Rapid asimilation: Automatically integrating new information with existing beliefs

Social Cognition

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 199-219

  Smith, Colin Tucker ^a   Ratliff, Kate A ^b   Nosek, Brian A ^b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863589919     PISSN: 0278016X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/soco.2012.30.2.199     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (1998). Ideological realignment in the U.S. electorate. Journal of Politics, 60, 634-652. (Pubitemid 128185232)
2. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462-479.
3. Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.
4. Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group infuence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 808-822. (Pubitemid 37417543)
5. Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1989). Candidate perception in an ambiguous world: Campaigns, cues, and inference processes. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 912-940.
6. Dasgupta, N., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). The frst ontological challenge to the IAT: Attitude or mere familiarity? Psychological Inquiry, 14, 238-243. (Pubitemid 38118514)
7. Feldman, S., & Conover, P. J. (1983). Candidates, issues, and voters: The role of inference in political perception. Journal of Politics, 45, 810-839.
8. Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692-731. (Pubitemid 44306752)
9. Greenwald, A. G, McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test (IAT). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480. (Pubitemid 128658112)
10. Greenwald, A. G, Nosek, B. A, & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test (IAT): I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216. (Pubitemid 37394958)
11. Gregg, A. P., Seibt, B., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). Easier done than undone: Asymmetry in the malleability of implicit preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 1-20. (Pubitemid 43172339)
12. Krosnick, J. A., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1-24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision-making. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 951-971.
14. McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why are there complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of con-nectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102, 419-457.
15. Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863. (Pubitemid 43083772)
16. Nosek, B. A. (2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 565-584. (Pubitemid 41759653)
17. Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G, & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test (IAT): II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 166-180. (Pubitemid 40176558)
18. Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G, & Banaji, M. R. (2007). The Implicit Association Test (IAT) at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes (pp. 265-292). New York: Psychology Press.
19. Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Hansen, J. J., De-vos, T., Lindner, N. M., Ranganath, K. A., Smith, C. T., Olson, K. R., Chugh, D., Greenwald, A. G, & Banaji, M. R. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 36-88.
20. Petty, R. E., Haugtvedt, C, & Smith, S. M. (1995). Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 93-130). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Pomerantz, E. M., Chaiken, S., & Tordesillas, R. S. (1995). Attitude strength and resistance processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 408-419.
22. Popkin, S. L. (1994). The reasoning voter, second edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Ranganath, K. A., & Nosek, B. A. (2008). Implicit attitude generalization occurs immediately, explicit attitude generalization takes time. Psychological Science, 19, 249-254.
24. Ratliff, K. A., & Nosek, B. A. (2010). Creating distinct implicit and explicit attitudes with an illusory correlation paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 721-728.
25. Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., Strain, L. M, Claypool, H. M, & Hugenberg, K. (2007). Implicit and explicit attitudes respond differently to increasing amount of counterattitudinal information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 867-878.
26. Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (1998). Knowledge acquisition, accessibility, and use in person perception and stereotyping: Simulation with a recurrent connectionist network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 21-35. (Pubitemid 128458952)
27. Wilson, T. D., Lindsey S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101-126.