Design-based research: Connecting theory and practice in pharmacy educational intervention research

Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2019, Pages 309-318

  Wolcott, Michael D ^a,b   Lobczowski, Nikki G ^a,b   Lyons, Kayley ^a,b   McLaughlin, Jacqueline E ^a  

^a UNC Hamner Institute for Drug Safety Sciences   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Design based research; Mixed methods; Research design; Research methods

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EDUCATION; EXERCISE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; STUDENT; THEORETICAL STUDY; CURRICULUM; PHARMACY RESEARCH; PROCEDURES;

CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, PHARMACY; HUMANS; PHARMACY RESEARCH;

EID: 85059090582     PISSN: 18771297     EISSN: 18771300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.12.002     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Bauman, J.L., Ascione, F.J., Brueggemeier, R.W., et al. Maintaining pharmacy education's research focus as the academy expands. Am J Pharm Educ, 76(8), 2012, 10.5688/ajpe768144.
2. DiPiro, J., The 21st century Abraham Flexner. Am J Pharm Educ, 72(4), 2008 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2576418/pdf/ajpe79.pdf Accessed 23 December 2018.
3. McLaughlin, J.E., Dean, M.J., Mumper, R.J., Blouin, R.A., Roth, M.T., A roadmap for educational research in pharmacy. Am J Pharm Educ, 77(10), 2013, 10.5688/ajpe7710218.
4. Persky, A.M., Romanelli, F., Insights, pearls, and guidance on successfully producing and publishing educational research. Am J Pharm Educ, 80(5), 2016, 10.5688/ajpe80575.
5. Cook, D.A., Bordage, G., Schmidt, H.G., Description, justification and clarification: a framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Med Educ 42:2 (2008), 128–133.
6. The Design-Based Research Collective, Design-based research: an emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educ Res 32:1 (2003), 5–8.
7. Dolmans, D.H., Tigelaar, D., Building bridges between theory and practice in medical education using a design-based research approach: AMEE Guide No. 60. Med Teach 34:1 (2012), 1–10.
8. Norman, G., How bad is medical educational research anyway?. Adv Health Sci Educ 12 (2007), 1–5.
9. Brown, A., Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions. J Learn Sci 2:2 (1992), 141–178.
10. Collins, A., Joseph, D., Bielaczyc, K., Design research: theoretical and methodological issues. J Learn Sci 13:1 (2004), 15–42.
11. Barab, S., Design-based research: a methodological toolkit for engineering change. Sawyer, R.K., (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 2nd ed, 2014, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 151–170.
12. Barab, S., Squire, K., Design-based research: putting a stake in the ground. J Learn Sci 13:1 (2004), 1–14.
13. McKenney, S., Reeves, T.C., Conducting Educational Design Research. 1st ed., 2012, Routledge, New York, NY.
14. Kelly, A., Design research in education: yes, but is it methodological?. J Learn Sci 13:1 (2004), 115–128.
15. Kelly, A.E., The role of design in educational research. Educ Res 32:1 (2003), 3–4.
16. McKenney, S., van den Akker, J., Computer-based support for curriculum designers: a case of developmental research. Educ Technol Res Dev 53:2 (2005), 41–66.
17. Reeves, T.C., Herrington, J., Oliver, R., Design research: a socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. J Comput High Educ 16:2 (2005), 97–116.
18. Wang, F., Hannafin, M.J., Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educ Technol Res Dev 53:4 (2005), 5–23.
19. Järvelä S., Kirschner, P.A., Panadero, E., et al. Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educ Technol Res Dev 63:1 (2015), 125–142.
20. Edelson, D.C., Design research: what we learn when we engage in design. J Learn Sci 11:1 (2002), 105–121.
21. Svihla, V., Reeve, R., Design as Scholarship: Case Studies from the Learning Sciences. 2016, Routledge, New York, NY.
22. McLaughlin, J.E., Roth, M.T., Glatt, D.M., et al. The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Acad Med 89:2 (2014), 236–243.
23. Khan, K.Z., Ramachandran, S., Gaunt, K., Pushkar, P., The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): AMEE Guide No. 81. Part I: an historical and theoretical perspective. Med Teach 35:9 (2013), e1437–e1446.
24. Khan, K.Z., Gaunt, K., Ramachandran, S., Pushkar, P., The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): AMEE Guide No. 81. Part II: organization and administration. Med Teach 35:9 (2013), e1447–e1463.
25. Easterday, M.W., Lewis, D.R., Gerber, E.M., Design-based research process: problems, phases, and applications. Paper Presented at: The International Conference of Learning Sciences, Boulder, CO, 2014 June 24.
26. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., Design experiments in educational research. Educ Res 32:1 (2003), 9–13.
27. Van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., Nieveen, N., Educational Design Research. 1st ed., 2006, Routledge, New York, NY.
28. Silver, J.K., Binder, D.S., Zubcevik, N., Zafonte, R.D., Healthcare hackathons provide educational and innovation opportunities: a case study and best practice recommendations. J Med Syst, 40(7), 2016 10.1007s10916-019-0532-3.
29. Olson, K.R., Walsh, M., Garg, P., et al. Health hackathons: theatre or substance? A survey assessment of outcomes from healthcare-focused hackathons in three countries. BMJ Innov 3:1 (2017), 37–44.
30. Bradley, G., The crisis in educational research: a pragmatic approach. Eur Educ Res J 2:2 (2003), 296–308.
31. Albert, M., Hodges, B., Regehr, G., Research in medical education: balancing service and science. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 12:1 (2007), 103–115.