An evaluation of two interventions to enhance patient-physician communication using the observer OPTION5 measure of shared decision making

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 100, Issue 10, 2017, Pages 1910-1917

  Dillon, Ellis C ^a   Stults, Cheryl D ^a   Wilson, Caroline ^b   Chuang, Judith ^a   Meehan, Amy ^a   Li, Martina ^a   Elwyn, Glyn ^c   Frosch, Dominick L ^a,d   Yu, Edward ^e   Tai Seale, Ming ^a  

^a PALO ALTO MEDICAL FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b All Native Group   (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH POLICY AND CLINICAL PRACTICE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e PALO ALTO MEDICAL FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Measurement; Methods; Patient provider communication; Shared decision making

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CALIFORNIA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMMUNICATION SKILL; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SHARED DECISION MAKING; DECISION MAKING; EVALUATION STUDY; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY;

ADULT; CALIFORNIA; COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85019961868     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: 18735134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.04.020     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. C.H. Braddock 3rd, The emerging importance and relevance of shared decision making to clinical.
2. Elwyn, G., Frosch, D., Thomson, R., Joseph-Williams, N., Lloyd, A., Kinnersley, P., et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 27 (2012), 1361–1367.
3. Barry, M.J., Edgman-Levitan, S., Shared decision making — the pinnacle of patient-centered care. N. Engl. J. Med. 366 (2012), 780–781.
4. Charles, C., Gafni, A., Whelan, T., Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc. Sci. Med. 49 (1999), 651–661.
5. Starfield, B., Shi, L., Macinko, J., Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q. 83 (2005), 457–502.
6. Hulscher, M., Wensing, M., Grol, R., Van Der Weijden, T., Van Weel, C., Interventions to improve the delivery of preventive services in primary care. Am. J. Public Health 89 (1999), 737–746.
7. Tai-Seale, M., McGuire, T., Zhang, W., Time allocation in primary care office visits. Health Serv. Res. 42 (2007), 1871–1894.
8. Braddock, C.H. 3rd, Edwards, K.A., Hasenberg, N.M., Laidley, T.L., Levinson, W., Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 282 (1999), 2313–2320.
9. Street, R.L., Information-giving in medical consultations: the influence of patients' communicative styles and personal characteristics. Soc. Sci. Med. 32 (1991), 541–548.
10. Willems, S., De Maesschalck, S., Deveugele, M., Derese, A., De Maeseneer, J., Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor–patient communication: does it make a difference?. Patient Educ. Couns. 56 (2005), 139–146.
11. Oliver, J.W., Kravitz, R.L., Kaplan, S.H., Meyers, F.J., Individualized patient education and coaching to improve pain control among cancer outpatients. J. Clin. Oncol. 19 (2001), 2206–2212.
12. Austin, C., Mohottige, D., Sudore, R., Smith, A., Hanson, L., Tools to promote shared decision making in serious illness: a systematic review. JAMA Intern. Med. 175 (2015), 1213–1221.
13. Lewis, C.L., Adams, J., Tai-Seale, M., Huang, Q., Knowles, S.B., Nielsen, M.E., et al. A randomized controlled effectiveness trial for PSA screening decision support interventions in two primary care settings. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 30:6 (2015), 810–816.
14. Kasper, J., Heesen, C., Köpke, S., Fulcher, G., Geiger, F., Patients’ and observers’ perceptions of involvement differ. Validation study on inter-relating measures for shared decision making. PLoS One, 6, 2011, e26255.
15. Wunderlich, T., Cooper, G., Divine, G., Flocke, S., Oja-Tebbe, N., Stange, K., et al. Inconsistencies in patient perceptions and observer ratings of shared decision making: the case of colorectal cancer screening. Patient Educ. Couns. 80 (2010), 358–363.
16. Stacey, D., Taljaard, M., Drake, E.R., O'Connor, A.M., Audit and feedback using the brief Decision Support Analysis Tool (DSAT-10) to evaluate nurse–standardized patient encounters. Patient Educ. Couns. 73 (2008), 519–525.
17. Shields, C.G., Franks, P., Fiscella, K., Meldrum, S., Epstein, R.M., Rochester participatory decision-making scale (RPAD): reliability and validity. Ann. Fam. Med. 3 (2005), 436–442.
18. Scholl, I., Loon, M.K.-V., Sepucha, K., Elwyn, G., Légaré, F., Härter, M., et al. Measurement of shared decision making – a review of instruments. Zeitschrift fér Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 105 (2011), 313–324.
19. Elwyn, G., Hutchings, H., Edwards, A., Rapport, F., Wensing, M., Cheung, W.Y., et al. The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expect. 8 (2005), 34–42.
20. Elwyn, G., Edwards, A., Wensing, M., Hood, K., Atwell, C., Grol, R., Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Qual. Saf. Health Care 12 (2003), 93–99.
21. Elwyn, G., Tsulukidze, M., Edwards, A., Légaré, F., Newcombe, R., Using a ‘talk'model of shared decision making to propose an observation-based measure: observer OPTION 5 Item. Patient Educ. Couns. 93 (2013), 265–271.
22. Barr, P.J., O'Malley, A.J., Tsulukidze, M., Gionfriddo, M.R., Montori, V., Elwyn, G., The psychometric properties of Observer OPTION 5, an observer measure of shared decision making. Patient Educ. Couns. 98:8 (2015), 970–976.
23. Stubenrouch, F.E., Pieterse, A.H., Falkenberg, R., Santema, T.K.B., Stiggelbout, A.M., van der Weijden, T., et al. OPTION 5 versus OPTION 12 instruments to appreciate the extent to which healthcare providers involve patients in decision-making. Patient Educ. Couns. 99:6 (2015), 1062–1068.
24. Elwyn, G., Tsulukidze, M., Edwards, A., Légaré, F., Newcombe, R., Using a ‘talk'model of shared decision making to propose an observation-based measure: observer OPTION 5 Item. Patient Educ. Couns. 93 (2013), 265–271.
25. Tai-Seale, M., Elwyn, G., Wilson, C., Stults, C., Dillon, E., Li, M., et al. Enhancing shared decision making through carefully designed interventions that target patient and provider behavior. Health Aff. 35 (2016), 605–612.
26. Shepherd, H.L., Barratt, A., Trevena, L.J., McGeechan, K., Carey, K., Epstein, R.M., et al. Three questions that patients can ask to improve the quality of information physicians give about treatment options: a cross-over trial. Patient Educ. Couns. 84 (2011), 379–385.
27. Tai-Seale, M., Bramson, R., Bao, X., Decision or no decision: how do patient–physician interactions end and what matters?. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 22 (2007), 297–302.
28. Couët, N., Desroches, S., Robitaille, H., Vaillancourt, H., Leblanc, A., Turcotte, S., et al. Assessments of the extent to which healthëcare providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Health Expect. 18:4 (2013), 542–561.
29. Donner, A., Methodological issues in the design and analysis of community intervention trials. Detels, R., Gulliford, M., Abdool Karim, Q., Tan, C., (eds.) Oxford Textbook of Global Public Health, 6th ed., 2015, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 500–515.
30. Lee, E., Whitehead, A., Jacques, R., Julious, S., The statistical interpretation of pilot trials: should significance thresholds be reconsidered?. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 14, 2014, 41.
31. Stone, A.L., Tai-Seale, M., Stults, C.D., Luiz, J.M., Frankel, R.M., Three types of ambiguity in coding empathic interactions in primary care visits: implications for research and practice. Patient Educ. Couns. 89 (2012), 63–68.
32. Elwyn, G., Grande, S.W., Barr, P., Observer OPTION 5 Manual. 2015 http://www.optioninstrument.org/raters-manual.html (Accessed 19 January 2017).