Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 120, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 382-388

  Treesh, Joshua C ^a   Liacouras, Peter C ^a   Taft, Robert M ^a   Brooks, Daniel I ^a   Raiciulescu, Sorana ^a   Ellert, Daniel O ^a   Grant, Gerald T ^a   Ye, Ling ^a  

^a WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DEVICES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; TOOTH ARCH;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; PRINTING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 85046347942     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Mormann, W.H., The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 137:suppl (2006), 7S–13S.
2. Mormann, W.H., The origin of the Cerec method: a personal review of the first 5 years. Int J Comput Dent 7 (2004), 11–24.
3. Logozzo, S., Zanettia, E., Franceschinia, G., Kilpeläb, A., Mäkynenb, A., Recent advances in dental optics – Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Opt Lasers Eng 54 (2014), 203–221.
4. Seelbach, P., Brueckel, C., Wostmann, B., Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 17 (2013), 1759–1764.
5. Tidehag, P., Ottosson, K., Sjogren, G., Accuracy of ceramic restorations made using an in-office optical scanning technique: an in vitro study. Oper Dent 39 (2014), 308–316.
6. Pradies, G., Zarauz, C., Valverde, A., Ferreiroa, A., Martinez-Rus, F., Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology. J Dent 43 (2015), 201–208.
7. Zarauz, C., Valverde, A., Martinez-Rus, F., Hassan, B., Pradies, G., Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions. Clin Oral Investig 20 (2016), 799–806.
8. Schaefer, O., Decker, M., Wittstock, F., Kuepper, H., Guentsch, A., Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro. J Dent 42 (2014), 677–683.
9. Nakamura, T., Dei, N., Kojima, T., Wakabayashi, K., Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 16 (2003), 244–248.
10. Lee, K.B., Park, C.W., Kim, K.H., Kwon, T.Y., Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic crowns fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems. Dent Mater J 27 (2008), 422–426.
11. Anadioti, E., Aquilino, S.A., Gratton, D.G., Holloway, J.A., Denry, I., Thomas, G.W., et al. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. J Prosthodont 23 (2014), 610–617.
12. Syrek, A., Reich, G., Ranftl, D., Klein, C., Cerny, B., Brodesser, J., Clinical evaluation of all ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 38 (2010), 553–559.
13. Renne, W., McGill, S.T., Forshee, K.V., DeFee, M.R., Mennito, A.S., Predicting marginal fit of CAD/CAM crowns based on the presence or absence of common preparation errors. J Prosthet Dent 108 (2012), 310–315.
14. Tamim, H., Skjerven, H., Ekfeldt, A., Ronold, H.J., Clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM metal-ceramic posterior crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions. Int J Prosthodont 27 (2014), 331–337.
15. Ahlholm, P., Sipila, K., Vallittu, P., Jakonen, M., Kotiranta, U., Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: a review. J Prosthodont 27 (2018), 35–41.
16. Ng, J., Ruse, D., Wyatt, C., A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 112 (2014), 555–560.
17. Euan, R., Figueras-Alvarez, O., Cabratosa-Termes, J., Oliver-Parra, R., Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design. J Prosthet Dent 112 (2014), 155–162.
18. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 5725-1:1994. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Part 1: general principles and definitions. 1994, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva Available at https://www.iso.org/standard/11833.html.
19. The American National Standards Institute and American Dental Association. ANSI/ADA132:2015. Scanning accuracy of dental chair side and laboratory CAD/CAM systems. 2015, American Dental Association, Chicago Available at https://ebusiness.ada.org/productcatalog/10944/Dental-Equipment/ANSIADA-Standard-No-132-Scanning-Accuracy-of-Dental-Chair-Si/ADA132-2015.
20. Yuzbasioglu, E., Kurt, H., Turunc, R., Bilir, H., Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health, 14, 2014, 10.
21. Patzelt, S.B., Lamprinos, C., Stampf, S., Att, W., The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc 145 (2014), 542–551.
22. Patzelt, S.B., Emmanouilidi, A., Stampf, S., Strub, J.R., Att, W., Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 18 (2014), 1687–1694.
23. Ender, A., Attin, T., Mehl, A., In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent 115 (2016), 313–320.
24. Ender, A., Mehl, A., Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 109 (2013), 121–128.
25. Ender, A., Mehl, A., In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. Quintessence Int 46 (2015), 9–17.
26. Flugge, T.V., Schlager, S., Nelson, K., Nahles, S., Metzger, M.C., Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 144 (2013), 471–478.
27. Guth, J.F., Edelhoff, D., Schweiger, J., Keul, C., A new method for the evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch digital impressions in vitro. Clin Oral Investig 20 (2016), 1487–1494.
28. Ender, A., Mehl, A., Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions–an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 14 (2011), 11–21.
29. Goracci, C., Franchi, L., Vichi, A., Ferrari, M., Accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of intraoral scanners for full-arch impressions: a systematic review of the clinical evidence. Eur J Orthod 38 (2016), 422–428.
30. Vecsei, B., Joos-Kovacs, G., Borbely, J., Hermann, P., Comparison of the accuracy of direct and indirect three-dimensional digitizing processes for CAD/CAM systems – An in vitro study. J Prosthodont Res 61 (2017), 177–184.
31. Guth, J.F., Runkel, C., Beuer, F., Stimmelmayr, M., Edelhoff, D., Keul, C., Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization. Clin Oral Investig 21 (2017), 1445–1455.
32. Jeong, I.D., Lee, J.J., Jeon, J.H., Kim, J.H., Kim, H.Y., Kim, W.C., Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 115 (2016), 755–759.
33. Renne, W., Ludlow, M., Fryml, J., Schurch, Z., Mennito, A., Kessler, R., et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthet Dent 118 (2017), 36–42.