Ecosystem services as a post-normal field of science

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 31, Issue , 2018, Pages 93-101

  Ainscough, Jacob ^a,b   Wilson, Meriwether ^a,b   Kenter, Jasper O ^a,b,c  

^a Laurence Mee Centre for Society and the Sea   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044739794     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.021     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Albert, C., Neßhöver, C., Schröter, M., Wittmer, H., Bonn, A., Burkhard, B., Dauber, J., Döring, R., Fürst, C., Grunewald, K., Haase, D., Hansjürgens, B., Hauck, J., Hinzmann, M., Koellner, T., Plieninger, T., Rabe, S.-E., Ring, I., Spangenberg, J.H., Stachow, U., Wüstemann, H., Görg, C., Towards a national ecosystem assessment in Germany: a plea for a comprehensive approach. GAIA – Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 26 (2017), 27–33.
2. Aslaksen, I., Glomsrød, S., Myhr, A., Post-normal science and ecological economics: strategies for precautionary approaches and sustainable development. Int. J. Sustainable Dev. 16 (2013), 107–126.
3. Barnaud, C., Antona, M., Deconstructing ecosystem services: uncertainties and controversies around a socially constructed concept. Geoforum 56 (2014), 113–123.
4. Berkes, F., Folke, C., Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. 1998, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
5. Braat, L.C., 2018. Five reasons why the Science publication “Assessing nature's contributions to people” (Diaz et al. 2018) would not have been accepted in Ecosystem Services. Ecosyst. Serv. In Press, 2017–2018.
6. Bremer, S., “No right to rubbish”: mobilising post-normal science for planning Gisborne's wastewater outfall. Mar. Policy 46 (2014), 22–30.
7. Carmen, E., Watt, A., Carvalho, L., Dick, J., Fazey, I., Garcia-Blanco, G., Grizzetti, B., Hauck, J., Izakovicova, Z., Kopperoinen, L., Liquete, C., Odee, D., Steingröver, E., Young, J., Knowledge needs for the operationalisation of the concept of ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 29 (2018), 441–451.
8. Castro e Silva, M., Teixeira, A.A.C., A bibliometric account of the evolution of EE in the last two decades. is ecological economics (becoming) a post-normal science?. Ecol. Econ. 70 (2011), 849–862.
9. Chan, K.M.A., Guerry, A.D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S., Satterfield, T., Basurto, X., Bostrom, A., Chuenpagdee, R., Gould, R., Halpern, B.S., Hannahs, N., Levine, J., Norton, B., Ruckelshaus, M., Russell, R., Tam, J., Woodside, U., Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? a framework for constructive engagement. Bioscience 62 (2012), 744–756.
10. Chiesura, A., De Groot, R., Critical natural capital: a socio-cultural perspective. Ecol. Econ. 44 (2003), 219–231.
11. Cordier, M., Pérez Agúndez, J.A., O'Connor, M., Rochette, S., Hecq, W., Quantification of interdependencies between economic systems and ecosystem services: an input-output model applied to the Seine estuary. Ecol. Econ. 70 (2011), 1660–1671.
12. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Braat, L., Kubiszewski, I., Fioramonti, L., Sutton, P., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go?. Ecosyst. Serv. 28 (2017), 1–16.
13. Crouzat, E., Arpin, I., Brunet, L., Colloff, M.J., Turkelboom, F., Lavorel, S., Researchers must be aware of their roles at the interface of ecosystem services science and policy. Ambio, 2017, 1–9.
14. Curtis, I.A., Valuing ecosystem goods and services: a new approach using a surrogate market and the combination of a multiple criteria analysis and a Delphi panel to assign weights to the attributes. Ecol. Econ. 50 (2004), 163–194.
15. Dankel, D.J., Aps, R., Padda, G., Röckmann, C., Van Der Sluijs, J.P., Wilson, D.C., Degnbol, P., Advice under uncertainty in the marine system. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 69 (2012), 3–7.
16. Daw, T.M., Coulthard, S., Cheung, W.W.L., Brown, K., Abunge, C., Galafassi, D., Peterson, G.D., McClanahan, T.R., Omukoto, J.O., Munyi, L., Evaluating taboo trade-offs in ecosystems services and human well-being. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112 (2015), 6949–6954.
17. De La Vega-Leinert, A.C., Schröter, D., Leemans, R., Fritsch, U., Pluimers, J., A stakeholder dialogue on European vulnerability. Reg. Environ. Change 8 (2008), 109–124.
18. Dempsey, J., Robertson, M.M., Ecosystem services: tensions, impurities, and points of engagement within neoliberalism. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 36 (2012), 758–779.
19. Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., Ash, N., Larigauderie, A., Adhikari, J.R., Arico, S., Báldi, A., Bartuska, A., Baste, I.A., Bilgin, A., Brondizio, E., Chan, K.M.A., Figueroa, V.E., Duraiappah, A., Fischer, M., Hill, R., Koetz, T., Leadley, P., Lyver, P., Mace, G.M., Martin-Lopez, B., Okumura, M., Pacheco, D., Pascual, U., Pérez, E.S., Reyers, B., Roth, E., Saito, O., Scholes, R.J., Sharma, N., Tallis, H., Thaman, R., Watson, R., Yahara, T., Hamid, Z.A., Akosim, C., Al-Hafedh, Y., Allahverdiyev, R., Amankwah, E., Asah, T.S., Asfaw, Z., Bartus, G., Brooks, A.L., Caillaux, J., Dalle, G., Darnaedi, D., Driver, A., Erpul, G., Escobar-Eyzaguirre, P., Failler, P., Fouda, A.M.M., Fu, B., Gundimeda, H., Hashimoto, S., Homer, F., Lavorel, S., Lichtenstein, G., Mala, W.A., Mandivenyi, W., Matczak, P., Mbizvo, C., Mehrdadi, M., Metzger, J.P., Mikissa, J.B., Moller, H., Mooney, H.A., Mumby, P., Nagendra, H., Nesshover, C., Oteng-Yeboah, A.A., Pataki, G., Roué M., Rubis, J., Schultz, M., Smith, P., Sumaila, R., Takeuchi, K., Thomas, S., Verma, M., Yeo-Chang, Y., Zlatanova, D., The IPBES conceptual framework – connecting nature and people. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainable 14 (2015), 1–16.
20. Díaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., Martín-López, B., Watson, R.T., Molnár, Z., Hill, R., Chan, K.M.A., Baste, I.A., Brauman, K.A., Polasky, S., Church, A., Lonsdale, M., Larigauderie, A., Leadley, P.W., van Oudenhoven, A.P.E., van der Plaat, F., Schröter, M., Lavorel, S., Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y., Bukvareva, E., Davies, K., Demissew, S., Erpul, G., Failler, P., Guerra, C.A., Hewitt, C.L., Keune, H., Lindley, S., Shirayama, Y., Assessing nature's contributions to people. Science 359 (2018), 270–272.
21. Dick, J., Turkelboom, F., Woods, H., Iniesta-Arandia, I., Primmer, E., Saarela, S.R., Bezák, P., Mederly, P., Leone, M., Verheyden, W., Kelemen, E., Hauck, J., Andrews, C., Antunes, P., Aszalós, R., Baró F., Barton, D.N., Berry, P., Bugter, R., Carvalho, L., Czúcz, B., Dunford, R., Garcia Blanco, G., Geamănă N., Giucă R., Grizzetti, B., Izakovičová Z., Kertész, M., Kopperoinen, L., Langemeyer, J., Montenegro Lapola, D., Liquete, C., Luque, S., Martínez Pastur, G., Martin-Lopez, B., Mukhopadhyay, R., Niemela, J., Odee, D., Peri, P.L., Pinho, P., Patrício-Roberto, G.B., Preda, E., Priess, J., Röckmann, C., Santos, R., Silaghi, D., Smith, R., Vădineanu, A., van der Wal, J.T., Arany, I., Badea, O., Bela, G., Boros, E., Bucur, M., Blumentrath, S., Calvache, M., Carmen, E., Clemente, P., Fernandes, J., Ferraz, D., Fongar, C., García-Llorente, M., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Gundersen, V., Haavardsholm, O., Kalóczkai, Á., Khalalwe, T., Kiss, G., Köhler, B., Lazányi, O., Lellei-Kovács, E., Lichungu, R., Lindhjem, H., Magare, C., Mustajoki, J., Ndege, C., Nowell, M., Nuss Girona, S., Ochieng, J., Often, A., Palomo, I., Pataki, G., Reinvang, R., Rusch, G., Saarikoski, H., Smith, A., Soy Massoni, E., Stange, E., Vågnes Traaholt, N., Vári, Á., Verweij, P., Vikström, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Zulian, G., Stakeholders’ perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept: Results from 27 case studies. Ecosyst. Serv. 29 (2018), 552–565.
22. Dong, X.B., Yu, B.H., Brown, M.T., Zhang, Y.S., Kang, M.Y., Jin, Y., Zhang, X.S., Ulgiati, S., Environmental and economic consequences of the overexploitation of natural capital and ecosystem services in Xilinguole league, China. Energy Policy 67 (2014), 767–780.
23. Felipe-Lucia, M.R., Comín, F.A., Escalera-Reyes, J., A framework for the social valuation of ecosystem services. Ambio 44 (2014), 308–318.
24. Fish, R., Potschin, M., Turner, R.K., Haines-Young, R., Ecosystem services: never waste the opportunity offered by a good crisis. Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services, 2016, Routledge, London, 803–808.
25. Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norström, A.V., Reyers, B., Rockström, J., Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecol. Soc. 21 (2016), 41–57.
26. Fontaine, C.M., Dendoncker, N., De Vreese, R., Jacquemin, I., Marek, A., Van Herzele, A., Devillet, G., Mortelmans, D., François, L., Towards participatory integrated valuation and modelling of ecosystem services under land-use change. J. Land Use Sci. 9 (2014), 278–303.
27. Funtowicz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R., A new scientific methodology for global environmental issues. Costanza, R., (eds.) Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability, 1991, Columbia University Press, New York, 137–152.
28. Funtowicz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R., Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science. Krimsky, S., Golding, D., (eds.) Social Theories of Risk, 1992, Praeger Publishing, Westport, USA, 251–273.
29. Funtowicz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R., Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25 (1993), 739–755.
30. Funtowicz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R., Emergent complex systems. Futures 26 (1994), 568–582.
31. Funtowicz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R., Uncertainty, complexity and post-normal science. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 13 (1994), 1881–1885.
32. Funtowicz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R., The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science. Ecol. Econ. 10 (1994), 197–207.
33. Funtowicz, S.O., Strand, R., Models of science and policy. Traavik, T., Ching, L.L., (eds.) Biosafety First: Holistic Approaches to Risk and Uncertainty in Genetic Engineering and Genetically Modified Organisms, 2007, Tapir Academic Publishers, Trondheim, 1–21.
34. Gilioli, G., Baumgärtner, J., Adaptive ecosocial system sustainability enhancement in Sub-Saharan Africa. Ecohealth 4 (2007), 428–444.
35. Grima, N., Singh, S.J., Smetschka, B., Decision making in a complex world: using OPTamos in a multi-criteria process for land management in the Cuitzmala watershed in Mexico. Land Use Policy 67 (2017), 73–85.
36. Guerry, A.D., Polasky, S., Lubchenco, J., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Daily, G.C., Griffin, R., Ruckelshaus, M., Bateman, I.J., Duraiappah, A., Elmqvist, T., Feldman, M.W., Folke, C., Hoekstra, J., Kareiva, P.M., Keeler, B.L., Li, S., McKenzie, E., Ouyang, Z., Reyers, B., Ricketts, T.H., Rockström, J., Tallis, H., Vira, B., Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112 (2015), 7348–7355.
37. Haines-Young, R., Exploring ecosystem service issues across diverse knowledge domains using Bayesian Belief Networks. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 35 (2011), 681–699.
38. Hamel, P., Bryant, B.P., Uncertainty assessment in ecosystem services analyses: seven challenges and practical responses. Ecosyst. Serv. 24 (2017), 1–15.
39. Heydinger, J.M., Reinforcing the ecosystem services perspective: the temporal component. Ecosystems 19 (2016), 661–673.
40. Hisschemöller, M., Hoppe, R., Groenewegen, P., Midden, C.J.H., Knowledge use and political choice in Dutch environmental policy: a problem structuring perspective on real life experiments in extended peer review. Hisschemöller, M., Ravetz, J.R., Hoppe, R., Dunn, W.N., (eds.) Knowledge, Power and Participation in Environmental Policy Analysis, 2001, Transaction Publishers, New Jersey, 437–470.
41. Hockley, N., Cost-benefit analysis: a decision-support tool or a venue for contesting ecosystem knowledge?. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 32 (2014), 283–300.
42. Irvine, K., O'Brien, L., Ravenscroft, N., Cooper, N., Everard, M., Fazey, I.R., Reed, M., Kenter, J.O., Ecosystem services and the idea of shared values. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 184–193.
43. Jacobs, S., Nicolas, D., Keune, H., No root, no fruit-sustainability and ecosystem services. Jacobs, S., Nicolas, D., Keune, H., (eds.) Ecosystem Services – Global Issues, Local Practices, 2013, Elsevier Inc., London, 19–28.
44. Jacobs, S., Spanhove, T., De Smet, L., Van Daele, T., Van Reeth, W., Van Gossum, P., Stevens, M., Schneiders, A., Panis, J., Demolder, H., Michels, H., Thoonen, M., Simoens, I., Peymen, J., The ecosystem service assessment challenge: Reflections from Flanders-REA. Ecol. Indica 61 (2015), 715–727.
45. Jardins, J.R. Des, Environmental Ethics: An Introduction to Environmental Philosophy. Second ed., 1997, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont.
46. Jasanoff, S., Is science socially constructed and can it still inform public policy?. Sci. Eng. Ethics 2 (1996), 264–276.
47. Jax, K., Furman, E., Saarikoski, H., Barton, D.N., Delbaere, B., Dick, J., Duke, G., Görg, C., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Harrison, P.A., Maes, J., Pérez-Soba, M., Saarela, S.-R., Turkelboom, F., van Dijk, J., Watt, A.D., Handling a messy world: lessons learned when trying to make the ecosystem services concept operational. Ecosyst. Serv. 29 (2018), 415–427.
48. Kay, J.J., Boyle, M., Regier, H.A., Francis, G., An ecosystem approach for sustainbility: addressing the challenge of complexity. Future 31 (1999), 721–742.
49. Kenter, J.O., Editorial: shared, plural and cultural values. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 175–183.
50. Kenter, J.O., Integrating deliberative monetary valuation, systems modelling and participatory mapping to assess shared values of coastal ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 291–307.
51. Kenter, J.O., 2018. IPBES: don't throw out the baby whilst keeping the bathwater; Put people's values central, not nature's contributions. Ecosyst. Serv. In Review.
52. Kenter, J.O., Reed, M., Irvine, K.N., O'Brien, E., Brady, E., Bryce, R., Christie, M., Church, A., Cooper, N., Davies, A., Shared, Plural and Cultural Values: A Handbook for Decision-Makers. 2014, Technical Report, Cambridge.
53. Kenter, J.O., O'Brien, L., Hockley, N., Ravenscroft, N., Fazey, I.R., Irvine, K.N., Reed, M., Christie, M., Brady, E., Bryce, R., Church, A., Cooper, N., Davies, A., Evely, A., Everard, M., Fish, R., Fisher, J.A., Jobstvogt, N., Molloy, C., Orchard-Webb, J., Ranger, S., Ryan, M., Watson, V., Williams, S., What are shared and social values of ecosystems?. Ecol. Econ. 111 (2015), 86–99.
54. Kenter, J.O., Reed, M., Fazey, I.R., The deliberative value formation model. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 194–207.
55. Keune, H., Bauler, T., Wittmer, H., Ecosystem services governance: managing complexity. Jacobs, S., Dendoncker, N., Keune, H., (eds.) Ecosystem Services: Global Issues Local Practices, 2013, Elsevier, 135–155.
56. Kuhn, T., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 1962, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
57. Kull, C.A., Arnauld de Sartre, X., Castro-Larranaga, M., The political ecology of ecosystem services. Geoforum 61 (2015), 122–134.
58. La Notte, A., D'Amato, D., Mäkinen, H., Paracchini, M.L., Liquete, C., Egoh, B., Geneletti, D., Crossman, N.D., Ecosystem services classification: a systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework. Ecol. Indica 74 (2017), 392–402.
59. Liquete, C., Udias, A., Conte, G., Grizzetti, B., Masi, F., Integrated valuation of a nature-based solution for water pollution control Highlighting hidden benefits. Ecosyst. Serv. 22 (2016), 392–401.
60. Lopes, R., Videira, N., Conceptualizing stakeholders’ perceptions of ecosystem services: a participatory systems mapping approach. Environ. Clim. Technol. 16 (2015), 36–53.
61. McDonough, K., Hutchinson, S., Moore, T., Hutchinson, J.M.S., Analysis of publication trends in ecosystem services research. Ecosyst. Serv. 25 (2017), 82–88.
62. Mederly, P., Schmidt, S., Erik, G.B., Fanny, B., Francesca, M.L., Kati, V., S, P.K., Anna, P., Ruiz, R., Shannon, R.H., Francis, T., Wouter, V.R., T, V.Z.B., Hilde, W., A new valuation school: Integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions land use decisions. Ecosyst. Serv. 22 (2016), 213–220.
63. Navarro-Ortega, A., Acuña, V., Batalla, R.J., Blasco, J., Conde, C., Elorza, F.J., Elosegi, A., Francés, F., La-Roca, F., Muñoz, I., Petrovic, M., Picó Y., Sabater, S., Sanchez-Vila, X., Schuhmacher, M., Barceló D., Assessing and forecasting the impacts of global change on Mediterranean rivers. the SCARCE consolider project on Iberian basins. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 19 (2012), 918–933.
64. Norgaard, R.B., Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecol. Econ. 69 (2010), 1219–1227.
65. Norgaard, R.B., Kallis, G., Kiparsky, M., Collectively engaging complex socio-ecological systems: re-envisioning science, governance, and the California Delta. Environ. Sci. Policy 12 (2009), 644–652.
66. Odum, H.T., Environment Power and Society. 1971, Wiley-Blackwell, New Jersey, US.
67. Oikonomou, V., Dimitrakopoulos, P.G., Troumbis, A.Y., Incorporating ecosystem function concept in environmental planning and decision making by means of multi-criteria evaluation: the case-study of Kalloni, Lesbos. Greece. Environ. Manage 47 (2011), 77–92.
68. Pascual, U., Balvanera, P., Díaz, S., Pataki, G., Roth, E., Stenseke, M., Watson, R.T., Başak Dessane, E., Islar, M., Kelemen, E., Maris, V., Quaas, M., Subramanian, S.M., Wittmer, H., Adlan, A., Ahn, S.E., Al-Hafedh, Y.S., Amankwah, E., Asah, S.T., Berry, P., Bilgin, A., Breslow, S.J., Bullock, C., Cáceres, D., Daly-Hassen, H., Figueroa, E., Golden, C.D., Gómez-Baggethun, E., González-Jiménez, D., Houdet, J., Keune, H., Kumar, R., Ma, K., May, P.H., Mead, A., O'Farrell, P., Pandit, R., Pengue, W., Pichis-Madruga, R., Popa, F., Preston, S., Pacheco-Balanza, D., Saarikoski, H., Strassburg, B.B., van den Belt, M., Verma, M., Wickson, F., Yagi, N., Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainable 26–27 (2017), 7–16.
69. Potschin, M.B., Haines-Young, R.H., Ecosystem services: exploring a geographical perspective. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 35 (2011), 575–594.
70. Ranger, S., Bryce, R., Richardson, P., Kenter, J.O., Forming shared values in marine conservation management: a deliberative multi-criteria approach to include community voices. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 344–357.
71. Ravetz, J.R., Postnormal science and the maturing of the structural contradictions of modern European science. Futures 43 (2011), 142–148.
72. Raymond, C.M., Kenter, J.O., Transcendental values and the valuation and management of ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 241–257.
73. Raymond, C.M., Kenter, J.O., Plieninger, T., Turner, N.J., Alexander, K.A., Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 107 (2014), 145–156.
74. Ruckelshaus, M., McKenzie, E., Tallis, H., Guerry, A., Daily, G.C., Kareiva, P., Polasky, S., Ricketts, T., Bhagabati, N., Wood, S.A., Bernhardt, J., Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions. Ecol. Econ. 115 (2013), 11–21.
75. Russel, D., Jordan, A., Turnpenny, J., The use of ecosystem services knowledge in policy-making: drawing lessons and adjusting expectations. Potschin, M., Young, R.H., Fish, R., Turner, R.K., (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services, 2016, Routledge, London, 778–791.
76. Sagoff, M., The quantification and valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 70 (2011), 497–502.
77. Sarkki, S., Ficko, A., Grunewald, K., Nijnik, M., Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance. Reg. Environ. Change 16 (2016), 2019–2032.
78. Schröter, M., van der Zanden, E.H., van Oudenhoven, A.P.E., Remme, R.P., Serna-Chavez, H.M., de Groot, R., Opdam, P., Ecosystem services as a contested concept: a synthesis of critique and counter-arguments. Conserv. Lett. 7 (2014), 514–523.
79. Spangenberg, J.H., Görg, C., Settele, J., Stakeholder involvement in ESS research and governance: between conceptual ambition and practical experiences – risks, challenges and tested tools. Ecosyst. Serv. 16 (2015), 201–211.
80. Spangenberg, J.H., Settele, J., Precisely incorrect? monetising the value of ecosystem services. Ecol. Complexity 7 (2010), 327–337.
81. Spangenberg, J.H., von Haaren, C., Settele, J., The ecosystem service cascade: further developing the metaphor. Integrating societal processes to accommodate social processes and planning, and the case of bioenergy. Ecol. Econ. 104 (2014), 22–32.
82. Spash, C.L., The content, direction and philosophy of ecological economics. Martinez-Alier, J., Muradian, R., (eds.) Handbook of Ecological Economics, 2015, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 26–47.
83. Spash, C.L., Vatn, A., Transferring environmental value estimates: issues and alternatives. Ecol. Econ. 60 (2006), 379–388.
84. Strand, R., Post-normal science. Spash, C.L., (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Ecological Economics: Nature and Society, 2017, Routledge, London, 288–298.
85. Suter, G.W., Cormier, S.M., Why care about aquatic insects: uses, benefits, and services. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage 11 (2015), 188–194.
86. Vatn, A., An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2009), 2207–2215.
87. Villegas-Palacio, C., Berrouet, L., López, C., Ruiz, A., Upegui, A., Lessons from the integrated valuation of ecosystem services in a developing country: three case studies on ecological, socio-cultural and economic valuation. Ecosyst. Serv. 22 (2016), 297–308.
88. Waltner-Toews, D., Kay, J.J., Neudoerffer, C., Gitau, T., Perspective changes everything: managing ecosystems from the inside out. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1 (2003), 23–30.