The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 213-224

  Van Bavel, Jay J ^a   Pereira, Andrea ^a,b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

attention; group identity; memory; partisanship; perception; reasoning

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; DATA STORAGE EQUIPMENT; SENSORY PERCEPTION;

ATTENTION; COGNITIVE PROCESS; GROUP IDENTITIES; IDENTITY-BASED; PARTISANSHIP; POLITICAL PARTIES; REASONING; RECENT RESEARCHES;

BIOLOGY;

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IDENTITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEMORY; PERCEPTION; BRAIN CORTEX; PHYSIOLOGY; POLITICS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

CEREBRAL CORTEX; HUMANS; POLITICS; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 85042155163     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.004     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Rutjens, B.T., et al. Not all skepticism is equal: exploring the ideological antecedents of science acceptance and rejection. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 2017, 10.1177/0146167217741314 Published online December 1, 2017.
2. Akerlof, G.A., Kranton, R.E., Economics and identity. Q. J. Econ. 115 (2000), 715–753.
3. Petts, J., Brooks, C., Expert conceptualisations of the role of lay knowledge in environmental decision making: challenges for deliberative democracy. Environ. Plann. A 38 (2006), 1045–1059.
4. Webster, F., Knowledgeability and democracy in an information age. Libr. Rev. 48 (1999), 373–383.
5. Cohen, G.L., Party over policy: the dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85 (2003), 808–822.
6. Alford, J.R., et al. Are political orientations genetically transmitted?. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 99 (2005), 153–167.
7. Jost, J.T., et al. Political neuroscience: the beginning of a beautiful friendship. Polit. Psychol. 35 (2014), 3–42.
8. Alford, J.R., Hibbing, J.R., The origin of politics: an evolutionary theory of political behavior. Perspect. Polit. 2 (2004), 707–723.
9. Fraley, R.C., et al. Developmental antecedents of political ideology: a longitudinal investigation from birth to age 18 years. Psychol. Sci. 23 (2012), 1425–1431.
10. Block, J., Block, J.H., Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. J. Res. Pers. 40 (2006), 734–749.
11. Nam, H.H., et al. Amygdala structure and the tendency to regard the social system as legitimate and desirable. Nat. Hum. Behav., 2017, 10.1038/s41562-017-0248-5 Published online December 4, 2017.
12. Kanai, R., et al. Political orientations are correlated with brain structure in young adults. Curr. Biol. 21 (2011), 677–680.
13. Hartstone, M., Augoustinos, M., The minimal group paradigm: categorization into two versus three groups. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 25 (1995), 179–193.
14. Bartels, L.M., Partisanship and voting behavior, 1952–1996. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 44 (2000), 35–50.
15. Fiorina, M.P., Parties and partisanship: a 40-year retrospective. Polit. Behav. 24 (2002), 93–115.
16. Tajfel, H., Turner, J.C., The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Jost, J.T., Sidanius, J., (eds.) Key Readings in Social Psychology. Political Psychology, 1986, Psychology Press, 276–293.
17. Cosmides, L., et al. Perceptions of race. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7 (2003), 173–179.
18. Cikara, M., et al. Decoding ‘us’ and ‘them’: neural representations of generalized group concepts. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 146 (2017), 621–631.
19. Cikara, M., Van Bavel, J.J., The neuroscience of intergroup relations: an integrative review. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 9 (2014), 245–274.
20. Grace, D.M., et al. Investigating preschoolers’ categorical thinking about gender through imitation, attention, and the use of self-categories. Child Dev. 79 (2008), 1928–1941.
21. Steele, C.M., Aronson, J., Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69 (1995), 797–811.
22. Smith, E.R., et al. Can emotions be truly group level? Evidence regarding four conceptual criteria. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 93 (2007), 431–446.
23. Turner, J.C., et al. Self and collective: cognition and social context. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 20 (1994), 454–463.
24. Xiao, Y.J., et al. Perceiving the world through group-colored glasses: a perceptual model of intergroup relations. Psychol. Inq. 27 (2016), 255–274.
25. Vallone, R.P., et al. The hostile media phenomenon: biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 49, 1985, 577.
26. Ross, L., Reactive devaluation in negotiation and conflict resolution. Arrow, K., (eds.) Barriers to Conflict Resolution, 1995, Norton & Company, 27–42.
27. Ross, L., Ward, A., et al. Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. Reed, E.S., (eds.) The Jean Piaget Symposium Series. Values and Knowledge, 1996, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 103–135.
28. Simon, B., Klandermans, P.G., Politicized collective identity: a social psychological analysis. Am. Psychol. 56 (2001), 319–331.
29. Baumeister, R.F., Leary, M.R., The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull., 117, 1995, 497.
30. Brewer, M.B., The social self: on being the same and different at the same time. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 17 (1991), 475–482.
31. Webster, D.M., Kruglanski, A.W., Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 67, 1994, 1049.
32. Campbell, D.T., Ethnocentric and other altruistic motives. Nebr. Symp. Motiv. 13 (1965), 283–311.
33. Turner, J.C., Social Influence (Mapping Social Psychology Series). 1991, Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing.
34. Tetlock, P.E., Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7 (2003), 320–324.
35. Caprara, G.V., et al. Personality and politics: values, traits, and political choice. Polit. Psychol. 27 (2006), 1–28.
36. Correll, J., Park, B., A model of the ingroup as a social resource. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 9 (2005), 341–359.
37. Festinger, L., A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. 1962, Stanford University Press.
38. Festinger, L., et al. When Prophecy Fails: A Social and Psychological Study of a Modern Group That Predicted the Destruction of the World. 1964, Harper Torchbooks.
39. Stalder, D.R., Competing roles for the subfactors of need for closure in moderating dissonance-produced attitude change. Pers. Individ. Differ. 48 (2010), 775–778.
40. Graham, J., et al. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 96 (2009), 1029–1046.
41. Haidt, J., The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. 2012, Vintage.
42. Sterling, J., et al. Are neoliberals more susceptible to bullshit?. Judgm. Decis. Mak., 11, 2016, 352.
43. Gerber, A.S., et al. Party affiliation, partisanship, and political beliefs: a field experiment. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 104 (2010), 720–744.
44. Campbell, A., The American Voter. 1980, University of Chicago Press.
45. Leeper, T.J., Slothuus, R., Political parties, motivated reasoning, and public opinion formation. Polit. Psychol. 35 (2014), 129–156.
46. Bartels, L.M., Beyond the running tally: partisan bias in political perceptions. Polit. Behav. 24 (2002), 117–150.
47. Gaines, B.J., et al. Same facts, different interpretations: partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. J. Polit. 69 (2007), 957–974.
48. Kam, C.D., Who toes the party line? Cues, values, and individual differences. Polit. Behav. 27 (2005), 163–182.
49. Petersen, M.B., et al. Motivated reasoning and political parties: evidence for increased processing in the face of party cues. Polit. Behav. 35 (2013), 831–854.
50. Kahan, D.M., et al. Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. J. Risk Res. 14 (2011), 147–174.
51. Rangel, A., et al. A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9 (2008), 545–556.
52. Berkman, E.T., et al. Finding the ‘self’ in self-regulation: the identity-value model. Psychol. Inq. 28 (2017), 77–98.
53. Balleine, B.W., Neural bases of food-seeking: affect, arousal and reward in corticostriatolimbic circuits. Physiol. Behav. 86 (2005), 717–730.
54. Wikenheiser, A.M., Schoenbaum, G., Over the river, through the woods: cognitive maps in the hippocampus and orbitofrontal cortex. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 17 (2016), 513–523.
55. Cunningham, W.A., et al. The iterative reprocessing model: a multilevel framework for attitudes and evaluation. Soc. Cogn. 25 (2007), 736–760.
56. Chaumon, M., et al. Visual predictions in the orbitofrontal cortex rely on associative content. Cereb. Cortex 24 (2013), 2899–2907.
57. Kahan, D.M., The expressive rationality of inaccurate perceptions. Behav. Brain Sci., 40, 2017, e6.
58. Kahan, D.M., Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection: an experimental study. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 8 (2013), 407–424.
59. Taber, C.S., Lodge, M., The illusion of choice in democratic politics: the unconscious impact of motivated political reasoning. Polit. Psychol. 37 (2016), 61–85.
60. Drummond, C., Fischhoff, B., Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114 (2017), 9587–9592.
61. Kahan, D.M., et al. The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat. Clim. Change 2 (2012), 732–735.
62. Frenda, S.J., et al. False memories of fabricated political events. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 49 (2013), 280–286.
63. Castelli, L., Carraro, L., Ideology is related to basic cognitive processes involved in attitude formation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 47 (2011), 1013–1016.
64. Smith, C.T., et al. Rapid assimilation: automatically integrating new information with existing beliefs. Soc. Cogn. 30 (2012), 199–219.
65. Molenberghs, P., et al. Seeing is believing: neural mechanisms of action – perception are biased by team membership. Hum. Brain Mapp. 34 (2013), 2055–2068.
66. Kahan, D.M., et al. They saw a protest: cognitive illiberalism and the speech-conduct distinction. Stanford Law Rev., 64, 2012, 851.
67. Caruso, E.M., et al. Political partisanship influences perception of biracial candidates’ skin tone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106 (2009), 20168–20173.
68. Granot, Y., et al. Justice is not blind: visual attention exaggerates effects of group identification on legal punishment. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 143, 2014, 2196.
69. Ståhl, T., van Prooijen, J.-W., Epistemic rationality: skepticism toward unfounded beliefs requires sufficient cognitive ability and motivation to be rational. Pers. Individ. Differ. 122 (2018), 155–163.
70. Steele, C.M., The psychology of self-affirmation: sustaining the integrity of the self. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 21 (1988), 261–302.
71. Čehajić S., et al. Affirmation, acknowledgment of in-group responsibility, group-based guilt, and support for reparative measures. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 101 (2011), 256–270.
72. Lerner, J.S., Tetlock, P.E., Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychol. Bull., 125, 1999, 255.
73. Bullock, J.G., et al. Partisan Bias in Factual Beliefs about Politics. 2013, National Bureau of Economic Research.
74. Park, C.L., Making sense of the meaning literature: an integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychol. Bull., 136, 2010, 257.
75. Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., Displacing misinformation about events: an experimental test of causal corrections. J. Exp. Polit. Sci. 2 (2015), 81–93.
76. Baumeister, R.F., Newman, L.S., Self-regulation of cognitive inference and decision processes. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 20 (1994), 3–19.
77. Kunda, Z., The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol. Bull., 108, 1990, 480.
78. Bolsen, T., et al. The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Polit. Behav. 36 (2014), 235–262.
79. Fernbach, P.M., et al. Political extremism is supported by an illusion of understanding. Psychol. Sci. 24 (2013), 939–946.
80. Suhay, E., et al. The polarizing effects of online partisan criticism: evidence from two experiments. Int. J. Press 23 (2018), 95–115.
81. Abrams, D., Hogg, M.A., Social identification, self-categorization and social influence. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 1 (1990), 195–228.
82. Mugny, G., et al. Influence minoritaire et relations entre groupes: l'importance du contenu du message et des styles de comportement. Rev. Suisse Psychol. Pure Appl. 43 (1984), 331–351.
83. Clementson, D.E., Truth bias and partisan bias in political deception detection. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol., 2017, 10.1177/0261927X17744004 Published online November 22, 2017.
84. Scroggins, W.A., et al. Reducing prejudice with labels: shared group memberships attenuate implicit bias and expand implicit group boundaries. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 42 (2016), 219–229.
85. Van Bavel, J.J., Cunningham, W.A., Self-categorization with a novel mixed-race group moderates automatic social and racial biases. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 35 (2009), 321–335.
86. Van Bavel, J.J., et al. The neural substrates of in-group bias: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation. Psychol. Sci. 19 (2008), 1131–1139.
87. Van Bavel, J.J., et al. Modulation of the fusiform face area following minimal exposure to motivationally relevant faces: evidence of in-group enhancement (not out-group disregard). J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23 (2011), 3343–3354.
88. Gaertner, S.L., et al. The common ingroup identity model: recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 4 (1993), 1–26.
89. Wenzel, M., et al. Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: the ingroup projection model. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 18 (2008), 331–372.
90. Hornsey, M.J., Imani, A., Criticizing groups from the inside and the outside: an identity perspective on the intergroup sensitivity effect. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 30 (2004), 365–383.
91. Fazio, R.H., Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: the MODE model as an integrative framework. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 23 (1990), 75–109.
92. Gawronski, B., Bodenhausen, G.V., The associative-propositional evaluation model: theory, evidence, and open questions. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 44, 2011, 59.
93. Van Bavel, J.J., Cunningham, W.A., A social neuroscience approach to self and social categorisation: a new look at an old issue. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 21 (2011), 237–284.
94. Crowder, R.G., Principles of Learning and Memory (Classic Edition). 2014, Psychology Press.
95. Thorson, E., Belief echoes: the persistent effects of corrected misinformation. Polit. Commun. 33 (2016), 460–480.
96. Cobb, M.D., et al. Beliefs don't always persevere: how political figures are punished when positive information about them is discredited. Polit. Psychol. 34 (2013), 307–326.
97. Nyhan, B., et al. The hazards of correcting myths about health care reform. Med. Care 51 (2013), 127–132.
98. Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., Does correcting myths about the flu vaccine work? An experimental evaluation of the effects of corrective information. Vaccine 33 (2015), 459–464.
99. Nyhan, B., Why the ‘death panel’ myth wouldn't die: misinformation in the health care reform debate. Forum, 8(1), 2010.
100. Motyl, M., et al. How ideological migration geographically segregates groups. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 51 (2014), 1–14.