Justice is not blind: Visual attention exaggerates effects of group identification on legal punishment

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 143, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 2196-2208

  Granot, Yael ^a   Balcetis, Emily ^a   Schneider, Kristin E ^a   Tyler, Tom R ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Eye tracking; Legal decision making; Punishment; Social identification; Visual attention

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; PUNISHMENT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL JUSTICE; YOUNG ADULT;

ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PUNISHMENT; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; SOCIAL JUSTICE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84919896453     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0037893     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Adolphs, R., Gosselin, F., Buchanan, T. W., Tranel, D., Schyns, P., & Damasio, A. R. (2005). A mechanism for impaired fear recognition after amygdala damage. Nature, 433, 68-72. doi:10.1038/nature03086
2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (2005). Fundamentalism and authoritarianism. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.) Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 378-393). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
5. Amodio, D. M., Jost, J. T., Master, S. L., & Yee, C. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1246-1247. doi:10.1038/nn1979
6. Anwar, S., Bayer, P., & Hjalmarsson, R. (2012). A jury pool's race can deny justice. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/23/ opinion/anwar-bayer-hjalmarsson-jury-racism
7. Aviezer, H., Bentin, S., Hassin, R. R., Meschino, W. S., Kennedy, J., Grewal, S.,... Moscovitch, M. (2009). Not on the face alone: Perception of contextualized face expressions in Huntington's disease. Brain, 132, 1633-1644. doi:10.1093/brain/awp067
8. Balcetis, E., & Dunning, D. (2006). See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 612-625. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.612
9. Balcetis, E., & Lassiter, G. D. (2010). Social psychology of visual perception. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
10. Brosch, T., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2012). The flexibility of emotional attention: Accessible social identities guide rapid attention orienting. Cognition, 125, 309-316. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.007
11. Calvo, M. G., Nummenmaa, L., & Hyönä, J. (2008). Emotional scenes in peripheral vision: Selective orienting and gist processing, but not content identification. Emotion, 8, 68-80. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.8.1.68
12. Christianson, S., Loftus, E. F., Hoffman, H., & Loftus, G. R. (1991). Eye fixations and memory for emotional events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 693-701. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.17.4.693
13. Dadds, M. R., Perry, Y., Hawes, D. J., Merz, S., Riddell, A. C., Haines, D. J.,... Abeygunawardane, A. I. (2006). Attention to the eyes and fear-recognition deficits in child psychopathy. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 189, 280-281. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.105.018150
14. DeSantis, A., & Kayson, W. A. (1997). Defendants' characteristics of attractiveness, race, and sex and sentencing decisions. Psychological Reports, 81, 679-683. doi:10.2466/pr0.1997.81.2.679
15. Duchowski, A. T. (2002). A breadth-first survey of eye tracking applications. Behavior Research Methods, 34, 455-470.
16. Dunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (1989). Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1082-1090. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1082
17. Eberhardt, J. L., Davies, P. G., Purdie-Vaughns, V. J., & Johnson, S. L. (2006). Looking deathworthy perceived stereotypicality of Black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 17, 383-386. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01716.x
18. Faulkner, S. (1991). Action-response use of force continuum. Unpublished manuscript, Ohio Peace Officers Training Academy.
19. Feather, N. T. (1998). Reactions to penalties for offenses committed by the police and public citizens: Testing a social-cognitive process model of retributive justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 528-544. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.528
20. Gamboa, S. (2012). Trayvon Martin case: George Zimmerman's race is a complicated matter. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/29/trayvon-martin-case-georg_n_1387711.html
21. Gamer, M., & Büchel, C. (2009). Amygdala activation predicts gaze toward fearful eyes. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 9123-9126. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1883-09.2009
22. Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
23. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingsworth, A. (1998). Eye movements during scene viewing: An overview. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 269-293). Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier Science. doi:10.1016/B978-008043361-5/50013-4
25. Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1985). Interpersonal attraction, social identification and psychological group formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 51-66. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420150105
26. Holder, T. (2013). Zimmerman jury is homogenous... and dangerous. Fox News. Retrieved from http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/06/21/ zimmerman-jury-homogeneous-dangerous/
27. Isaacowitz, D. M., Toner, K., Goren, D., & Wilson, H. R. (2008). Looking while unhappy: Mood-congruent gaze in young adults, positive gaze in older adults. Psychological Science, 19, 848-853.
28. Janoff-Bulman, R., Sheikh, S., & Baldacci, K. G. (2008). Mapping moral motives: Approach, avoidance, and political orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1091-1099. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.11.003
29. Kahan, D. M., Hoffman, D. A., & Braman, D. (2009). Whose eyes are you going to believe? Scott V. Harris and the perils of cognitive illiberalism. Harvard Law Review, 122, 837-906.
30. Klein, K., & Creech, B. (1982). Race, rape, and bias: Distortion of prior odds and meanings changes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 21-33. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp0301_2
31. Koster, E. H. W., Crombez, G., Van Damme, S., Verschuere, B., & De Houwer, J. (2004). Does imminent threat capture and hold attention? Emotion, 4, 312-317. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.4.3.312
32. Kovesdi, C., Barton, B. K., & Rice, L. (2012). Visual efficiency detection index: A new composite measure of visual search. Journal of Eye tracking, Visual Cognition, and Emotions, 2, 11-26.
33. Krosch, A. R., Berntsen, L., Amodio, D. M., Jost, J. T., & van Bavel, J. J. (2013). On the ideology of hypodescent: Political conservatism predicts categorization of racially ambiguous faces as Black. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1196-1203. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.009
34. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
35. Kurzban, R., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2001). Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 15387-15392. doi:10.1073/pnas.251541498
36. Lassiter, G. D., Geers, A. L., Handley, I. M., Weiland, P. E., & Munhall, P. J. (2002). Videotaped interrogations and confessions: A simple change in camera perspective alters verdicts in simulated trials. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 867-874. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.867
37. Lassiter, G. D., Munhall, P. J., Berger, I. P., Weiland, P. E., Handley, I. M., & Geers, A. L. (2005). Attributional complexity and the camera perspective bias in videotaped confessions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 27-35. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2701_3
38. Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1999). Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 254- 264. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01332-7
39. Levinson, J. D. (2007). Forgotten racial equality: Implicit bias, decisionmaking, and misremembering. Duke Law Journal., 11, 55-62
40. Loftus, E. F., Loftus, G. R., & Messo, J. (1987) Some facts about "weapon focus." Law and Human Behavior. doi:10.1007/BF01044839, 57, 345-424
41. Loftus, G. R. (1972). Eye fixations and recognition memory for pictures. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 525-551. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90021-7
42. Marques, J. M., & Paez, D. (1994). The 'black sheep effect': Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 37-68. doi: 10.1080/14792779543000011
43. Mazzella, R., & Feingold, A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1315-1338. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01552.x
44. McGowen, R., & King, G. D. (1982). Effects of authoritarian, antiauthoritarian, and egalitarian legal attitudes on mock juror and jury decisions. Psychological Reports, 51, 1067-1074. doi:10.2466/pr0.1982.51.3f.1067
45. Mitchell, T. L., Haw, R. M., Pfeifer, J. E., & Meissner, C. A. (2005). Racial bias in mock juror decision-making: A meta-analytic review of defendant treatment. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 621-637. doi:10.1007/ s10979-005-8122-9
46. Moran, G., & Comfort, J. C. (1986). Neither "tentative" nor "fragmentary": Verdict preference of impaneled felony jurors as a function of attitude toward capital punishment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 146- 155. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.1.146
47. Moynihan, C. (2012). Scores arrested as the police clear Zuccotti park. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/ 2012/03/17/arrests-made-as-protesters-mark-occupy-wall-streets-sixmonth-anniversary/
48. Nelson, W. W., & Loftus, G. R. (1980). The functional visual field during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 391-399. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.4.391
49. New York Civil Liberties Union. (2006). Who's watching? Video camera surveillance in New York City and the need for public oversight. Retrieved from http://www.nyclu.org/pdfs/surveullance:cams_report_121306.pdf
50. O'Regan, J. K., Deubel, H., Clark, J. J., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Picture changes during blinks: Looking without seeing and seeing without looking. Visual Cognition, 7, 191-211. doi:10.1080/135062800394766
51. Packer, D. (2011). 2010 NPMSRP police misconduct statistical report. CATO Institute. Retrieved from http://www.policemisconduct.net/2010-npmsrp-police-misconduct-statistical-report/
52. Perry, P. (2002). Shades of white: White kids and racial identities in high school. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/ 9780822383659
53. Poulson, R. L. (1990). Mock juror attribution of criminal responsibility: Effects of race and the Guilty But Mentally Ill (GBMI) verdict option. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 1596-1611. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb01495.x
54. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Assessing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227. doi:10.1080/ 00273170701341316
55. Reynolds, K. J., Turner, J. C., Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Bizumic, B., & Subasic, E. (2007). Does personality explain in-group identification and discrimination? Evidence from the minimal group paradigm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 517-539. doi:10.1348/ 014466606X153080
56. Scott V. Harris, 127S. Ct. 1769, 1773 (2007). Transcript of oral argument, 27.
57. Sherwin, R. K., Feigenson, N., & Spiesel, C. (2006). Law in the digital age: How visual communication technologies are transforming the practice, theory, and teaching of law. Journal of Science and Technology Law, 12, 227-270.
58. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 261-267. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01080-2
59. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 644-649. doi:10.3758/BF03208840
60. Snyder, C. J., Lassiter, G. D., Lindberg, M. J., & Pinegar, S. K. (2009). Videotaped interrogations and confessions: Does a dual-camera approach yield unbiased and accurate evaluations? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27, 451-466. doi:10.1002/bsl.875
61. Sommers, S. R. (2007). Race and the decision making of juries. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 171-187. doi:10.1348/135532507X189687
62. Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2001). White juror bias: An investigation of prejudice against Black defendants in the American courtroom. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 201-229. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.201
63. Stack, S. (2003). Authoritarianism and support for the death penalty: A multivariate analysis. Sociological Focus, 36, 333-352. doi:10.1080/ 00380237.2003.10571228
64. State of Connecticut. (2009). Criminal jury instructions: Note-taking. Retrieved from http://www.jud.ct.gov/ji/criminal/part1/1.2-11.htm
65. Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., & Morrison, K. R. (2009). Intergroup threat theory. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
66. Stone, C. H., & Crisp, R. J. (2007). Superordinate and subgroup identification as predictors of intergroup evaluation in common ingroup contexts. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 493-513. doi: 10.1177/1368430207081537
67. Storms, M. D. (1973). Videotape and the attribution process: Reversing actors' and observers' points of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 165-175. doi:10.1037/h0034782
68. Sweeney, L. T., & Haney, C. (1992). The influence of race on sentencing: A meta-analytic review of experimental studies. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 179-195. doi:10.1002/bsl.2370100204
69. Swets, J., Tanner, W. J., & Birdsall, T. (1961). Decision processes in perception. Psychological Review, 68, 301-340. doi:10.1037/h0040547
70. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245
71. Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1975). Point of view and perceptions of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 439-445. doi:10.1037/h0077095
72. Toutant, C. (2011). N. J. court: Replay of video evidence for jurors could be prejudicial. Law Technology News. Retrieved from http:// www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id_ 1202511096186&NJ_Court_Replay_of_Video_Evidence:for_Jurors_ Could_Be_Prejudicial&slreturn_20130614092747
73. Trawalter, S., Todd, A. R., Baird, A. A., & Richeson, J. A. (2008). Attending to threat: Race-based patterns of selective attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1322-1327. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.006
74. Treisman, A. (2006). How the deployment of attention determines what we see. Visual Cognition, 14, 411-443. doi:10.1080/13506280500195250
75. Tyler, T. R., & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231-275.
76. United States v. Watson, 483F. 3d 828 (2007).
77. van Prooijen, J., & Lam, J. (2007). Retributive justice and social categorizations: The perceived fairness of punishment depends on intergroup status. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1244-1255. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.421
78. Veltkamp, M., Aarts, H., & Custers, R. (2008). Perception in the service of goal pursuit: Motivation to attain goals enhances the perceived size of goal-instrumental objects. Social Cognition, 26, 720-736. doi:10.1521/ soco.2008.26.6.720
79. Verkuyten, M. (2005). Ethnic group identification and group evaluation among minority and majority groups: Testing the multiculturalism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 121-138. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.121
80. Voss, A., Rothermund, K., & Brandtstädter, J. (2008). Interpreting ambiguous stimuli: Separating perceptual and judgmental biases. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1048-1056. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.009
81. Ware, L. J., Lassiter, D. G., Patterson, S. M., & Ransom, M. R. (2008). Camera perspective bias in videotaped confessions: Evidence that visual attention is a mediator. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 192-200. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.192
82. Wells, T. T., Clerkin, E. M., Ellis, A. J., & Beevers, C. G. (2014). Effect of antidepressant medication use on emotional information processing in major depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 195-200. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12091243
83. Younge, G. (2005). A nation divided? Ten years after that verdict what has become of OJ and the nation he divided? The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/oct/03/usa.garyyounge