Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 115, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 755-759

  Jeong, Il Do ^a   Lee, Jae Jun ^a   Jeon, Jin Hun ^b   Kim, Ji Hwan ^a   Kim, Hae Young ^a   Kim, Woong Chul ^a  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

^b Kyungdong University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BLUE LIGHT; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROL GROUP; IN VITRO STUDY; MODEL; VIDEORECORDING; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH ARCH;

DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84970005876     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. 1 DIN 13995 (NADENT: NA 014-00-05-06 AK): Dentistry-terminology of the process chain for CAD/CAM-systems, 2010. Available at: http://www.din.de/en/getting-involved/standards-committees/nadent. Last accessed October 20, 2015.
2. 2 Christensen, G.J., Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions?. J Am Dent Assoc 139 (2008), 761–763.
3. 3 Christensen, G.J., Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 140 (2009), 1301–1304.
4. 4 Patzelt, S.B., Emmanouilidi, A., Stampf, S., Strub, J.R., Att, W., Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 18 (2014), 1687–1694.
5. 5 Ender, A., Mehl, A., Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 109 (2013), 121–128.
6. 6 Nedelcu, R.G., Persson, A.S., Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent 112 (2014), 1461–1471.
7. 7 Ender, A., Mehl, A., In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. Quintessence Int 46 (2014), 9–17.
8. 8 Güth, J.F., Keul, C., Stimmelmayr, M., Beuer, F., Edelhoff, D., Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig 17 (2013), 1201–1208.
9. 9 Flügge, T.V., Schlager, S., Nelson, K., Nahles, S., Metzger, M.C., Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 144 (2013), 471–478.
10. 10 Rudolph, H., Luthardt, R.G., Walter, M.H., Computer-aided analysis of the influence of digitizing and surfacing on the accuracy in dental CAD/CAM technology. Comput Biol Med 37 (2007), 579–587.
11. 11 Trifkovic, B., Budak, I., Todorovic, A., Vukelic, D., Lazic, V., Puskar, T., Comparative analysis on measuring performances of dental intraoral and extraoral optical 3D digitization systems. Measurement 47 (2014), 45–53.
12. 12 Ender, A., Mehl, A., Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 16 (2012), 11–21.
13. 13 International Organization for Standardization. ISO-5725–1. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results–Part 1: general principles and definitions. 1994, ISO, Geneva Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/store.htm Last accessed December 22, 2015.
14. 14 International Organization for Standardization. ISO-12836. Digitizing devices for CAD/CAM systems for indirect dental restorations – Test methods for assessing accuracy. 2012, ISO, Geneva Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/store.htm Last accessed December 22, 2015.
15. 15 Sandrik, J.L., Sarna, T., Temperature of elastomeric impression materials while setting in the mouth. J Dent Res 59 (1980), 1985–1986.
16. 16 Wöstmann, B., Rehmann, P., Balkenhol, M., Accuracy of impressions obtained with dual-arch trays. Int J Prosthodont 22 (2009), 158–160.
17. 17 Caputi, S., Varvara, G., Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 99 (2008), 274–281.