Facilitating improved writing among students through directed peer review

Active Learning in Higher Education

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 219-229

  Crossman, Joanne M ^a   Kite, Stacey L ^b  

^a School of Education and Social Services   (United States)

^b JOHNSON AND WALES UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

discovery mode interactions; improved writing skills; nonnative speakers of English; Optimal Model of peer critique of university coursework; peer review; teaching writing; writing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869058330     PISSN: 14697874     EISSN: 17412625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1469787412452980     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Creswell JWResearch Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1994:.
2. DiPardo A,Freedman SW.Peer response groups in the writing classroom: Theoretic foundations and new directions.Review of Educational Research. 1988;58 (2): 119-49.
3. Elbow P,Belanoff PA Community of Writers. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill; 2000:.
4. Falchikov N,Goldfinch J.Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks.Review of Educational Research. 2000;70 (3): 287-322.
5. Fink A,Kosecoff JHow to Conduct Surveys. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1998:.
6. Flower L,Hayes JR,Carey L, et al.Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision.College Composition and Communication. 1986;37 (1): 16-55.
7. Gere ARPerspectives on Talk and Learning. Hynds SRubin D, ed. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English; 1990:115-28.
8. Goulden NR.Theory and vocabulary for communication assessments.Communication Education. 1992;41 (3): 258-68.
9. Karegianes M,Pascarella E,Pflaum S.The effects of peer editing on the writing proficiency of low-achieving tenth grade students.Journal of Educational Research. 1980;73 (2): 203-7.
10. Kolin PCSuccessful Writing at Work. 2010) Successful Writing at Work, 9th edn.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; 2010:.
11. Liu NF,Carless D.Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment.Teaching in Higher Education. 2006;11 (3): 279-90.
12. Lockhart C,Ng P.Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions and content.Language Learning. 1995;45 (4): 605-55.
13. Nicol D,MacFarlane-Dick D.Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice.Studies in Higher Education. 2006;31 (2): 199-218.
14. Ober SContemporary Business Communication. 2009) Contemporary Business Communication, 7th edn.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; 2009:.
15. Rieber LJ.Using peer review to improve student writing in business courses.Journal of Education for Business. 2006;81 (6): 322-6.
16. Topping KJ.Peer assessment between students in college and university.Review of Educational Research. 1998;65 (3): 249-76.
17. Topping KJ.Peer assessment.Theory into Practice. 2009;48 (1): 20-7.
18. Topping KJ,Smith EF,Swanson I, et al.Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2000;25 (2): 149-69.
19. Van Den Berg I,Admiraal W,Pilot A.Peer assessment in university teaching: Evaluating seven course designs.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2006;31 (1): 19-36.