How often do both core competencies of shared decision making occur in family medicine teaching clinics?;À quelle fréquence rencontre-t-on les deux principales compétences de la prise de décisions en commun dans les cliniques d’enseignement universitaire de médecine familiale?

Canadian Family Physician

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2019, Pages E64-E75

  Diendéré, Gisèle ^a   Dansokho, Selma Chipenda ^a   Rocque, Rhéa ^a   Julien, Anne Sophie ^a   Légaré, France ^a   Côté, Luc ^a   Jacob, Sonia Mahmoudi Philippe ^a   Casais, Natalia Arias ^a   Pilote, Laurie ^a   Grad, Roland ^a   Giguère, Anik M C ^a   Witteman, Holly O ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIETITIAN; FAMILY MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NURSE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; RESIDENT; SHARED DECISION MAKING; TEACHING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; ECONOMICS; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUEBEC; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DECISION MAKING, SHARED; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT, HEALTH CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUEBEC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85061563977     PISSN: 0008350X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27(10):1361-7. Epub 2012 May 23.
2. Rivera-Spoljaric K, Halley M, Wilson SR. Shared clinician-patient decision-making about treatment of pediatric asthma: what do we know and how can we use it? Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2014;14(2):161-7.
3. Hack TF, Degner LF, Watson P, Sinha L. Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 2006;15(1):9-19.
4. Hamann J, Langer B, Winkler V, Busch R, Cohen R, Leucht S, et al. Shared decision making for in-patients with schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2006;114(4):265-73.
5. Joosten EA, DeFuentes-Merillas L, de Weert GH, Sensky T, van der Staak CP, de Jong CA. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom 2008;77(4):219-26. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
6. Stacey D, Légaré F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(1):CD001431.
7. Légaré F, Labrecque M, Cauchon M, Castel J, Turcotte S, Grimshaw J. Training family physicians in shared decision-making to reduce the overuse of antibiotics in acute respiratory infections: a cluster randomized trial. CMAJ 2012;184(13):E726-34. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
8. Shay LA, Lafata JE. Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med Decis Making 2015;35(1):114-31. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
9. Légaré F, Witteman HO. Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32(2):276-84.
10. Couët N, Desroches S, Robitaille H, Vaillancourt H, Leblanc A, Turcotte S, et al. Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Health Expect 2015;18(4):542-61. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
11. Dillon EC, Stults CD, Wilson C, Meehan A, Chuang J, Li M, et al. Evaluating shared decision-making across clinical topics in primary care: an exploratory study using the OPTION5 observer measure. J Patient Cent Res Rev 2016;3(3):187.
12. Légaré F. Decisions faced by patients: primary care. In: Kattan MW, editor. Encyclopedia of medical decision making. Vol 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2009. p. 316-9.
13. Hudon C, Chouinard MC, Diadiou F, Lambert M, Bouliane D. Case management in primary care for frequent users of health care services with chronic diseases: a qualitative study of patient and family experience. Ann Fam Med 2015;13(6):523-8.
14. Hunt LM, Kreiner M, Brody H. The changing face of chronic illness management in primary care: a qualitative study of underlying influences and unintended outcomes. Ann Fam Med 2012;10(5):452-60.
15. Nutting PA, Goodwin MA, Flocke SA, Zyzanski SJ, Stange KC. Continuity of primary care: to whom does it matter and when? Ann Fam Med 2003;1(3):149-55.
16. Kievit J. Applied decision analysis. In: Kattan MW, editor. Encyclopedia of medical decision making. Vol 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2009. p. 25-9.
17. Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The Control Preferences Scale. Can J Nurs Res 1997;29(3):21-43.
18. Chew LD, Griffin JM, Partin MR, Noorbaloochi S, Grill JP, Snyder A, et al. Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23(5):561-6. Epub 2008 Mar 12.
19. Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA, Jankovic A, Derry HA, Smith DM. Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale. Med Decis Making 2007;27(5):672-80. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
20. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Smith DM, Ubel PA, Fagerlin A. Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations. Med Decis Making 2007;27(5):663-71. Epub 2007 Jul 24.
21. Pluye P, Hong QN. Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annu Rev Public Health 2014;35:29-45. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
22. Trevena LJ, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Edwards A, Gaissmaier W, Galesic M, Han PK, et al. Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013;13(Suppl 2):S7. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
23. Zikmund-Fisher BJ. The right tool is what they need, not what we have: a taxonomy of appropriate levels of precision in patient risk communication. Med Care Res Rev 2013;70(1 Suppl):37S-49S. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
24. Zipkin DA, Umscheid CA, Keating NL, Allen E, Aung K, Beyth R, et al. Evidence-based risk communication: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2014;161(4):270-80.
25. Akl EA, Oxman AD, Herrin J, Vist GE, Terrenato I, Sperati F, et al. Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(3):CD006776.
26. Witteman HO, Gavaruzzi T, Scherer LD, Pieterse AH, Fuhrel-Forbis A, Chipenda Dansokho S, et al. Effects of design features of explicit values clarification methods: a systematic review. Med Decis Making 2016;36(6):760-76. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
27. Witteman HO, Scherer LD, Gavaruzzi T, Pieterse AH, Fuhrel-Forbis A, Chipenda Dansokho S, et al. Design features of explicit values clarification methods: a systematic review. Med Decis Making 2016;36(4):453-71. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
28. Lee YK, Low WY, Ng CJ. Exploring patient values in medical decision making: a qualitative study. PLoS One 2013;8(11):e80051.
29. Schwartz A, Weiner SJ, Binns-Calvey A, Weaver FM. Providers contextualise care more often when they discover patient context by asking: meta-analysis of three primary data sets. BMJ Qual Saf 2016;25(3):159-63. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
30. Barr PJ, O’Malley AJ, Tsulukidze M, Gionfriddo MR, Montori V, Elwyn G. The psychometric properties of Observer OPTION(5), an observer measure of shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns 2015;98(8):970-6. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
31. Elwyn G, Tsulukidze M, Edwards A, Légaré F, Newcombe R. Using a ‘talk’ model of shared decision making to propose an observation-based measure: Observer OPTION 5 item. Patient Educ Couns 2013;93(2):265-71. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
32. Stubenrouch FE, Pieterse AH, Falkenberg R, Santema TK, Stiggelbout AM, van der Weijden T, et al. OPTION(5) versus OPTION(12) instruments to appreciate the extent to which healthcare providers involve patients in decision-making. Patient Educ Couns 2016;99(6):1062-8. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
33. 5 measure of shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns 2017;100(10):1910-7. Epub 2017 May 1.
34. MacCallum RC, Zhang S, Preacher KJ, Rucker DD. On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychol Methods 2002;7(1):19-40.
35. Naggara O, Raymond J, Guilbert F, Roy D, Weill A, Altman DG. Analysis by categorizing or dichotomizing continuous variables is inadvisable: an example from the natural history of unruptured aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32(3):437-40. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
36. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159-74.
37. Elwyn G, Miron-Shatz T. Deliberation before determination: the definition and evaluation of good decision making. Health Expect 2010;13(2):139-47. Epub 2009 Sep 9.
38. Holman GT, Beasley JW, Karsh BT, Stone JA, Smith PD, Wetterneck TB. The myth of standardized workflow in primary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016;23(1):29-37. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
39. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Smith C, Williams S, Thornton H. Consumers’ views of quality in the consultation and their relevance to ‘shared decision-making’ approaches. Health Expect 2001;4(3):151-61.
40. Ford S, Schofield T, Hope T. Observing decision-making in the general practice consultation: who makes which decisions? Health Expect 2006;9(2):130-7.
41. Canadian Employment Equity Act. S.C. 1995, c. 44, section 3.
42. Kenny DA, Veldhuijzen W, Weijden Tv, Leblanc A, Lockyer J, Légaré F, et al. Interpersonal perception in the context of doctor-patient relationships: a dyadic analysis of doctor-patient communication. Soc Sci Med 2010;70(5):763-8. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
43. Premji K, Upshur R, Légaré F, Pottie K. Future of family medicine. Role of patient-centred care and evidence-based medicine. Can Fam Physician 2014;60:409-12 (Eng), 421-4 (Fr).
44. Saba GW, Wong ST, Schillinger D, Fernandez A, Somkin CP, Wilson CC, et al. Shared decision making and the experience of partnership in primary care. Ann Fam Med 2006;4(1):54-62.
45. Légaré F, O’Connor AM, Graham ID, Wells GA, Tremblay S. Impact of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework on the agreement and the difference between patients’ and physicians’ decisional conflict. Med Decis Making 2006;26(4):373-90.
46. 2 : exploiting the clinical consultation as a knowledge transfer and exchange environment: a study protocol. Implement Sci 2009;4:14.
47. Pellerin MA, Elwyn G, Rousseau M, Stacey D, Robitaille H, Légaré F. Toward shared decision making: using the OPTION scale to analyze resident-patient consultations in family medicine. Acad Med 2011;86(8):1010-8.
48. Gagnon S, Labrecque M, Njoya M, Rousseau F, St-Jacques S, Légaré F. How much do family physicians involve pregnant women in decisions about prenatal screening for Down syndrome? Prenat Diagn 2010;30(2):115-21.
49. Mangin D, Stephen G, Bismah V, Risdon C. Making patient values visible in healthcare: a systematic review of tools to assess patient treatment priorities and preferences in the context of multimorbidity. BMJ Open 2016;6(6):e010903.
50. Bensing J. Bridging the gap. The separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine. Patient Educ Couns 2000;39(1):17-25.
51. Mulley AG, Trimble C, Elwyn G. Stop the silent misdiagnosis: patients’ preferences matter. BMJ 2012;345:e6572.
52. Morris E, Feig SA, Drexler M, Lehman C. Implications of overdiagnosis: impact on screening mammography practices. Popul Health Manag 2015;18(Suppl 1):S3-11.
53. Hudson B, Zarifeh A, Young L, Wells JE. Patients’ expectations of screening and preventive treatments. Ann Fam Med 2012;10(6):495-502.
54. Shepherd HL, Tattersall MH, Butow PN. Physician-identified factors affecting patient participation in reaching treatment decisions. J Clin Oncol 2008;26(10):1724-31.
55. Valverde Bolívar FJ, Pedregal González M, Pérez Fuentes MF, Alcalde Molina MD, Torío Durántez J, Delgado Rodríguez M. Communication skills of tutors and family medicine physician residents in primary care clinics. Aten Primaria 2016;48(10):632-41. Epub 2016 May 5.
56. Crespo S. Portrait du profil scolaire des régions administratives du Québec. In: Institut de la statistique du Québec. Panorama des régions du Québec. Édition 2017. Quebec city, QC: Gouvernement du Québec; 2017. p. 45. Available from: www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/docs-hmi/statistiques/profils/panorama-regions-2017.pdf#page=45. Accessed 2017 Nov 14.
57. Sarma S, Hajizadeh M, Thind A, Chan R. The association between health information technology adoption and family physicians’ practice patterns in Canada: evidence from 2007 and 2010 National Physician Surveys. Healthc Policy 2013;9(1):97-117.