A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management

Environmental Evidence

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Haddaway, N R ^a   Kohl, C ^b   Rebelo Da Silva, N ^c   Schiemann, J ^b   Spok A ^d   Stewart, R ^c   Sweet, J B ^e   Wilhelm, R ^b  

^a STOCKHOLM ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b INSTITUTE FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PATHOGEN DIAGNOSTICS   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG   (South Africa)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

^e JT Environmental Consultants Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Best practice; Communication; Conflict resolution; Dissemination; Methodology; Stakeholder analysis; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

EID: 85019411730     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20472382     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13750-017-0089-8     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Smith J, Mapendembe A, Vega A, Hernandez Morcillo M, Walpole M, Herkenrath P. Linking the thematic programmes of work of the convention on biological diversity (CBD) to poverty reduction. Biodiversity for development: new approaches for national biodiversity strategies. Montreal: CBD Secretariat; 2010.
2. Enters T, Young A, Boshier D, Boyle T. Rethinking stakeholder involvement in biodiversity conservation projects. In: Forest conservation genetics: principles and practice. 2000. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing; p. 263-73.
3. Freeman R. Stakeholder management: a strategic approach. New York: Pitman; 1984.
4. Reed MS. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv. 2008;141(10):2417-31.
5. Sterling EJ, Betley E, Sigouin A, Gomez A, Toomey A, Cullman G, Malone C, Pekor A, Arengo F, Blair M, Filardi C, Landrigan K, Porzecanski AL. Assessing the evidence for stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv. 2017;209:159-71.
6. Reed MS, Dougill AJ, Baker TR. Participatory indicator development: what can ecologists and local communities learn from each other. Ecol Appl. 2008;18(5):1253-69.
7. Richards C, Carter C, Sherlock K. Practical approaches to participation, Citeseer. 2004.
8. Dougill A, Fraser E, Holden J, Hubacek K, Prell C, Reed M, Stagl S, Stringer L. Learning from doing participatory rural research: lessons from the Peak District National Park. J Agric Econ. 2006;57(2):259-75.
9. Reed M, Dougill A. Linking degradation assessment to sustainable land management: a decision support system for Kalahari pastoralists. J Arid Environ. 2010;74(1):149-55.
10. Deverka PA, Lavallee DC, Desai PJ, Esmail LC, Ramsey SD, Veenstra DL, Tunis SR. Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement. 2012.
11. Nelson N, Wright S. Power and participatory development: theory and practice. Athens, Greece: ITDG Publishing; 1995.
12. Vedwan N, Ahmad S, Miralles-Wilhelm F, Broad K, Letson D, Podesta G. Institutional evolution in Lake Okeechobee management in Florida: characteristics, impacts, and limitations. Water Resour Manag. 2008;22(6):699-718.
13. Cottrell E, Whitlock E, Kato E, Uhl S, Belinson S, Chang C, Hoomans T, Meltzer D, Noorani H, Robinson K. Defining the benefits of stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews. 2014.
14. CEE. Guidelines for systematic review and evidence synthesis in environmental management. Version 4.2., The Collaboration for Environmental Evidence, 4.2. 2013.
15. Davies ZG, Pullin AS. Do hedgerow corridors increase the population viability of woodland species? Systematic Review No. 8 Part A. Technical report. Birmingham: Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation; 2006.
16. Stewart GB, Coles CF, Pullin AS. Applying evidence-based practice in conservation management: lessons from the first systematic review and dissemination projects. Biol Conserv. 2005;126(2):270-8.
17. Martínez-Abraín A, Oro D, Jiménez J, Stewart G, Pullin A. What are the impacts of human recreational activity on the distribution, nest-occupancy rates and reproductive success of breeding raptors? CEE review 07-003 (SR27). Collaboration for Environmental Evidence; 2008. www.environmentalevidence.org/SR27.html.
18. Pullin AS, Bangpan M, Dalrymple S, Dickson K, Haddaway NR, Healey JR, Hauari H, Hockley N, Jones JP, Knight T. Human well-being impacts of terrestrial protected areas. Environ Evid. 2013;2(1):19.
19. James KL, Randall NP, Haddaway NR. A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environ Evid. 2016;5(1):7.
20. Bunn F. The impact of systematic reviews on health care policy in England. 2010.
21. Oliver S, Liabo K, Stewart R, Rees R. Public involvement in research: making sense of the diversity. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015;20(1):45-51.
22. Ramirez R. Stakeholder analysis and conflict management. In: Cultivating peace: conflict and collaboration in natural resource management. International Development Research Centre (Canada), World Bank Institute; 1999. p. 101-26.
23. Swiderska K. Implementing the rio conventions: implications for the south. iied Opinion, special issue. London: IIED; 2002.
24. Byrson J. What to do when stakeholders matter. Public Manag Rev. 2004;6(1):21-53.
25. Grimble R, Chan MK. Stakeholder analysis for natural resource management in developing countries. In: Natural resources forum. New York: Wiley; 1995.
26. Reed MS, Graves A, Dandy N, Posthumus H, Hubacek K, Morris J, Prell C, Quinn CH, Stringer LC. Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J Environ Manag. 2009;90(5):1933-49.
27. Brugha R, Varvasovszky Z. Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy Planning. 2000;15(3):239-46.
28. Ihugba BU, Osuji OK. Corporate citizenship and stakeholder engagement: maintaining an equitable power balance. 2011.
29. Stewart GB, Pullin AS, Coles CF. Effects of wind turbines on bird abundance. CEE review 04-002 (SR4). Collaboration for Environmental Evidence; 2005. www.environmentalevidence.org/SR4.html.
30. Leventon J, Fleskens L, Claringbould H, Schwilch G, Hessel R. An applied methodology for stakeholder identification in transdisciplinary research. Sustain Sci. 2016;11(5):763-75.
31. Wellen R, Toronto O. Open access scholarly publishing and the problem of networks and intermediaries in the academic commons. Univ.-Bibliothek; 2005.
32. Sears C. Revising the system of corporate tax loss transfers in Canada, University of New Brunswick, Faculty of Business Administration. 2013.
33. Berggren HM. Institutional context and reduction of the resource bias in political sophistication. Political Res Q. 2001;54(3):531-52.
34. Cramer CK, Klasser GD, Epstein JB, Sheps SB. The Delphi process in dental research. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2008;8(4):211-20.
35. Pullin AS, Knight TM. Effectiveness in conservation practice: pointers from medicine and public health. Conserv Biol. 2001;15(1):50-4.