Polymerase chain reaction-based species verification and microsatellite analysis for canine cell line validation

Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 780-785

  O'Donoghue, Liza E ^a   Rivest, Jason P ^a   Duval, Dawn L ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Canine; cell line validation; short tandem repeat genotyping

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CELL LINE; DOG; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; CELL LINE; DOGS; GENETIC VARIATION; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84855378559     PISSN: 10406387     EISSN: 19434936     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1040638711408064     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. American Type Culture Collection Standards Development Organization Workgroup ASN-0002. Cell line misidentification: the beginning of the end.Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:441-448.
2. Chen JW,Uboh CE,Soma LR, et al.Identification of racehorse and sample contamination by novel 24-plex STR system.Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2010;4:158-167.
3. Coomber N,David VA,O'Brien SJ,Menotti-Raymond M.Validation of a short tandem repeat multiplex typing system for genetic individualization of domestic cat samples.Croat Med J. 2007;48:547-555.
4. Cooper J,Sykes G,King S, et al.Species identification in cell culture: a two-pronged molecular approach.Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2007;43:344-351.
5. DeNise S,Johnston E,Halverson J, et al.Power of exclusion for parentage verification and probability of match for identity in American kennel club breeds using 17 canine microsatellite markers.Anim Genet. 2004;35:14-17.
6. Gartler SM.Apparent HeLa cell contamination of human heteroploid cell lines.Nature. 1968;217:750-751.
7. Hughes P,Marshall D,Reid Y, et al.The costs of using unauthenticated, over-passaged cell lines: how much more data do we need?.BioTechniques. 2007;43:575-586.
8. Kanthaswamy S,Tom BK,Mattila AM, et al.Canine population data generated from a multiplex STR kit for use in forensic casework.J Forensic Sci. 2009;54:829-840.
9. Lacroix M.Persistent use of "false" cell lines.Int J Cancer. 2008;122:1-4.
10. Masters JR,Thomson JA,Daly-Burns B, et al.Short tandem repeat profiling provides an international reference standard for human cell lines.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:8012-8017.
11. Nardone R.Eradication of cross-contaminated cell lines: a call for action.Cell Biol Toxicol. 2007;23:367-372.
12. van Asch B,Alves C,Gusmao L, et al.A new autosomal STR nineplex for canine identification and parentage testing.Electrophoresis. 2009;30:417-423.
13. van Asch B,Pereira F.State-of-the-art and future prospects of canine STR-based genotyping.Open Forensic Sci J [serial online]. 2010;3:45-52.
14. van Asch B,Pinheiro R,Pereira R, et al.A framework for the development of STR genotyping in domestic animal species: characterization and population study of 12 canine X-chromosome loci.Electrophoresis. 2010;31:303-308.
15. van de Goor LH,Koskinen MT,van Haeringen WA.Population studies of 16 bovine STR loci for forensic purposes.Int J Legal Med. 2011;125:111-119.
16. van de Goor LH,Panneman H,van Haeringen WA.A proposal for standardization in forensic bovine DNA typing: allele nomenclature of 16 cattle-specific short tandem repeat loci.Anim Genet. 2009;40:630-636.