Chloroplast phylogeny indicates that bryophytes are monophyletic

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 21, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 1813-1819

  Nishiyama, Tomoaki ^a   Wolf, Paul G ^b   Kugita, Masanori ^c   Sinclair, Robert B ^d   Sugita, Mamoru ^e   Sugiura, Chika ^e   Wakasugi, Tatsuya ^f   Yamada, Kyoji ^f   Yoshinaga, Koichi ^c   Yamaguchi, Kazuo ^g   Ueda, Kunihiko ^g   Hasebe, Mitsuyasu ^a,h  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR BASIC BIOLOGY   (Japan)

^b UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SHIZUOKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d JACKSON LABORATORY   (United States)

^e NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TOYAMA   (Japan)

^g KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^h GRADUATE UNIVERSITY FOR ADVANCED STUDIES   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bryophytes; Codon usage; Land plants; LogDet; Nucleotide composition

Indexed keywords

NUCLEOTIDE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CHLOROPLAST; GENOME; LIVERWORT; MONOPHYLY; MOSS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; RNA TRANSLATION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; VASCULAR PLANT;

BRYOPHYTA; CHLOROPLASTS; DNA, CHLOROPLAST; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY;

ANTHOCEROTOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; EMBRYOPHYTA; MARCHANTIOPHYTA; TRACHEOPHYTA; VIRIDIPLANTAE;

EID: 4944236760     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msh203     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adachi, J., and M. Hasegawa. 1996. Molphy Version 2.3: programs for molecular phylogenetics based on maximum likelihood. The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo, Japan.
2. Chapman, R. L., and D. A. Waters. 2002. Green algae and land plants - an answer at last? J. Phycol. 38:237-240.
3. Cummings, M. P., S. P. Otto, and J. Wakeley. 1995. Sampling properties of DNA sequence data in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:814-822.
4. Duff, R. J., and D. L. Nickrent. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of land plants using mitochondrial small-subunit rDNA sequences. Am. J. Bot. 86:372.
5. Edwards, D., J. G. Duckett, and J. B. Richardson. 1995. Hepatic characters in the earliest land plants. Nature 374:635-636.
6. Felsenstein, J. 2003. Inferring phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
7. Garbary, D. J., and K. S. Renzaglia. 1998. Bryophyte phylogeny and the evolution of land plants: evidence from development and ultrastructure. Pp. 45-63 in J. W. Bates, N. W. Ashton, and J. G. Duckett, eds. Bryology for the twenty-first century. Maney Publishing and British Bryological Society, Leeds, United Kingdom.
8. Garbary, D. J., K. S. Renzaglia, and J. G. Duckett. 1993. The phylogeny of land plants - a cladistic analysis based on male gametogenesis. Plant Syst. Evol. 188:237-269.
9. Graham, L. E., and J. Gray. 2001. The origin, morphology, and ecophysiology of early embryophytes: neontological and paleontological perspectives. Pp. 140-158 in P. G. Gensel and D. Edwards, eds. Plants invade the land: evolutionary and environmental perspectives. Columbia University Press, New York.
10. Graham, L. K., and L. W. Wilcox. 2000. The origin of alternation of generations in land plants: a focus on matrotrophy and hexose transport. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 355:757-766.
11. Gray, J. 1993. Major Paleozoic land plant evolutionary bio-events. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 104:153-169.
12. Gu, X., and W. H. Li. 1996. Bias-corrected paralinear and Log-Del distances and tests of molecular clocks and phylogenies under nonstationary nucleotide frequencies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1375-1383.
13. Hedderson, T. A., R. Chapman, and C. J. Cox. 1998. Bryophytes and the origins and diversification of land plants: new evidence from molecules. Pp. 65-77 in J. W. Bates, N. W. Ashton, and J. G. Duckett, eds. Bryology for the twenty-first century. Maney Publishing and British Bryological Society, Leeds, United Kingdom.
14. Jones, D. T., W. R. Taylor, and J. M. Thornton. 1992. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8:275-282.
15. Judd, W. S., C. S. Campbell, E. A. Kellogg, P. F. Stevens, and M. J. Donoghue. 2002. Plant systematics: a phylogenetic approach. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
16. Karol, K. G., R. M. McCourt, M. T. Cimino, and C. F. Delwiche. 2001. The closest living relatives of land plants. Science 294:2351-2353.
17. Katoh, K., K. Misawa, K. Kuma, and T. Miyata. 2002. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:3059-3066.
18. Kenrick, P. 2000. The relationships of vascular plants. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 355:847-855.
19. Kenrick, P., and P. R. Crane. 1997a. The origin and early evolution of plants on land. Nature 389:33-39.
20. -. 1997b. The origin and early diversification of land plants: a cladistic study. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
21. Kishino, H., and M. Hasegawa. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:170-179.
22. Kugita, M., A. Kaneko, Y. Yamamoto, Y. Takeya, T. Matsumoto, and K. Yoshinaga. 2003. The complete nucleotide sequence of the hornwort (Anthoceros formosae) chloroplast genome: insight into the earliest land plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:716-721.
23. Lake, J. A. 1994. Reconstructing evolutionary trees from DNA and protein sequences: paralinear distances. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1455-1459.
24. Lewis, L. A., B. D. Mishler, and R. Vilgalys. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of the liverworts (Hepaticae), a basal embryophyte lineage, inferred from nucleotide sequence data of the chloroplast gene rbcL. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7:377-393.
25. Lockhart, P. J., M. A. Steel, M. D. Hendy, and D. Penny. 1994. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:605-612.
26. Mishler, B. D., and S. P. Churchill. 1984. A cladistic approach to the phylogeny of the "bryophytes." Brittonia 36:406-424.
27. -. 1985. Transition to a land flora: phylogenetic relationships of the green algae and bryophytes. Cladistics 1:305-328.
28. Nickrent, D. L., C. L. Parkinson, J. D. Palmer, and R. J. Duff. 2000. Multigene phylogeny of land plants with special reference to bryophytes and the earliest land plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:1885-1895.
29. Nishiyama, T., and M. Kato. 1999. Molecular phylogenetic analysis among bryophytes and tracheophytes based on combined data of plastid coded genes and the 18S rRNA gene. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1027-1036.
30. Pryer, K. M., H. Schneider, A. R. Smith, R. Cranfill, P. G. Wolf, J. S. Hunt, and S. D. Sipes. 2001. Horsetails and ferns are a monophyletic group and the closest living relatives to seed plants. Nature 409:618-622.
31. Qiu, Y. L., Y. Cho, J. C. Cox, and J. D. Palmer. 1998. The gain of three mitochondrial introns identifies liverworts as the earliest land plants. Nature 394:671-674.
32. Qiu, Y. L., J. Lee, F. Bernasconi-Quadroni, D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, M. Zanis, E. A. Zimmer, Z. Chen, V. Savolainen, and M. W. Chase. 1999. The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature 402:404-407.
33. Renzaglia, K. S., R. J. T. Duff, D. L. Nickrent, and D. J. Garbary. 2000. Vegetative and reproductive innovations of early land plants: implications for a unified phylogeny. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 355:769-793.
34. Renzaglia, K. S., and D. J. Garbary. 2001. Motile gametes of land plants: diversity, development, and evolution. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 20:107-123.
35. Russo, C. A. M., N. Takezaki, and M. Nei. 1996. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 525-536.
36. Saitou, N., and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406-425.
37. Shimodaira, H. 2002. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst. Biol. 51:492-508.
38. Shimodaira, H., and M. Hasegawa. 2001. CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 17:1246-1247.
39. Simmons, M. P., H. Ochoterena, and J. V. Freudenstein. 2002. Amini acid vs. nucleotide characters: challenging preconceived notions. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 24:78-90.
40. Steel, M. 1994. Recovering a tree from the leaf volourations it generates under a Markov model. Appl. Math. Lett. 7:19-23.
41. Steel, M. A., D. Huson, and P. J. Lockhart. 2000. Invariable site models and their use in phylogeny reconstruction. Syst. Biol. 49:225-232.
42. Steel, M. A., P. J. Lockhart, and D. Penny. 1993. Confidence in evolutionary trees from biological sequence data. Nature 364: 440-442.
43. Sugiura, C., Y. Kobayashi, S. Aoki, C. Sugita, and M. Sugita. 2003. Complete chloroplast DNA sequence of the moss Physcomitrella patens: evidence for the loss and relocation of rpoA from the chloroplast to the nucleus. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:5324-5331.
44. Swofford, D. L. 1998. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
45. Swofford, D. L., P. J. Waddell, J. P. Huelsenbeck, P. G. Foster, P. O. Lewis, and J. S. Rogers. 2001. Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods. Syst. Biol. 50:525-539.
46. Taylor, W. A. 1995. Spores in earliest land plants. Nature 373: 391-392.
47. Turmel, M., M. Ehara, C. Otis, and C. Lemieux. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships among streptophytes as inferred from chloroplast small and large subunit rRNA gene sequences. J. Phycol. 38:364-375.
48. Wellman, C. H., P. L. Osterloff, and U. Mohiuddin. 2003. Fragments of the earliest land plants. Nature 425:282-285.
49. Wolf, P. G., C. A. Rowe, R. B. Sinclair, and M. Hasebe. 2003. Complete nucleotide sequence of the chloroplast genome from the leptosporangiate fern Adiantum capillus-veneris L. DNA Res. 10:59-65.
50. Yang, Z. 1994. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39:306-314.
51. -. 1997. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:555-556.