Unlocking innovation potential: A typology of family business innovation postures and the critical role of the family system

Journal of Family Business Strategy

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2019, Pages

  Rondi, Emanuela ^a   De Massis, Alfredo ^a,b   Kotlar, Josip ^b  

^a FREE UNIVERSITY OF BOZEN BOLZANO   (Italy)

^b Lancaster University   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Family business; Family cohesion; Goal diversity; Innovation; Paradox; Tradition; Typology

Indexed keywords

EID: 85041623423     PISSN: 18778585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Adner, R., Snow, D., Old technology responses to new technology threats: Demand heterogeneity and technology retreats. Industrial and Corporate Change 19:5 (2010), 1655–1675.
2. Aldrich, H.E., Cliff, J.E., The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing 18 (2003), 573–596.
3. Björnberg, Å., Nicholson, N., The family climate scales—Development of a new measure for use in family business research. Family Business Review 20:3 (2007), 229–246.
4. Block, J., Miller, D., Jaskiewicz, P., Spiegel, F., Economic and technological importance of innovations in large family and founder firms: An analysis of patent data. Family Business Review 26:2 (2013), 180–199.
5. Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Van Reenen, J., Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. The Review of Economic Studies 66:3 (1999), 529–554.
6. Brockhaus, R.H., Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal 23:3 (1980), 509–520.
7. Calantone, R., Rubera, G., When should RD&E and marketing collaborate? The moderating role of exploration-exploitation and environmental uncertainty. Journal of Product Innovation Management 29:1 (2012), 144–157.
8. Calantone, R.J., Chan, K., Cui, A.S., Decomposing product innovativeness and its effects on new product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management 23:5 (2006), 408–421.
9. Cameron, K., Measuring organizational effectiveness in institutions of higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly 23:4 (1978), 604–632.
10. Carayannis, E.G., Provance, M., Measuring firm innovativeness: Towards a composite innovation index built on firm innovative posture, propensity and performance attributes. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development 1:1 (2008), 90–107.
11. Chirico, F., Salvato, C., Knowledge internalization and product development in family firms: When relational and affective factors matter. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 40:1 (2016), 201–229.
12. Chrisman, J.J., Patel, P.C., Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal 55:4 (2012), 976–997.
13. Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., Pearson, A.W., Barnett, T., Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 36:2 (2012), 267–293.
14. Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Wright, M., The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 32:3 (2015), 310–318.
15. Chrisman, J.J., Fang, H., Kotlar, J., De Massis, A., A note on family influence and the adoption of discontinuous technologies in family firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management 32:3 (2015), 384–388.
16. Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., Sharma, P., Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 23(4), 1999 [19-19].
17. CNN Money, Remember Smarties? The retro candy is thriving. 2015 Available at: http://money.cnn.com/2015/10/04/investing/smarties-candy-company-millennial-women/ Accessed 27.03.17.
18. Cornelissen, J., Editor's comments: Developing propositions, a process model, or a typology? Addressing the challenges of writing theory without a boilerplate. Academy of Management Review 42:1 (2017), 1–9.
19. Corriere della Sera, Esselunga rinnova i vertici arriva Marina Caprotti. 2017 Available at: http://www.corriere.it/economia/17_giugno_12/esselunga-rinnova-vertici-arriva-marina-caprotti-5fad4f2c-4f58-11e7-b3da-d63487cd15a9.shtml Accessed 12.07.17.
20. Covin, J.G., Slevin, D.P., New venture strategic posture, structure, and performance: An industry life cycle analysis. Journal of Business Venturing 5:2 (1990), 123–135.
21. Craig, J., Dibrell, C., The natural environment, innovation, and firm performance: A comparative study. Family Business Review 19:4 (2006), 275–288.
22. Cucculelli, M., Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D., Product innovation, firm renewal and family governance. Journal of Family Business Strategy 7:2 (2016), 90–104.
23. Davis, P.S., Harveston, P.D., In the founder's shadow: Conflict in the family firm. Family Business Review 12:4 (1999), 311–323.
24. De Massis, A., Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., Factors preventing intra-family succession. Family Business Review 21:2 (2008), 183–199.
25. De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Lichtenthaler, U., Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions. Family Business Review 26:1 (2013), 10–31.
26. De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior: Implications for theory and empirical studies. Journal of Small Business Management 52:2 (2014), 344–364.
27. De Massis, A., Di Minin, A., Frattini, F., Family-driven innovation: Resolving the paradox in family firms. California Management Review 58:1 (2015), 5–19.
28. De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Pizzurno, E., Cassia, L., Product innovation in family versus non-family firms: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Small Business Management 53:1 (2015), 1–36.
29. De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Kotlar, J., Petruzzelli, A.M., Wright, M., Innovation through tradition: Lessons from innovative family businesses and directions for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives 30:1 (2016), 93–116.
30. De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Frattini, F., Chrisman, J.J., Nordqvist, M., Family governance at work: Organizing for new product development in family SMEs. Family Business Review 29:2 (2016), 189–213.
31. De Massis, A., Audretsch, D., Uhlaner, L., Kammerlander, N., Innovation with limited resources: Management lessons from the German Mittelstand. Journal of Product Innovation Management 35:1 (2017), 125–146, 10.1111/jpim.12373.
32. De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Mazzola, P., Minola, T., Sciascia, S., Conflicting selves: Family owners’ multiple goals and self-control agency problems in private firms. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 42(4), 2017.
33. Doty, D.H., Glick, W.H., Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Academy of Management Review 19:2 (1994), 230–251.
34. Drazin, R., Van de Ven, A.H., Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1985, 514–539.
35. Duran, P., Kammerlander, N., Van Essen, M., Zellweger, T., Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal 59:4 (2016), 1224–1264.
36. Dyer, W.G., Examining the family effect on firm performance. Family Business Review 19:4 (2006), 253–273.
37. Economist, Dynasties and durability. 2009 Available at http://www.economist.com/node/14517406 (Accessed 13 March 2017).
38. Ensley, M.D., Pearson, A.W., An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: Cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 29:3 (2005), 267–284.
39. Filser, M., De Massis, A., Gast, J., Kraus, S., Niemand, T., Tracing the roots of innovativeness in family SMEs: The effect of functionality and socioemotional wealth. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2017, 10.1111/jpim.12433 Forthcoming.
40. Fiss, P.C., Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal 54:2 (2011), 393–420.
41. Fitzpatrick, M.A., Ritchie, L.D., Communication schemata within the family. Human Communication Research 20:3 (1994), 275–301.
42. Forbes, The world's most innovative companies. 2014 Available at: www.forbes.com/innovative-companies/list/#page:1_sort:0_direction:asc_search:_filter;All%20industries (Accessed 29 March 2017).
43. Freeman, C., Economics of industrial innovation. 1976, Pinter, London, England.
44. Garud, R., Tuertscher, P., Van de Ven, A.H., Perspectives on innovation processes. Academy of Management Annals 7:1 (2013), 775–819.
45. Gersick, K.E., Davis, J.A., Hampton, M.M., Lansberg, I., Generation to generation. 1997, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
46. Gilley, K.M., Walters, B.A., Olson, B.J., Top management team risk taking propensities and firm performance: Direct and moderating effects. Journal of Business Strategies, 19(2), 2002, 95.
47. Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Campbell, J.T., Martin, G., Hoskisson, R.E., Makri, M., Sirmon, D.G., Socioemotional wealth as a mixed gamble: Revisiting family firm R&D investments with the behavioral agency model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 38:6 (2014), 1351–1374.
48. Goodman, J.M., Defining the new professional: The family business counselor. Family Business Review 11:4 (1998), 349–354.
49. Greenhaus, J.H., Beutell, N.J., Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review 10:1 (1985), 76–88.
50. Hamilton, E., Cruz, A.D., Jack, S., Re-framing the status of narrative in family business research: Towards an understanding of families in business. Journal of Family Business Strategy 8:1 (2017), 3–12.
51. Hauck, J., Prügl, R., Innovation activities during intra-family leadership succession in family firms: An empirical study from a socioemotional wealth perspective. Journal of Family Business Strategy 6:2 (2015), 104–118.
52. Isaksen, S.G., Tidd, J., Meeting the innovation challenge: Leadership for transformation and growth. 2007, Wiley.
53. Janis, I.L., Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. 2nd ed., 1982, Houghton Mifflin, New York, NY.
54. Jaskiewicz, P., Dyer, Addressing the elephant in the room: Dis-entangling family heterogeneity to advance family business research. Family Business Review 30:2 (2017), 111–118.
55. Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J., Shanine, K., Kacmar, M., Introducing the family: A review of family science with implications for management research. Academy of Management Annals 30:2 (2017), 111–118.
56. König, A., Kammerlander, N., Enders, A., The family innovator's dilemma: How family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms. Academy of Management Review 38:3 (2013), 418–441.
57. Kammerlander, N., Van Essen, M., Research: Family firms are more innovative than other companies. 2017, Harvard Business Review Available at: https://hbr.org/2017/01/research-family-firms-are-more-innovative-than-other-companies (Accessed 29 March 2017).
58. Kammerlander, N., Dessì, C., Bird, M., Floris, M., Murru, A., The impact of shared stories on family firm innovation: A multicase study. Family Business Review 28:4 (2015), 332–354.
59. Kellermanns, F.W., Eddleston, K.A., Feuding families: When conflict does a family firm good. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 28:3 (2004), 209–228.
60. Kellermanns, F.W., Eddleston, K.A., Sarathy, R., Murphy, F., Innovativeness in family firms: A family influence perspective. Small Business Economics 38:1 (2012), 85–101.
61. Kidwell, R.E., Kellermanns, F.W., Eddleston, K.A., Harmony, justice, confusion, and conflict in family firms: Implications for ethical climate and the Fredo effect. Journal of Business Ethics 106:4 (2012), 503–517.
62. Kotlar, J., De Massis, A., Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family-centered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 37:6 (2013), 1263–1288.
63. Kotlar, J., De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Bianchi, M., Fang, H., Technology acquisition in family and nonfamily firms: A longitudinal analysis of Spanish manufacturing firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management 30:6 (2013), 1073–1088.
64. Kotlar, J., Signori, A., De Massis, A., Vismara, S., Financial wealth, socioemotional wealth and IPO underpricing in family firms: A two-stage gamble model. Academy of Management Journal, 2017, 10.5465/amj.2016.0256 in press.
65. Kraiczy, N.D., Hack, A., Kellermanns, F.W., New product portfolio performance in family firms. Journal of Business Research 67:6 (2014), 1065–1073.
66. L'eco di Bergamo, Per fare la spesa adesso basta uno smartphone. 2017 Available at: http://www.ecodibergamo.it/stories/bergamo-citta/esselunga-per-fare-la-spesaadesso-basta-uno-smartphone_1241247_11/ Accessed 10.07.17.
67. Li, H., Atuahene-Gima, K., Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal 44:6 (2001), 1123–1134.
68. Li, Z., Daspit, J.J., Understanding family firm innovation heterogeneity: A typology of family governance and socioemotional wealth intentions. Journal of Family Business Management 6:2 (2016), 103–121.
69. Messeni Petruzzelli, A., Albino, V., When tradition turns into innovation. How firms can create and appropriate value through tradition. 2012, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Oxford, UK.
70. Meyer, A.D., Tsui, A.S., Hinings, C.R., Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal 36:6 (1993), 1175–1195.
71. Miller, D., Wright, M., Le Breton-Miller, I., Scholes, L., Resources and innovation in family businesses. California Management Review 58:1 (2015), 20–40.
72. Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., Sjöberg, K., Wiklund, J., Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Family Business Review 20:1 (2007), 33–47.
73. Neubauer, F., Lank, A.G., The family business - Its governance for sustainability. 1998, MacMillan, London.
74. New York Times, Smarties, a Halloween Favorite, Maintains a Sweet Family Business. 2015 Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/01/nyregion/smarties-a-halloween-favorite-maintains-a-sweet-family-business.html?_r= Accessed 27.03.17.
75. Nieto, M.J., Santamaria, L., Fernandez, Z., Understanding the innovation behavior of family firms. Journal of Small Business Management 53:2 (2015), 382–399.
76. Olson, D.H., Sprenkle, D.H., Russell, C.S., Circumplex model of marital and family systems: I. Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications. Family Process 18:1 (1979), 3–28.
77. Olson, D.H., Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy 22:2 (2000), 144–167.
78. Patel, P.C., Chrisman, J.J., Risk abatement as a strategy for R&D investments in family firms. Strategic Management Journal 35:4 (2014), 617–627.
79. Patel, P.C., Cooper, D., Structural power equality between family and non-family TMT members and the performance of family firms. Academy of Management Journal 57:6 (2014), 1624–1649.
80. Pieper, T.M., Mechanisms to assure long-term family business survival: A study of the dynamics of cohesion in multigenerational family business families. 2007, Peter Lang Publishing, Frankfurt, Germany.
81. Pieper, T.M., Non solus: Toward a psychology of family business. Journal of Family Business Strategy 1:1 (2010), 26–39.
82. Repubblica, Beretta, “Investiamo e cresciamo senza debiti perché tutti i dividendi restano in azienda”. 2015 Available at: http://www.repubblica.it/economia/affari-e-finanza/2015/05/18/news/beretta_investiamo_e_cresciamo_senza_debiti_perch_tutti_i_dividendi_restano_in_azienda-114711015/ Accessed 27.03.17.
83. Repubblica, Eredità Caprotti, alla segretaria del patron di Esselunga 75 milioni di euro. 2016 Available at: http://www.repubblica.it/economia/2016/10/25/news/esselunga_chiodi-150540485/ Accessed 28.03.17.
84. Röd, I., Disentangling the family firm's innovation process: A systematic review. Journal of Family Business Strategy 7:3 (2016), 185–201.
85. Ritchie, L.D., Fitzpatrick, M.A., Family communication patterns: Measuring intrapersonal perceptions of interpersonal relationships. Communication Research 17:4 (1990), 523–544.
86. Rogoff, E.G., Heck, R.K.Z., Evolving research in entrepreneurship and family business: Recognizing family as the oxygen that feeds the fire of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing 18 (2003), 559–566.
87. Sørensen, J.B., The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 47:1 (2002), 70–91.
88. Salvato, C., Melin, L., Creating value across generations in family-controlled businesses: The role of family social capital. Family Business Review 21:3 (2008), 259–276.
89. Sharma, P., Hoy, F., Astrachan, J.H., Koiranen, M., The practice-driven evolution of family business education. Journal of Business Research 60:10 (2007), 1012–1021.
90. Siggelkow, N., Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal 50 (2007), 20–24.
91. Smilkstein, G., The family APGAR: A proposal for a family function test and its use by physicians. The Journal of Family Practice 6:6 (1978), 1231–1239.
92. Snow, C.C., Ketchen, D.J., Typology-driven theorizing: A response to delbridge and fiss. Academy of Management Review 39:2 (2014), 231–233.
93. Sole 24 Ore, Esselunga, parte il riassetto: patto tra i soci e apre alla borsa. 2017 Available at: http://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/finanza-e-mercati/2017-06-21/esselunga-parte-riassetto-patto-i-soci-e-apre-borsa-221905.shtml?uuid=AEuBWRjB Accessed 20.07.17.
94. Sundaramurthy, C., Kreiner, G.E., Governing by managing identity boundaries: The case of family businesses. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 32:3 (2008), 415–436.
95. Tagiuri, R., Davis, J., Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review 9:2 (1996), 199–208.
96. Tharawat Magazine, CeDe Candy: The family business that makes smarties. 2015 Available at: https://www.tharawat-magazine.com/sustain/smarties-family-business/ Accessed 26.03.17.
97. Urbinati, A., Franzò, S., De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Innovation in family firms: A review of prior studies and a framework for future research. Brem, A., Viardot, E., (eds.) Revolution of innovation management -internationalization and business models, 2017, Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.
98. Veider, V., Matzler, K., The ability and willingness of family-controlled firms to arrive at organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Family Business Strategy 7:2 (2016), 105–116.
99. Villanueva, J., Sapienza, H.J., Goal tolerance, outside investors, and family firm governance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 33:6 (2009), 1193–1199.
100. Von Bertalanffy, L., General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. 1968, George Braziller Inc, New York, NY.
101. Ward, J.L., Growing the family business: Special challenges and best practices. Family Business Review 10:4 (1997), 323–337.
102. Washington Post, The rift: A family dynasty fights over the future of Luray Caverns. 2013 Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/liveblog/wp/2013/03/14/magazine-the-rift-a-family-dynasty-fights-over-the-future-of-luray-caverns/?utm_term=.844e7c1ac5f2 Accessed 26.03.17.
103. Zahra, S.A., Neubaum, D.O., Larrañeta, B., Knowledge sharing and technological capabilities: The moderating role of family involvement. Journal of Business Research 60:10 (2007), 1070–1079.
104. Zahra, S.A., Organizational learning and entrepreneurship in family firms: Exploring the moderating effect of ownership and cohesion. Small Business Economics 38:1 (2012), 51–65.