Knowledge use and political choice in Dutch environmental policy: A problem structuring perspective on real life experiments in extended peer review

Knowledge, Power, and Participation in Environmental Policy Analysis

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 437-470

  Hisschemöller, Matthijs ^a   Hoppe, Rob ^b   Groenewegen, Peter ^a   Midden, Cees J H ^c  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85070620032     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Akkerman, A.E, M. Hisschemoller, P. Vellinga, J.H.G. Klabbers, A.P.M. Baede, W. Fransen, G.J. Komen, A.P. van Ulden, M.M. Berk, R.J. Leemans, R.J. Swart. (1996). Werkconferentie Klimaatverandering. De tweede IPCC rapportage. Indrukken en readies uit de Nederlandse samenleving. Report 410 200 001, Bilthoven: Dutch National Research Program on Global Air Pollution and Climate Change
2. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage
3. Boogerd, J.L.M., P. Groenewegen and M. Hisschemoller. (1998). Knowledge utilisation in water management in the Netherlands, related to desiccation. American Water Resources Association Bulletin
4. Collingridge, D. and C. Reeve. (1986). Science speaks to power: The role of experts in policy making. London: Frances Pinter
5. Cozzens, S.E., and E.J. Woodhouse. (1995). Science, government, and the politics of knowledge, in: Jasanoff, S., G.E. Markle, J.C. Petersen, and T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 533-553
6. Dijk, J.W.A. van (1998). in: Hoppe, R. and A. Peterse (Eds.), Bouwstenen voor argumentatieve beleidsanalyse. Den Haag: Elsevier
7. Dryzek, J.S. (1990). Discursive democracy: Politics, policy, and political science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
8. Eberg, J. (1997). Waste policy and learning. Policy dynamics of waste management and waste incineration in The Netherlands and Bavaria. Delft: Eburon
9. Edwards, A. (1998). Scientific expertise and policy making: The intermediary function of the public sphere, paper presented at the Netherlands Institute of Government Research Seminar "Scientific Expertise and Policy Making: Pitfalls and Paradoxes," Delft, June 4
10. Eeten, M.J.G., van (1999). Dialogues of the deaf Defining new agendas fo r environmental deadlocks. Delft: Eburon
11. Eeten, M.J.G., van and E. ten Heuvelhof. (1998). In: Hoppe, R. and A. Peterse (Eds.), Bouwstenen voor argumentatieve beleidsanalyse. Den Haag: Elsevier
12. Fixdal, J. (1997). Consensus conferences as "extended peer groups." Science and Public Policy, 24,6,366-376
13. Funtowicz, S.O. and J.R. Ravetz. (1990). Uncertainty and quality in science fo r policy. Dordrecht: Kluwer
14. Funtowicz, S.O. and J.R. Ravetz. (1992). Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of postnormal science, in: Krimsky, S. and D. Golding (Eds.), Social Theories of Risk. Westport CT: Praeger, 251-273
15. Gieryn, T.F. (1995). "Boundary work," in: S. Jasanoff et al. (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications
16. Grijp, N. van der, M. Hisschemoller, H. Jansen, P. Glas and P. Baan. (1996). Vissen in de natuur: een inventarisatie van opvattingen over het toekomstige beheer van de mgr Noordzee. Onderzoeksrapport. Ministerie van VROM, Den Haag
17. Groenewegen, P. et al. (1996). Op weg naar duurzame gewasbescherming. Den Haag: Rathenau Instituut
18. Hajer, M.A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernisation and the policy process. New York: Oxford University Press
19. Heijs, W. and C.J.H. Midden. (1997). Explaining attitudes towards biotechnology, in: S. Lundin and M. Ideland (Eds.), Gene Technology and the Public. Lund: Nordic Academic Press
20. Hisschemoller, M. and R. Hoppe. (1996). Coping with intractable controversies: The case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis. Knowledge and Policy, the International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilisation, 8,4,40-61
21. Hisschemoller, M., J. Klabbers, M. Berk, R. Swart, A. van Ulden and P. Vellinga. (1995). Opties voor klimaatbeleid en hun implicaties voor beleidsgericht wetenschappelijk onderzoek. Amsterdam: Instituut voor Milieuvraagstukken, R-95/11 (83 p)
22. Hoppe, R. and A. Peterse (1993). Handling frozen fire. Political culture and risk management. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
23. Hoppe, R. and A. Peterse (eds.) (1998). Bouwstenen voor argumentatieve beleidsanalyse. Den Haag: Elsevier
24. Knorr Cetina, K. (1995). Laboratory studies: The cultural approach, in: S. Jasanoff et al. (Eds.), 140-166
25. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
26. Levidov, L. (1998). Democratizing technology-or technologizing democracy? Regulating agricultural biotechnology in Europe. Technology in Society, 20,211-226
27. Kerkhof, van der. (1999). Wetenschapsbeoefening in het NOP: verschuivend naar postnormaal? Een onderzoek naar kenmerken van een nieuwe wetenschapsbeoefening in het Nederlandse klimaatonderzoek. Interim-rapport. Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen
28. Kickert, W.J.M., E.-H. Klijn and J.F.M. Koppenjan. (eds.) (1997). Managing complex networks. Strategies fo r the public sector. London: SAGE
29. Kooiman, J., M. van Vliet and S. Jentoft. (eds.) (1999). Creative governance. Opportunities fo r fisheries in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate (in press)
30. March, J.G. and J.P. Olsen. (eds.)(1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget
31. Midden, C.J.H. and J. van der Pligt. (eds.) (1990). Psychological fall-out from the Chernobyl nuclear accident. Journal of Environmental Psychology (special issue), 10,2
32. Nelkin, D. (1995). Science controversies: The dynamics of public disputes in the United States, in: S. Jasanoff et al. (eds). Handbook of science and technology studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 444-56
33. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions fo r collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
34. Restivo, S. (1995). The theory landscape in science studies, in: S. Jasanoff etal. (eds.), 95-110
35. Rijn, J.P., van (1995). Milieubeoordeling van Bestrijdingsmiddelen. Amsterdam, Vakgroep Algemene Vorming VU (intern document)
36. Rip, A. (1997). A cognitive approach to relevance of science. Social Science Information. London: SAGE, 615-640
37. Roe, E. (1998). Taking complexity seriously. Policy analysis, triangulation and sustainable development. Dordrecht, Kluwer
38. Sabatier, Paul and Henk Jenkins-Smith. (eds.) 1993. Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
39. Schomburg, R. van (1997). Argumentatie in de context van een wetenschappelijke controverse: een analyse van de discussie over de introductie van genetisch gemodificeerde organismen in het milieu. Delft: Eburon
40. Sluys, J.P. van der (1997). Anchoring amid uncertainty. On the management of uncertainties in risk assessment of anthropogenic climate change. Leiden: Mostert en Van Onderen
41. Tuininga, E.J., F. den Hond and P. Groenewegen. (1993). The role ofLCA in the discussion about environmental impact of packaging. Paper presented at Greening of Industry Conference, Boston, November 1993
42. Vellinga, P, M. Hisschemoller, J.H.G. Klabbers, M.N. Berk, R.J. Swart, A.P. van Ulden, and M.M. Berk. (1995). Climate change, policy options and research implications, in: S. Zwerver, R.S.A.R. van Rompaei, M.T.J. Kok and M.M. Berk (eds.), Climate change research: Evaluation and policy implications. Amsterdam: Elsevier, Studies in Environmental Sciences 65 A, 119-134
43. Weale, A. (1992). The new politics of pollution. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press
44. Weinberg, A.M. (1972). Science and trans-science. Minerva, 33,209-222
45. Weingart, P. (1983). Verwissenschaftlichung der Gesellschaft-Politiserung der Wissenschaft. Zeitschriftfur Soziologie, 12/3,225-241
46. Weiss, C.H. (1991). Policy research: data, ideas, or arguments?, in: Wagner, P. et al. (eds.), Social sciences and modem states: National experiments and theoretical crossroads. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 307-332
47. Winsemius, P. (1989). Guest in our own home. Alphen aan de Rijn: Samsom
48. Yearley, S. (1988). Science, technology, and social change, Londen: Unwin Hyman
49. Ziman. J.M. (1990). What is happening to science?, in: S.E. Cozzens, P. Healy, A. Rip and J. M. Ziman (eds.), The research system in transition. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 23-33