Structures of the otopetrin proton channels Otop1 and Otop3

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2019, Pages 518-525

  Saotome, Kei ^a,b   Teng, Bochuan ^c   Tu, Yu Hsiang ^c   Kaplan, Joshua P ^c   Liman, Emily R ^c  

^a Alex)   (United States)

^b HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d Alex)   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARRIER PROTEIN; OTOPETRIN 1; OTOPETRIN 3; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; AVIAN PROTEIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; OTOP 1 PROTEIN, ZEBRAFISH; PROTON PUMP; ZEBRAFISH PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTON TRANSPORT; VESTIBULE; ZEBRA FISH; ANIMAL; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; CHEMISTRY; CHICKEN; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; AVIAN PROTEINS; CHICKENS; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAINS; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTON PUMPS; ZEBRAFISH; ZEBRAFISH PROTEINS;

EID: 85066951351     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41594-019-0235-9     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. DeCoursey, T. E. The voltage-gated proton channel: a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. Biochemistry 54, 3250–3268 (2015).
2. Fogel, M. & Hastings, J. W. Bioluminescence: mechanism and mode of control of scintillon activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 69, 690–693 (1972).
3. Fischer, H. Function of proton channels in lung epithelia. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Membr. Transp. Signal 1, 247–258 (2012).
4. Chang, R. B., Waters, H. & Liman, E. R. A proton current drives action potentials in genetically identified sour taste cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 22320–22325 (2010).
5. + and pH responses in mouse taste cells. J. Physiol. 547, 475–483 (2003).
6. Lyall, V. et al. Decrease in rat taste receptor cell intracellular pH is the proximate stimulus in sour taste transduction. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 281, C1005–C1013 (2001).
7. Decoursey, T. E. Voltage-gated proton channels. Compr. Physiol. 2, 1355–1385 (2012).
8. Ramsey, I. S., Moran, M. M., Chong, J. A. & Clapham, D. E. A voltage-gated proton-selective channel lacking the pore domain. Nature 440, 1213–1216 (2006).
9. Sasaki, M., Takagi, M. & Okamura, Y. A voltage sensor-domain protein is a voltage-gated proton channel. Science 312, 589–592 (2006).
10. Tu, Y. H. et al. An evolutionarily conserved gene family encodes proton-selective ion channels. Science 359, 1047–1050 (2018).
11. Hurle, B. et al. Non-syndromic vestibular disorder with otoconial agenesis in tilted/mergulhador mice caused by mutations in otopetrin 1. Hum. Mol. Genet. 12, 777–789 (2003).
12. Hughes, I. et al. Otopetrin 1 is required for otolith formation in the zebrafish danio rerio. Dev. Biol. 276, 391–402 (2004).
13. Sollner, C., Schwarz, H., Geisler, R. & Nicolson, T. Mutated otopetrin 1 affects the genesis of otoliths and the localization of Starmaker in zebrafish. Dev. Genes Evol. 214, 582–590 (2004).
14. Wang, G. X. et al. Otopetrin 1 protects mice from obesity-associated metabolic dysfunction through attenuating adipose tissue inflammation. Diabetes 63, 1340–1352 (2014).
15. Wu, C. et al. BioGPS: an extensible and customizable portal for querying and organizing gene annotation resources. Genome Biol. 10, R130 (2009).
16. Parikh, K. et al. Colonic epithelial cell diversity in health and inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 567, 49–55 (2019).
17. Kawate, T. & Gouaux, E. Fluorescence-detection size-exclusion chromatography for precrystallization screening of integral membrane proteins. Structure 14, 673–681 (2006).
18. Quistgaard, E. M., Low, C., Guettou, F. & Nordlund, P. Understanding transport by the major facilitator superfamily (MFS): structures pave the way. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 123–132 (2016).
19. Abramson, J. et al. Structure and mechanism of the lactose permease of Escherichia coli. Science 301, 610–615 (2003).
20. Murakami, S., Nakashima, R., Yamashita, E. & Yamaguchi, A. Crystal structure of bacterial multidrug efflux transporter AcrB. Nature 419, 587–593 (2002).
21. Gupta, K. et al. The role of interfacial lipids in stabilizing membrane protein oligomers. Nature 541, 421–424 (2017).
22. Wu, H. X. et al. Structure of a Class C GPCR metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 bound to an allosteric modulator. Science 344, 58–64 (2014).
23. Nagle, J. F. & Morowitz, H. J. Molecular mechanisms for proton transport in membranes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 75, 298–302 (1978).
24. Hong, M. & DeGrado, W. F. Structural basis for proton conduction and inhibition by the influenza M2 protein. Protein Sci. 21, 1620–1633 (2012).
25. Pinto, L. H. et al. A functionally defined model for the M2 proton channel of influenza A virus suggests a mechanism for its ion selectivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 11301–11306 (1997).
26. + permeation pathway in the voltage-gated proton channel Hv1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 869–875 (2010).
27. Dudev, T. et al. Selectivity mechanism of the voltage-gated proton channel, HV1. Sci. Rep. 5, 10320 (2015).
28. Chamberlin, A. et al. Hydrophobic plug functions as a gate in voltage-gated proton channels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E273–E282 (2014).
29. Aryal, P., Sansom, M. S. & Tucker, S. J. Hydrophobic gating in ion channels. J. Mol. Biol. 427, 121–130 (2015).
30. Morgan, D. et al. Peregrination of the selectivity filter delineates the pore of the human voltage-gated proton channel hHV1. J. Gen. Physiol. 142, 625–640 (2013).
31. DeCoursey, T. E. CrossTalk proposal: proton permeation through HV 1 requires transient protonation of a conserved aspartate in the S1 transmembrane helix. J. Physiol. 595, 6793–6795 (2017).
32. Chen, H. et al. Charge delocalization in proton channels, I: the aquaporin channels and proton blockage. Biophys. J. 92, 46–60 (2007).
33. Chen, Q., Zeng, W., She, J., Bai, X. & Jiang, Y. Structural and functional characterization of an otopetrin family proton channel. eLife 8, e46710 (2019).
34. Grinkova, Y. V., Denisov, I. G. & Sligar, S. G. Engineering extended membrane scaffold proteins for self-assembly of soluble nanoscale lipid bilayers. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 23, 843–848 (2010).
35. Suloway, C. et al. Automated molecular microscopy: the new Leginon system. J. Struct. Biol. 151, 41–60 (2005).
36. Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
37. Zhang, K. Gctf: real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1–12 (2016).
38. Kimanius, D., Forsberg, B. O., Scheres, S. H. W. & Lindahl, E. Accelerated cryo-EM structure determination with parallelisation using GPUs in RELION-2. eLife 5, e18722 (2016).
39. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).
40. Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018).
41. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
42. Afonine, P. V. et al. New tools for the analysis and validation of cryo-EM maps and atomic models. Acta Crystallogr. D 74, 814–840 (2018).
43. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
44. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213–221 (2010).
45. Wang, R. Y. R. et al. Automated structure refinement of macromolecular assemblies from cryo-EM maps using Rosetta. eLife 5, e17219 (2016).
46. Hughes, I. et al. Identification of the Otopetrin Domain, a conserved domain in vertebrate otopetrins and invertebrate otopetrin-like family members. BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 41 (2008).
47. Waterhouse, A. et al. SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W296–W303 (2018).
48. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System v.2.0, Schrödinger, LLC. (2018).
49. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera – a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
50. Goddard, T. D. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 27, 14–25 (2018).
51. Ashkenazy, H. et al. ConSurf 2016: an improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W344–W350 (2016).
52. Landau, M. et al. ConSurf 2005: the projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W299–W302 (2005).
53. Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).
54. Robert, X. & Gouet, P. Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W320–W324 (2014).
55. GROMACS. High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1–2, 19–25 (2015).
56. de Jong, D. H. et al. Improved parameters for the martini coarse-grained protein force field. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 687–697 (2013).
57. Stansfeld, P. J. et al. MemProtMD: automated insertion of membrane protein structures into explicit lipid membranes. Structure 23, 1350–1361 (2015).
58. Stansfeld, P. J. & Sansom, M. S. P. From coarse grained to atomistic: a serial multiscale approach to membrane protein simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 1157–1166 (2011).
59. Best, R. B. et al. Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone phi, psi and Side-Chain chi(1) and chi(2) Dihedral Angles. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 3257–3273 (2012).
60. Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W. & Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926–935 (1983).
61. Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single-crystals – a new molecular-dynamics method. J. Appl Phys. 52, 7182–7190 (1981).
62. Bussi, G., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 014101 (2007).
63. Hess, B. P-LINCS: a parallel linear constraint solver for molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 116–122 (2008).
64. Essmann, U. et al. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8577–8593 (1995).
65. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996). 27–38.
66. Sheather, S. J. & Jones, M. C. A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density-estimation. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B Met. 53, 683–690 (1991).