Computerized clinical decision support systems for therapeutic drug monitoring and dosing: A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review

Implementation Science

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Nieuwlaat, Robby ^a,b   Connolly, Stuart J ^a,b,c   Mackay, Jean A ^b   Weise Kelly, Lorraine ^b   Navarro, Tamara ^b   Wilczynski, Nancy L ^b   Brian Haynes, R ^b,c  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c HAMILTON HEALTH SCIENCES   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INSULIN; VITAMIN K GROUP;

CANADA; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DRUG ANTAGONISM; DRUG MONITORING; HEALTH; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CANADA; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DRUG MONITORING; HUMANS; INSULIN; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VITAMIN K; WORLD HEALTH;

EID: 79960983780     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-90     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano M, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, Sam J, Haynes RB. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005, 293(10):1223-1238. 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223, 15755945.
2. Haynes RB, Wilczynski NL, . the Computerized Clinical Decision Support System (CCDSS) Systematic Review Team Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: methods of a decision-maker-research partnership systematic review. Implement Sci 2010, 5:12. 2829489, 20181104, the Computerized Clinical Decision Support System (CCDSS) Systematic Review Team.
3. Haynes RB, Cotoi C, Holland J, Walters L, Wilczynski N, Jedraszewski D, McKinlay J, Parrish R, McKibbon KA, . McMaster Premium Literature Service (PLUS) Project Second-order peer review of the medical literature for clinical practitioners. JAMA 2006, 295(15):1801-1808. 10.1001/jama.295.15.1801, 16622142, McMaster Premium Literature Service (PLUS) Project.
4. Peck CC, Sheiner LB, Martin CM, Combs DT, Melmon KL. Computer-assisted digoxin therapy. N Engl J Med 1973, 289(9):441-446. 10.1056/NEJM197308302890902, 4763409.
5. Mc Donald CJ. Use of a computer to detect and respond to clinical events: its effect on clinician behavior. Ann Intern Med 1976, 84(2):162-167.
6. Rodman JH, Jelliffe RW, Kolb E, Tuey DB, de Guzman MF, Wagers PW, Haywood LJ. Clinical studies with computer-assisted initial lidocaine therapy. Arch Intern Med 1984, 144(4):703-709. 10.1001/archinte.144.4.703, 6712366.
7. White KS, Lindsay A, Pryor TA, Brown WF, Walsh K. Application of a computerized medical decision-making process to the problem of digoxin intoxication. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984, 4(3):571-576. 10.1016/S0735-1097(84)80104-7, 6381570.
8. Hurley SF, Dziukas LJ, McNeil JJ, Brignell MJ. A randomized controlled clinical trial of pharmacokinetic theophylline dosing. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986, 134(6):1219-1224.
9. Carter BL, Taylor JW, Becker A. Evaluation of three dosage-prediction methods for initial in-hospital stabilization of warfarin therapy. Clin Pharm 1987, 6(1):37-45.
10. White RH, Hong R, Venook AP, Daschbach MM, Murray W, Mungall DR, Coleman RW. Initiation of warfarin therapy: comparison of physician dosing with computer-assisted dosing. J Gen Intern Med 1987, 2(3):141-148. 10.1007/BF02596140, 3295148.
11. Begg EJ, Atkinson HC, Jeffery GM, Taylor NW. Individualised aminoglycoside dosage based on pharmacokinetic analysis is superior to dosage based on physician intuition at achieving target plasma drug concentrations. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1989, 28(2):137-141. 1379894, 2775618.
12. Gonzalez ER, Vanderheyden BA, Ornato JP, Comstock TG. Computer-assisted optimization of aminophylline therapy in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med 1989, 7(4):395-401. 10.1016/0735-6757(89)90046-6, 2735986.
13. Hickling K, Begg E, Moore ML. A prospective randomised trial comparing individualised pharmacokinetic dosage prediction for aminoglycosides with prediction based on estimated creatinine clearance in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 1989, 15(4):233-237. 10.1007/BF00271057, 2745867.
14. Burton ME, Ash CL, Hill DP, Handy T, Shepherd MD, Vasko MR. A controlled trial of the cost benefit of computerized bayesian aminoglycoside administration. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1991, 49(6):685-694. 10.1038/clpt.1991.86, 1905602.
15. White RH, Mungall D. Outpatient management of warfarin therapy: comparison of computer-predicted dosage adjustment to skilled professional care. Ther Drug Monit 1991, 13(1):46-50. 10.1097/00007691-199101000-00006, 2057991.
16. Ryff-de Leche A, Engler H, Nutzi E, Berger M, Berger W. Clinical application of two computerized diabetes management systems: comparison with the log-book method. Diabetes Res 1992, 19(3):97-105.
17. Casner PR, Reilly R, Ho H. A randomized controlled trial of computerized pharmacokinetic theophylline dosing versus empiric physician dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993, 53(6):684-690. 10.1038/clpt.1993.90, 8513660.
18. Poller L, Wright D, Rowlands M. Prospective comparative study of computer programs used for management of warfarin. J Clin Pathol 1993, 46(4):299-303. 10.1136/jcp.46.4.299, 501207, 8496384.
19. Fihn SD, McDonell MB, Vermes D, Henikoff JG, Martin DC, Callahan CM, Kent DL, White RH. A computerized intervention to improve timing of outpatient follow-up: a multicenter randomized trial in patients treated with warfarin. National Consortium of Anticoagulation Clinics. J Gen Intern Med 1994, 9(3):131-139. 10.1007/BF02600026, 8195911.
20. Fitzmaurice DA, Hobbs FD, Murray ET, Bradley CP, Holder R. Evaluation of computerized decision support for oral anticoagulation management based in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 1996, 46(410):533-535. 1239749, 8917873.
21. Overhage JM, Tierney WM, Zhou XH, McDonald CJ. A randomized trial of 'corollary orders' to prevent errors of omission. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997, 4(5):364-375. 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040364, 61254, 9292842.
22. Vadher B, Patterson DL, Leaning M. Evaluation of a decision support system for initiation and control of oral anticoagulation in a randomised trial. BMJ 1997, 314(7089):1252-1256. 2126598, 9154031.
23. Ageno W, Turpie AG. A randomized comparison of a computer-based dosing program with a manual system to monitor oral anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Res 1998, 91(5):237-240. 10.1016/S0049-3848(98)00092-9, 9755836.
24. Poller L, Shiach CR, MacCallum PK, Johansen AM, Munster AM, Magalhaes A, Jespersen J. Multicentre randomised study of computerised anticoagulant dosage. European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation. Lancet 1998, 352(9139):1505-1509. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)04147-6, 9820298.
25. Fitzmaurice DA, Hobbs FD, Murray ET, Holder RL, Allan TF, Rose PE. Oral anticoagulation management in primary care with the use of computerized decision support and near-patient testing: a randomized, controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2000, 160(15):2343-2348. 10.1001/archinte.160.15.2343, 10927732.
26. Manotti C, Moia M, Palareti G, Pengo V, Ria L, Dettori AG. Effect of computer-aided management on the quality of treatment in anticoagulated patients: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of APROAT (Automated PRogram for Oral Anticoagulant Treatment). Haematologica 2001, 86(10):1060-1070.
27. Claes N, Buntinx F, Vijgen J, Arnout J, Vermylen J, Fieuws S, Van Loon H. The Belgian Improvement Study on Oral Anticoagulation Therapy: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Heart J 2005, 26(20):2159-2165. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi327, 15917280.
28. Claes N, Moeremans K, Frank B, Jef A, Jos V, Herman VL, Lieven A. Estimating the cost-effectiveness of quality-improving interventions in oral anticoagulation management within general practice. Value Health 2006, 9(6):369-376. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00129.x, 17076867.
29. Mitra R, Marciello MA, Brain C, Ahangar B, Burke DT. Efficacy of computer-aided dosing of warfarin among patients in a rehabilitation hospital. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005, 84(6):423-427. 10.1097/01.phm.0000163716.00164.23, 15905656.
30. Rood E, Bosman RJ, van der Spoel JI, Taylor P, Zandstra DF. Use of a computerized guideline for glucose regulation in the intensive care unit improved both guideline adherence and glucose regulation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005, 12(2):172-180. 551549, 15561795.
31. Tierney WM, Overhage JM, Murray MD, Harris LE, Zhou XH, Eckert GJ, Smith FE, Nienaber N, McDonald CJ, Wolinsky FD. Can computer-generated evidence-based care suggestions enhance evidence-based management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A randomized, controlled trial. Health Serv Res 2005, 40(2):477-497. 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.0t369.x, 1361152, 15762903.
32. Judge J, Field TS, DeFlorio M, Laprino J, Auger J, Rochon P, Bates DW, Gurwitz JH. Prescribers' responses to alerts during medication ordering in the long term care setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006, 13(4):385-390. 10.1197/jamia.M1945, 1513672, 16622171.
33. Albisser AM, Wright CE, Sakkal S. Averting iatrogenic hypoglycemia through glucose prediction in clinical practice: progress towards a new procedure in diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007, 76(2):207-214. 10.1016/j.diabres.2006.09.007, 17023087.
34. Matheny ME, Sequist TD, Seger AC, Fiskio JM, Sperling M, Bugbee D, Bates DW, Gandhi TK. A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve medication laboratory monitoring. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008, 15(4):424-429. 10.1197/jamia.M2602, 2442256, 18436905.
35. Poller L, Keown M, Ibrahim S, Lowe G, Moia M, Turpie AG, Roberts C, van den Besselaar AM, van der Meer FJ, Tripodi A, Palareti G, Shiach C, Bryan S, Samama M, Burgess-Wilson M, Heagerty A, Maccallum P, Wright D, Jespersen J. An international multicenter randomized study of computer-assisted oral anticoagulant dosage vs. medical staff dosage. J Thromb Haemost 2008, 6(6):935-943. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.02959.x, 18489430.
36. Poller L, Keown M, Ibrahim S, Lowe G, Moia M, Turpie AG, Roberts C, van den Besselaar AM, van der Meer FJ, Tripodi A, Palareti G, Jespersen J. A multicentre randomised clinical endpoint study of PARMA 5 computer-assisted oral anticoagulant dosage. Br J Haematol 2008, 143(2):274-283. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07337.x, 18759767.
37. Poller L, Keown M, Ibrahim S, Lowe G, Moia M, Turpie AG, Roberts C, van den Besselaar AM, van der Meer FJ, Tripodi A, Palareti G, Shiach C, Bryan S, Samama M, Burgess-Wilson M, Heagerty A, Maccallum P, Wright D, Jespersen J, . European Action on Anticoagulation (EAA) A multicentre randomised assessment of the DAWN AC computer-assisted oral anticoagulant dosage program. Thromb Haemost 2009, 101(3):487-494. European Action on Anticoagulation (EAA).
38. Saager L, Collins GL, Burnside B, Tymkew H, Zhang L, Jacobsohn E, Avidan M. A randomized study in diabetic patients undergoing cardiac surgery comparing computer-guided glucose management with a standard sliding scale protocol. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008, 22(3):377-382. 10.1053/j.jvca.2007.09.013, 18503924.
39. Cavalcanti AB, Silva E, Pereira AJ, Caldeira-Filho M, Almeida FP, Westphal GA, Beims R, Fernandes CC, Correa TD, Gouvea MR, Eluf-Neto J. A randomized controlled trial comparing a computer-assisted insulin infusion protocol with a strict and a conventional protocol for glucose control in critically ill patients. J Crit Care 2009, 24(3):371-378. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.05.005, 19592202.
40. The Cochrane Collaboration Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009] 2009, The Cochrane Collaboration.
41. The Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager (RevMan) 2008, 5.0. The Cochrane Collaboration.
42. Vadher BD, Patterson DL, Leaning M. Comparison of oral anticoagulant control by a nurse-practitioner using a computer decision-support system with that by clinicians. Clin Lab Haematol 1997, 19(3):203-207. 10.1111/j.1365-2257.1997.tb00008.x, 9352146.
43. Mungall DR, Anbe D, Forrester PL, Luoma T, Genovese R, Mahan J, LeBlanc S, Penney JB. A prospective randomized comparison of the accuracy of computer-assisted versus GUSTO nomogram--directed heparin therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1994, 55(5):591-596. 10.1038/clpt.1994.73, 8181203.
44. Verner D, Seligmann H, Platt S, Dany S, Almog S, Zulty L, Halkin H, Ezra D. Computer assisted design of a theophylline dosing regimen in acute bronchospasm: serum concentrations and clinical outcome. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1992, 43(1):29-33. 10.1007/BF02280750, 1505605.
45. Durieux P, Trinquart L, Colombet I, Nies J, Walton R, Rajeswaran A, Rege Walther M, Harvey E, Burnand B. Computerized advice on drug dosage to improve prescribing practice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008, 3:CD002894.
46. Jones M, McEwan P, Morgan CL, Peters JR, Goodfellow J, Currie CJ. Evaluation of the pattern of treatment, level of anticoagulation control, and outcome of treatment with warfarin in patients with non-valvar atrial fibrillation: a record linkage study in a large British population. Heart 2005, 91(4):472-477. 10.1136/hrt.2004.042465, 1768813, 15772203.
47. Connolly SJ, Pogue J, Eikelboom J, Flaker G, Commerford P, Franzosi MG, Healey JS, Yusuf S, ACTIVE WI. Benefit of oral anticoagulant over antiplatelet therapy in atrial fibrillation depends on the quality of international normalized ratio control achieved by centers and countries as measured by time in therapeutic range. Circulation 2008, 118(20):2029-2037. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.750000, 18955670.
48. Ray KK, Seshasai SR, Wijesuriya S, Sivakumaran R, Nethercott S, Preiss D, Erqou S, Sattar N. Effect of intensive control of glucose on cardiovascular outcomes and death in patients with diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2009, 373(9677):1765-1772. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60697-8, 19465231.