Corporate social responsibility communication through corporate websites: A comparison of leading corporations in the United States and China

International Journal of Business Communication

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 205-227

  Tang, Lu ^a,b   Gallagher, Christine C ^c,d   Bie, Bijie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c TROY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

China; Content analysis; Corporate social responsibility (CSR); Corporate websites; United States

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044294758     PISSN: 23294884     EISSN: 23294892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2329488414525443     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Abdi, H. (2010). Holm’s sequential Bonferroni procedure. In N. Salkind (Eds.), Encyclopedia of research design (pp. 1-8). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Ang, S. W., & Leong, S. M. (2000). Out of the mouths of babes: Business ethics and youths in Asia. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(2), 129-144.
3. Balmer, J. M. T., & Gray, E. R. (1999). Corporate identity and corporate communications: Creating competitive advantage. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 4, 171-176.
4. Bartlett, J., Tywoniak, S., & Hatcher, C. (2007). Public relations professional practice and the institutionalisation of CSR. Journal of Communication Management, 11(4), 281-299.
5. Baughn, C. C., Bodie, N. L., & McIntosh, J. C. (2007). Corporate social and environmental responsibility in Asian countries and other geographical regions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(4), 189-205.
6. Burton, B. K., Farh, J. L., & Hegarty, W. H. (2000). A cross-cultural comparison of corporate social responsibility orientation: Hong Kong vs. United States students. Teaching Business Ethics, 4(2), 151-167.
7. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 948-967.
8. Capriotti, P., & Moreno, A. (2007). Corporate citizenship and public relations: The importance and interactivity of social responsibility issues on corporate websites. Public Relations Review, 33, 84-91.
9. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
10. Carroll, A. B. (2008). A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 19-46). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11. Chan, A. (2003, March). A “race to the bottom”: Globalization and China’s labor standards. China Perspectives, 46, 41-49.
12. Chan, K., & Prendergast, G. P. (2008). Social comparison, imitation of celebrity models and materialism among Chinese youth. International Journal of Advertising, 27(5), 799-826. doi:10.2501/S026504870808030X
13. Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A sevencountry study of CSR web site reporting. Business Society, 44(4), 415-441.
14. Cheng, H. (1997). “Holding up half of the sky?” A sociocultural comparison of gender-role portrayals in Chinese and US advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 16(4), 295-319.
15. Cheong, Y., Kim, K., & Zheng, L. (2010). Advertising appeals as a reflection of culture: A cross-cultural analysis of food advertising appeals in China and the U.S. Asian Journal of Communication, 20(1), 1-16.
16. Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.
17. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationale in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
18. Dawkins, C., & Ngunjiri, F. W. (2008). Corporate social responsibly reporting in South Africa: A descriptive and comparative analysis. Journal of Business Communication, 43(3), 286-307.
19. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
20. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Review, 12(1), 8-19.
21. Dunfee, T. W. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Managing corporate social responsibility in a multiple actor context. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 346-362). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22. Elsbach, K. D. (1994). Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 57-88.
23. Frederick, W. C. (2006). Corporation, be good! The story of corporate social responsibility. Indianapolis, IN: Dog Ear.
24. Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, p. 32.
25. Fukukawa, K., & Moon, J. (2004). A Japanese model of corporate social responsibility: A study of website reporting. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 16, 45-59.
26. Galaskiewicz, J., & Burt, R. S. (1991). Interorganizational contagion in corporate philanthropy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(1), 88-105.
27. Godfrey, P. C., & Hatch, N. W. (2007). Researching corporate social responsibility: An agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Business Communication, 70, 87-98.
28. Gomez, L. M., & Chalmeta, R. (2011). Corporate responsibility in U.S. corporate websites: A pilot study. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 93-95.
29. Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C., & Putnam, L. (2004). Introduction: Organizational discourse: Exploring the field. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Grushina, S. (2008, November). Corporate social responsibility through the lens of communication theory and research. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
31. Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
32. Hutton, J., Goodman, M., Alexander, J., & Genest, C. (2001). Reputation management: The new face of corporate public relations? Public Relations Review, 27, 247-261.
33. Kampf, C. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: Walmart, Maersk and the cultural bounds of representation in corporate web sites. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 12(1), 41-57.
34. Kim, D., Kang, S., & Nam, Y. (2010). An analysis of corporate environmental responsibility on the global corporate web sites and their dialogic principles. Public Relations Review, 36(3), 285-288.
35. Kimber, D., & Lipton, P. (2005). Corporate governance and business ethics in the Asia-Pacific region. Business and Society, 44(2), 178-210.
36. Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. A. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from businesses’ self-presentation. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497-514.
37. Maynard, M., & Tian, Y. (2004). Between global and glocal: Content analysis of the Chinese web sites of the 100 top global brands. Public Relations Review, 30, 285-291.
38. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
39. Mele, D. (2008). Corporate social responsibility theories. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 46-82). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
40. Mincer, J. (2008, October 6). The color of money: Sustainability has become more than a buzzword among corporations: It has become smart business. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122305414262702711.html
41. Muthuri, J., & Gilbert, V. (2011). An institutional analysis of corporate social responsibility in Kenya. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 467-483.
42. Nwabuzor, A. (2005). Corruption and development: New initiatives in economic openness and strengthened rule of law. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 121-138.
43. O’Connor, A., & Shumate, M. (2010). As economic industry and institutional level of analysis of corporate social responsibility communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 24, 529-551.
44. Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Pollach, I. (2003). Communicating corporate ethics on the world wide web: A discourse analysis of selected company websites. Business and Society, 42, 277-287.
46. Ramasamy, B., & Hung, W. T. (2004). A comparative analysis of corporate social responsibility awareness: Malaysian and Singaporean firms. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 13, 109-123.
47. Rodriguez, P., Uhlenbruck, K., & Eden, L. (2005). Government corruption and the entry strategies of multinationals. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 383-396.
48. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Globalization and corporate social responsibility. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 413-431). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
49. Soo-Yeon, K., & Reber, B. H. (2009). How public relations professionalism influences corporate social responsibility: A survey of practitioners. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(1), 157-174.
50. Stohl, C. (2001). Globalizing organizational communication. In F. M. Jablin & L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 323-378). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Tang, L., & Li, H. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in the context of globalization: An analysis of CSR self-presentation of Chinese and global corporations in China. Public Relations Review, 35, 199-212.
52. Waldman, D. A., de Luque, M. S., Washburn, N., House, R. J., Adetoun, B., Barrasa, A., Wilderom, C. P. M. (2006). Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: A GLOBE study of 15 countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 823-837.
53. Waller, R. L., & Conaway, R. D. (2011). Framing and counterframing the issue of the corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Communication, 48(1), 83-106.
54. Wang, J., & Chaudhri, V. (2007). Corporate social responsibility engagement and communication by Chinese companies. Public Relations Review, 35, 247-250. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.04.005
55. Weaver, G. R. (2001). Ethics programs in global businesses: Culture’s role in managing ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(1), 3-15.
56. Welford, R. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in Europe, North America and Asia. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 17, 33-52.
57. Williams, C. A. (2008). Toward a taxonomy of corporate reporting strategies. Journal of Business Communication, 45(3), 232-264.
58. Williams, C. A., & Aguilera, R. V. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in comparative perspective. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 452-472). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.