The cellosaurus, a cell-line knowledge resource

Journal of Biomolecular Techniques

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 25-38

  Bairoch, Amos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Computational biology; Database

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; BIOLOGY; BIOMEDICINE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN CELL; INVERTEBRATE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NONHUMAN; VERTEBRATE; CELL LINE; CLASSIFICATION; FACTUAL DATABASE; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE;

CELL LINE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 85058355973     PISSN: 15240215     EISSN: 19434731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7171/jbt.18-2902-002     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Earle WR, Schilling EL, Stark TH, Straus NP, Brown MF, Shelton E. Production of malignancy in vitro. IV. The mouse fibroblast cultures and changes seen in the living cells. J Natl Cancer Inst 1943;4:165–212.
2. Skloot R. 2010. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. Random House, New York.
3. Milstein C. The hybridoma revolution: an offshoot of basic research. BioEssays 1999;21:966–973.
4. Solter D. From teratocarcinomas to embryonic stem cells and beyond: a history of embryonic stem cell research. Nat Rev Genet 2006;7:319–327.
5. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006;126:663–676.
6. Baker M. Reproducibility crisis: blame it on the antibodies. Nature 2015;521:274–276.
7. Gartler SM. Apparent Hela cell contamination of human heteroploid cell lines. Nature 1968;217:750–751.
8. Nelson-Rees WA, Flandermeyer RR, Hawthorne PK. Banded marker chromosomes as indicators of intraspecies cellular contamination. Science 1974;184:1093–1096.
9. Lorsch JR, Collins FS, Lippincott-Schwartz J. Cell biology. Fixing problems with cell lines. Science 2014;346:1452–1453.
10. Masters JR, Thomson JA, Daly-Burns B, et al. Short tandem repeat profiling provides an international reference standard for human cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:8012–8017.
11. Kato S, Calnek BW, Powell PC, Witter RL. A proposed method for designating avian cell lines and transplantable tumours. Avian Pathol 1979;8:487–498.
12. Luong MX, Auerbach J, Crook JM, et al. A call for standardized naming and reporting of human ESC and iPSC lines. Cell Stem Cell 2011;8:357–359.
13. Kurtz A, Seltmann S, Bairoch A, et al. A standard nomenclature for referencing and authentication of pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Reports 2018;10:1–6.
14. Gaudet P, Michel PA, Zahn-Zabal M, et al. The neXtProt knowledgebase on human proteins: current status. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43:D764–D770.
15. Hinard V, Britan A, Schaeffer M, et al. Annotation of functional impact of voltage-gated sodium channel mutations. Hum Mutat 2017;38:485–493.
16. Romano P, Manniello A, Aresu O, Armento M, Cesaro M, Parodi B. Cell Line Data Base: structure and recent improvements towards molecular authentication of human cell lines. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:D925–D932.
17. Sobel RE, Sadar MD. Cell lines used in prostate cancer research: a compendium of old and new lines–part 1. J Urol 2005;173:342–359.
18. Robinson J, Soormally AR, Hayhurst JD, Marsh SG. The IPD-IMGT/HLA Database-new developments in reporting HLA variation. Hum Immunol 2016;77:233–237.
19. Seltmann S, Lekschas F, Müller R, et al. hPSCreg–the human Pluripotent Stem Cell Registry. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44: D757–D763.
20. Sarntivijai S, Lin Y, Xiang Z, et al. CLO: the Cell Line Ontology. J Biomed Semantics 2014;5:37.
21. Gremse M, Chang A, Schomburg I, et al. The BRENDA Tissue Ontology (BTO): the first all-integrating ontology of all organisms for enzyme sources. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39: D507–D513.
22. Malone J, Holloway E, Adamusiak T, et al. Modeling sample variables with an experimental factor ontology. Bioinformatics 2010;26:1112–1118.
23. Ong E, Sarntivijai S, Jupp S, Parkinson H, He Y. Comparison, alignment, and synchronization of cell line information between CLO and EFO. BMC Bioinformatics 2017; 18(Suppl 17):557.
24. Barretina J, Caponigro G, Stransky N, et al. The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity. Nature 2012;483:603–607.
25. Yang W, Soares J, Greninger P, et al. Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC): a resource for therapeutic biomarker discovery in cancer cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41: D955–D961.
26. Li J, Zhao W, Akbani R, et al. Characterization of human cancer cell lines by reverse-phase protein arrays. Cancer Cell 2017;31:225–239.
27. Streeter I, Harrison PW, Faulconbridge A, et al. The human-induced pluripotent stem cell initiative-data resources for cellular genetics. Nucleic Acids Res 2017;45:D691–D697.
28. Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets–update. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41:D991–D995.
29. Kolesnikov N, Hastings E, Keays M, et al. ArrayExpress update–simplifying data submissions. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43:D1113–D1116.
30. Kale NS, Haug K, Conesa P, et al. MetaboLights: an open-access database repository for metabolomics data. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2016;53:14.13.1–14.13.18.
31. Vizcaíno JA, Csordas A, Del-Toro N, et al. 2016 Update of the PRIDE database and its related tools. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:11033.
32. Stachelscheid H, Seltmann S, Lekschas F, et al. CellFinder: a cell data repository. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:D950–D958.
33. Reinhold WC, Sunshine M, Liu H, et al. CellMiner: a web-based suite of genomic and pharmacologic tools to explore transcript and drug patterns in the NCI-60 cell line set. Cancer Res 2012;72:3499–3511.
34. Chisanga D, Keerthikumar S, Pathan M, et al. Colorectal cancer atlas: an integrative resource for genomic and proteomic annotations from colorectal cancer cell lines and tissues. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44:D969–D974.
35. Shiau CK, Gu DL, Chen CF, Lin CH, Jou YS. IGRhCellID: integrated genomic resources of human cell lines for identification. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39(Suppl 1):D520–D524.
36. Dirks WG, MacLeod RA, Nakamura Y, et al. Cell line cross-contamination initiative: an interactive reference database of STR profiles covering common cancer cell lines. Int J Cancer 2010;126:303–304.
37. Knutsen T, Gobu V, Knaus R, et al. The interactive online SKY/ M-FISH & CGH database and the Entrez cancer chromosomes search database: linkage of chromosomal aberrations with the genome sequence. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2005;44:52–64.
38. Forbes SA, Beare D, Boutselakis H, et al. COSMIC: somatic cancer genetics at high-resolution. Nucleic Acids Res 2017;45: D777–D783.
39. Gaulton A, Hersey A, Nowotka M, et al. The ChEMBL database in 2017. Nucleic Acids Res 2017;45:D945–D954.
40. NCBI Resource Coordinators. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44:D7–D19.
41. Faulconbridge A, Burdett T, Brandizi M, et al. Updates to BioSamples database at European Bioinformatics Institute. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:D50–D52.
42. Vasilevsky N, Johnson T, Corday K, et al. Research resources: curating the new eagle-i discovery system. Database 2012;2012: Bar067.
43. Davis CA, Hitz BC, Sloan CA, et al. The Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE): data portal update. Nucleic Acids Res 2018;46:D794–D801.
44. Koleti A, Terryn R, Stathias V, et al. Data portal for the Library of Integrated Network-Based Cellular Signatures (LINCS) program: integrated access to diverse large-scale cellular perturbation response data. Nucleic Acids Res 2018;46:D558–D566.
45. Dekker J, Belmont AS, Guttman M, et al. The 4D Nucleome project. [Corrigendum: Nature 2017;552:278.] Nature 2017; 549:219–226.
46. Sayers EW, Barrett T, Benson DA, et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. [Erratum: Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:3124.] Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:D5–D15.
47. Sioutos N, de Coronado S, Haber MW, Hartel FW, Shaiu WL, Wright LW. NCI Thesaurus: a semantic model integrating cancer-related clinical and molecular information. J Biomed Inform 2007;40:30–43.
48. Marygold SJ, Crosby MA, Goodman JL;; FlyBase Consortium. Using FlyBase, a database of Drosophila genes and genomes. Methods Mol Biol 2016;1478:1–31.
49. Gray KA, Yates B, Seal RL, Wright MW, Bruford EA. Genenames.org: the HGNC resources in 2015. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43:D1079–D1085.
50. Eppig JT, Richardson JE, Kadin JA, Ringwald M, Blake JA, Bult CJ. Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI): reflecting on 25 years. Mamm Genome 2015;26:272–284.
51. Shimoyama M, De Pons J, Hayman GT, et al. The Rat Genome Database 2015: genomic, phenotypic and environmental variations and disease. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43: D743–D750.
52. UniProt Consortium. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 2018;46:2699.
53. Xavier CP, Pesic M, Vasconcelos MH. Understanding cancer drug resistance by developing and studying resistant cell line models. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2016;16:226–237.
54. Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, et al. ChEBI in 2016: improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44:D1214–D1219.
55. Law V, Knox C, Djoumbou Y, et al. DrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolism. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42: D1091–D1097.
56. Saragusty J, Diecke S, Drukker M, et al. Rewinding the process of mammalian extinction. Zoo Biol 2016;35:280–292.
57. American Type Culture Collection Standards Development Organization Workgroup ASN-0002. Cell line misidentification: the beginning of the end. Nat Rev Cancer 2010;10: 441–448.
58. Almeida JL, Cole KD, Plant AL. Standards for cell line authentication and beyond. PLoS Biol 2016;14:e1002476.
59. O’Donoghue LE, Rivest JP, Duval DL. Polymerase chain reaction-based species verification and microsatellite analysis for canine cell line validation. J Vet Diagn Invest 2011;23:780–785.
60. Capes-Davis A, Reid YA, Kline MC, et al. Match criteria for human cell line authentication: where do we draw the line? Int J Cancer 2013;132:2510–2519.
61. Artimo P, Jonnalagedda M, Arnold K, et al. ExPASy: SIB bioinformatics resource portal. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40: W597–W603.
62. Bandrowski A, Brush M, Grethe JS, et al. The resource identification initiative: a cultural shift in publishing. F1000 Res 2015;4:134.
63. Burgstaller-Muehlbacher S, Waagmeester A, Mitraka E, et al. Wikidata as a semantic framework for the Gene Wiki initiative. Database 2016;2016:baw015.
64. Bols NC, Pham PH, Dayeh VR, Lee LE. Invitromatics, invitrome, and invitroomics: introduction of three new terms for in vitro biology and illustration of their use with the cell lines from rainbow trout. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2017;53: 383–405.
65. Haendel MA, Balhoff JP, Bastian FB, et al. Unification of multi-species vertebrate anatomy ontologies for comparative biology in Uberon. J Biomed Semantics 2014;5:21.