A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 985-991

  Concannon, Thomas W ^a   Meissner, Paul ^b   Grunbaum, Jo Anne ^c   McElwee, Newell ^d   Guise, Jeanne Marie ^e   Santa, John ^f   Conway, Patrick H ^g,h   Daudelin, Denise ^a   Morrato, Elaine H ⁱ   Leslie, Laurel K ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

^d MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

^e OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f Health Ratings Center   (United States)

^g CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES   (United States)

ⁱ Global Health and Health Disparities   (United States)

Author keywords

Guidance; Research; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOME RESEARCH; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SIMULATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); TAXONOMY; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

CLASSIFICATION; HEALTH PLANNING GUIDELINES; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT-CENTERED CARE;

EID: 84864423456     PISSN: 08848734     EISSN: 15251497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2037-1     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: How will we ever keep up? PLoS Med. 2010;7: E1000326.
2. Zilberberg MD. The clinical research enterprise. JAMA. 2011;305:604-5.
3. Grol R. Improving the quality of medical care. JAMA. 2001;286:2578-85.
4. Rothwell PM. Treating individuals 2. Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: Importance, indications, and interpretation. Lancet. 2005;365:176-86. (Pubitemid 40091809)
5. Rothwell PM, Mehta Z, Howard SC, Gutnikov SA, Warlow CP. Treating individuals 3: From subgroups to individuals: General principles and the example of carotid endarterectomy. Lancet. 2005;365:256-65. (Pubitemid 40138020)
6. Kent DM, Hayward RA. Limitations of applying summary results of clinical trials to individual patients: The need for risk stratification. JAMA. 2007;298:1209-12. (Pubitemid 47403108)
7. Killien M, Bigby JA, Champion V, et al. Involving minority and underrepresented women in clinical trials: The National Centers of Excellence in Women's Health. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000;9:1061-70. (Pubitemid 32060900)
8. Yancey AK, Ortega AN, Kumanyika SK. Effective recruitment and retention of minority participants. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:1-28.
9. Caldwell PH, Murphy SB, Butow PN, Craig JC. Clinical trials in children. Lancet. 2004;364:803-811. (Pubitemid 39165102)
10. Institute of Medicine. Initial Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Washington: National Academies Press; 2009.
11. Federal Coordinating Council forComparative Effectiveness Research. Report to the President and Congress. Washington: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2009. http://www.hhs.gov/recovery/programs/cer/cerannualrpt.pdf. Accessed June 18, 2011.
12. Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Available at: Http://www.pcori.org. Accessed June 18, 2011.
13. McClellan M, Benner J, Garber AM, Meltzer DO, Tunis SR, Pearson S. Comparative Effectiveness Research: Will It Bend the Health Care Cost Curve and Improve Quality? Washington: The Brookings Institute; 2009.
14. Roehr B. More stakeholder engagement is needed to improve quality of research, say US experts. Br Med J. 2010;341:c4193.
15. Conway PH, Clancy C. Charting a path from comparative effectiveness funding to improved patient-centered health care. JAMA. 2010;303:985-6.
16. Institute of Medicine. Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Washington: National Academies Press; 2009.
17. Harvard Business School Press. The Essentials of Negotiation. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing; 2005.
18. Malhotra D, Bazerman MH. Negotiation Genius. New York: Bantam Books; 2008.
19. Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2011.
20. Selker HP, Leslie LK, Wasser JS, Plaut AG, Wilson IB, Griffith JL, Tufts CTSI. Tufts CTSI. Clin Transl Sci. 2010;3:56-8.
21. Minkler ME, Wallerstein NE. Community Based Participatory Research for Health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2003.
22. CTSA Community Engagement Key Function Committee. Principles of Community Engagement. 2nd ed. Washington: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2011.
23. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of communitybased research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173-202. (Pubitemid 28279929)
24. O'Haire C, McPheeters M, Nakamoto EK, et al. Methods for Engaging Stakeholders To Identify and Prioritize Future Research Needs. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011. AHRQ Publication No. 11-EHC044-EF.
25. Hoffman A, Montgomery R, Aubry W, Tunis SR. How best to engage patients, doctors, and other stakeholders in designing comparative effectiveness studies. Health Aff. 2010;29:1834-41.
26. Medicare prescription drug, improvement, and modernization act of 2003, H.R.1, 108th Congress.
27. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Draft National priorities for research and research agenda, version 1. Washington; 2012.
28. Luce BR, Kramer JM, Goodman SN, et al. Rethinking randomized clinical trials for comparative effectiveness research: The need for transformational change. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:206-9.
29. Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM. Practical clinical trials: Increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA. 2003;290:1624-32. (Pubitemid 37430387)
30. Ware JH, Hamel MB. Pragmatic trials: Guides to better patient care? N Eng J Med. 2011;364:1685-7.
31. Lindenauer PK, Pekow PS, Lahti MC, Lee Y, Benjamin EM, Rothberg MB. Association of corticosteroid dose and route of administration with risk of treatment failure in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JAMA. 2010;303:2359-67.
32. Krishnan JA, Mularski RA. Acting on comparative effectiveness research in COPD. JAMA. 2010;303:2409-10.
33. Institute of Medicine. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington: National Academies Press; 2011.
34. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008.
35. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100.
36. Facey K, Boivin A, Gracia J, et al. Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: A route to robust evidence and fair deliberation. Int J Tech Assess Health Care. 2010;26:334-40.
37. Krahn M, Naglie G. The next step in guideline development: Incorporating patient preferences. JAMA. 2008;300:436-8. (Pubitemid 352040257)
38. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. About the Eisenberg Center. Available at: Http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/who-is-involved- in-the-effective-health-care-program1/about-the-eisenberg-center. Accessed June 18, 2011.
39. Benner JS, Morrison MR, Karnes EK, Kocot SL, McClellan M. An evaluation of recent federal spending on comparative effectiveness research: Priorities, gaps, and next steps. Health Aff. 2010;29:1768-76.
40. Lauer MS, Collins FS. Using science to improve the nation's health system: NIH's commitment to comparative effectiveness research. JAMA. 2010;303:2182-3.
41. Selker HP, Strom BL, Ford DE, et al. White paper on CTSA consortium role in facilitating comparative effectiveness research. Clin Transl Sci. 2010;3:29-37.
42. Veterans Administration. Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI). Available at: Http://www.queri.research.va.gov/about/default.cfm. Accessed June 18, 2011.
43. Wells K, Miranda J, Bruce ML, Alegria M, Wallerstein N. Bridging community intervention and mental health services research. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:955-63. (Pubitemid 38735981)
44. Leung MW, Yen IH, Minkler M. Community based participatory research: A promising approach for increasing epidemiology's relevance in the 21st century. Int J Epid. 2004;33:499-506. (Pubitemid 38997220)
45. Seifer S. Building and sustaining community-institutional partnerships for prevention research: Findings from a national collaborative. J Urban Health. 2006;83:989-1003. (Pubitemid 46024880)
46. Clancy CM. Getting to 'smart' health care. Heal Aff. 2006;25:589-92.
47. Rosengren K, Trinity M. Roundtable on expanding capacity for comparative effectiveness research in the United States. Heal Serv Res. 2009;44:327-42.