Evidence summaries: The evolution of a rapid review approach

Systematic Reviews

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Khangura, Sara ^a   Konnyu, Kristin ^a   Cushman, Rob ^b   Grimshaw, Jeremy ^c   Moher, David ^a,c  

^a OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b Planning Integration and Community Engagement   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAINSTORMING; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SERVICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; PUBLICATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; LITERATURE; PUBLISHING;

DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PUBLISHING; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84876172734     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20464053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-10     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Green S, Higgins J, Alderson P, Clarke M, Mulrow C, Oxman A. Chapter 1 - Introduction. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 2008, West Sussex, England: The Cochrane Collaboration and John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Higgins J, Green S.
2. Hailey D, Corabian P, Harstall C, Schneider W. The use and impact of rapid health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000, 16:651-656.
3. Ganann R, Ciliska D, Thomas H. Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews. Implement Sci 2010, 5:56. 10.1186/1748-5908-5-56, 2914085, 20642853.
4. Watt A, Cameron A, Sturm L, Lathlean T, Babidge W, Blamey S, et al. Rapid versus full systematic reviews: validity in clinical practice?. ANZ J Surg 2008, 78:1037-1040. 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04730.x, 18959712.
5. McGregor M, Brophy JM. End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: a way to increase impact. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005, 21:263-267.
6. McGregor M. Impact of TAU reports Report Number 33. Montreal, Quebec: McGill University Health Centre; 2008. Available at http://www.mcgill.ca/files/tau/FINAL_TAU_IMPACT_REPORT_FEB_2008.pdf.
7. Lomas J. Commentary: whose views count in evidence synthesis? And when do they count?. Healthc Policy 2006, 1:55-57. 2585343, 19305671.
8. Information services CADTH Grey matters: A practical search tool for evidence-based medicine 2011, Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Information services CADTH.
9. Moher D, Pham B, Lawson ML, Klassen TP. The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews. Health Technol Assess 2003, 7:1-90.
10. Buscemi N, Hartling L, Vandermeer B, Tjosvold L, Klassen TP. Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2006, 59:697-703. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.010, 16765272.
11. Moher D, Tetzlaff J, Tricco AC, Sampson M, Altman DG. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Med 2007, 4:e78. 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040078, 1831728, 17388659.
12. Maxwell L, Santesso N, Tugwell PS, Wells GA, Judd M, Buchbinder R. Method guidelines for Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group systematic reviews. J Rheumatol 2006, 33:2304-2311.
13. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007, 7:10. 10.1186/1471-2288-7-10, 1810543, 17302989.
14. SUPPORT Collaboration. , http://www.support-collaboration.org
15. Centre for Clinical Effectiveness. , http://www.southernhealth.org.au/page/Health_Professionals/CCE/
16. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health - Rapid response. , http://cadth.ca/en/products/rapid-response
17. The Ontario HIV Treatment Network - Rapid response service. , http://www.ohtn.on.ca/Pages/Knowledge-Exchange/Rapid-Response-Service.aspx
18. Parkill A, Clavisi R, Pattuwage L, Chau M, Turner T, Bragge P, et al. Searches for evidence mapping: effective, shorter, cheaper. J Med Libr Assoc 2011, 99:157-160. 10.3163/1536-5050.99.2.008, 3066574, 21464854.
19. Groves T, Godlee F. Innovations in publishing BMJ research. BMJ 2009, 338:3-4.
20. Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Chou R, Shekelle P, Robinson KA. Using existing systematic reviews in complex systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 2008, 148:776-782.