Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 1445-1455

  Güth, Jan Frederik ^a   Runkel, Cornelius ^a   Beuer, Florian ^b   Stimmelmayr, Michael ^a   Edelhoff, Daniel ^a   Keul, Christine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Digital impression; Impression; Intraoral scanner; STL datasets

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DEVICES; DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IN VITRO STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOFTWARE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84978161015     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1902-4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Rubel BS (2007) Impression materials: a comparative review of impression materials most commonly used in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin N Am 51:629–642 vi
2. Christensen GJ (2005) The state of fixed prosthodontic impressions: room for improvement. J Am Dent Assoc 136:343–346
3. Christensen GJ (2008) Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? J Am Dent Assoc 139:761–763
4. Mehl A, Ender A, Mormann W, Attin T (2009) Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 12:11–28
5. Henkel GL (2007) A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions. Compend Contin Educ Dent 28:422–424 426-428, 430-421
6. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J (2010) Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 38:553–559
7. Ender A, Mehl A (2013) Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 109:121–128
8. Ender A, Mehl A (2013) Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 16:11–21
9. Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S (2005) Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent 8:283–294
10. Almeida E, Silva JS, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Araujo E, Stimmelmayr M, Vieira LC, et al. (2014) Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Investig 18:515–523
11. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wostmann B (2013) Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 17:1759–1764
12. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results—part 1: general principles and definitions (ISO 5725–1:1994)
13. Keul C, Stawarczyk B, Erdelt KJ, Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Guth JF (2014) Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization—a laboratory study. Dent Mater 30:400–407
14. Guth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D (2013) Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig 17:1201–1208
15. Ender A, Mehl A (2011) Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions—an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 14:11–21
16. Ender A, Mehl A (2015) In-Vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. Quintessence Int 46:9–17
17. Nedelcu RG, Persson AS (2014) Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent 112:1461–1471
18. Ueda K, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Erdelt K, Keul C, Guth JF (2015) Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions. Clin Oral Investig