S, Ahmed M, Paige J,. Objective structured assessment of debriefing; bringing science to the art of debriefing in surgery. Ann Surg 2012; 256 (6): 982-988.
10. Runnacles J, Thomas L, Sevdalis N, Kneebone R, Arora S,. Development of a tool to improve performance debriefing and learning: The paediatric Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing (OSAD) tool. Postgr Med J 2014; 90: 613-621.
11. Cook DA, Brydges R, Ginsburg S, Hatala R,. A contemporary approach to validity arguments: A practical guide to Kane's framework. Med Educ 2015; 49 (6): 560-575.
12. Kane MT,. An argument-based approach to validation. Pscyhological Bull 112: 527-535.
13. Frallicciardi A, Vora S, Bentley S,. Development of an emergency medicine simulation fellowship consensus curriculum: Initiative of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Simulation Academy. Acad Emerg Med 2016; 23: 1054-1060.
14. Natal B, Szyld D, Pasichow S, Bismilla Z, Pirie J, Cheng A, International Simulation Fellowship Training Investigators. Simulation Fellowship Programs: An international survey of program directors. Acad Med 2017; 92 (8): 1204-1211.
15. Hughes PG, Brito JC, Ahmed RA,. Training the trainers: A survey of simulation fellowship graduates. Can Med Educ J 2017; 8 (3): E81-e87.
16. Downing SM,. Validity: On meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ 2003; 37: 830-837.
17. Cheng A, Grant V, Huffman J,. Coaching the debriefer: Peer coaching to improve debriefing quality in simulation programs. Simul Healthc 2017; 12 (5): 319-325.
18. Sittner BJ, Aebersold ML, Paige JB,. INACSL standards of best practice for simulation: Past, present, and future. Nurs Educ Perspect 2015; 36 (5): 294-298.
19. Saylor JL, Wainwright SF, Herge EA, Pohlig RT,. Development of an instrument to assess the clinical effectiveness of the debriefer in simulation education. J Allied Health 2016; 45 (3): 191-198.
20. Burgess A, Shah K, Hough O, Hynynen K,. Resident versus faculty member simulation debriefing. Clin Teach 2016; 15 (5): 477-491.
21. Durand C, Secheresse T, Leconte M,. Intérêt de la grille DASH pour l'évaluation de la qualité des débriefings: Étude au cours d'un programme de simulation autour de la reánimation du nouveau-né en salle de naissance. Arch Pediatr 2017; 24 (12): 1197-1204.
22. Ahmed RA, Atkinson SS, Gable B, Yee J, Gardner AK,. Coaching from the sidelines: Examining the impact of teledebriefing in simulation-based training. Simul Healthc 2016; 11 (5): 334-339.
23. Kibble J,. Use of unsupervised online quizzes as formative assessment in a medical physiology course: Effects of incentives on student participation and performance. Adv Physiol Educ 2007; 31 (3): 253-260.
24. Zhang N, Henderson CNR,. Can formative quizzes predict or improve summative exam performance? J Chiropr Educ 2015; 29 (1): 16-21.
25. Mcnulty JA, Espiritu BR, Hoyt AE, Ensminger DC, Chandrasekhar AJ,. Associations between formative practice quizzes and summative examination outcomes in a medical anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ 2015; 8 (1): 37-44.
26. Hiller K, Franzen D, Heitz C, Emery M, Poznanski S,. Correlation of the National Board of Medical Examiners Emergency Medicine Advanced Clinical Examination given in July to intern American Board of Emergency Medicine in-training Examination Scores: A predictor of performance? West J Emerg Med 2015; 16 (6): 957-960.
27. Peterson LN, Rusticus SA, Ross LP,. Comparability of the national board of medical examiners comprehensive clinical science examination and a set of five clinical science subject examinations. Acad Med 2015; 90 (5): 684-690.
28. Haberyan K,. Do weekly quizzes improve student performance on biology exams? Am Biol Teach 2003; 65 (2): 110-113.
29. Peat M, Franklin S,. Has student learning been improved by the use of online and offline formative assessment opportunities? Aust J Educ Technol 2003; 19 (1): 87-99.
30. ACGME. EM Milestones. As excerpted from: Http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/EmergencyMedicineMilestones.pdf. Accessed September 10, 2019.
31. Yuan CM, Prince LK, Oliver JD 3rd, Abbott KC, Nee R,. Implementation of nephrology subspecialty curricular milestones. Am J Kidney Dis 2015; 66 (1): 15-22.
32. Courtright KR, Weinberger SE, Wagner J,. Meeting the milestones: Strategies for including high-value care education in pulmonary and critical care fellowship training. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015; 12 (4): 574-578.
33. Bartlett KW, Whicker SA, Bookman J,. Milestone-based assessments are superior to Likert-type assessments in illustrating trainee progression. J Grad Med Educ 2015; 7 (1): 75-80.
34. Shah D, Goettler CE, Torrent DJ,. Milestones: The road to faculty development. J Surg Educ 2015; 72 (6): E226-e235.
35. Jonker G, Hoff RG, Ten Cate OTJ,. A case for competency-based anaesthesiology training with entrustable professional activities: An agenda for development and research. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2015; 32 (2): 71-76.
36. Ericsson KA,. Acquisition and maintenance of medical expertise: A perspective from the expert-performance approach with deliberate practice. Acad Med 2015; 90 (11): 1471-1486.
37. Mcgaghie WC, Draycott TJ, Dunn WF, Lopez CM,. Evaluating the impact of simulation on translational patient outcomes. Simul Healthc 2011;(Suppl 6): S42-S47.
38. van Gog T, Ericsson KA, Rikers RMJP, Paas F,. Instructional design for advanced learners: Establishing connections between the theoretical frameworks of cognitive load and deliberate practice. Educ Technol Res Dev 2005; 53 (3): 73-81.
39. Ericsson KA,. The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance: Cambridge University Press; 2006;685-705. Available at: Http://psych.colorado.edu/ketels/psych4145/Ericsson_2006.pdf. Accessed September 10, 2019.
40. Ten Cate O,. Competency-based education, entrustable professional activities, and the power of language. J Grad Med Educ 2013; 5 (1): 6-7.
41. Chang A, Bowen JL, Buranosky RA,. Transforming primary care training-patient-centered medical home entrustable professional activities for internal medicine residents. J Gen Intern Med 2013; 28 (6): 801-809.
42. Holzhausen Y, Maaz A, Renz A, Bosch J, Peters H,. How to define core entrustable professional activities for entry into residency? BMC Med Educ 2018; 18 (1): 87.
43. Gardner AK, Gee D, Ahmed RA,. Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for simulation leaders: The time has come. J Surg Educ 2018; 75 (5): 1137-1139.
44. Downing SM, Yudkowsky D,. Assessment in Healthcare Professions Education. New York: Routledge Publishers; 2009: 2.