A new valuation school: Integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 22, Issue , 2016, Pages 213-220

  Jacobs, Sander ^a   Dendoncker, Nicolas ^b   Martín López, Berta ^c   Barton, David Nicholas ^e   Gomez Baggethun, Erik ^d,e   Boeraeve, Fanny ^f   McGrath, Francesca L ^g   Vierikko, Kati ^h   Geneletti, Davide ⁱ   Sevecke, Katharina J ^j   Pipart, Nathalie ^b   Primmer, Eeva ^k   Mederly, Peter ^l   Schmidt, Stefan ^m,n   Aragão, Alexandra ^o   Baral, Himlal ^p   Bark, Rosalind H ^q   Briceno, Tania ^r   Brogna, Delphine ^b   Cabral, Pedro ^s   De Vreese, Rik ^t   Liquete, Camino ^u   Mueller, Hannah ^v   Peh, Kelvin S H ^w,x   Phelan, Anna ^y   Rincón, Alexander R ^z   Rogers, Shannon H ^aa   Turkelboom, Francis ^a   Van Reeth, Wouter ^a   van Zanten, Boris T ^ab   Wam, Hilde Karine ^ac   Washbourn, Carla Leanne ^ad   more..

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NATURE AND FOREST INBO   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAMUR   (Belgium)

^c LEUPHANA UNIVERSITY OF LÜNEBURG   (Germany)

^d NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^e NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR NATURE RESEARCH   (Norway)

^f UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^g NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^h UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^j ESMT European School of Management and Technology   (Germany)

^k FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^l Department of Ethics and Aesthetics   (Slovakia)

^m HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

ⁿ MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^o UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^p UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^q UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^r Earth Economics   (United States)

^s NOVA INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SCHOOL NOVA IMS   (Portugal)

^t VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^u JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^v UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

^w UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^x UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^y UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^z INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIÓN DE RECURSOS BIOLÓGICOS ALEXANDER VON HUMBOLDT   (Colombia)

^aa PLYMOUTH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^ab VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^ac NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF BIOECONOMY RESEARCH   (Norway)

^ad UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

Benefits of nature; Decision support; Ecosystem services; Integrated valuation; Intrinsic value; Participation; Quality of life; Social and environmental justice

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007203205     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Aragao, A., Jacobs, S., Cliquet, A., What's law got to do with it? Why environmental justice is essential to ecosystem service valuation. Ecosyst. Serv. 22B (2016), 221–227.
2. Armiero, M., Sedrez, L., (eds.) A History of Environmentalism: Local Struggles, Global Histories, 2014, Bloomsbury, London, 208.
3. Baral, H., Guariguata, M.R., Rodney, J.K., A proposed framework for assessing ecosystem goods and services from planted forests. Ecosyst. Serv. 22B (2016), 260–268.
4. Bark, R.H., Coloff, M.J., MacDonald, D.H., Pollino, C.A., Jackson, S., Crossman, N.D., Integrated valuation of ecosystem services obtained from restoring water to the environment in a major regulated river basin. Ecosyst. Serv. 22B (2016), 381–391.
5. Barton, D.N., Andersen, T., Bergland, O., Engebretsen, A., Moe, S.J., Orderud, G.I., Tominaga, K., Romstad, E., Vogt, R.D., Eutropia: Integrated Valuation of Lake Eutrophication Abatement Decisions Using a Bayesian Belief Network. Chap.14. Niel, Z.P., (eds.) Handbook of Applied Systems Science, 2016, Routledge, New York and London, 10.4324/9781315748771.ch14.
6. Baveye, P.C., Baveye, J., Gowdy, J., Monetary valuation of ecosystem services: it matters to get the timeline right. Ecol. Econ. 95 (2013), 231–235, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.09.009.
7. Beder, S., Environmental economics and ecological economics: the contribution of interdisciplinarity to understanding, influence and effectiveness. Environ. Conserv. 38:2 (2011), 140–150, 10.1017/S037689291100021X.
8. Bellet, L., 2015. Using integrated valuation of ecosystem services as indicators of agroecosystem socioeconomic and environmental performances. In:Jacobs, S., Dendoncker, N., Barton, D., & Gomez-Baggethun, E. Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services in science-policy practice. Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the Ecosystem Services Partnership, 9-13th November 2015, Stellenbosch, South Africa. (http://www.espconference.org/espconference2015#.WCI70tzbEfM).
9. Berbés-Blázquez, M., A participatory assessment of ecosystem services and human wellbeing in rural Costa Rica using photo-voice. Environ. Manag. 49:4 (2012), 862–875, 10.1007/s00267-012-9822-9.
10. Berg, C.E., Mineau, M.M., Rogers, S.H., Examining the ecosystem service of nutrient removal in a coastal watershed. Ecosyst. Serv. 22B (2016), 309–317.
11. Bieling, C., Plieninger, T., Pirker, H., Vogl, C.R., Linkages between landscapes and human well-being: an empirical exploration with short interviews. Ecol. Econ. 105 (2014), 19–30 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.013).
12. Blaikie, P., 2012. Should some political ecology be useful? In: The Inaugural lecture for the Cultural and Political Ecology Specialty Group, Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, April 2010. Geoforum 43: pp. 231–239. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.08.010).
13. Boeraeve, F., Dendoncker, N., Jacobs, S., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Dufrêne, M., How (not) to perform ecosystem service valuations: pricing gorillas in the mist. Biodivers. Conserv. 24:1 (2015), 187–197 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0796-1).
14. Buizer, M., Elands, B., Vierikko, K., Governing cities reflexively – the biocultural diversity concept as an alternative to ecosystem services. Environ. Sci. Policy 62 (2016), 7–13.
15. Cabral, P., Feger, C., Levrel, H., Chambolle, M., Basque, D., Assessing the impact of land-cover changes on ecosystem services: a first step toward integrative planning in Bordeaux, France. Ecosyst. Serv. 22B (2016), 318–327.
16. Chan, K.M.A., Balvanera, P., Benessaiah, K., Chapman, M., Díaz, S., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Gould, R.K., Hannahs, N., Jax, K., Klain, S.C., Luck, G., Martín-López, B., Muraca, B., Norton, B., Ott, K., Pascual, U., Satterfield, T., Tadaki, M., Taggart, J., Turner, N.J., Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. PNAS 113 (2016), 1462–1465, 10.1073/pnas.1525002113.
17. Dendoncker, N., Keune, H., Jacobs, S., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Inclusive ecosystem service valuation. Jacobs, S., Dendoncker, N., Keune, H., (eds.) Ecosystem Services: Global Issues, Local Practices, 2013, Elsevier, New York, xix–xxviii.
18. De Vreese, R., Leys, M., Dendoncker, N., Van Herzele, A., Fontaine, C.M., Images of nature as a boundary object in social and integrated ecosystem services assessments. Reflections from a Belgian case study. Ecosyst. Serv. 22B (2016), 269–279.
19. Dias Carrilho, C., de Almeida, P., 2015. Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: The case of the Araça Bay (Brazil). In:Jacobs, S., Dendoncker, N., Barton, D., & Gomez-Baggethun, E. Integrated valuation of ecosystem services in science-policy practice. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the Ecosystem Services Partnership, 9–13th November 2015, Stellenbosch, South Africa. (http://www.espconference.org/espconference2015#.WCI70tzbEfM).
20. Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Joly, C., Lonsdale, W.M., Larigauderie, A., A Rosetta Stone for nature's benefits to people. PLoS Biol., 13(1), 2015, e1002040 (http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002040).
21. Faria, C., Mollett, S. Critical feminist reflexivity and the politics of whiteness in the ‘field’. In: Gender, Place & Culture. 2014. pp. 1–15. (http://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2014.958065).
22. Fisher, B., Turner, R.K., Morling, P., Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2009), 643–653, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014.
23. García-Llorente, M., Castro, A., Quintas-Soriano, C., López, I., Castro, H., Montes, C., Martín-López, B., The value of time in biological conservation and supplied services: a willingness to give up time exercise. J. Arid Environ. 124 (2016), 13–21 (https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1016%2Fj.jaridenv.2015.07.004).
24. García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., López-Santiago, C.A., Aguilera, P.A., Montes, C., The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: an ecosystem service approach. Environ. Sci. Policy 19–20 (2012), 136–146, 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.006.
25. Gómez-Baggethun, E., De Groot, R., Lomas, P.L., Montes, C., The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecol. Econ. 69 (2010), 1209–1218 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007).
26. Gómez-Baggethun, E., Martín-López, B., Ecological economics perspective in ecosystem services valuation. Martínez-Alier, J., Muradian, R., (eds.) Handbook of Ecological Economics, 2015, Edward Elgar, London, 260–282.
27. Gómez-Baggethun, E., Martín-López, M., Barton, D., Braat, L., Saarikoski, H., Kelemen, M. et al. 2014, EU FP7 OpenNESS Project Deliverable 4.1, State-of-the-art report on integrated valuation of ecosystem services. European Commission, Brussels.
28. Gómez-Baggethun, E., Barton, D., Berry, P., Dunford, R., Harrison, P., Concepts and methods in ecosystem services valuation. Potschin, M., Haines-Young, R., Fish, R., Turner, R.K., (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services, 2016, Routledge, London and New York, 99–111.
29. Hansjürgens, B., Schröter-Schlaack, C., Berghöfer, A., Lienhoop, N., Justifying social values of nature: economic reasoning beyond self-interested preferences. Ecosyst. Serv. 22B (2016), 228–237.
30. Heras, M., Tàbara, J.D., Conservation theatre: mirroring experiences and performing stories in community management of natural resources. Soc. Nat. Resour. 29:8 (2016), 948–964, 10.1080/08941920.2015.1095375.
31. Heras, M., Tabara, J.D., Meza, A., Performing biospheric futures with younger generations: a case in the MAB Reserve of La Sepultura, Mexico. Ecol. Soc., 21(2), 2016 (http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08317-210214).
32. Higuera, D., Martín-López, B., Sánchez-Jabba, A., Social preferences towards ecosystem services provided by cloud forests in the neotropics: implications for conservation strategies. Reg. Environ. Change 13 (2013), 861–872, 10.1007/s10113-012-0379-1.
33. Iniesta-Arandia, I., Garcia-Llorente, M., Aguilera, P.A., Montes, C., Martin-Lopez, B., Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change, and human well-being ecological Econonics., 108, 2014, 36–48 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.028).
34. Iniesta-ArandiaI., RaveraF., BuechlerS., Díaz-ReviriegoI., Fernández-GiménezM., ReedM., Thompson-HallM., WilmerH., AreguL., CohenP., DjoudiH., Martín-LópezB., VillamorG., WanguiE., 2016. A synthesis of convergent reflections, tensions and silences in linking gender and global environmental change research. AMBIO.In press.
35. IPBES, 2015. Preliminary guide regarding diverse conceptualization of multiple values of nature and its benefits, including biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services (deliverable 3(d)). IPBES/4/INF/13.
36. Jacobs, S., Spanhove, T., De Smet, L., Van Daele, T., Van Reeth, W., Van Gossum, P., Michels, H., The ecosystem service assessment challenge: reflections from Flanders-REA. Ecol. Indic. 61 (2016), 715–727 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.023).
37. Jacobs, S., Dendoncker, N., Barton, D., Gomez-Baggethun, E., 2015. Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services in science-policy practice. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the Ecosystem Services Partnership, 9-13th November 2015, Stellenbosch, South Africa. (http://www.espconference.org/espconference2015#.WCI70tzbEfM).
38. Jarosz, L., Political ecology as ethical practice. Political Geogr. 23:7 (2004), 917–927 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2004.05.014).
39. Jerico-Daminello, C., Edda, S., Burgues, I., 2015. Improving decision-making for hydroelectric dam development through valuing local ecosystem services: Case study of the Sao Luiz de Tapajos Hydroelectric project, Brazil. In:Jacobs, S., Dendoncker, N., Barton, D., & Gomez-Baggethun, E. Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services in science-policy practice. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the Ecosystem Services Partnership, 9-13th November 2015, Stellenbosch, South Africa. (http://www.espconference.org/espconference2015#.WCI70tzbEfM).
40. Kelemen, E, Barton, D, Jacobs, S. Martín-López, B. Saarikoski, H. Termansen, G. Bela, L. Braat, R. Demeyer, M. García-Llorente, E. Gómez-Baggethun, J. Hauck, H. Keune, S. Luque, I. Palomo, G. Pataki, M. Potschin, C. Schleyer, P. Tenerilli, F. Turkelboom (2015). Preliminary guidelines for integrated assessment and valuation of ecosystem services in specific policy contexts EU FP7 OpenNESS Project Deliverable 4.3., European Commission FP7.
41. Klain, S.C., Satterfield, T.A., Chan, K.M., What matters and why? Ecosystem services and their bundled qualities. Ecol. Econ. 107 (2014), 310–320 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.003).
42. Kobayashi, A., Coloring the field: gender, ‘race’, and the politics of fieldwork. Prof. Geogr. 46:1 (1994), 73–90, 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00073.x.
43. Kobayashi, A., GPC ten years on: is self-reflexivity enough?. Gend. Place Cult. 10:4 (2003), 345–349.
44. Kopperoinen, L., Viinikka, A., Tiitu, M., 2015. Integrating ecosystem services with technical and social values in deciding on where to place infill development. In:Jacobs, S., Dendoncker, N., Barton, D., & Gomez-Baggethun, E. Integrated valuation of ecosystem services in science-policy practice. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the Ecosystem Services Partnership, 9-13th November 2015, Stellenbosch, South Africa. (http://www.espconference.org/espconference2015#.WCI70tzbEfM).
45. La Notte, A., Liquete, C., Grizzetti, B., Maes, J., Egoh, B.N., Paracchini, M.L., An ecological-economic approach to the valuation of ecosystem services to support biodiversity policy. A case study for nitrogen retention by Mediterranean rivers and lakes. Ecol. Indic. 48 (2015), 292–302 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.006).
46. Limb, M., Dwyer, C., (eds.) Qualitative methodologies for geographers: issues and debates, 2001, Oxford University Press, New York.
47. Liquete, C., Udias, A., Conte, G., Grizzetti, B., Masi, F., Integrated valuation of a nature-based solution for water pollution control. Highlighting hidden benefits. Ecosyst. Serv. 22B (2016), 392–401.
48. Liu, S., Costanza, R., Farber, S., Troy, A., Valuing ecosystem services. Theory, practice, and the need for a transdisciplinary synthesis. Ecol. Econ. Rev. 1185 (2010), 54–78, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05167.x.
49. McGrath, F.L., Carrasco, L.R., 2015. Valuing ecosystem services using life-years instead of dollars. In:Jacobs, S. Dendoncker, N., Barton, D., & Gomez-Baggethun, E. Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services in science-policy practice. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the Ecosystem Services Partnership, 9–13th November 2015, Stellenbosch, South Africa. (http://www.espconference.org/espconference2015#.WCI70tzbEfM).
50. Martín-López, B., Gómez-Bagghetun, E., García-Llorente, M., Montes, C., Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessments. Ecol. Indic. 37A (2014), 220–228 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003).
51. Martínez-Alier, J., Munda, G., O'Neill, J., Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 26:3 (1998), 277–286.
52. Martínez-Alier, J., The Environmentalism of the Poor. 2002, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA.
53. Martinez-Alier, J., Temper, L., Del Bene, D., Scheidel, A., Is there a global environmental justice movement?. J. Peasant Stud., 2016, 10.1080/03066150.2016.1141198.
54. Mederly, P., Bezak, P., Izakovicova, Z., Petrovic, F., 2015. Integrated valuation of ecosystem services as a tool for landscape management and decision making at regional and local level (Case study Trnava, Slovakia). at regional and local level (Case study Trnava, Slovakia). In:Jacobs, S., Dendoncker, N., Barton, D., & Gomez-Baggethun, E. Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services in science-policy practice. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the Ecosystem Services Partnership, 9-13th November 2015, Stellenbosch, South Africa. (http://www.espconference.org/espconference2015#.WCI70tzbEfM).
55. Milcu, A.I., Sherren, K., Hanspach, J., Abson, D., Fischer, J., Navigating conflicting landscape aspirations: application of a photo-based Q-method in Transylvania (Central Romania). Land Use Policy 41 (2014), 408–422 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.019).
56. Mueller, H., Hamilton, D.P., Doole, G.J., Evaluating services and damage costs of degradation of a major lake ecosystem. Ecosyst. Serv. 22B (2016), 370–380.
57. Pandeya, B., Buytaert, W., Zulkafli, Z., Karpouzoglou, T., Mao, F., Hannah, D.M., A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale in data scarce regions. Ecosyst. Serv. 22B (2016), 250–259.
58. Pascual, U., Balvanera, P., Diaz, S., Pataki, G., Roth, E., Stenseke, M., Watson, R., Dessane, E.B., Breslow, S., Islar, M., Kelemen, E. (…] Gómez-Baggethun, E. et al.2016. [41 authors]. Subm. Revealing the diversity of values of nature and its benefits to people for a good quality of life: The IPBES approach. Submitted for publication to Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 10th July.
59. Peh, K., Thapa, I., Basnyat, M., Balmford, A., Bhattarai, G., Bradbury, R., Brown, C., Butchart, S., Dhakal, M., Gurung, H., Hugues, F., Mulligan, M., Pandeya, B., Thomas, D., Walpole, M., Merriman, J., Synergies between biodiversity conservation and ecosystem service provision: lessons on integrated ecosystem service valuation from a Himalayan protected area, Nepal. Ecosyst. Serv. 22B (2016), 359–369.
60. Phelan, A., Jacobs, S., Facing the true cost of fracking; social externalities and the role of integrated valuation. Ecosyst. Serv. 22B (2016), 348–358.
61. Pipart, N., Maeve, L., Dufrêne, M., Dendoncker, N., 2015. An integrated valuation framework for the assessment of Ecosystem Services at the walloon regional scale. In:Jacobs, S., Dendoncker, N., Barton, D., & Gomez-Baggethun, E. Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services in science-policy practice. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the Ecosystem Services Partnership, 9–13th November 2015, Stellenbosch, South Africa. (http://www.espconference.org/espconference2015#.WCI70tzbEfM).
62. Popa, F., Guillermin, M., Dedeurwaerdere, T., A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: from complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures 65 (2015), 45–56 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.02.002).
63. Potschin, M., Haines-Young, R., Ecosystem services: exploring a geographical perspective. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 35:5 (2011), 575–594.
64. Potschin, M., Haines-Young, R., Frameworks for ecosystem assessments. Potschin, M., Haines-Young, R., Fish, R., Turner, R.K., (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services, 2016, Routledge, London and New York, 125–143.
65. Rincon Ruiz, A., Lara, D., Castro, L.G., Rojas, C., 2015. Environmental conflicts and integrated valuation of biodiversity and ecosystem services: a case study in Orotoy river basin (Colombia). In:Jacobs, S., Dendoncker, N., Barton, D., & Gomez-Baggethun, E. Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services in science-policy practice. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the Ecosystem Services Partnership, 9-13th November 2015, Stellenbosch, South Africa. (http://www.espconference.org/espconference2015#.WCI70tzbEfM).
66. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F.S. III, Lambin, E., Lenton, T.M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H., Nykvist, B., De Wit, C.A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P.K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R.W., Fabry, V.J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P., Foley, J., Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol. Soc., 14(2), 2009, 32 (online)( URL) (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/).
67. Saarikoski, H., Mustajoki, J., Barton, D.N., Geneletti, D., Langemeyer, J., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Marttunen, M., Antunes, P., Keune, H., Multi-criteria decision analysis and cost-benefit analysis: Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 22B (2016), 238–249.
68. Santos-Martín, F., Montes, C., Martín-López, B., et al. Ecosystems and biodiversity for human wellbeing - Spanish National Ecosystem Assessment. 2014, Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y medio ambiante, Madrid.
69. Schroder, S.A., Toth, S.F., Deal, R.L., Ettl, G.J., Multi-objective optimization to evaluate tradeoffs among forest ecosystem services following fire hazard reduction in the Deschutes National forest, USA. Ecosyst. Serv. 22B (2016), 328–347.
70. Seppelt, R., Dormann, C.F., Eppink, F.V., Lautenbach, S., Schmidt, S., A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J. Appl. Ecol. 48 (2011), 630–636, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x.
71. Sevecke, K.J., Geisendorf, S., 2015. What does it take to make integrated ecosystem service valuation feasible in urban environmental decisions? Decision-makers' view on value pluralism of ecosystem services. In:Jacobs, S., Dendoncker, N., Barton, D., & Gomez-Baggethun, E.Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services in science-policy practice. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the Ecosystem Services Partnership, 9–13th November 2015, Stellenbosch, South Africa. (http://www.espconference.org/espconference2015#.WCI70tzbEfM).
72. Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockstrom, J., Cornell, S.E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E.M., Riggs, R., Carpenter, S.R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C.A., Folke, C., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Mace, G.M., Persson, L.M., Ramanathan, V., Reyers, B., Sorlin, S., Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 2015, 1259855, 10.1126/science.1259855.
73. Turnhout, E., Stuiver, M., Klostermann, J., Harms, B., Leeuwis, C., New roles of science in society: different repertoires of knowledge brokering. Sci. Public Policy 40:3 (2013), 354–365, 10.1093/scipol/scs114.
74. NEA, 2011. UK National Ecosystem Assessment: understanding Nature's value to society. UNEP-WMCMC, Cambridge.
75. Van Zanten, B., Koetse, M.J., Verburg, P., Economic valuation at all cost? The role of the price attribute in a landscape preference study. Ecosyst. Serv. 22B (2016), 289–296.
76. Vatn, A., An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal. Ecol. Econ. 68:8–9 (2009), 2207–2215.
77. Villegas Palacio, C., Berrouet, L., Lopez, C., Ruiz, A., Upegui, A., Lessons from integrated valuation of ecosystem services in a developing country: three case studies of ecological, socio-cultural and economic valuation. Ecosyst. Serv. 22B (2016), 297–308.
78. Wam, H.K., Bunnefeld, N., Clarke, N., Hofstad, O., Conflicting interest of ecosystem services: multicriteria modelling and indirect evaluation to trade off monetary and non-monetary measures. Ecosyst. Serv. 22B (2016), 280–288.