PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 75, Issue , 2016, Pages 40-46

  McGowan, Jessie ^a,b   Sampson, Margaret ^c   Salzwedel, Douglas M ^d   Cogo, Elise ^d   Foerster, Vicki ^e   Lefebvre, Carol ^b,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b Cochrane Information Retrieval Methods Group ^*  (Canada)

^c CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^d Manor Farm Cottage ^*  (Canada)

^e Oxford Station   (Canada)

^f Lefebvre Associates Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evidence synthesis; Guideline; Information retrieval; Literature search; Peer review; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE STUDY; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DOCUMENTATION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPELLING; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FACTUAL DATABASE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LITERATURE; MEDLINE; PROCEDURES;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MEDLINE; PEER REVIEW; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 84961227000     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: 18785921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. [1] Sampson, M., McGowan, J., Cogo, E., Grimshaw, J., Moher, D., Lefebvre, C., An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. J Clin Epidemiol 62 (2009), 944–952.
2. [2] Sampson, M., McGowan, J., Lefebvre, C., Moher, D., Grimshaw, J.M., PRESS: Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies. 2008, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Ottawa Available at http://cadth.ca/index.php/en/publication/781 Appendices Available at http://www.cadth.ca/media/pdf/477_PRESS-Peer-Review-Electronic-Search-Strategies_tr_Appendices.pdf Accessed August 17, 2015.
3. [3] McGowan, J., Sampson, M., Lefebvre, C., Evidence Based Checklist for the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS EBC). Evid Based Libr Inf Pract 5 (2010), 149–154 Available at http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/7402/6436 Accessed August 17, 2015.
4. [4] Sampson, M., McGowan, J., Tetzlaff, J., Cogo, E., Moher, D., No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 61 (2008), 748–754.
5. [5] Sampson, M., McGowan, J., Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequency. J Clin Epidemiol 59 (2006), 1057–1063.
6. [6] McGowan, J., Sampson, M., Salzwedel, D., Cogo, E., Foerster, V., Lefebvre, C., PRESS–Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Explanation & Elaboration (PRESS E&E). 2016, CADTH, Ottawa Ottawa.
7. [7] Lefebvre, C., Manheimer, E., Glanville, J., Chapter 6: searching for studies. Higgens, J., Green, S., (eds.) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0, 5.1.0 ed., 2011, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, 1–46.
8. [8] Liberati, A., Altman, D.G., Tetzlaff, J., et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLos Med, 6, 2009, e1000100.
9. [9] Harbour, J., Fraser, C., Lefebvre, C., glanville, J., Beale, S., Boachie, C., et al. Reporting methodological search filter performance comparisons: a literature review. Health Info Libr J 31 (2014), 176–194.
10. [10] Booth, A., “Brimful of STARLITE”: toward standards for reporting literature searches. J Med Libr Assoc 94 (2006), 421–429 e205. Available at http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1629442&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract Accessed August 17, 2015.
11. [11] Fehrmann, P., Thomas, J., Comprehensive computer searches and reporting in systematic reviews. Res Synth Methods 2 (2011), 15–32 Available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jrsm.31/abstract; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jrsm.31/full; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/jrsm.31/asset/jrsm31.pdf?v=1&t=h3389vri&s=0e997cf5b8a71a96d9bcdeaa63fff8bbffcc00b5. Accessed August 10, 2015.
12. [12] O'Mara-Eves, A., Thomas, J., McNaught, J., Miwa, M., Ananiadou, S., Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches. Syst Rev, 4, 2015, 5.