Nuclear protein phylogenies support the monophyly of the three bryophyte groups (Bryophyta Schimp.)

New Phytologist

Volumn 222, Issue 1, 2019, Pages 565-575

  de Sousa, Filipe ^a   Foster, Peter G ^b   Donoghue, Philip C J ^c   Schneider, Harald ^b,c,d   Cox, Cymon J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALGARVE   (Portugal)

^b DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^d KEY LABORATORY OF TROPICAL FOREST ECOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

bryophytes; compositional heterogeneity; land plants; life cycle; phylogenomics; substitutional saturation

Indexed keywords

BRYOPHYTE; CHLOROPLAST; GENOMICS; HETEROGENEITY; LIFE CYCLE; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN; VASCULAR PLANT;

ANTHOCEROTOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; EMBRYOPHYTA; MARCHANTIOPHYTA; TRACHEOPHYTA;

AMINO ACID; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; NUCLEOTIDE;

GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOSS; PHYLOGENY;

AMINO ACIDS; BRYOPHYTA; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; NUCLEOTIDES; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 85058051129     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15587     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Blanquart S, Lartillot N. 2008. A site- and time-heterogeneous model of amino acid replacement. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 842–858.
2. Bulmer M. 1988. Are codon usage patterns in unicellular organisms determined by selection-mutation balance? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 1: 15–26.
3. Campbell DH. 1891. Elements of structural and systematic botany. Boston, MA, USA: Ginn & Company.
4. Chang Y, Graham SW. 2011. Inferring the higher-order phylogeny of mosses (Bryophyta) and relatives using a large, multigene plastid data set. American Journal of Botany 98: 839–849.
5. Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2016. Terrace aware data structure for phylogenomic inference from supermatrices. Systematic Biology 65: 997–1008.
6. Civáň P, Foster PG, Embley MT, Seneca A, Cox CJ. 2014. Analyses of charophyte chloroplast genomes help characterize the ancestral chloroplast genome of land plants. Genome Biology and Evolution 6: 897–911.
7. Clarke JT, Warnock RCM, Donoghue PCJ. 2011. Establishing a time-scale for plant evolution. New Phytologist 192: 266–301.
8. Cox CJ. 2018. Land plant molecular phylogenetics: a review with comments on evaluating incongruence among phylogenies. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, in press, doi: 10.1080/07352689.2018.1482443.
9. Cox CJ, Foster PG, Hirt RP, Harris SR, Embley TM. 2008. The archaebacterial origin of eukaryotes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 20356–20361.
10. Cox CJ, Li B, Foster PG, Embley TM, Civáň P. 2014. Conflicting phylogenies for early land plants are caused by composition biases among synonymous substitutions. Systematic Biology 63: 272–279.
11. Cronquist A, Takhtajan A, Zimmermann W. 1966. On the higher taxa of Embryobionta. Taxon 15: 129–134.
12. Dayhoff MO, Schwartz RM, Orcutt BC. 1978. A model of evolutionary change in proteins. In: Dayhoff MO, ed. Atlas of protein sequence and structure, vol. 5. Washington DC, USA: National Biomedical Research Foundation, 345–352.
13. Foster PG. 2004. Modeling compositional heterogeneity. Systematic Biology 53: 485–495.
14. Foster PG, Cox CJ, Embley TM. 2009. The primary divisions of life: a phylogenomic approach employing composition-heterogeneous methods. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 364: 2197–2207.
15. Gao L, Su YJ, Wang T. 2010. Plastid genome sequencing, comparative genomics, and phylogenomics: current status and prospects. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 48: 77–93.
16. Goffinet B, Buck WR. 2013. The evolution of body form in bryophytes. Annual Plant Reviews 45: 51–89.
17. Goffinet B, Buck WR, Shaw AJ. 2009. Morphology, anatomy, and classification of the Bryophyta. In: Goffinet B, Shaw AJ, eds. Bryophyte biology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 55–138.
18. Gouy M, Gautier C. 1982. Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Research 10: 7055–7074.
19. Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2009. SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27: 221–224.
20. Graham LKE, Wilcox LW. 2000. The origin of alternation of generations in land plants: a focus on matrotrophy and hexose transport. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 355: 757–767.
21. Haig D. 2008. Homologous versus antithetic alternation of generations and the origin of sporophytes. Botanical Review 74: 395–418.
22. Huang H, Knowles LL. 2009. What is the danger of the anomaly zone for empirical phylogenetics? Systematic Biology 58: 527–536.
23. Inagaki Y, Roger AJ. 2006. Phylogenetic estimation under codon models can be biased by codon usage heterogeneity. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40: 428–434.
24. Inagaki Y, Simpson AG, Dacks JB, Roger AJ. 2004. Phylogenetic artifacts can be caused by leucine, serine, and arginine codon usage heterogeneity: dinoflagellate plastid origins as a case study. Systematic Biology 53: 582–593.
25. Jeffroy O, Brinkmann H. 2006. Phylogenomics: the beginning of incongruence? TRENDS in Genetics 22: 225–231.
26. Karol KG. 2001. The closest living relatives of land plants. Science 294: 2351–2353.
27. Karol KG, Arumuganathan K, Boore JL, Duffy AM, Everett KDE, Hall JD, Hansen SK, Kuehl JV, Mandoli DF, Mishler BD et al. 2010. Complete plastome sequences of Equisetum arvense and Isoetes flaccida: implications for phylogeny and plastid genome evolution of early land plant lineages. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10: 321.
28. Keane TM, Creevey CJ, Pentony MM, Naughton TJ, Mclnerney JO. 2006. Assessment of methods for amino acid matrix selection and their use on empirical data shows that ad hoc assumptions for choice of matrix are not justified. BMC Evolutionary Biology 6: 29.
29. Kenrick P, Wellman CH, Schneider H, Edgecombe GD. 2012. A timeline for terrestrialization: consequences for the carbon cycle in the Palaeozoic. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 367: 519–536.
30. Lartillot N, Lepage T, Blanquart S. 2009. PhyloBayes 3: a Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating. Bioinformatics 25: 2286–2288.
31. Laurin-Lemay S, Brinkmann H, Philippe H. 2012. Origin of land plants revisited in the light of sequence contamination and missing data. Current Biology 22: R593–R594.
32. Lenton TM, Crouch M, Johnson M, Pires N, Dolan L. 2012. First plants cooled the Ordovician. Nature Geoscience 5: 86–89.
33. Ligrone R, Duckett JG, Renzaglia KS. 2012. Major transitions in the evolution of early land plants: a bryological perspective. Annals of Botany 109: 851–871.
34. Liu Y, Cox CJ, Wang W, Goffinet B. 2014. Mitochondrial phylogenomics of early land plants: mitigating the effects of saturation, compositional heterogeneity, and codon-usage bias. Systematic Biology 63: 862–878.
35. Lockhart PJ, Howe CJ, Bryant DA, Beanland TJ, Larkum AWD. 1992. Substitutional bias confounds inference of cyanelle origins from sequence data. Journal of Molecular Evolution 34: 153–162.
36. Magallón S, Hilu KW, Quandt D. 2013. Land plant evolutionary timeline: gene effects are secondary to fossil constraints in relaxed clock estimation of age and substitution rates. American Journal of Botany 100: 556–573.
37. McCourt RM, Delwiche CF, Karol KG. 2004. Charophyte algae and land plant origins. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 661–666.
38. Mooers AØ, Holmes EC. 2000. The evolution of base composition and phylogenetic inference. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15: 365–369.
39. Morris JL, Puttick MN, Clark JW, Edwards D, Kenrick P, Pressel S, Wellman CH, Yang Z, Schneider H, Donoghue PCJ. 2018. The timescale of early land plant evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 115: E2274–E2283.
40. Newton MA, Raftery AE. 1994. Approximate Bayesian inference with the weighted likelihood bootstrap. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 56: 3–48.
41. Nguyen LT, Schmidt HS, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2015. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32: 268–274.
42. Niklas KJ, Kutschera U. 2010. The evolution of the land plant life cycle. New Phytologist 185: 27–41.
43. Nishiyama T, Kato M. 1999. Molecular phylogenetic analysis among bryophytes and tracheophytes based on combined data of plasmid coded genes and the 18S rRNA gene. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 1027–1036.
44. Nishiyama T, Sakayama H, de Vries J, Buschmann H, Saint-Marcoux D, Ullrich KK, Haas FB, Vanderstraeten L, Becker D, Lang D et al. 2018. The Chara Genome: secondary complexity and implications for plant terrestrialization. Cell 174: 448–464.
45. Nishiyama T, Wolf PG, Kugita M, Sinclair RB, Sugita M, Sugiura C, Wakasugi T, Yamada K, Yoshinaga K, Yamaguchi K et al. 2004. Chloroplast phylogeny indicates that bryophytes are monophyletic. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 1813–1819.
46. Nylander JA, Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP, Nieves-Aldrey J. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Systematic Biology 53: 47–67.
47. Philippe H, Brinkmann H, Lavrov DV, Littlewood DTJ, Manuel M, Wörheide G, Baurain D. 2011. Resolving difficult phylogenetic questions: why more sequences are not enough. PLoS Biology 9: e1000602.
48. Philippe H, Laurent J. 1998. How good are deep phylogenetic trees? Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 8: 616–623.
49. Plotkin JB, Kudla G. 2011. Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias. Nature Reviews Genetics 12: 32–42.
50. Puttick MN, Morris JL, Williams TA, Cox CJ, Edwards D, Kenrick P, Pressel S, Wellman CH, Schneider H, Pisani D et al. 2018. The interrelationships of land plants and the nature of the ancestral embryophyte. Current Biology 28: 733–745.
51. Qiu Y-L, Li L, Wang B, Chen Z, Knoop V, Groth-Malonek M, Dombrovska O, Lee J, Kent L, Rest J et al. 2006. The deepest divergences in land plants inferred from phylogenomic evidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103: 15511–15516.
52. Regier JC, Shultz JW, Zwick A, Hussey A, Ball B, Wetzer R, Martin JW, Cunningham CW. 2010. Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences. Nature 11: 1–6.
53. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542.
54. Rota-Stabelli O, Lartillot N, Philippe H, Pisani D. 2012. Serine codon-usage bias in deep phylogenomics: pancrustacean relationships as a case study. Systematic Biology 62: 121–133.
55. Ruggiero MA, Gordon DP, Orrell TM, Bailly N, Bourgoin T, Brusca RC, Cavalier-Smith T, Guiry MD, Kirk PM. 2015. A higher level classification of all living organisms. PLoS ONE 10: e0119248.
56. Schimper WP. 1879. Bryophyta. In: von Zittel KA, eds. Handbuch der palaeontologie, vol. 2. München & Leipzig, Germany: R. Oldenbourg.
57. Sharp PM, Stenico M, Peden JF, Lloyd AT. 1993. Codon usage: mutational bias, translational selection, or both? Biochemical Society Transactions 21: 835–841.
58. Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30: 1312–1313.
59. Stamatakis A, Aberer AJ. 2013. Novel parallelization schemes for large-scale likelihood-based phylogenetic inference. IEEE Computer Society, 1195–1204.
60. Stebbins GL, Hill GJC. 1980. Did multicellular plants invade the land? American Naturalist 115: 342–353.
61. Stenøien HK. 2005. Adaptive basis of codon usage in the haploid moss Physcomitrella patens. Heredity 94: 87.
62. Susko E, Roger AJ. 2007. On reduced amino acid alphabets for phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 2139–2150.
63. Timme RE, Bachvaroff TR, Delwiche CF. 2012. Broad phylogenomic sampling and the sister lineage of land plants. PLoS ONE 7: e29696.
64. Whittaker RH. 1969. New concepts of kingdoms of organisms. Science 163: 150–160.
65. Wickett NJ, Mirarab S, Nguyen N, Warnow T, Carpenter C, Matasci N, Ayyampalayam S, Barker MS, Burleigh JG, Gitzendanner MA et al. 2014. Phylotranscriptomic analysis of the origin and early diversification of land plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 111: E4859–E4868.
66. Wodniok S, Brinkmann H, Glöckner G, Heidel AJ, Philippe H, Melkonian M, Becker B. 2011. Origin of land plants: Do conjugating green algae hold the key? BMC Evolutionary Biology 11: 104.
67. Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1586–1591.
68. Yang Z, Nielsen R. 1998. Synonymous and nonsynonymous rate variation in nuclear genes of mammals. Journal of Molecular Evolution 46: 409–418.
69. Zhou M, Li X. 2009. Analysis of synonymous codon usage patterns in different plant mitochondrial genomes. Molecular Biology Reports 36: 2039–2046.