Perspectives of foreign language preservice teachers on the use of a web-based instructional environment in a methods course

CALICO Journal

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 91-109

  Van Olphen, Marcela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic Exchanges; Connectivity; Methods Class; Preservice Teachers; Web based Instructional Environments

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044799080     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20569017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1558/cj.v25i1.91-109     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Al Musawi, A. S., & Abdelraheem, A. Y. (2004). E-learning at Sultan Qaboos University: Status and future. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35 (3), 363-367.
2. Armstrong, K. M., & Yetter-Vassot, K. (1994). Transforming teaching through technology. Foreign Language Annals, 27 (4), 475-486.
3. Auyeung, L. H. (2004). Building a collaborative online learning community: A case study in Hong Kong. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31 (2), 119-136.
4. Axmann, M., Fourie, W., & Papo, W. D. (2002). Adding net value: The nature of online education at a South African residential institution. Educational Media International, 39 (3/4), 267-273.
5. Baier, M., & Mueggenburg, K. (2001). Using the Internet for clinical instruction. Nurse Educator, 26 (1), 3.
6. Bales, A. B., Taylor, C. L., & Havert, M. L. (2001). Electronic reserves and WebCT: Using courseware to implement electronic reserves at the university libraries of Notre Dame. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply, 11 (4), 37-50.
7. Beauvois, M. H. (1997). Computer-mediated communication: Technology for improving speaking and writing. In M. D. Bush & R. M. Terry (Eds.), Technology-enhanced language learning (pp. 165-213). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
8. Bickle, M. C., & Carroll, J. C. (2003). Checklist for quality online instruction: Outcomes for learners, the professor and the institution. College Student Journal, 37 (2), 208-218.
9. Borras, I., & Lafayette, R. C. (1994). Effects of multimedia courseware subtitling on the speaking performance of college students of French. Modern Language Journal, 78 (1), 61-75.
10. Brickman, B. (2003). Designing and teaching an online composition course. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 30 (4), 358-364.
11. Buehler, M. A. (2004). Where is the library in course management software? Journal of Library Administration, 41 (1/2), 75-84.
12. Burnett, J. (1998). Language alternation in a computer-equipped foreign language classroom: The intersection of teacher beliefs, language, and technology. Canadian Modern Language Review, 55 (1), 97-123.
13. Bush, M. D., & Terry, R. M. (Eds.). (1997). Technology-enhanced language learning. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
14. Carey, S. (1999). The use of WebCT for a highly interactive virtual graduate seminar. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12 (4), 371-380.
15. Carter, K. (2002). Let’s meet online: Collaboration tools. Technology & Learning, 22 (9), 10-16.
16. Cerri, C., & Bonomi Barufi, M. C. (2003). Differential and integral calculus III through WebCT: Analysis of results. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34 (3), 335-341.
17. Cervato, C. (2003). Getting help from course management software to teach a large-enrollment introductory geology class. Journal of Geoscience Education, 51 (2), 185-193.
18. Charlesworth, P., & Vician, C. (2003). Leveraging technology for chemical sciences education: An early assessment of WebCT usage in first-year Chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 80 (11), 1333-1337.
19. Clark, J. (2002). [Review of WebCT]. Internet and Higher Education, 5 (1), 79-82.
20. Cole, R. (2000). Chemistry, teaching, and WebCT. Journal of Chemical Education, 77 (7), 826-827.
21. Conroy, P. V., Jr. (2004). E-Mail or Blackboard: Teaching advanced French composition. The French Review, 77 (3), 550-559.
22. Curtin, J. (2002). WebCT and online tutorials: New possibilities for student interaction. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 18 (1), 110-126.
23. Dabbagh, N. H. (2000). The challenges of interfacing between face-to-face and online instruction. Tech-Trends, 44 (6), 37-42.
24. Dabbagh, N. H., & Schmitt, J. (1998). Redesigning instruction through web-based course authoring tools. Educational Media International, 35 (2), 106-110.
25. DeBourgh, G. A. (2001). Using web technology in a clinical nursing course. Nurse Educator, 26 (5), 227-233.
26. Firdyiwek, Y. (1999). Web-based courseware tools: Where is the pedagogy? Educational Technology, 39 (1), 29-34.
27. Foreman, J., & Widmayer, S. (2000). How on-line course management systems affect the course. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development, 13 (2), 16-19.
28. Gaide, S. (2004). Student orientation at Tarleton State takes the distance out of distance education. Distance Education Report, 8 (17), 4.
29. Galbraith, M. W. E. (2003). Mentoring adult learners. Adult Learning, 14 (1), 2-28.
30. Garfinkel, A., & Sosa, C. (1996). Foreign language teacher education in a professional development school. In Z. Moore (Ed.), Foreign language teacher education: Multiple perspectives (pp. 97-121). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
31. Garrett, R. E. (2004). [Review of WebCT Vista]. Internet and Higher Education, 7 (2), 165-168.
32. Gibson, S. E. (2002). Using a problem-based, multimedia-enhanced approach in learning about teaching. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 18 (3), 394-409.
33. Good, D. J. (2004). The use of Flash animations within a WebCT environment: Enhancing comprehension of experimental procedures in a biotechnology laboratory. International Journal of Instructional media, 31 (4), 355-370.
34. Gore, P. J. W. (2000). Developing and teaching online courses in geology at the two-year college level in Georgia. Computers and Geosciences, 26 (6), 641-646.
35. Henly, D. C., & Reid, A. E. (2001). Use of the web to provide learning support for a large metabolism and nutrition class. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 29 (6), 229-233.
36. Hernandez, R. (2000). The combined use of compressed video and WebCT as a strategy for distance education. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development, 13 (1), 41-43.
37. Herron, C. A., & Moos, M. A. (1993). Electronic media in the foreign language and literature classroom: A fusion between science and the humanities. Foreign Language Annals, 26 (4), 479-490.
38. Higham, J., & Morris, D. (1993). Developing information technology through in-service and initial teacher education: A Hypercard project. Language Learning Journal, 7, 31-35.
39. Hutchins, H. M. (2001). Enhancing the business communication course through WebCT. Business Communication Quarterly, 64 (3), 87-94.
40. Hwu, F. (2003). Learners’ behaviors in computer-based input activities elicited through tracking technologies. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16 (1), 5-29.
41. Iyer, H. (2003). Web-based instructional technology in an information science classroom. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 44 (3/4), 296-315.
42. Jackson, P. (2003). Ten challenges for introducing web-supported learning to overseas students in the social sciences. Active Learning in Higher Education, 4 (1), 87-106.
43. Johnson, E. M. (2002). The role of computer-supported discussion for language teacher education: What do the students say? CALICO Journal, 20 (1), 59-80.
44. Johnson, E. M., Bishop, A., Holt, A., Stirling, J. A., & Zane, J. (2001). Reflections in cyberspace: Web conferencing for language teacher education. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 17 (2), 169-186.
45. Kaiden, R. (2002). [Review of WebCT]. Internet and Higher Education, 5 (4), 399-404.
46. Kelm, O. R. (1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25 (5), 441-454.
47. Knee, R., Ariza, E. N., & Long, J. (2002). The sound of music—From a distance: Using WebCT to teach an online music course. Learning and Leading with Technology, 29 (6), 22-27.
48. Kost, C. R. (1999). Enhancing communicative language skills through effective use of the world wide web in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 32 (3), 309-320.
49. Kouritzin, S. G. (2002). The personal, practical, and professional rewards of teaching MA-TESOL courses online. TESOL Quarterly, 36 (4), 621-624.
50. Kraemer, E. W. (2003). Developing the online learning environment: The pros and cons of using WebCT for library instruction. Information Technology and Libraries, 22 (2), 87-92.
51. Krueger, K., Bobac, M., & Smaldino, S. (2004). InTime impact report: What was InTime’s effectiveness and impact on faculty and preservice teachers? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12 (2), 185-210.
52. Kubota, R. (1999). Word processing and WWW projects in a college Japanese language class. Foreign Language Annals, 32 (2), 205-218.
53. Lam, Y. (2000). Technophilia vs. technophobia: A preliminary look at why second-language teachers do or do not use technology in their classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56 (3), 390-420.
54. Lee, K. S. Y. (2004). Web-based courses for all disciplines: How? Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 41 (4), 437-447.
55. Lee, L. (2002). Synchronous online exchanges: A study of modification devices on non-native discourse. System, 30 (3), 275-288.
56. Lichtenberg, J. (1999). Education publishers awaiting shakeout among software suppliers. Publishers Weekly, 246 (50), 18.
57. Lindenau, S. E. (1984). The teacher and technology in the humanities and arts. Modern Language Journal, 68 (2), 119-124.
58. MacDonald, K. (2003). Internet technology and second/foreign language education: Activities for the classroom teacher. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59 (3), 455-462.
59. Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
60. McAvinia, C., & Hughes, J. (2003). Sharing systems, sharing language: Designing and working in a virtual department. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16 (5), 445-467.
61. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thous and Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
62. Moore, Z., Morales, B., & Carel, S. (1998). Technology and teaching culture: Results of a state survey of foreign language teachers. CALICO Journal, 15 (1-3), 109-128.
63. Morley, L., & LaMaster, K. J. (1999). Use electronic bulletin boards to extend classrooms. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 70 (6), 16-18.
64. Musgrove, A., & Musgrove, G. (2004). Online Learning and the younger student—Theoretical and practical applications. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 213-225.
65. Oliva, M., & Pollastrini, Y. (1995). Internet resources and second language acquisition: An evaluation of virtual immersion. Foreign Language Annals, 28 (4), 551-563.
66. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
67. Penzhorn, C., & Fourie, I. (2004). Challenges in web-based teaching of reference work: Experiences at the University of Pretoria. Mousaion, 22 (1), 70-88.
68. Pienta, N. J. (2003). A placement examination and mathematics tutorial for general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 80 (11), 1244-1247.
69. Rilling, S., Dahlman, A., Dodson, S., Boyles, C., & Pazvant, O. (2005). Connecting CALL theory and practice in preservice teacher education and beyond: Processes and products. CALICO Journal, 22 (2), 213-236.
70. Rodriguez-van Olphen, M. M. C. (2002). Integrating technology into the foreign language teacher education curriculum: A phenomenological study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
71. Rosenbusch, M. H., Garcia-Villada, E., & Padgitt, J. S. (2003). The attitudes of classroom teachers toward early language learning. NECTFL Review, 52, 21-28.
72. Rushubirwa, L. F. R. (2002). Experiences of faculty and students integrating multimedia and web-based technologies into university foreign language learning: A study of three languages. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio University, Athens, OH.
73. Savenye, W., Dwyer, H., & Niemczyk, M. (2003). Development of the digital high school project: A school-university partnership. Computers in the Schools, 20 (3), 3-14.
74. Shelley, J. O. (1997). Post-institute connections: Implementation and outcomes of a diffusion-based electronic mail instructional model. Foreign Language Annals, 30 (1), 124-139.
75. Shelley, J. O. (1998). Factors that affect the adoption and use of electronic mail by K-12 foreign language educators. Computers in Human Behavior, 14 (2), 269-285.
76. Siekmann, S. (2001). Which course management system is right for me? A comparison of WebCT 3.1 and Blackboard 5.0. CALICO Journal, 18 (3), 590-617.
77. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
78. Suen, L. (2005). Teaching epidemiology using WebCT: Application of the seven principles of good practice. Journal of Nursing Education, 44 (3), 143-146.
79. Teng, Y., & Allen, J. (2005). Using Blackboard in an educational psychology course to increase preservice teachers’ skills and confidence in technology integration. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3 (4), 1-12.
80. Tognozzi, E. (2001). Italian language instruction: The need for teacher development in technology. Italica, 78 (4), 486-498.
81. Van Manen, M. (1991). The tact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
82. Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal, 81 (4), 470-481.
83. Whitehead, D. K., & Knee, R. (2000). Developing an online associate degree in nursing program. Nurse Educator, 25 (1), 15.
84. Williams, P., & Quinsee, S. (2003). Using WebCT to teach key skills. Library & Information Update, 2 (2), 42-43.
85. Young, S., & Shaw, D. (2004). Effective online teaching in higher education. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego, California.