p66Shc couples mechanical signals to RhoA through focal adhesion kinase-dependent recruitment of p115-RhoGEF and GEF-H1

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 36, Issue 22, 2016, Pages 2824-2837

  Wu, Ru Feng ^a   Liao, Chengxu ^a   Fu, Guosheng ^a   Hayeng, Heather N ^a,b   Yang, Kejia ^c   Ma, Zhenyi ^d   Liu, Zhe ^d   Terada, Lance S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b The University of Texas at Dallas   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^d TIANJIN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FOCAL ADHESION KINASE; P115 RHO GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE EXCHANGE FACTOR; P52 SHC PROTEIN; P66 SHC PROTEIN; RAS PROTEIN; RHO GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE EXCHANGE FACTOR; RHO GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE EXCHANGE FACTOR H1; RHOA GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN; SHC SIGNALING ADAPTOR PROTEIN; SOS PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR TAZ; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR YAP; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANOIKIS; ARTICLE; CELL DEATH; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVATION; ENZYME PHOSPHORYLATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TENSION; TRANSACTIVATION;

EID: 85047870172     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: 10985549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00194-16     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Matthews BD, Overby DR, Mannix R, Ingber DE. 2006. Cellular adaptation to mechanical stress: role of integrins, Rho, cytoskeletal tension and mechanosensitive ion channels. J Cell Sci 119:508-518. http://dx.doi.org /10.1242/jcs.02760
2. McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS. 2004. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 6:483-495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00075-9
3. Ewald AJ, Brenot A, Duong M, Chan BS, Werb Z. 2008. Collective epithelial migration and cell rearrangements drive mammary branching morphogenesis. Dev Cell 14:570-581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel .2008.03.003
4. Farge E. 2003. Mechanical induction of Twist in the Drosophila foregut/ stomodeal primordium. Curr Biol 13:1365-1377. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1016/S0960-9822(03)00576-1
5. Harden N, Ricos M, Ong YM, Chia W, Lim L. 1999. Participation of small GTPases in dorsal closure of the Drosophila embryo: distinct roles for Rho subfamily proteins in epithelial morphogenesis. J Cell Sci 112(Pt 3):273-284
6. Moore KA, Polte T, Huang S, Shi B, Alsberg E, Sunday ME, Ingber DE. 2005 Control of basement membrane remodeling and epithelial branching morphogenesis in embryonic lung by Rho and cytoskeletal tension. Dev Dyn 232:268-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.20237
7. Nakaya Y, Sukowati EW, Wu Y, Sheng G. 2008. RhoA and microtubule dynamics control cell-basement membrane interaction in EMT during gastrulation. Nat Cell Biol 10:765-775. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1038/ncb1739
8. Zhao XH, Laschinger C, Arora P, Szaszi K, Kapus A, McCulloch CA. 2007 Force activates smooth muscle alpha-actin promoter activity through the Rho signaling pathway. J Cell Sci 120:1801-1809. http://dx .doi.org/10.1242/jcs.001586
9. Pelicci G, Lanfrancone L, Grignani F, McGlade J, Cavallo F, Forni G, Nicoletti I, Pawson T, Pelicci PG. 1992. A novel transforming protein (SHC) with an SH2 domain is implicated in mitogenic signal transduction. Cell 70:93-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(92)90536-L
10. Rozakis-Adcock M, McGlade J, Mbamalu G, Pelicci G, Daly R, Li W, Batzer A, Thomas S, Brugge J, Pelicci PG, Schlessinger J, Pawson T. 1992 Association of the Shc and Grb2/Sem5 SH2-containing proteins is implicated in activation of the Ras pathway by tyrosine kinases. Nature 360:689-692. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/360689a0
11. Nicholson PR, Empereur S, Glover HR, Dilworth SM. 2001. ShcA tyrosine phosphorylation sites can replace ShcA binding in signalling by middle T-antigen. EMBO J 20:6337-6346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093 /emboj/20.22.6337
12. Ong SH, Dilworth S, Hauck-Schmalenberger I, Pawson T, Kiefer F. 2001 ShcA and Grb2 mediate polyoma middle T antigen-induced endothelial transformation and Gab1 tyrosine phosphorylation. EMBO J 20: 6327-6336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.22.6327
13. Wary KK, Mainiero F, Isakoff SJ, Marcantonio EE, Giancotti FG. 1996 The adaptor protein Shc couples a class of integrins to the control of cell cycle progression. Cell 87:733-743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016 /S0092-8674(00)81392-6
14. Wary KK, Mariotti A, Zurzolo C, Giancotti FG. 1998. A requirement for caveolin-1 and associated kinase Fyn in integrin signaling and anchorage-dependent cell growth. Cell 94:625-634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81604-9
15. Cowan KJ, Law DA, Phillips DR. 2000. Identification of Shc as the primary protein binding to the tyrosine-phosphorylated beta 3 subunit of alpha IIbbeta 3 during outside-in integrin platelet signaling. J Biol Chem 275:36423-36429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M004068200
16. Deshmukh L, Gorbatyuk V, Vinogradova O. 2010. Integrin-beta}3 phosphorylation dictates its complex with the Shc phosphotyrosinebinding (PTB) domain. J Biol Chem 285:34875-34884. http://dx.doi.org /10.1074/jbc.M110.159087
17. Migliaccio E, Mele S, Salcini AE, Pelicci G, Lai KM, Superti-Furga G, Pawson T, Di Fiore PP, Lanfrancone L, Pelicci PG. 1997. Opposite effects of the p52shc/p46shc and p66shc splicing isoforms on the EGF receptor-MAP kinase-fos signalling pathway. EMBO J 16:706-716. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/16.4.706
18. Xi G, Shen X, Clemmons DR. 2010. p66shc inhibits insulin-like growth factor-I signaling via direct binding to Src through its polyproline and Src homology 2 domains, resulting in impairment of Src kinase activation. J Biol Chem 285:6937-6951. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.069872
19. Natalicchio A, Laviola L, De Tullio C, Renna LA, Montrone C, Perrini S, Valenti G, Procino G, Svelto M, Giorgino F. 2004. Role of the p66Shc isoform in insulin-like growth factor I receptor signaling through MEK/ Erk and regulation of actin cytoskeleton in rat myoblasts. J Biol Chem 279:43900-43909. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M403936200
20. Lee MK, Smith SM, Banerjee MM, Li C, Minoo P, Volpe MV, Nielsen HC. 2014. The p66Shc adapter protein regulates the morphogenesis and epithelial maturation of fetal mouse lungs. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 306:L316-L325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00062.2013
21. Favetta LA, Madan P, Mastromonaco GF, St John EJ, King WA, Betts DH. 2007. The oxidative stress adaptor p66Shc is required for permanent embryo arrest in vitro. BMC Dev Biol 7:132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186 /1471-213X-7-132
22. Ma Z, Myers DP, Wu RF, Nwariaku FE, Terada LS. 2007. p66Shc mediates anoikis through RhoA. J Cell Biol 179:23-31. http://dx.doi.org /10.1083/jcb.200706097
23. Ma Z, Liu Z, Wu RF, Terada LS. 2010. p66Shc restrains Ras hyperactivation and suppresses metastatic behavior. Oncogene 29:5559-5567. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2010.326
24. Wang YL, Pelham RJ, Jr. 1998. Preparation of a flexible, porous polyacrylamide substrate for mechanical studies of cultured cells. Methods Enzymol 298:489-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(98)98041-7
25. Guilluy C, Swaminathan V, Garcia-Mata R, O'Brien ET, Superfine R, Burridge K. 2011. The Rho GEFs LARG and GEF-H1 regulate the mechanical response to force on integrins. Nat Cell Biol 13:724-729. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2254
26. Zhou MM, Ravichandran KS, Olejniczak EF, Petros AM, Meadows RP, Sattler M, Harlan JE, Wade WS, Burakoff SJ, Fesik SW. 1995. Structure and ligand recognition of the phosphotyrosine binding domain of Shc. Nature 378:584-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/378584a0
27. Lietha D, Cai X, Ceccarelli DF, Li Y, Schaller MD, Eck MJ. 2007. Structural basis for the autoinhibition of focal adhesion kinase. Cell 129: 1177-1187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.041
28. Iwanicki MP, Vomastek T, Tilghman RW, Martin KH, Banerjee J, Wedegaertner PB, Parsons JT. 2008. FAK, PDZ-RhoGEF and ROCKII cooperate to regulate adhesion movement and trailing-edge retraction in fibroblasts. J Cell Sci 121:895-905. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.020941
29. Medley QG, Buchbinder EG, Tachibana K, Ngo H, Serra-Pages C, Streuli M. 2003. Signaling between focal adhesion kinase and trio. J Biol Chem 278:13265-13270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M300277200
30. Garcia-Mata R, Wennerberg K, Arthur WT, Noren NK, Ellerbroek SM, Burridge K. 2006. Analysis of activated GAPs and GEFs in cell lysates. Methods Enzymol 406:425-437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016 /S0076-6879(06)06031-9
31. Khamdaeng T, Luo J, Vappou J, Terdtoon P, Konofagou EE. 2012. Arterial stiffness identification of the human carotid artery using the stress-strain relationship in vivo. Ultrasonics 52:402-411. http://dx.doi .org/10.1016/j.ultras.2011.09.006
32. Riley WA, Barnes RW, Evans GW, Burke GL. 1992. Ultrasonic measurement of the elastic modulus of the common carotid artery. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Stroke 23:952-956
33. Dupont S, Morsut L, Aragona M, Enzo E, Giulitti S, Cordenonsi M, Zanconato F, Le Digabel J, Forcato M, Bicciato S, Elvassore N, Piccolo S. 2011. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature 474:179-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10137
34. Chen KD, Li YS, Kim M, Li S, Yuan S, Chien S, Shyy JY. 1999. Mechanotransduction in response to shear stress. Roles of receptor tyrosine kinases, integrins, and Shc. J Biol Chem 274:18393-18400
35. Liu Y, Sweet DT, Irani-Tehrani M, Maeda N, Tzima E. 2008. Shc coordinates signals from intercellular junctions and integrins to regulate flow-induced inflammation. J Cell Biol 182:185-196. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1083/jcb.200709176
36. Hardy WR, Li L, Wang Z, Sedy J, Fawcett J, Frank E, Kucera J, Pawson T. 2007. Combinatorial ShcA docking interactions support diversity in tissue morphogenesis. Science 317:251-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126 /science.1140114
37. Vanderlaan RD, Hardy WR, Kabir MG, Pasculescu A, Jones N, deTombe PP, Backx PH, Pawson T. 2011. The ShcA phosphotyrosine docking protein uses distinct mechanisms to regulate myocyte and global heart function. Circ Res 108:184-193. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.233924
38. Dubash AD, Wennerberg K, Garcia-Mata R, Menold MM, Arthur WT, Burridge K. 2007. A novel role for Lsc/p115 RhoGEF and LARG in regulating RhoA activity downstream of adhesion to fibronectin. J Cell Sci 120:3989-3998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.003806
39. Scott DW, Tolbert CE, Burridge K. 2016. Tension on JAM-A activates RhoA via GEF-H1 and p115 RhoGEF. Mol Biol Cell 27:1420-1430. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E15-12-0833
40. Schlaepfer DD, Jones KC, Hunter T. 1998. Multiple Grb2-mediated integrin-stimulated signaling pathways to ERK2/mitogen-activated protein kinase: summation of both c-Src-and focal adhesion kinase-initiated tyrosine phosphorylation events. Mol Cell Biol 18:2571-2585. http://dx .doi.org/10.1128/MCB.18.5.2571
41. Barberis L, Wary KK, Fiucci G, Liu F, Hirsch E, Brancaccio M, Altruda F, Tarone G, Giancotti FG. 2000. Distinct roles of the adaptor protein Shc and focal adhesion kinase in integrin signaling to ERK. J Biol Chem 275: 36532-36540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M002487200
42. Gu J, Tamura M, Pankov R, Danen EH, Takino T, Matsumoto K, Yamada KM. 1999. Shc and FAK differentially regulate cell motility and directionality modulated by PTEN. J Cell Biol 146:389-403. http://dx.doi .org/10.1083/jcb.146.2.389
43. Schaller MD. 2010. Cellular functions of FAK kinases: insight into molecular mechanisms and novel functions. J Cell Sci 123:1007-1013. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.045112
44. Chan SW, Lim CJ, Guo K, Ng CP, Lee I, Hunziker W, Zeng Q, Hong W. 2008. A role for TAZ in migration, invasion, and tumorigenesis of breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 68:2592-2598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158 /0008-5472.CAN-07-2696
45. Tian Y, Kolb R, Hong JH, Carroll J, Li D, You J, Bronson R, Yaffe MB, Zhou J, Benjamin T. 2007. TAZ promotes PC2 degradation through a SCFbeta-Trcp E3 ligase complex. Mol Cell Biol 27:6383-6395. http://dx .doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00254-07
46. Zhou Z, Hao Y, Liu N, Raptis L, Tsao MS, Yang X. 2011. TAZ is a novel oncogene in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene 30:2181-2186. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2010.606
47. Zhao B, Li L, Wang L, Wang CY, Yu J, Guan KL. 2012. Cell detachment activates the Hippo pathway via cytoskeleton reorganization to induce anoikis. Genes Dev 26:54-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.173435.111
48. Li X, Xu Z, Du W, Zhang Z, Wei Y, Wang H, Zhu Z, Qin L, Wang L, Niu Q, Zhao X, Girard L, Gong Y, Ma Z, Sun B, Yao Z, Minna JD, Terada LS, Liu Z. 2014. Aiolos promotes anchorage independence by silencing p66(Shc) transcription in cancer cells. Cancer Cell 25:575-589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2014.03.020
49. Glaven JA, Whitehead IP, Nomanbhoy T, Kay R, Cerione RA. 1996. Lfc and Lsc oncoproteins represent two new guanine nucleotide exchange factors for the Rho GTP-binding protein. J Biol Chem 271:27374-27381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.44.27374
50. Jaiswal M, Gremer L, Dvorsky R, Haeusler LC, Cirstea IC, Uhlenbrock K, Ahmadian MR. 2011. Mechanistic insights into specificity, activity, and regulatory elements of the regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS)-containing Rho-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) p115, PDZRhoGEF( PRG), and leukemia-associatedRhoGEF(LARG). J BiolChem286: 18202-18212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.226431
51. Nimnual AS, Yatsula BA, Bar-Sagi D. 1998. Coupling of Ras and Rac guanosine triphosphatases through the Ras exchanger Sos. Science 279: 560-563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5350.560