Designs for learning analytics to support information problem solving

Informational Environments: Effects of use, Effective Designs

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 249-272

  Winne, Philip H ^a   Vytasek, Jovita M ^a   Patzak, Alexandra ^a   Rakovic, Mladen ^a   Marzouk, Zahia ^a   Pakdaman Savoji, Azar ^a   Ram, Ilana ^a   Samadi, Donya ^a   Lin, Michael P C ^a   Liu, Arita ^a   Liaqat, Amna ^b   Nashaat Sobhy, Nashwa ^c   Mozaffari, Zahra ^a   Stewart Alonso, Jason ^a   Nesbit, John C ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSIDAD SAN JORGE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Big data; Information problem solving; Learning analytics; Learning technologies; Self regulated learning; Traces

Indexed keywords

EID: 85042738975     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-64274-1_11     Document Type: Chapter

References (79)

1. 25 learning principles to guide pedagogy and the design of learning environments. (n.d.) Retrieved December 5, 2016, from https://legacy.wlu.ca/documents/60931/25-learning-principles-toguide-pedagogy_(1).pdf
2. Alvermann, D. E. (1981). The compensatory effect of graphic organizers on descriptive text. Journal of Educational Research, 75(1), 44-48.
3. Anderman, E. M., & Wolters, C. A. (2006). Goals, values, and affect: Influences on student motivation. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
5. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 213-238.
6. Bascones, J., & Novak, J. D. (1985). Alternative instructional systems and the development of problem solving skills in physics. European Journal of Science Education, 7(3), 253-261.
7. Baumann, J. F., & Bergeron, B. S. (1993). Story map instruction using children’s literature: Effects on first graders’ comprehension of central narrative elements. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25(4), 407-437.
8. Beauvais, C., Olive, T., & Passerault, J.-M. (2011). Why are some texts good and others not? Relationship between text quality and management of the writing processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 415-428.
9. Bisra, K., Liu, Q., Salimi, F., Nesbit, J. C., & Winne, P. H. (2017). Inducing self-explanation: A meta-analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
10. Boekaerts, P. P., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic.
11. Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Walraven, A. (2009). A descriptive model of information problem solving while using internet. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1207-1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.004
12. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 61-100.
13. Buehler, R., Griffin, D. W., & Ross, M. (1994). Exploring the “planning fallacy”: Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 366-381.
14. Butler, D. L., &Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.
15. Cerdán, R., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2008). The effects of tasks on integrating information from multiple documents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 209-222.
16. Chi, M. T. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73-105.
17. Cho, Y. H., & Cho, K. (2011). Peer reviewers learn from giving comments. Instructional Science, 39, 629-643.
18. Cromley, J. G., Snyder-Hogan, L. E., & Luciw-Dubas, U. A. (2010). Reading comprehension of scientific text: A domain-specific test of the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 687-700.
19. Cronin, H., Sinatra, R. C., & Barkley, W. (1992). Combining writing with text organization in content instruction. National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP) Bulletin, 76, 34-45.
20. Crossman, J. M., & Kite, S. L. (2012). Facilitating improved writing among students through directed peer review. Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(3), 219-229.
21. Dehmer, M., & Emmert-Streib, F. (Eds.). (2009). Analysis of complex networks: From biology to linguistics. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH.
22. Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58.
23. Eisenberg, M. B. (2008). Information literacy: Essential skills for the information age. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 28(2), 39.
24. Ferris, D. R. (2002). Treatment of error in second language writing classes. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
25. Foster, N. L., Was, C. A., Dunlosky, J., & Isaacson, R. M. (2016). Even after thirteen class exams, students are still overconfident: The role of memory for past exam performance in student predictions. Metacognition Learning, 12(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-016-9158-6
26. Goldfinch, J., & Hughes, M. (2007). Skills, learning styles and success of first-year undergraduates. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(3), 259-273.
27. Gurlitt, J., & Renkl, A. (2008). Are high-coherent concept maps better for prior knowledge activation? Differential effects of concept mapping tasks on high school vs. University students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(5), 407-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00277.x
28. Hacker, D. J., Keener, M. C., & Kircher, J. C. (2009). Writing is applied metacognition. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 154-172). New York, NY: Routledge.
29. Haswell, R. H. (2000). Documenting improvement in college writing: A longitudinal approach. Written Communication, 17, 307-352.
30. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
31. Hopkins, D. J., & King, G. (2010). A method of automated nonparametric content analysis for social science. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 229-247.
32. Ives, B., & Hoy, C. (2003). Graphic organizers applied to higher-level secondary mathematics. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(1), 36-51.
33. Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S., & Bastian, M. (2014). ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLoS ONE, 9(6), e98679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679
34. Johnson, D., & Steele, V. (1996). So many words, so little time: Helping college ESL learners acquire vocabulary-building strategies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 39(5), 348-357.
35. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. TIMS Studies in. Management Science, 12, 313-327.
36. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284.
37. Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179-211.
38. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121-1134.
39. Lee, H. S., & Anderson, J. R. (2013). Student learning: What has instruction got to do with it? Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 445-469.
40. Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009). Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(4), 319.
41. Lipson, M. (1995). The effect of semantic mapping instruction on prose comprehension of belowlevel college readers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 34(4), 367-378.
42. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological Science, 1(4), 240-246.
43. Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008a). Scoring, term weighting and the vector space model. Introduction to Information Retrieval, 100, 2-4.
44. Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008b). Language models for information retrieval. Introduction to Information Retrieval, 218-233.
45. Marzouk, Z., Rakovic, M., Liaqat, A., Vytasek, J., Samadi, D., Stewart-Alonso, J.,… Nesbit, J. C. (2016). What if learning analytics were based on learning science? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 1-18.
46. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. NY: Cambridge University Press.
47. Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413-448. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076003413
48. Ng, Z. Y., Tay, W. Y., & Cho, Y. H. (2015). Usefulness of peer comments for English language writing through web-based peer assessment. In G. Chen, V. Kumar, H. R. Kinshuk, & S. Kong (Eds.), Emerging issues in smart learning. Lecture notes in educational technology. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
49. Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937-949.
50. Novak, J. D. (1991). Clarify with concept maps: A tool for students and teachers alike. The Science Teacher, 58, 45-49.
51. Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Novak, J. D., &Wandersee, J. (1991) (Eds.) Special issue on concept mapping. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 10.
53. Ojima, M. (2006). Concept mapping as pre-task planning: A case study of three Japanese ESL writers. System, 34(4), 566-585.
54. Patterson, E. W. (2001). Structuring the composition process in scientific writing. International Journal of Scientific Education, 23, 1-16.
55. Patzak, A., &Winne, P. H. (2016). Using research on decision making to account for why and how students self-handicap. Unpublished manuscript.
56. Pieronek, F. (1994). Using maps to teach note taking and outlining for report writing. The Social Studies, 85, 165-169.
57. Piolat, A., Roussey, J.-Y., Olive, T., & Amada, M. (2004). Processing time and cognitive effort in revision: Effects of error type and of working memory capacity. In L. Allai, L. Chanquoy, & P. Largy (Eds.), Revision cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 21-38). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
58. Reynolds, S. B., & Hart, J. (1990). Cognitive mapping and word processing: Aids to story revision. Journal of Experimental Education, 58, 273-279.
59. Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 20-27.
60. Roll, I., & Winne, P. H. (2015). Understanding, evaluating, and supporting self-regulated learning using learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(1), 7-12.
61. Roth, W. M. (1994). Student views of collaborative concept mapping: An emancipatory research project. Science Education, 78(1), 1-34.
62. Saddler, B., Moran, S., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2004). Preventing writing difficulties: The effects of planning strategy instruction on the writing performance of struggling writers. Exceptionality, 12(1), 3-17.
63. Schultz, M. (1991). Mapping and cognitive development in the teaching of foreign language writing. The French Review, 64, 978-988.
64. Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-efficacy and education and instruction. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Selfefficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
65. Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulation through goal setting. In ERIC/CASS Digest. Washington, DC. Retrieved from www.eric.ed.gov. ED462671.
66. Schwarz, N. (2002). Emotion, cognition, and decision making. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 433-440.
67. Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2006). Computer-supported example-based learning: When instructional explanations reduce self-explanations. Computers and Education, 46(4), 426-445.
68. Trumpower, D. L., & Sarwar, G. S. (2010). Effectiveness of structural feedback provided by Pathfinder networks. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(1), 7-24.
69. Washington, V. M. (1988). Report writing: A practical application of semantic mapping. Teacher Educator, 24, 24-30.
70. Whittaker, R., Llinares, A., & McCabe, A. (2011). Written discourse development in CLIL at secondary school. Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 343-362.
71. Winn, W. (1991). Learning from maps and diagrams. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 211-247.
72. Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153-189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
73. Winne, P. H. (2013). Teaching and researching open-minded inquiry in the 21st century. In J. View, D. Laitsch, & P. Earley (Eds.), Why public schools? Voices from the United States and Canada (pp. 166-170). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
74. Winne, P. H. (2017a). Cognition and metacognition in self-regulated learning. In D. Schunk & J. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
75. Winne, P. H. (2017b). Learning analytics for self-regulated learning. In G. Siemens & C. Lang (Eds.), Handbook of learning analytics. Beaumont, AB: Society for Learning Analytics Research.
76. Winne, P. H. (2017c). Leveraging big data to help each learner upgrade learning and accelerate learning science. Teachers College Record, 119(3), 1-24.
77. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
78. Wyatt, D., Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., Stein, S., Evans, P., & Brown, R. (1993). Comprehension strategies, worth and credibility monitoring, and evaluations: Cold and hot cognition when experts read professional articles that are important to them. Learning and Individual Differences, 5(1), 49-72.
79. Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.